1.Estimating the Prevalence of Autosomal Recessive Neuromuscular Diseases in the Korean Population
Soo-Hyun KIM ; Yunjung CHOI ; Young-Chul CHOI ; Seung Woo KIM ; Ha Young SHIN ; Hyung Jun PARK
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2025;40(19):e68-
Background:
Genetic neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) are a heterogeneous group of conditions that primarily affect the peripheral nerves, muscles, and neuromuscular junctions. This study was performed to identify pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PLPVs), calculate carrier frequencies, and predict the genetic prevalence of autosomal recessive-NMDs (AR-NMDs) in a Korean population.
Methods:
In total, 267 genes were associated with AR-NMDs. We analyzed genetic variants from 984 Korean whole genomes and identified PLPVs to assess the carrier frequency and genetic prevalence of the variants.
Results:
We identified 165 PLPVs, including 75 literature verified and 90 manually verified variants. Most PLPVs in AR-NMD genes were frameshifts (61, 37.0%), followed by nonsense (36, 21.8%), missense (35, 21.2%), and splice variants (28, 17.0%). The carrier frequency of the AR-NMDs was 27.1%. DYSF exhibited the highest carrier frequency (1.63%), followed by GAA (1.55%), HEXB (1.53%), PREPL (0.76%), NEB (0.66%), ADSS1 (0.65%), ALPK3 (0.65%), and CHRNG (0.65%). The predicted genetic prevalence of AR-NMDs in the Korean population was 38.0 cases per 100,000 individuals. DYSF (6.7 cases per 100,000 individuals) showed the highest genetic prevalence. The variant with the highest allele frequency was c.1250C>T in HEXB at 0.00764, followed by c.[752T>C; c.761C>T] in GAA at 0.00505, and c.2055+2T>G in DYSF at 0.00437.
Conclusion
Our study suggests that 27.1% of the Korean population are healthy carriers of at least one AR-NMD causing PLPV, revealing the genetic prevalence of NMDs in the Korean population.
2.Estimating the Prevalence of Autosomal Recessive Neuromuscular Diseases in the Korean Population
Soo-Hyun KIM ; Yunjung CHOI ; Young-Chul CHOI ; Seung Woo KIM ; Ha Young SHIN ; Hyung Jun PARK
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2025;40(19):e68-
Background:
Genetic neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) are a heterogeneous group of conditions that primarily affect the peripheral nerves, muscles, and neuromuscular junctions. This study was performed to identify pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PLPVs), calculate carrier frequencies, and predict the genetic prevalence of autosomal recessive-NMDs (AR-NMDs) in a Korean population.
Methods:
In total, 267 genes were associated with AR-NMDs. We analyzed genetic variants from 984 Korean whole genomes and identified PLPVs to assess the carrier frequency and genetic prevalence of the variants.
Results:
We identified 165 PLPVs, including 75 literature verified and 90 manually verified variants. Most PLPVs in AR-NMD genes were frameshifts (61, 37.0%), followed by nonsense (36, 21.8%), missense (35, 21.2%), and splice variants (28, 17.0%). The carrier frequency of the AR-NMDs was 27.1%. DYSF exhibited the highest carrier frequency (1.63%), followed by GAA (1.55%), HEXB (1.53%), PREPL (0.76%), NEB (0.66%), ADSS1 (0.65%), ALPK3 (0.65%), and CHRNG (0.65%). The predicted genetic prevalence of AR-NMDs in the Korean population was 38.0 cases per 100,000 individuals. DYSF (6.7 cases per 100,000 individuals) showed the highest genetic prevalence. The variant with the highest allele frequency was c.1250C>T in HEXB at 0.00764, followed by c.[752T>C; c.761C>T] in GAA at 0.00505, and c.2055+2T>G in DYSF at 0.00437.
Conclusion
Our study suggests that 27.1% of the Korean population are healthy carriers of at least one AR-NMD causing PLPV, revealing the genetic prevalence of NMDs in the Korean population.
4.Profiling of Anti-Signal-Recognition Particle Antibodies and Clinical Characteristics in South Korean Patients With Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy
Soo-Hyun KIM ; Yunjung CHOI ; Eun Kyoung OH ; Ichizo NISHINO ; Shigeaki SUZUKI ; Bum Chun SUH ; Ha Young SHIN ; Seung Woo KIM ; Byeol-A YOON ; Seong-il OH ; Yoo Hwan KIM ; Hyunjin KIM ; Young-Min LIM ; Seol-Hee BAEK ; Je-Young SHIN ; Hung Youl SEOK ; Seung-Ah LEE ; Young-Chul CHOI ; Hyung Jun PARK
Journal of Clinical Neurology 2025;21(1):31-39
Background:
and Purpose This study evaluated the diagnostic utility of an anti-signal-recognition particle 54 (anti-SRP54) antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as well as the clinical, serological, and pathological characteristics of patients with SRP immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM).
Methods:
We evaluated 87 patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy and 107 healthy participants between January 2002 and December 2023. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA for anti-SRP54 antibodies were assessed, and the clinical profiles of patients with antiSRP54 antibodies were determined.
Results:
The ELISA for anti-SRP54 antibodies had a sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 99%, respectively, along with a test–retest reliability of 0.92 (p<0.001). The 32 patients diagnosed with anti-SRP IMNM using a line-blot immunoassay included 28 (88%) who tested positive for anti-SRP54 antibodies using the ELISA, comprising 12 (43%) males and 16 (57%) females whose median ages at symptom onset and diagnosis were 43.0 years and 43.5 years, respectively. Symptoms included proximal muscle weakness in all 28 (100%) patients, neck weakness in 9 (32%), myalgia in 15 (54%), dysphagia in 5 (18%), dyspnea in 4 (14%), dysarthria in 2 (7%), interstitial lung disease in 2 (7%), and myocarditis in 2 (7%). The median serum creatine kinase (CK) level was 7,261 U/L (interquartile range: 5,086–10,007 U/L), and the median anti-SRP54 antibody level was 2.0 U/mL (interquartile range: 1.0–5.6 U/mL). The serum CK level was significantly higher in patients with coexisting anti-Ro-52 antibodies.
Conclusions
This study has confirmed the reliability of the ELISA for anti-SRP54 antibodies and provided insights into the clinical, serological, and pathological characteristics of South Korean patients with anti-SRP IMNM.
5.Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach (Update of 2022 Guideline)
In-Ho KIM ; Seung Joo KANG ; Wonyoung CHOI ; An Na SEO ; Bang Wool EOM ; Beodeul KANG ; Bum Jun KIM ; Byung-Hoon MIN ; Chung Hyun TAE ; Chang In CHOI ; Choong-kun LEE ; Ho Jung AN ; Hwa Kyung BYUN ; Hyeon-Su IM ; Hyung-Don KIM ; Jang Ho CHO ; Kyoungjune PAK ; Jae-Joon KIM ; Jae Seok BAE ; Jeong Il YU ; Jeong Won LEE ; Jungyoon CHOI ; Jwa Hoon KIM ; Miyoung CHOI ; Mi Ran JUNG ; Nieun SEO ; Sang Soo EOM ; Soomin AHN ; Soo Jin KIM ; Sung Hak LEE ; Sung Hee LIM ; Tae-Han KIM ; Hye Sook HAN ; On behalf of The Development Working Group for the Korean Practice Guideline for Gastric Cancer 2024
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2025;25(1):5-114
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.
6.Erratum to "Suppression of Lipopolysaccharide-induced Inflammatory and Oxidative Response by 5-Aminolevulinic Acid in RAW 264.7 Macrophages and Zebrafish Larvae" Biomol Ther 29(6), 685-696 (2021)
Seon Yeong JI ; Hee-Jae CHA ; Ilandarage Menu Neelaka MOLAGODA ; Min Yeong KIM ; So Young KIM ; Hyun HWANGBO ; Hyesook LEE ; Gi-Young KIM ; Do-Hyung KIM ; Jin Won HYUN ; Heui-Soo KIM ; Suhkmann KIM ; Cheng-Yun JIN ; Yung Hyun CHOI
Biomolecules & Therapeutics 2025;33(3):554-554
8.Profiling of Anti-Signal-Recognition Particle Antibodies and Clinical Characteristics in South Korean Patients With Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy
Soo-Hyun KIM ; Yunjung CHOI ; Eun Kyoung OH ; Ichizo NISHINO ; Shigeaki SUZUKI ; Bum Chun SUH ; Ha Young SHIN ; Seung Woo KIM ; Byeol-A YOON ; Seong-il OH ; Yoo Hwan KIM ; Hyunjin KIM ; Young-Min LIM ; Seol-Hee BAEK ; Je-Young SHIN ; Hung Youl SEOK ; Seung-Ah LEE ; Young-Chul CHOI ; Hyung Jun PARK
Journal of Clinical Neurology 2025;21(1):31-39
Background:
and Purpose This study evaluated the diagnostic utility of an anti-signal-recognition particle 54 (anti-SRP54) antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as well as the clinical, serological, and pathological characteristics of patients with SRP immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM).
Methods:
We evaluated 87 patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy and 107 healthy participants between January 2002 and December 2023. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA for anti-SRP54 antibodies were assessed, and the clinical profiles of patients with antiSRP54 antibodies were determined.
Results:
The ELISA for anti-SRP54 antibodies had a sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 99%, respectively, along with a test–retest reliability of 0.92 (p<0.001). The 32 patients diagnosed with anti-SRP IMNM using a line-blot immunoassay included 28 (88%) who tested positive for anti-SRP54 antibodies using the ELISA, comprising 12 (43%) males and 16 (57%) females whose median ages at symptom onset and diagnosis were 43.0 years and 43.5 years, respectively. Symptoms included proximal muscle weakness in all 28 (100%) patients, neck weakness in 9 (32%), myalgia in 15 (54%), dysphagia in 5 (18%), dyspnea in 4 (14%), dysarthria in 2 (7%), interstitial lung disease in 2 (7%), and myocarditis in 2 (7%). The median serum creatine kinase (CK) level was 7,261 U/L (interquartile range: 5,086–10,007 U/L), and the median anti-SRP54 antibody level was 2.0 U/mL (interquartile range: 1.0–5.6 U/mL). The serum CK level was significantly higher in patients with coexisting anti-Ro-52 antibodies.
Conclusions
This study has confirmed the reliability of the ELISA for anti-SRP54 antibodies and provided insights into the clinical, serological, and pathological characteristics of South Korean patients with anti-SRP IMNM.
9.Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach (Update of 2022 Guideline)
In-Ho KIM ; Seung Joo KANG ; Wonyoung CHOI ; An Na SEO ; Bang Wool EOM ; Beodeul KANG ; Bum Jun KIM ; Byung-Hoon MIN ; Chung Hyun TAE ; Chang In CHOI ; Choong-kun LEE ; Ho Jung AN ; Hwa Kyung BYUN ; Hyeon-Su IM ; Hyung-Don KIM ; Jang Ho CHO ; Kyoungjune PAK ; Jae-Joon KIM ; Jae Seok BAE ; Jeong Il YU ; Jeong Won LEE ; Jungyoon CHOI ; Jwa Hoon KIM ; Miyoung CHOI ; Mi Ran JUNG ; Nieun SEO ; Sang Soo EOM ; Soomin AHN ; Soo Jin KIM ; Sung Hak LEE ; Sung Hee LIM ; Tae-Han KIM ; Hye Sook HAN ; On behalf of The Development Working Group for the Korean Practice Guideline for Gastric Cancer 2024
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2025;25(1):5-114
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.
10.Erratum to "Suppression of Lipopolysaccharide-induced Inflammatory and Oxidative Response by 5-Aminolevulinic Acid in RAW 264.7 Macrophages and Zebrafish Larvae" Biomol Ther 29(6), 685-696 (2021)
Seon Yeong JI ; Hee-Jae CHA ; Ilandarage Menu Neelaka MOLAGODA ; Min Yeong KIM ; So Young KIM ; Hyun HWANGBO ; Hyesook LEE ; Gi-Young KIM ; Do-Hyung KIM ; Jin Won HYUN ; Heui-Soo KIM ; Suhkmann KIM ; Cheng-Yun JIN ; Yung Hyun CHOI
Biomolecules & Therapeutics 2025;33(3):554-554

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail