1.Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder 2025:Comparisons with Other Treatment Guidelines
Won-Seok CHOI ; Young Sup WOO ; Won-Myong BAHK ; Nak-Young KIM ; Jeong Seok SEO ; Sheng-Min WANG ; Won KIM ; Sung-Yong PARK ; Jung Goo LEE ; Chan-Mo YANG ; Hyung Mo SUNG ; Young-Eun JUNG ; Moon-Doo KIM ; Jong-Hyun JEONG ; Bo-Hyun YOON ; Kyung Joon MIN
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2026;24(1):2-14
The sixth edition of the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder (KMAP-DD) was published in 2025. This review compared KMAP-DD 2025 with four major international clinical practice guidelines: Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Major Depressive Disorders, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Depression Guideline, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists Clinical Practice Guidelines for Mood Disorders, and British Association for Psychopharmacology Guideline. While KMAP-DD is based on expert consensus, and others on evidence-based methods, overall treatment strategies for depressive episodes were fairly consistent. Especially, KMAP-DD 2025 offers more structured recommendations in areas lacking strong evidence, such as premenstrual dysphoric disorder, perinatal depression, and depression with medical comorbidities. KMAP-DD 2025 also reflected Korean clinical practice patterns emphasizing rapid symptom relief and early use of combination strategies. Despite limitations as a consensus-based guideline, KMAP-DD 2025 complements evidence-based approaches and provides practical, situation-specific guidance for real-world clinical decision-making in Korea.
2.Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia: Recommendations for Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Memantine
Yeshin KIM ; Dong Woo KANG ; Geon Ha KIM ; Ko Woon KIM ; Hee-Jin KIM ; Seunghee NA ; Kee Hyung PARK ; Young Ho PARK ; Gihwan BYEON ; Jeewon SUH ; Joon Hyun SHIN ; YongSoo SHIM ; YoungSoon YANG ; Yoo Hyun UM ; Seong-il OH ; Sheng-Min WANG ; Bora YOON ; Sun Min LEE ; Juyoun LEE ; Jin San LEE ; Jae-Sung LIM ; Young Hee JUNG ; Juhee CHIN ; Hyemin JANG ; Miyoung CHOI ; Yun Jeong HONG ; Hak Young RHEE ; Jae-Won JANG ;
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2025;24(1):1-23
Background:
and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia.
Methods:
Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.
Results:
Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects.
Conclusions
This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.
3.Post-blepharoplasty ectropion management: therapeutic benefits of platelet-rich plasma and polydeoxyribonucleotide injections
Hyung Woo WANG ; Han Earl LEE ; Seong Oh PARK ; Youn Hwan KIM
Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2025;31(2):41-45
Background:
Ectropion, a common complication after lower blepharoplasty, causes significant patient discomfort and dissatisfaction, yet effective treatments remain lacking. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of intradermal injections of polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for scar regeneration and the rapid recovery of temporary ectropion following lower blepharoplasty.
Methods:
This retrospective study analyzed 21 cases of ectropion among 420 patients who underwent transcutaneous lower blepharoplasty between January 2020 and October 2022. PDRN and PRP were injected intradermally into the lower eyelid, with patients monitored at 1- or 2-week intervals. We investigated patient satisfaction, the total number of injections administered, and the time to complete improvement of the ectropion.
Results:
The average time for complete ectropion resolution was 9.3 weeks, with a relatively high patient satisfaction rating (mean, 4.3 out of 5). Ten primary cases responded well to a single injection, whereas all six patients with previous operations required two or more injections. The rate of improvement was faster than previously reported, likely due to the enhanced collagen synthesis and anti-inflammatory effects of PDRN, along with the tissue repair and angiogenic properties of PRP.
Conclusions
Intradermal injections of PDRN and PRP demonstrated promising results in rapidly resolving ectropion after lower blepharoplasty, thereby reducing patient discomfort and increasing overall satisfaction.
4.Post-blepharoplasty ectropion management: therapeutic benefits of platelet-rich plasma and polydeoxyribonucleotide injections
Hyung Woo WANG ; Han Earl LEE ; Seong Oh PARK ; Youn Hwan KIM
Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2025;31(2):41-45
Background:
Ectropion, a common complication after lower blepharoplasty, causes significant patient discomfort and dissatisfaction, yet effective treatments remain lacking. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of intradermal injections of polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for scar regeneration and the rapid recovery of temporary ectropion following lower blepharoplasty.
Methods:
This retrospective study analyzed 21 cases of ectropion among 420 patients who underwent transcutaneous lower blepharoplasty between January 2020 and October 2022. PDRN and PRP were injected intradermally into the lower eyelid, with patients monitored at 1- or 2-week intervals. We investigated patient satisfaction, the total number of injections administered, and the time to complete improvement of the ectropion.
Results:
The average time for complete ectropion resolution was 9.3 weeks, with a relatively high patient satisfaction rating (mean, 4.3 out of 5). Ten primary cases responded well to a single injection, whereas all six patients with previous operations required two or more injections. The rate of improvement was faster than previously reported, likely due to the enhanced collagen synthesis and anti-inflammatory effects of PDRN, along with the tissue repair and angiogenic properties of PRP.
Conclusions
Intradermal injections of PDRN and PRP demonstrated promising results in rapidly resolving ectropion after lower blepharoplasty, thereby reducing patient discomfort and increasing overall satisfaction.
5.Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia: Recommendations for Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Memantine
Yeshin KIM ; Dong Woo KANG ; Geon Ha KIM ; Ko Woon KIM ; Hee-Jin KIM ; Seunghee NA ; Kee Hyung PARK ; Young Ho PARK ; Gihwan BYEON ; Jeewon SUH ; Joon Hyun SHIN ; YongSoo SHIM ; YoungSoon YANG ; Yoo Hyun UM ; Seong-il OH ; Sheng-Min WANG ; Bora YOON ; Sun Min LEE ; Juyoun LEE ; Jin San LEE ; Jae-Sung LIM ; Young Hee JUNG ; Juhee CHIN ; Hyemin JANG ; Miyoung CHOI ; Yun Jeong HONG ; Hak Young RHEE ; Jae-Won JANG ;
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2025;24(1):1-23
Background:
and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia.
Methods:
Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.
Results:
Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects.
Conclusions
This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.
6.Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia: Recommendations for Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Memantine
Yeshin KIM ; Dong Woo KANG ; Geon Ha KIM ; Ko Woon KIM ; Hee-Jin KIM ; Seunghee NA ; Kee Hyung PARK ; Young Ho PARK ; Gihwan BYEON ; Jeewon SUH ; Joon Hyun SHIN ; YongSoo SHIM ; YoungSoon YANG ; Yoo Hyun UM ; Seong-il OH ; Sheng-Min WANG ; Bora YOON ; Sun Min LEE ; Juyoun LEE ; Jin San LEE ; Jae-Sung LIM ; Young Hee JUNG ; Juhee CHIN ; Hyemin JANG ; Miyoung CHOI ; Yun Jeong HONG ; Hak Young RHEE ; Jae-Won JANG ;
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2025;24(1):1-23
Background:
and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia.
Methods:
Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.
Results:
Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects.
Conclusions
This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.
7.Post-blepharoplasty ectropion management: therapeutic benefits of platelet-rich plasma and polydeoxyribonucleotide injections
Hyung Woo WANG ; Han Earl LEE ; Seong Oh PARK ; Youn Hwan KIM
Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2025;31(2):41-45
Background:
Ectropion, a common complication after lower blepharoplasty, causes significant patient discomfort and dissatisfaction, yet effective treatments remain lacking. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of intradermal injections of polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for scar regeneration and the rapid recovery of temporary ectropion following lower blepharoplasty.
Methods:
This retrospective study analyzed 21 cases of ectropion among 420 patients who underwent transcutaneous lower blepharoplasty between January 2020 and October 2022. PDRN and PRP were injected intradermally into the lower eyelid, with patients monitored at 1- or 2-week intervals. We investigated patient satisfaction, the total number of injections administered, and the time to complete improvement of the ectropion.
Results:
The average time for complete ectropion resolution was 9.3 weeks, with a relatively high patient satisfaction rating (mean, 4.3 out of 5). Ten primary cases responded well to a single injection, whereas all six patients with previous operations required two or more injections. The rate of improvement was faster than previously reported, likely due to the enhanced collagen synthesis and anti-inflammatory effects of PDRN, along with the tissue repair and angiogenic properties of PRP.
Conclusions
Intradermal injections of PDRN and PRP demonstrated promising results in rapidly resolving ectropion after lower blepharoplasty, thereby reducing patient discomfort and increasing overall satisfaction.
