3.Chemotherapy response score no longer predicts survival outcomes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients with BRCA mutation and/or maintenance therapy
Young Joo LEE ; Yoon Kyung SHIN ; Nae Ry KIM ; Se Ik KIM ; Yoo-Young LEE ; Jeong-Yeol PARK ; Jae-Weon KIM ; Hyun-Woong CHO ; Jung-Yun LEE
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024;35(6):e73-
Objective:
We aimed to revalidate the chemotherapy response score (CRS) system as a prognostic factor for ovarian cancer patients with breast cancer gene (BRCA) mutations or those receiving frontline poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors or bevacizumab as maintenance therapy.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was performed using medical records of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery between January 2007 and December 2021 at 5 tertiary medical institutions in South Korea. At each hospital, pathologists independently assessed each slide of omental tissues obtained from surgery using the CRS system. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) values were obtained using Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate the effect of BRCA mutation, maintenance therapy, and CRS on survival time.
Results:
Of 466 patients, BRCA mutations were detected in 156 (33.5%) and 131 (28.1%) were treated with maintenance therapy; 98 (21.0%) and 42 (9.0%) were treated with PARP inhibitors or bevacizumab, respectively. Patients with CRS3 had significantly longer PFS than those with CRS1 or 2 (24.7 vs. 16.8 months, p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in PFS improvement between CRS3 patients and those with CRS1 or 2 with BRCA mutation (22.0 vs. 19.3 months, p=0.193). Moreover, no significant PFS prolongation was observed in CRS3 patients compared to CRS1 or 2 patients treated with PARP inhibitors or bevacizumab (24.3 vs. 22.4 months, p=0.851; 27.5 vs. 15.7 months, p=0.347, respectively).
Conclusion
CRS may not be a prognostic factor in patients with BRCA mutations and those receiving frontline maintenance therapy.
7.Chemotherapy response score no longer predicts survival outcomes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients with BRCA mutation and/or maintenance therapy
Young Joo LEE ; Yoon Kyung SHIN ; Nae Ry KIM ; Se Ik KIM ; Yoo-Young LEE ; Jeong-Yeol PARK ; Jae-Weon KIM ; Hyun-Woong CHO ; Jung-Yun LEE
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024;35(6):e73-
Objective:
We aimed to revalidate the chemotherapy response score (CRS) system as a prognostic factor for ovarian cancer patients with breast cancer gene (BRCA) mutations or those receiving frontline poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors or bevacizumab as maintenance therapy.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was performed using medical records of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery between January 2007 and December 2021 at 5 tertiary medical institutions in South Korea. At each hospital, pathologists independently assessed each slide of omental tissues obtained from surgery using the CRS system. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) values were obtained using Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate the effect of BRCA mutation, maintenance therapy, and CRS on survival time.
Results:
Of 466 patients, BRCA mutations were detected in 156 (33.5%) and 131 (28.1%) were treated with maintenance therapy; 98 (21.0%) and 42 (9.0%) were treated with PARP inhibitors or bevacizumab, respectively. Patients with CRS3 had significantly longer PFS than those with CRS1 or 2 (24.7 vs. 16.8 months, p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in PFS improvement between CRS3 patients and those with CRS1 or 2 with BRCA mutation (22.0 vs. 19.3 months, p=0.193). Moreover, no significant PFS prolongation was observed in CRS3 patients compared to CRS1 or 2 patients treated with PARP inhibitors or bevacizumab (24.3 vs. 22.4 months, p=0.851; 27.5 vs. 15.7 months, p=0.347, respectively).
Conclusion
CRS may not be a prognostic factor in patients with BRCA mutations and those receiving frontline maintenance therapy.
8.Chemotherapy response score no longer predicts survival outcomes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients with BRCA mutation and/or maintenance therapy
Young Joo LEE ; Yoon Kyung SHIN ; Nae Ry KIM ; Se Ik KIM ; Yoo-Young LEE ; Jeong-Yeol PARK ; Jae-Weon KIM ; Hyun-Woong CHO ; Jung-Yun LEE
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024;35(6):e73-
Objective:
We aimed to revalidate the chemotherapy response score (CRS) system as a prognostic factor for ovarian cancer patients with breast cancer gene (BRCA) mutations or those receiving frontline poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors or bevacizumab as maintenance therapy.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was performed using medical records of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery between January 2007 and December 2021 at 5 tertiary medical institutions in South Korea. At each hospital, pathologists independently assessed each slide of omental tissues obtained from surgery using the CRS system. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) values were obtained using Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate the effect of BRCA mutation, maintenance therapy, and CRS on survival time.
Results:
Of 466 patients, BRCA mutations were detected in 156 (33.5%) and 131 (28.1%) were treated with maintenance therapy; 98 (21.0%) and 42 (9.0%) were treated with PARP inhibitors or bevacizumab, respectively. Patients with CRS3 had significantly longer PFS than those with CRS1 or 2 (24.7 vs. 16.8 months, p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in PFS improvement between CRS3 patients and those with CRS1 or 2 with BRCA mutation (22.0 vs. 19.3 months, p=0.193). Moreover, no significant PFS prolongation was observed in CRS3 patients compared to CRS1 or 2 patients treated with PARP inhibitors or bevacizumab (24.3 vs. 22.4 months, p=0.851; 27.5 vs. 15.7 months, p=0.347, respectively).
Conclusion
CRS may not be a prognostic factor in patients with BRCA mutations and those receiving frontline maintenance therapy.
9.Psychotropic Medications Promote Time-Dependent Reduction of Suicidal Ideation in Mood Disorder: A Prospective Cohort Study
Jeong Hun YANG ; C. Hyung Keun PARK ; Sang Jin RHEE ; Dae Hun KANG ; Min Ji KIM ; Hyun Jeong LEE ; Sang Yeol LEE ; Se-Hoon SHIM ; Jung-Joon MOON ; Seong-Jin CHO ; Shin Gyeom KIM ; Min-Hyuk KIM ; Jinhee LEE ; Won Sub KANG ; Jieun YOO ; Weon-Young LEE ; Yong Min AHN
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2024;39(31):e226-
Background:
Despite a plethora of research on the topic, there is still no solid evidence that pharmacological treatment actually reduces the risk of suicide in patients with mental illness.In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of psychotropic medications on suicidal ideation in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BPD) in two age groups: less than 25 years and 25 years and older.
Methods:
We analyzed 312 patients with mood disorders with current suicidal thoughts or recent suicide attempts. We followed the participants from baseline for 6 months and assessed changes in suicidal ideation with Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).The effect of psychotropic drug administration on suicidal ideation over time was analyzed using a linear mixed model.
Results:
In patients aged 25 years and older with mood disorders, suicidal ideation was more severe when using psychotropic drugs than when not using them. However, suicidal ideation decreased rapidly over time. The time-dependent reduction in suicidal ideation was accelerated when using antidepressants and sedatives/hypnotics in adult MDD, and when using mood stabilizers in adult BPD. However, this effect was not observed in participants aged less than 25 years.
Conclusion
Adequate psychotropic medication may reduce suicidal ideation in patients with mood disorders aged 25 years and older. Additional research on psychotropic drugs is needed to effectively reduce the risk of suicide among children and adolescents with mood disorders.
10.Facial Dermatoses Associated With Mask-Wearing in the COVID-19 Era:A Nationwide, Cross-Sectional, Multicenter, Questionnaire-based Study
Myoung Eun CHOI ; Woo Jin LEE ; Joo Yeon KO ; Kwang Joong KIM ; Jung Eun KIM ; Hei Sung KIM ; Kui Young PARK ; Mi Youn PARK ; Dae Hun SUH ; Kihyuk SHIN ; Min Kyung SHIN ; Hyo Hyun AHN ; Weon Ju LEE ; Jee Bum LEE ; Hee Jung LEE ; Min Soo JANG ; Seung Hyun CHEONG ; Soyun CHO ; Yu Sung CHOI ; You Won CHOI ; Hoon CHOI ; Mi Woo LEE
Annals of Dermatology 2024;36(2):81-90
Background:
Daily usage of facial masks during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic influenced on facial dermatoses.
Objective:
This study investigated the impact of mask-wearing habits on facial dermatoses.
Methods:
A nationwide, observational, questionnaire-based survey was conducted from July through August 2021, involving 20 hospitals in Korea.
Results:
Among 1,958 facial dermatoses, 75.9% of patients experienced aggravation or development of new-onset facial dermatoses after wearing masks. In aggravated or newly developed acne patients (543 out of 743), associated factors were healthcare provider, female gender, and a long duration of mask-wearing. Irritating symptoms, xerosis, and hyperpigmentation were more frequently observed in this group. Aggravated or newly developed rosacea patients (515 out of 660) were likely to be female, young, and have a long duration of mask-wearing per day. Seborrheic dermatitis patients who experienced aggravation or de novo development (132 out of 184) were younger, and they more frequently involved the chin and jaw in addition to the nasolabial folds and both cheeks. Contact dermatitis patients (132 out of 147) with aggravation or de novo development tended to be female, involve both cheeks, and complain of pruritus. Aggravated or newly developed atopic dermatitis patients (165 out of 224) were more likely to be female, and had a higher baseline investigator global assessment score before mask-wearing.
Conclusion
Clinical features and factors related to aggravation were different according to the types of facial dermatoses.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail