Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the detection ability of quality of life (QoL) changes and responsiveness of the KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS)-40 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ). Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate QoL changes after various gastrectomies between January 2021 and April 2022. Participants were instructed to complete the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. QoL changes over time and QoL responsiveness were assessed for each questionnaire. Results: Data from 491 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer at 22 institutions were analyzed. The summary scores of the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-STO22 showed significant differences between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.044 and p=0.038, respectively), but no difference was observed for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Dysphagia on the KOQUSS-40 was significantly different between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.031); however, dysphagia on the EORTC QLQ-STO22 did not differ. The responsiveness of the KOQUSS-40 was similar to that of the EORTC QLQ in patients who experienced ≥ 10% body weight loss, but approximately 10% less in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy than the EORTC QLQ. Conclusion KOQUSS-40 has several advantages over EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 when comparing QoL between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups. The findings provide information for researchers investigating the QoL of patients who have undergone curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Objectives: Cyberbullying is a modern form of violence involving intentional harassment through electronic devices. We aimed to investigate how psychological characteristics differ based on cyberbullying involvement, identify the psychological factors associated with cyberbullying, and examine whether these factors vary by gender. Methods: A survey was conducted with 449 middle school students in Cheongju, Korea. Participants were categorized into four groups based on their involvement: Neither (N), Victim (V), Perpetrator (P), and Victim-Perpetrator (VP). Psychological characteristics were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Self-Esteem Scale, and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). We compared these characteristics across the four groups and examined their influence on cyberbullying involvement by gender. Results: Overall, 31.8% of participants were involved in cyberbullying, with the VP group being the largest (17.1%) among them. The VP group exhibited more severe psychopathology than the N group across most internalizing and externalizing problems. SDQ-Conduct Problems subscale scores were significantly associated with victimization and perpetration. For female participants, high SDQEmotional Symptoms subscale scores were associated with greater victimization, and high BDI scores increased the risk of belonging to the VP group. No variables significantly increased the risk of belonging to the VP group among male participants. Conclusion Adolescents who are both victims and perpetrators of cyberbullying face the most significant psychological difficulties.Factors associated with cyberbullying involvement vary by gender, highlighting the need for tailored gender-specific prevention and intervention strategies.

Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) remains a cornerstone of curative treatment for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. However, dose escalation to improve tumor control is often constrained by the proximity of the rectum, which increases the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicities. Biodegradable rectal spacers inserted between the prostate and rectum have emerged as an effective approach to reduce rectal radiation exposure. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on indications, contraindications, procedural standards, and clinical management for biodegradable rectal spacer insertion during prostate cancer RT. Materials and Methods: This guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel through a systematic review of the literature, analysis of international guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, European Association of Urology, American Society for Radiation Oncology), and expert consensus among radiation oncologists, radiologists, and urologists with clinical experience in spacer insertion. The strength of each recommendation and the level of evidence were classified according to the modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. Results: Spacer insertion is conditionally recommended (Grade C, Level I) for patients receiving definitive external-beam RT without rectal invasion. It reduces the high-dose rectal irradiation volume (V70–75) by >50%, decreases acute GI toxicity, and helps maintain bowel-related quality of life. However, the benefit for late severe toxicity (grade 2 or higher) remains debated in recent meta-analyses. Contraindications include rectal invasion, anatomical inaccessibility, infection, and material hypersensitivity. Procedures should be performed under local anesthesia in a sterile environment by trained physicians. Short-course antibiotics and simulator-based training, including completion of multiple supervised cases, are advised. Conclusion Biodegradable rectal spacer insertion is clinically validated and effective in reducing acute rectal toxicity. Although pivotal trials demonstrated a favorable procedural safety profile, real-world postmarket data include reports of rare but severe procedural complications. This guideline provides standardized recommendations tailored to Korean clinical practice while remaining consistent with international standards, emphasizing the importance of operator training and careful patient selection.

Background: Orbital medial wall fractures, which are more common than inferior wall fractures, have traditionally been difficult to diagnose with conventional radiography. As the fracture extends deep into the bony orbit, accurately visualizing internal structures becomes challenging, increasing the risk of optic nerve compression. In a previous study, the author introduced a technique for treating medial orbital wall fractures using a combined transethmoidal and transcaruncular approach. In this study, the authors hypothesized that the use of surgical navigation could enhance precision, safety, and anatomical reconstruction in this approach and employed navigation during surgery for medial orbital wall fractures and evaluated whether it improved postoperative functional and anatomical outcomes while minimizing complications. Methods: From September 2021 to November 2023, 48 patients with isolated medial wall fractures underwent surgical treatment using a combined transcaruncular approach and transethmoidal packing to repair the orbital fracture. Of these patients, 23 underwent surgery with the use of intraoperative navigation, while the other 25 did not. Intraoperative navigation was employed to facilitate precise fracture reduction and reduce the risk of optic nerve injury. The outcomes were compared by dividing the patients into two groups. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included ophthalmologic evaluations, Hertel exophthalmometry, and computed tomography-based orbital volume measurements. Results: The surgical approach with intraoperative navigation was successfully performed in all patients. Postoperative outcomes showed full recovery without residual symptoms or complications. Orbital volume measurements indicated a significant reduction in the preoperative orbital volume ratio from 109.03% to 104.80% postoperatively (p< 0.001). However, changes in the Hertel scale were not statistically significant (p = 0.086). Conclusion The integration of intraoperative navigation in medial orbital wall fracture surgery enhances the precision of medial orbital wall restoration and minimizes postoperative complications, supporting its use in the surgical management of medial orbital fractures.

Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Background: Orbital medial wall fractures, which are more common than inferior wall fractures, have traditionally been difficult to diagnose with conventional radiography. As the fracture extends deep into the bony orbit, accurately visualizing internal structures becomes challenging, increasing the risk of optic nerve compression. In a previous study, the author introduced a technique for treating medial orbital wall fractures using a combined transethmoidal and transcaruncular approach. In this study, the authors hypothesized that the use of surgical navigation could enhance precision, safety, and anatomical reconstruction in this approach and employed navigation during surgery for medial orbital wall fractures and evaluated whether it improved postoperative functional and anatomical outcomes while minimizing complications. Methods: From September 2021 to November 2023, 48 patients with isolated medial wall fractures underwent surgical treatment using a combined transcaruncular approach and transethmoidal packing to repair the orbital fracture. Of these patients, 23 underwent surgery with the use of intraoperative navigation, while the other 25 did not. Intraoperative navigation was employed to facilitate precise fracture reduction and reduce the risk of optic nerve injury. The outcomes were compared by dividing the patients into two groups. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included ophthalmologic evaluations, Hertel exophthalmometry, and computed tomography-based orbital volume measurements. Results: The surgical approach with intraoperative navigation was successfully performed in all patients. Postoperative outcomes showed full recovery without residual symptoms or complications. Orbital volume measurements indicated a significant reduction in the preoperative orbital volume ratio from 109.03% to 104.80% postoperatively (p< 0.001). However, changes in the Hertel scale were not statistically significant (p = 0.086). Conclusion The integration of intraoperative navigation in medial orbital wall fracture surgery enhances the precision of medial orbital wall restoration and minimizes postoperative complications, supporting its use in the surgical management of medial orbital fractures.

Background: Orbital medial wall fractures, which are more common than inferior wall fractures, have traditionally been difficult to diagnose with conventional radiography. As the fracture extends deep into the bony orbit, accurately visualizing internal structures becomes challenging, increasing the risk of optic nerve compression. In a previous study, the author introduced a technique for treating medial orbital wall fractures using a combined transethmoidal and transcaruncular approach. In this study, the authors hypothesized that the use of surgical navigation could enhance precision, safety, and anatomical reconstruction in this approach and employed navigation during surgery for medial orbital wall fractures and evaluated whether it improved postoperative functional and anatomical outcomes while minimizing complications. Methods: From September 2021 to November 2023, 48 patients with isolated medial wall fractures underwent surgical treatment using a combined transcaruncular approach and transethmoidal packing to repair the orbital fracture. Of these patients, 23 underwent surgery with the use of intraoperative navigation, while the other 25 did not. Intraoperative navigation was employed to facilitate precise fracture reduction and reduce the risk of optic nerve injury. The outcomes were compared by dividing the patients into two groups. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included ophthalmologic evaluations, Hertel exophthalmometry, and computed tomography-based orbital volume measurements. Results: The surgical approach with intraoperative navigation was successfully performed in all patients. Postoperative outcomes showed full recovery without residual symptoms or complications. Orbital volume measurements indicated a significant reduction in the preoperative orbital volume ratio from 109.03% to 104.80% postoperatively (p< 0.001). However, changes in the Hertel scale were not statistically significant (p = 0.086). Conclusion The integration of intraoperative navigation in medial orbital wall fracture surgery enhances the precision of medial orbital wall restoration and minimizes postoperative complications, supporting its use in the surgical management of medial orbital fractures.

Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.