Background: Laser procedures are integral to dermatologic practice, yet safety measures- particularly regarding ocular protection and plume control- are poorly studied in real-world settings. Objective: To evaluate current practices in eye protection, infection control, and occupational risk awareness among Korean dermatologists performing laser treatments. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among board-certified dermatologists at the 2024 Korean Society for Dermatologic Laser Surgery meeting. The questionnaire covered demographics, laser frequency, use of goggles and masks, infection control strategies, ophthalmologic monitoring, and history of warts or cancer. Results: Seventy-nine respondents completed the survey. All reported using protective goggles, but only 26.6% and 22.8% did so for CO 2 and erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet lasers, respectively. Only 24.1% underwent regular eye exams, and 13.9% reported eye conditions after starting laser practice. While 89.9% used masks, 40.8% used dental masks, which are inadequate for plume protection. Suction devices were used by 94.9%, though performance specifications were unclear. Warts were reported by 46.8% of respondents; two reported cancer diagnoses after initiating laser work. Conclusion Despite high overall adherence to basic safety practices, critical gaps remain. Our findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and long-term occupational health monitoring to ensure safe laser practice.

Background: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by erythema, papules, ocular symptoms, and heightened sensitivity. Patients with neurogenic symptoms such as burning or stinging remain particularly difficult to manage. Current guidelines often underrepresent energy-based devices (EBDs), pigmentary sequelae, psychosocial burden, and ocular comorbidities. Objective: To examine Korean dermatologists’ expert perspectives on rosacea management, focusing on skin sensitivity, neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary changes, psychosocial impact, ocular involvement, and EBD use. Methods: A web-based, 29-item survey was administered to 25 board-certified Korean dermatologists (May–June 2025). Quantitative and qualitative responses were analyzed. Results: Erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular phenotypes with sensitivity skin predominated. EBDs (pulsed dye laser, intense pulsed light) were frequently used but limited by cost and sensitivity issues. Neurogenic symptoms were recognized but rarely treated with neuromodulators. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was infrequent, yet monitoring was inconsistent.Psychosocial and ocular aspects were acknowledged but seldomly systematically addressed.Respondents expressed interest in emerging adjunctive treatments such as cold plasma, skin boosters, and holistic care approaches. Conclusion Korean dermatologists adopt individualized strategies for rosacea, yet practice gaps remain regarding neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary complications, and psychosocial and ocular comorbidities. Findings support the need for updated multidisciplinary, phenotype-driven guidelines aligned with real-world practice.

Background: As nationwide government-led whole-genome sequencing (WGS) projects progress, optimizing the clinical integration of large-scale WGS results is crucial. We explored how the initial analysis from Korea’s First WGS Pilot Study for Rare Diseases was applied in clinical practice, and then we reanalyzed the data comprehensively at Samsung Medical Center (SMC) Seoul, Korea. Methods: A prospective cohort study designed to collect WGS data under a Korean national initiative was conducted from August 2020 to December 2021. We focused on patients with rare diseases recruited from 16 university hospitals. The participants included 5,000 individuals (2,200 probands and 2,800 family members). The initial WGS data and diagnostic reference reports (from 682 probands and 484 family members), generated based on the First Korean WGS Pilot Study for Rare Diseases, were subsequently reanalyzed by SMC. Results: The initial analysis of the First Korean WGS Pilot Study data revealed a diagnostic rate of 17%. Upon receiving these results, the SMC conducted two rounds of reanalysis, increasing the diagnostic rate from 15% in the first analysis, to 18% in the second, and finally to 24% in the third (P = 1.6 × 10 −5 ). Key factors in improving the genetic diagnosis included increased detection of novel (likely) pathogenic variants (P = 1.0 × 10 −4 ), improved diagnostic rates with larger family recruitment (P = 0.004), and refined clinical information for more precise genotype–phenotype correlation analysis (40%). Conclusions Although national WGS projects lay a foundation for rare disease diagnosis, hospital-level reanalysis and multidisciplinary collaborations are crucial for optimizing diagnostic outcomes.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of no-touch (NT) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) vs. tumorpuncture microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) measuring ≤3 cm. Materials and Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 304 patients who underwent either NT-RFA (n = 144) or MWA (n = 160) for a single HCC measuring ≤3 cm. Comparative analyses were conducted for the overall cohort, while 81 patients per group were matched using propensity score matching (PSM). The analyzed outcomes included technical success, primary technique efficacy, local tumor progression (LTP), and major complications. Cumulative LTP was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank text, while the rate of ablative margin ≥5 mm and ablation time were compared using Chi-squared and Mann–Whitney U tests, respectively. Results: Technical success was achieved in 98.6% (142/144) and 100% (160/160) of in the NT-RFA and MWA patients, respectively before PSM (P = 0.224), and 98.8% (80/81) and 100% (81/81) after PSM (P = 1.000). The primary technique efficacies were 98.6% (142/144) and 100% (160/160) before PSM (P = 0.224), and 97.5 % (79/81) and 100% (81/81) after PSM (P = 0.497), respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative LTP rates were 1.4%, 1.4%, and 2.3%, respectively, for NTRFA and 5.1%, 8.6%, and 8.6%, respectively, for MWA before PSM (P = 0.013). After PSM, the corresponding rates were 0%, 0%, and 0% for NT-RFA, and 7.6%, 10.4%, and 10.4% for MWA (P = 0.006). Major complications were not observed. NT-RFA achieved a higher proportion, with an ablative margin ≥5 mm (88.7% [126/142] vs. 71.9% [115/160]; P < 0.001), but required longer ablation times (median, 10.0 vs. 6.0 min; P < 0.001). Conclusion NT-RFA showed superior local tumor control compared to MWA, despite greater procedural complexity and longer ablation times.

Purpose: Due to its rarity, treatment guidelines for appendiceal cancer have traditionally followed those established for colorectal cancer, despite showing distinct histologic and clinical features. This study aimed to compare the clinicopathologic characteristics and long-term oncologic outcomes of appendiceal cancer with those of right-sided colon cancers. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with stage I–III appendiceal, cecal, or ascending colon cancer who underwent curative resection between 2010 and 2020 at our center. A 1:3:3 exact matching for age, sex, TNM stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy was performed. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. Results: Overall, 245 patients with appendiceal cancer (n = 35), ascending colon cancer (n = 105), and cecal cancer (n = 105) were analyzed. Appendiceal cancer exhibited a higher proportion of T4 tumors and fewer harvested lymph nodes compared with ascending or cecal cancers. The mean follow-up duration was 9.5 years. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were lower in appendiceal cancer (66.2% and 52.9%) than in ascending (91.2% and 78.4%) or cecal cancer (88.5% and 78.3%). Similarly, the 10-year disease-free survival rate was lower in appendiceal cancer (59.2%) compared with ascending (83.1%) and cecal cancers (78.4%). Cox regression analysis identified age (≥65 years), perforation, nodal metastasis, and lymphovascular invasion as independent predictors of poor prognosis. Conclusion Appendiceal cancer exhibited significantly worse long-term survival compared to cecal or ascending colon cancer. Tumor perforation, nodal metastasis, and lymphovascular invasion were adverse prognostic factors for overall and disease-free survival.

Purpose: Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) efficacy and safety is established for older patients, but East Asian data are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MBS by comparing older (≥55 years) and younger (<55 years) East Asian patients with obesity. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective review included 410 patients undergoing MBS from January to December 2019.Patients were stratified into the older group (OG, age ≥55 years; n = 39) and the younger group (YG, age <55 years; n = 371). We compared surgical safety, weight parameters, and comorbidity resolution rates. Results: The OG had lower mean body weight (97.9 ± 16.4 kg vs. 113.2 ± 23.1 kg, P < 0.001) but more comorbidities and lower average ABCD score for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission. Postoperative complication rate (12.8% vs. 7.5%, P = 0.400) and postoperative hospital stay (4.1 ± 1.8 days vs. 4.0 ± 8.9 days, P = 0.773) showed no significant differences.At 12 months, the percentage of total weight loss was significantly lower in the OG (23.7 ± 6.9% vs. 27.8 ± 8.4%, P = 0.014).Remission rates for T2DM (47.6% vs. 80.5%, P < 0.001), hypertension (34.6% vs. 57.5%, P = 0.073), and dyslipidemia (12.5% vs. 44.4%, P = 0.012) were also lower in the OG, yet still demonstrated clinically meaningful metabolic improvement. Conclusion MBS is a safe and effective treatment for older East Asians with obesity, offering substantial comorbidity resolution despite achieving a lower weight loss compared to the younger patients.

Purpose: The male predominance in the incidence of gastric cancer (GC) is established; however, sex differences in the prognosis of GC remain controversial. As such, this study analyzed the prognosis of patients with GC based on age and sex. Materials and Methods: Data from 14,739 patients diagnosed with GC at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between 2003 and 2023 were analyzed. Baseline characteristics, histological types of GC, overall and GC-specific survival rates (age and stage stratification), and associated risk factors were analyzed. Results: Females were significantly younger (p < 0.001) and exhibited more gastric body cancers (p < 0.001) and tumors with diffuse-type or poorly differentiated histology (p < 0.001) than males. Females exhibited an advantage over males in terms of overall survival (p=0.004), but not in GC-specific survival. However, age stratification revealed significant sex differences, that females < 50 years of age exhibited survival disadvantages (p < 0.001); however, this trend was reversed with age, and females > 60 years exhibited survival advantages (p < 0.001) for both overall and GC-specific survival. This may be explained by the lower ratio of diffuse-type GC as females age. Furthermore, in the analysis according to stage, females with stage IV disease exhibited significant survival disadvantages, with significantly younger age and a higher proportion of diffuse-type GC which exhibits aggressive features, resulting in poorer survival than in males. Conclusion Age and stage stratification revealed significant differences in survival between the sexes, which can be helpful for public health strategies.

Purpose: This study evaluates the Korean Cancer Study Group Geriatric Score-7 (KG-7) frailty screening tool’s effectiveness in elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients to prevent under and overtreatment. Materials and Methods: This prospective pilot cohort study included 100 elderly patients aged 70 and older with newly diagnosed MM who had not undergone transplantation from August 2020 to January 2022. Results: The median age was 77 years, and 73.0% of patients were classified at International Staging System stages 2 or 3. Using a 5-point cutoff on the KG-7 index (non-frail, score ≥ 5; frail, score < 5), 31% were categorized as frail. After a median follow-up of 26.8 months, the 3-year overall survival rate was 73.0%. There was no statistically significant association between any frailty index and the risk of death. However, frail patients defined by the simplified frailty index (hazard ratio [HR], 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 5.95; p=0.030) and by KG-7 (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.03 to 5.86; p=0.043) had a significantly higher risk of grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity, whereas the International Myeloma Working Group definition did not. Over a 24-month tracking period, vulnerability as measured by KG-7 either improved or deteriorated. Conclusion The pilot study, which had a limited number of participants, did not demonstrate KG-7’s effectiveness in predicting survival; however, it successfully predicted severe non-hematologic toxicities. We plan to conduct larger studies in elderly MM patients to determine whether KG-7 can help tailor their treatment regimens.

Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted healthcare systems worldwide, leading to increased mortality rates across various conditions. This study assessed the impact of COVID-19 on excess in-hospital mortality among emergency department patients and examined variations by community income levels, thereby highlighting socioeconomic disparities. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study used data from the National Emergency Department Information System in Korea. Cancer patients who visited emergency departments between January 27 and December 31 in 2019 (pre-COVID) and 2020 (during COVID) were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The main exposure was the COVID-19 outbreak, with county per capita income tax serving as the interaction variable. The risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rates were calculated. A multilevel linear regression model with an interaction term was used to estimate the difference-in-difference between the periods based on county income tax. Results: A total of 206,400 cancer patients were included 110,879 pre-COVID and 95,521 during COVID with an unadjusted in-hospital mortality rate of 1.0%. The risk-adjusted mortality rate was significantly higher during COVID than pre-COVID (1.2% vs. 0.9%, P<0.01). Using the highest socioeconomic status group (Q1) as the reference, the excess inhospital mortality odds during COVID were higher in Q3 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.54) and Q4 (aOR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.15-1.77). Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated in-hospital mortality disparities among cancer patients, imposing a greater burden on lower socioeconomic groups. These findings highlight the importance of implementing equitable healthcare strategies to protect vulnerable populations during health emergencies.