Background: The Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment (LST) has been implemented in Korea since 2018, yet data on its application in neurocritical care units remain scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of LST withdrawal or withholding in the neurocritical care unit. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis conducted at a tertiary university hospital in Busan, South Korea. Among patients admitted to the neurocritical care unit between February 2018 and August 2023, those with documented decisions for LST withdrawal or withholding were enrolled. Demographic and clinical characteristics, underlying and combined conditions, reasons for LST decisions, measures taken, and time from LST withdrawal to death were extracted from medical records. Results: A total of 69 patients were included, with a median age of 67 years, and 38 (55%) were male. Cerebrovascular disease (62%) and traumatic brain injury (22%) were the most common underlying diagnoses. The primary reason for LST decisions was irreversible neurological damage (71%), followed by systemic complications (19%). Mechanical ventilation cessation (91%) and extubation (86%) were most frequently used measures for LST withdrawal. The median time from LST withdrawal to death was 22 minutes. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that LST decisions in the neurocritical care unit predominantly occur among patients with cerebrovascular disease or traumatic brain injury, mostly triggered by neurological deterioration. Most patients died shortly after withdrawal. These findings provide important insight into current LST withdrawal practices in neurocritical care and may assist clinical and ethical decision making in similar settings.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and implement an antimicrobial stewardship education program for physician assistant nurses and to evaluate its effects on their knowledge and clinical performance. Methods: A quasi-experimental, single-group pre-post design was conducted with 50 physician assistant nurses at a university hospital in Seoul, Republic of Korea. The antimicrobial stewardship education program, developed using the ADDIE model, consisted of 12 sessions including lectures and case-based learning (CBL)-based discussions.Knowledge was measured before and immediately after the intervention, while performance was assessed pre-intervention and four weeks post-program. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Results: Knowledge scores significantly improved from 44.65±7.45 to 58.50±10.11 (p<.001), and all subdomains showed significant increases (p<.001). Performance scores increased from 3.68±0.77 to 4.28±0.68 (p<.001). Knowledge gain did not differ significantly between the medical and surgical departments (p=.710). Likewise, after adjusting for pre-test scores, no significant difference in performance improvement was observed between the two departments (ANCOVA, p=.170). These results indicate that the program was effective across both departments regardless of their characteristics. Conclusion The antimicrobial stewardship education program improved both knowledge and performance among physician assistant nurses. This program may contribute to the standardization of antimicrobial stewardship education and to appropriate antimicrobial use and the reduction of antimicrobial resistance.

Managing wounds outside of hospital settings can be challenging due to limited knowledge, resources, and financial constraints. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of using tap water and a commercial soap-based cleanser for wound care in outpatient settings. This prospective study enrolled 15 patients with open or surgical wounds. Participants used a commercial soap containing surfactants (decyl glucoside, sodium C14- 16 olefin sulfate) and tap water to cleanse their wounds. Exclusion criteria included severe systemic illnesses, uncontrolled diabetes, and immunosuppression. We monitored wound healing, infection rates, and complications over a 2-week period. The study examined wounds of various origins: surgical (n=9), traumatic (n=4), and infection-related (n=2). All wounds healed completely within 2 weeks, with no instances of infection, dehiscence, or delayed healing observed. These findings indicate that a straightforward soap-and-water cleansing regimen is both safe and effective for wound management. This study demonstrates that using tap water and commercial soap is a cost-effective and reliable strategy for wound management outside hospital settings. This approach has the potential to simplify wound care practices and reduce barriers to treatment, particularly in resource-limited environments.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Managing wounds outside of hospital settings can be challenging due to limited knowledge, resources, and financial constraints. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of using tap water and a commercial soap-based cleanser for wound care in outpatient settings. This prospective study enrolled 15 patients with open or surgical wounds. Participants used a commercial soap containing surfactants (decyl glucoside, sodium C14- 16 olefin sulfate) and tap water to cleanse their wounds. Exclusion criteria included severe systemic illnesses, uncontrolled diabetes, and immunosuppression. We monitored wound healing, infection rates, and complications over a 2-week period. The study examined wounds of various origins: surgical (n=9), traumatic (n=4), and infection-related (n=2). All wounds healed completely within 2 weeks, with no instances of infection, dehiscence, or delayed healing observed. These findings indicate that a straightforward soap-and-water cleansing regimen is both safe and effective for wound management. This study demonstrates that using tap water and commercial soap is a cost-effective and reliable strategy for wound management outside hospital settings. This approach has the potential to simplify wound care practices and reduce barriers to treatment, particularly in resource-limited environments.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Managing wounds outside of hospital settings can be challenging due to limited knowledge, resources, and financial constraints. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of using tap water and a commercial soap-based cleanser for wound care in outpatient settings. This prospective study enrolled 15 patients with open or surgical wounds. Participants used a commercial soap containing surfactants (decyl glucoside, sodium C14- 16 olefin sulfate) and tap water to cleanse their wounds. Exclusion criteria included severe systemic illnesses, uncontrolled diabetes, and immunosuppression. We monitored wound healing, infection rates, and complications over a 2-week period. The study examined wounds of various origins: surgical (n=9), traumatic (n=4), and infection-related (n=2). All wounds healed completely within 2 weeks, with no instances of infection, dehiscence, or delayed healing observed. These findings indicate that a straightforward soap-and-water cleansing regimen is both safe and effective for wound management. This study demonstrates that using tap water and commercial soap is a cost-effective and reliable strategy for wound management outside hospital settings. This approach has the potential to simplify wound care practices and reduce barriers to treatment, particularly in resource-limited environments.

Background: This study was designed to determine the current status of diagnosis and treatment of valvular heart disease (VHD) in Korea. Methods: A nationwide registry study was conducted in 45 hospitals in Korea involving adult patients with at least moderate VHD as determined by echocardiography carried out between September and October of 2019. Of a total of 4,094 patients with at least moderate VHD, 1,482 had severe VHD (age, 71.3 ± 13.5 years; 49.1% male). Echocar‑ diographic data used for the diagnosis of each case of VHD were analyzed. Experts from each center determined the diagnosis and treatment strategy for VHD based on current guidelines and institutional policy. The clinical out‑ come was in-hospital mortality. Results: Each valve underwent surgical or transcatheter intervention in 19.3% cases of severe mitral stenosis, 31.4% cases of severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR), 7.5% cases of severe secondary MR, 43.7% cases of severe aortic stenosis, 27.5% cases of severe aortic regurgitation, and 7.2% cases of severe tricuspid regurgitation. The overall inhospital mortality rate for patients with severe VHD was 5.4%, and for secondary severe MR and severe tricuspid regur‑ gitation, the rates were 9.0% and 7.5%, respectively, indicating a poor prognosis. In-hospital mortality occurred in 73 of the 1,244 patients (5.9%) who received conservative treatment and in 18 of the 455 patients (4.0%) who received a surgical or transcatheter intervention, which was significantly lower in the intervention group (P = 0.037). Conclusions This study provides important information about the current status of VHD diagnosis and treatment through a nationwide registry in Korea and helps to define future changes.