8.Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia: Recommendations for Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Memantine
Yeshin KIM ; Dong Woo KANG ; Geon Ha KIM ; Ko Woon KIM ; Hee-Jin KIM ; Seunghee NA ; Kee Hyung PARK ; Young Ho PARK ; Gihwan BYEON ; Jeewon SUH ; Joon Hyun SHIN ; YongSoo SHIM ; YoungSoon YANG ; Yoo Hyun UM ; Seong-il OH ; Sheng-Min WANG ; Bora YOON ; Sun Min LEE ; Juyoun LEE ; Jin San LEE ; Jae-Sung LIM ; Young Hee JUNG ; Juhee CHIN ; Hyemin JANG ; Miyoung CHOI ; Yun Jeong HONG ; Hak Young RHEE ; Jae-Won JANG ;
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2025;24(1):1-23
Background:
and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia.
Methods:
Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.
Results:
Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects.
Conclusions
This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.
9.Korean Medication Algorithm for Depressive Disorder 2025, Fifth Revision: An Executive Summary
Nak-Young KIM ; Jeong Seok SEO ; Won-Myong BAHK ; Won-Seok CHOI ; Sheng-Min WANG ; Young Sup WOO ; Won KIM ; Sung-Yong PARK ; Jung Goo LEE ; Chan-Mo YANG ; Sang-Yeol LEE ; Hyung Mo SUNG ; Young-Eun JUNG ; Moon-Doo KIM ; Jong-Hyun JEONG ; Duk-In JON ; Bo-Hyun YOON ; Se-Hoon SHIM ; Kyung Joon MIN
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2025;23(4):683-706
Objective:
Since its development in 2002 by the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology and the Korean Society for Affective Disorders, the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder (KMAP-DD) has undergone five revisions.
Methods:
To improve survey efficiency, reflect general clinical practice, and facilitate comparisons with previous KMAP-DD revisions, the overall structure of the questionnaire was retained. The six sections of the questionnaire were as follows:1) pharmacological treatment strategies for major depressive disorder with and without psychotic features; 2) pharmacological treatment strategies for persistent depressive disorder and other depressive disorder subtypes; 3) consensus on treatment-resistant depression; 4) selection of an antidepressant in consideration of safety, adverse effects, and comorbid physical conditions; 5) treatment strategies for special populations (children/adolescents, elderly, and women); and 6) non-pharmacological biological therapies. First-, second-, and third-line treatment recommendations were statistically derived.
Results:
Compared to KMAP-DD 2021, only minor changes were noted, due to the limited introduction of new medications or treatment modalities. Nonetheless, notable shifts included an increased preference for atypical antipsychotics (AAPs), and higher preference of combination strategies involving AAPs and mood stabilizers, indicating a more proactive and intensive treatment trend in Korea.
Conclusion
KMAP-DD is expected to serve as a valuable clinical resource by providing expert consensus-based recommendations on specific treatment strategies and pharmacological options for major depressive disorders, thereby supporting the integration of real-world clinical practice with evidence-based medicine.
10.The Usefulness of 18 F-FDG PET to Differentiate Subtypes of Dementia:The Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Seunghee NA ; Dong Woo KANG ; Geon Ha KIM ; Ko Woon KIM ; Yeshin KIM ; Hee-Jin KIM ; Kee Hyung PARK ; Young Ho PARK ; Gihwan BYEON ; Jeewon SUH ; Joon Hyun SHIN ; YongSoo SHIM ; YoungSoon YANG ; Yoo Hyun UM ; Seong-il OH ; Sheng-Min WANG ; Bora YOON ; Hai-Jeon YOON ; Sun Min LEE ; Juyoun LEE ; Jin San LEE ; Hak Young RHEE ; Jae-Sung LIM ; Young Hee JUNG ; Juhee CHIN ; Yun Jeong HONG ; Hyemin JANG ; Hongyoon CHOI ; Miyoung CHOI ; Jae-Won JANG ; On behalf of Korean Dementia Association
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2024;23(1):54-66
Background:
and Purpose: Dementia subtypes, including Alzheimer’s dementia (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), pose diagnostic challenges. This review examines the effectiveness of 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET) in differentiating these subtypes for precise treatment and management.
Methods:
A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using databases like PubMed and Embase to identify studies on the diagnostic utility of 18 F-FDG PET in dementia. The search included studies up to November 16, 2022, focusing on peer-reviewed journals and applying the goldstandard clinical diagnosis for dementia subtypes.
Results:
From 12,815 articles, 14 were selected for final analysis. For AD versus FTD, the sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–0.98) and specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). In the case of AD versus DLB, 18F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). Lastly, when differentiating AD from non-AD dementias, the sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91) and the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91). The studies mostly used case-control designs with visual and quantitative assessments.
Conclusions
18 F-FDG PET exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating dementia subtypes, particularly AD, FTD, and DLB. This method, while not a standalone diagnostic tool, significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in uncertain cases, complementing clinical assessments and structural imaging.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail