1.Comparative Analysis of Romosozumab Versus Vertebroplasty With Denosumab: Efficacy, Safety, and Secondary Bone Mineral Density Outcomes
Hyun Woong MUN ; Jong Joo LEE ; Hyun Chul SHIN ; Tae-Hwan KIM ; Seok Woo KIM ; Jae Keun OH
Neurospine 2025;22(1):69-77
Objective:
This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of romosozumab, a bone anabolic agent, versus vertebroplasty, a conventional surgical intervention, in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).
Methods:
A retrospective analysis included 86 thoracic/lumbar compression fracture patients from 2014 to 2022 at a medical center. Forty-two patients received romosozumab (monthly injections for 1 year) followed by 1 year of denosumab, while 44 underwent vertebroplasty followed by denosumab injections biannually for 2 years. Outcomes were assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain, bone mineral density (BMD), vertebral compression ratio, and Cobb angle over 12 months.
Results:
At 12 months, the romosozumab group showed a greater reduction in NRS scores (4.90 ± 1.01 vs. 4.27 ± 1.34, p = 0.015) and a higher increase in lumbar BMD (0.8 ± 0.5 vs. 0.5 ± 0.3, p = 0.000) compared to the vertebroplasty group. There were no significant differences in changes in hip total BMD and femur neck BMD (p = 0.190, p = 0.167, respectively). Radiographic assessments showed no significant differences in vertebral compression ratio (14.7% vs. 14.8%; p = 0.960) or Cobb angle (4.2° vs. 4.9°; p = 0.302). The incidence of major osteoporotic fractures was lower in the romosozumab group (7.1% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.051), with similar rates of cardiovascular events in both groups (4.8% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.716).
Conclusion
Romosozumab has demonstrated superior pain reduction and lumbar BMD improvement compared to vertebroplasty at 12 months, with no significant differences in radiographic outcomes or adverse events, suggesting it as an alternative to vertebroplasty for OVCF.
2.Clinical evaluation and management of endometriosis: 2024 guideline for Korean patients from the Korean Society of Endometriosis
Hyun Joo LEE ; Sang-Hee YOON ; Jae Hoon LEE ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; So Yun PARK ; Sung Woo KIM ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Sung Eun KIM ; Youjin KIM ; Sungwook CHUN ; Yong Jin NA
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(1):43-58
Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer.
3.Environmental disease monitoring by regional Environmental Health Centers in Korea: a narrative review
Myung-Sook PARK ; Hwan-Cheol KIM ; Woo Jin KIM ; Yun-Chul HONG ; Won-Jun CHOI ; Seock-Yeon HWANG ; Jiho LEE ; Young-Seoub HONG ; Yong-Dae KIM ; Seong-Chul HONG ; Joo Hyun SUNG ; Inchul JEONG ; Kwan LEE ; Won-Ju PARK ; Hyun-Joo BAE ; Seong-Yong YOON ; Cheolmin LEE ; Kyoung Sook JEONG ; Sanghyuk BAE ; Jinhee CHOI ; Ho-Hyun KIM
The Ewha Medical Journal 2025;48(1):e3-
This study explores the development, roles, and key initiatives of the Regional Environmental Health Centers in Korea, detailing their evolution through four distinct phases and their impact on environmental health policy and local governance. It chronicles the establishment and transformation of these centers from their inception in May 2007, through four developmental stages. Originally named Environmental Disease Research Centers, they were subsequently renamed Environmental Health Centers following legislative changes. The analysis includes the expansion in the number of centers, the transfer of responsibilities to local governments, and the launch of significant projects such as the Korean Children’s Environmental Health Study (Ko-CHENS ). During the initial phase (May 2007–February 2009), the 10 centers concentrated on research-driven activities, shifting from a media-centered to a receptor-centered approach. In the second phase, prompted by the enactment of the Environmental Health Act, six additional centers were established, broadening their scope to address national environmental health issues. The third phase introduced Ko-CHENS, a 20-year national cohort project designed to influence environmental health policy by integrating research findings into policy frameworks. The fourth phase marked a decentralization of authority, empowering local governments and redefining the centers' roles to focus on regional environmental health challenges. The Regional Environmental Health Centers have significantly evolved and now play a crucial role in addressing local environmental health issues and supporting local government policies. Their capacity to adapt and respond to region-specific challenges is essential for the effective implementation of environmental health policies, reflecting geographical, socioeconomic, and demographic differences.
4.Environmental disease monitoring by regional Environmental Health Centers in Korea: a narrative review
Myung-Sook PARK ; Hwan-Cheol KIM ; Woo Jin KIM ; Yun-Chul HONG ; Won-Jun CHOI ; Seock-Yeon HWANG ; Jiho LEE ; Young-Seoub HONG ; Yong-Dae KIM ; Seong-Chul HONG ; Joo Hyun SUNG ; Inchul JEONG ; Kwan LEE ; Won-Ju PARK ; Hyun-Joo BAE ; Seong-Yong YOON ; Cheolmin LEE ; Kyoung Sook JEONG ; Sanghyuk BAE ; Jinhee CHOI ; Ho-Hyun KIM
The Ewha Medical Journal 2025;48(1):e3-
This study explores the development, roles, and key initiatives of the Regional Environmental Health Centers in Korea, detailing their evolution through four distinct phases and their impact on environmental health policy and local governance. It chronicles the establishment and transformation of these centers from their inception in May 2007, through four developmental stages. Originally named Environmental Disease Research Centers, they were subsequently renamed Environmental Health Centers following legislative changes. The analysis includes the expansion in the number of centers, the transfer of responsibilities to local governments, and the launch of significant projects such as the Korean Children’s Environmental Health Study (Ko-CHENS ). During the initial phase (May 2007–February 2009), the 10 centers concentrated on research-driven activities, shifting from a media-centered to a receptor-centered approach. In the second phase, prompted by the enactment of the Environmental Health Act, six additional centers were established, broadening their scope to address national environmental health issues. The third phase introduced Ko-CHENS, a 20-year national cohort project designed to influence environmental health policy by integrating research findings into policy frameworks. The fourth phase marked a decentralization of authority, empowering local governments and redefining the centers' roles to focus on regional environmental health challenges. The Regional Environmental Health Centers have significantly evolved and now play a crucial role in addressing local environmental health issues and supporting local government policies. Their capacity to adapt and respond to region-specific challenges is essential for the effective implementation of environmental health policies, reflecting geographical, socioeconomic, and demographic differences.
5.Early Administration of Nelonemdaz May Improve the Stroke Outcomes in Patients With Acute Stroke
Jin Soo LEE ; Ji Sung LEE ; Seong Hwan AHN ; Hyun Goo KANG ; Tae-Jin SONG ; Dong-Ick SHIN ; Hee-Joon BAE ; Chang Hun KIM ; Sung Hyuk HEO ; Jae-Kwan CHA ; Yeong Bae LEE ; Eung Gyu KIM ; Man Seok PARK ; Hee-Kwon PARK ; Jinkwon KIM ; Sungwook YU ; Heejung MO ; Sung Il SOHN ; Jee Hyun KWON ; Jae Guk KIM ; Young Seo KIM ; Jay Chol CHOI ; Yang-Ha HWANG ; Keun Hwa JUNG ; Soo-Kyoung KIM ; Woo Keun SEO ; Jung Hwa SEO ; Joonsang YOO ; Jun Young CHANG ; Mooseok PARK ; Kyu Sun YUM ; Chun San AN ; Byoung Joo GWAG ; Dennis W. CHOI ; Ji Man HONG ; Sun U. KWON ;
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):279-283
6.Expert consensus on oral corticosteroid use and tapering in severe asthma management
Joo-Hee KIM ; Noeul KANG ; Sung-Yoon KANG ; Da Woon SIM ; So-Young PARK ; Jong-Sook PARK ; Hyun LEE ; Hyun Jung JIN ; Woo-Jung SONG ; So Ri KIM ; Sang-Heon KIM
Allergy, Asthma & Respiratory Disease 2025;13(1):12-21
Systemic corticosteroids play an essential role in the management of asthma. During acute exacerbation, the short-term use of systemic corticosteroids is recommended. For patients with uncontrolled asthma and severe asthma, long-term and low-dose oral corticosteroids (OCS) have frequently been advocated. However, both short-term and long-term use of systemic corticosteroids carry the risk of adverse events (AEs), including various morbidities and even mortality. Despite recent progress in adult severe asthma management and the availability of new treatment options, the current domestic guidelines for asthma do not provide specific recommendations for oral corticosteroid tapering in patients with severe asthma. Therefore, the task force team of the severe asthma working group in the Korean Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology has proposed a tapering protocol for systemic corticosteroid use in severe asthma. This includes practical recommendations for monitoring OCS-related AE, particularly for adrenal insufficiency and osteoporosis, which suggests corticosteroid-sparing strategies that include alternative therapies, modifying treatable traits, timely specialist assessment, and shared decision-making with patients. However, further real-world research and collaboration with doctors from primary and academic institutes, patients, and policymakers are necessary to establish an OCS stewardship approach. This should include realistic OCS-tapering strategies for patients with severe asthma using regular OCS, education, and campaigns for patients, the public, and healthcare providers about the burden of severe asthma, as well as improving timely access to specialized severe asthma services for optimal management.
7.Expert consensus on oral corticosteroid use and tapering in severe asthma management
Joo-Hee KIM ; Noeul KANG ; Sung-Yoon KANG ; Da Woon SIM ; So-Young PARK ; Jong-Sook PARK ; Hyun LEE ; Hyun Jung JIN ; Woo-Jung SONG ; So Ri KIM ; Sang-Heon KIM
Allergy, Asthma & Respiratory Disease 2025;13(1):12-21
Systemic corticosteroids play an essential role in the management of asthma. During acute exacerbation, the short-term use of systemic corticosteroids is recommended. For patients with uncontrolled asthma and severe asthma, long-term and low-dose oral corticosteroids (OCS) have frequently been advocated. However, both short-term and long-term use of systemic corticosteroids carry the risk of adverse events (AEs), including various morbidities and even mortality. Despite recent progress in adult severe asthma management and the availability of new treatment options, the current domestic guidelines for asthma do not provide specific recommendations for oral corticosteroid tapering in patients with severe asthma. Therefore, the task force team of the severe asthma working group in the Korean Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology has proposed a tapering protocol for systemic corticosteroid use in severe asthma. This includes practical recommendations for monitoring OCS-related AE, particularly for adrenal insufficiency and osteoporosis, which suggests corticosteroid-sparing strategies that include alternative therapies, modifying treatable traits, timely specialist assessment, and shared decision-making with patients. However, further real-world research and collaboration with doctors from primary and academic institutes, patients, and policymakers are necessary to establish an OCS stewardship approach. This should include realistic OCS-tapering strategies for patients with severe asthma using regular OCS, education, and campaigns for patients, the public, and healthcare providers about the burden of severe asthma, as well as improving timely access to specialized severe asthma services for optimal management.
8.Comparative Analysis of Romosozumab Versus Vertebroplasty With Denosumab: Efficacy, Safety, and Secondary Bone Mineral Density Outcomes
Hyun Woong MUN ; Jong Joo LEE ; Hyun Chul SHIN ; Tae-Hwan KIM ; Seok Woo KIM ; Jae Keun OH
Neurospine 2025;22(1):69-77
Objective:
This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of romosozumab, a bone anabolic agent, versus vertebroplasty, a conventional surgical intervention, in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).
Methods:
A retrospective analysis included 86 thoracic/lumbar compression fracture patients from 2014 to 2022 at a medical center. Forty-two patients received romosozumab (monthly injections for 1 year) followed by 1 year of denosumab, while 44 underwent vertebroplasty followed by denosumab injections biannually for 2 years. Outcomes were assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain, bone mineral density (BMD), vertebral compression ratio, and Cobb angle over 12 months.
Results:
At 12 months, the romosozumab group showed a greater reduction in NRS scores (4.90 ± 1.01 vs. 4.27 ± 1.34, p = 0.015) and a higher increase in lumbar BMD (0.8 ± 0.5 vs. 0.5 ± 0.3, p = 0.000) compared to the vertebroplasty group. There were no significant differences in changes in hip total BMD and femur neck BMD (p = 0.190, p = 0.167, respectively). Radiographic assessments showed no significant differences in vertebral compression ratio (14.7% vs. 14.8%; p = 0.960) or Cobb angle (4.2° vs. 4.9°; p = 0.302). The incidence of major osteoporotic fractures was lower in the romosozumab group (7.1% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.051), with similar rates of cardiovascular events in both groups (4.8% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.716).
Conclusion
Romosozumab has demonstrated superior pain reduction and lumbar BMD improvement compared to vertebroplasty at 12 months, with no significant differences in radiographic outcomes or adverse events, suggesting it as an alternative to vertebroplasty for OVCF.
9.Clinical evaluation and management of endometriosis: 2024 guideline for Korean patients from the Korean Society of Endometriosis
Hyun Joo LEE ; Sang-Hee YOON ; Jae Hoon LEE ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; So Yun PARK ; Sung Woo KIM ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Sung Eun KIM ; Youjin KIM ; Sungwook CHUN ; Yong Jin NA
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(1):43-58
Endometriosis, a prevalent but debilitating condition affecting women, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management. The current 2024 guideline, developed by the Korean Society of Endometriosis (KSE), builds upon the 2018 KSE guideline. This guideline aims to provide customized recommendations tailored to Korea’s unique clinical aspects and medical environment, and addresses key areas such as diagnosis, medical and surgical management, considerations for special populations, and its complex relationship with cancer.
10.Surgical Outcomes of Suspension Arthroplasty with Dermal Allograft Interposition after Trapeziectomy: Comparison with Ligament Reconstruction and Interposition Using the Flexor Carpi Radialis Tendon
Shin Woo CHOI ; Joo-Yul BAE ; Hyun June LEE ; Ha Sung PARK ; Yun Jae KIM ; Jae Kwang KIM
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2025;17(2):317-323
Background:
Trapeziectomy with suspension arthroplasty is a reliable treatment for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis.We modified the suture suspension technique to add further support to maintain the arthroplasty space by interposition of the dermal allograft. Our aim was to investigate the surgical outcomes of our technique of suspension arthroplasty with dermal allograft interposition (SADI) compared with those of traditional ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition (LRTI) using a half-sling of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon.
Methods:
This retrospective study enrolled 26 patients (29 thumbs) with thumb CMC arthritis who underwent trapeziectomy with traditional LRTI using the FCR tendon (15 thumbs; LRTI group) or SADI (14 thumbs; SADI group) between January 2017 and May 2022. Patient-reported outcomes (visual analog scale; the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; and patient-rated wrist evaluation), grip strength, and scaphometacarpal distance were measured at baseline and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The operation time was checked by reviewing medical records. All measurements were compared between the 2 groups.
Results:
Between baseline and 12-month postoperative follow-up, all patient-reported outcomes significantly improved in both groups. Patient-reported outcomes, grip strength, and scaphometacarpal distance showed no differences between the 2 groups at all follow-up assessments, except for the scaphometacarpal distance being significantly greater in the SADI group at 3 months postoperatively. The operation time was significantly shorter in the SADI group. No complication was observed in either group.
Conclusions
Our modified suture suspension arthroplasty technique using dermal allograft interposition results in markedly shorter surgical times with similar surgical outcomes compared with those of traditional LRTI using the FCR tendon. This procedure appears to be an effective alternative treatment for thumb CMC arthritis.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail