Early neurologic deterioration (END) is common and occurs within a few hours to days after an ischemic stroke. Traditionally, END has been treated as a collective entity, including the occurrence of new deficits (recurrence) and the aggravation of pre-existing neurologic deficits (progression). END arises from distinct mechanisms that require different therapeutic approaches. We reviewed clinical and experimental studies addressing the epidemiology, mechanisms, and treatment of END, focusing on differentiating END due to recurrence from END due to progression and on interventions including antiplatelet therapy, direct thrombin inhibition, and induced hypertension. Early recurrence is closely associated with thrombus growth and new ischemic events, particularly in atherothrombotic disease. Early recurrence is also common in patients with cancer-associated stroke. Thrombin and platelet activation play central roles under both conditions. In contrast, progression is mainly driven by infarct growth, that is, the evolution from incomplete infarction to complete infarction due to impaired perfusion, especially in lesions involving the subcortical fiber tracts. Therapeutic implications differ accordingly. Recurrence may respond to potent antithrombotic strategies, including combined antiplatelet and direct thrombin inhibition, whereas progression may benefit from induced hypertension. However, recurrence and progression often occur simultaneously, making clinical differentiation challenging. END should be conceptualized as a spectrum of clinical presentations arising from distinct mechanisms. Recognizing recurrence and progression as separate processes is essential for mechanism-oriented treatments. Future trials should adopt this framework to develop individualized strategies and improve outcomes in patients with acute stroke.

Purpose: The results of the TAILORx trial have shown that premenopausal patients with intermediate Oncotype Dx (ODx) recurrence score of 16–25 may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, the clinicopathological features showed the information complementary to ODx results. However, the characteristics may vary depending on menopausal status even in the same score. This study aimed to analyze the differences in the clinical characteristics by menopausal status. Methods: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 756 patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, and node-negative breast cancer who underwent the ODx test from July 2013 to December 2020 at the Severance Hospital. Results: Of the 756 patients, 261 patients were postmenopausal, and 495 were premenopausal. The premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx had similar clinicopathological features as compared to those with a high ODx. Conversely, the postmenopausal patients with a midrange ODx did not show significantly different clinicopathological features from those with a low ODx, whereas a difference was seen as compared to those with a high ODx. Conclusion In this study, unlike the postmenopausal patients, some of the clinicopathological characteristics of the premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx were closer to those with a high ODx than those with a low ODx. In the premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx, considering the baseline characteristic itself, there was a significant difference between those with a low ODx when compared with postmenopausal patients. Therefore, more aggressive treatment decisions may be helpful in premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx.

Purpose: The results of the TAILORx trial have shown that premenopausal patients with intermediate Oncotype Dx (ODx) recurrence score of 16–25 may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, the clinicopathological features showed the information complementary to ODx results. However, the characteristics may vary depending on menopausal status even in the same score. This study aimed to analyze the differences in the clinical characteristics by menopausal status. Methods: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 756 patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, and node-negative breast cancer who underwent the ODx test from July 2013 to December 2020 at the Severance Hospital. Results: Of the 756 patients, 261 patients were postmenopausal, and 495 were premenopausal. The premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx had similar clinicopathological features as compared to those with a high ODx. Conversely, the postmenopausal patients with a midrange ODx did not show significantly different clinicopathological features from those with a low ODx, whereas a difference was seen as compared to those with a high ODx. Conclusion In this study, unlike the postmenopausal patients, some of the clinicopathological characteristics of the premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx were closer to those with a high ODx than those with a low ODx. In the premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx, considering the baseline characteristic itself, there was a significant difference between those with a low ODx when compared with postmenopausal patients. Therefore, more aggressive treatment decisions may be helpful in premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx.

Purpose: The results of the TAILORx trial have shown that premenopausal patients with intermediate Oncotype Dx (ODx) recurrence score of 16–25 may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, the clinicopathological features showed the information complementary to ODx results. However, the characteristics may vary depending on menopausal status even in the same score. This study aimed to analyze the differences in the clinical characteristics by menopausal status. Methods: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 756 patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, and node-negative breast cancer who underwent the ODx test from July 2013 to December 2020 at the Severance Hospital. Results: Of the 756 patients, 261 patients were postmenopausal, and 495 were premenopausal. The premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx had similar clinicopathological features as compared to those with a high ODx. Conversely, the postmenopausal patients with a midrange ODx did not show significantly different clinicopathological features from those with a low ODx, whereas a difference was seen as compared to those with a high ODx. Conclusion In this study, unlike the postmenopausal patients, some of the clinicopathological characteristics of the premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx were closer to those with a high ODx than those with a low ODx. In the premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx, considering the baseline characteristic itself, there was a significant difference between those with a low ODx when compared with postmenopausal patients. Therefore, more aggressive treatment decisions may be helpful in premenopausal patients with a midrange ODx.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate postoperative imaging findings of patients who underwent breastconserving surgery for cancer and reconstruction with MegaDerm® (sheet-type and pellet-type), analyzing false positives and recurrences, using multi-modality images. Materials and Methods: This study included 201 women (age range: 28–81 years, mean age ± standard deviation: 53.2 ± 8.6 years) who underwent breast-conserving surgery and immediate reconstruction with MegaDerm®. Post-surgery, each patient underwent at least one mammography (MG), ultrasonography (US), and MRI, totaling 713 MG, 1063 US, and 607 MRI examinations. Postoperative images were reviewed separately for the two types of MegaDerm®, and suspicious imaging findings (false positives and recurrences) were analyzed, with a particular focus on the findings in direct contact with MegaDerm®. Results: MegaDerm® appeared as a circumscribed mass with homogeneous iso- or high density on MG, posterior shadowing on US, and no enhancement on MRI. Calcification was more common and increased in size in sheet-type MegaDerm®, while pellet-type often exhibited irregular margins. Nine out of 17 false positives had suspicious findings in direct contact with MegaDerm®, and six out of nine recurrences showed similar findings. Common suspicious findings included calcifications, asymmetries, and MegaDerm® irregularities on MG; masses and MegaDerm® irregularities on US; and enhancing masses and MegaDerm® irregularities with enhancement on MRI. Notably, MegaDerm® irregularity with calcification was observed on MG and US in only one recurrence case. In 44.4% (4/9) of false-positives in direct contact with MegaDerm®, suspicious findings showed no change or resolution on follow-up. Conclusion Suspicious imaging findings in direct contact with MegaDerm® may be associated with false positives or recurrences. Therefore, it is essential to recognize these characteristic findings and review the patient’s history of MegaDerm® insertion when in doubt.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate postoperative imaging findings of patients who underwent breastconserving surgery for cancer and reconstruction with MegaDerm® (sheet-type and pellet-type), analyzing false positives and recurrences, using multi-modality images. Materials and Methods: This study included 201 women (age range: 28–81 years, mean age ± standard deviation: 53.2 ± 8.6 years) who underwent breast-conserving surgery and immediate reconstruction with MegaDerm®. Post-surgery, each patient underwent at least one mammography (MG), ultrasonography (US), and MRI, totaling 713 MG, 1063 US, and 607 MRI examinations. Postoperative images were reviewed separately for the two types of MegaDerm®, and suspicious imaging findings (false positives and recurrences) were analyzed, with a particular focus on the findings in direct contact with MegaDerm®. Results: MegaDerm® appeared as a circumscribed mass with homogeneous iso- or high density on MG, posterior shadowing on US, and no enhancement on MRI. Calcification was more common and increased in size in sheet-type MegaDerm®, while pellet-type often exhibited irregular margins. Nine out of 17 false positives had suspicious findings in direct contact with MegaDerm®, and six out of nine recurrences showed similar findings. Common suspicious findings included calcifications, asymmetries, and MegaDerm® irregularities on MG; masses and MegaDerm® irregularities on US; and enhancing masses and MegaDerm® irregularities with enhancement on MRI. Notably, MegaDerm® irregularity with calcification was observed on MG and US in only one recurrence case. In 44.4% (4/9) of false-positives in direct contact with MegaDerm®, suspicious findings showed no change or resolution on follow-up. Conclusion Suspicious imaging findings in direct contact with MegaDerm® may be associated with false positives or recurrences. Therefore, it is essential to recognize these characteristic findings and review the patient’s history of MegaDerm® insertion when in doubt.

The hygiene hypothesis, first proposed in 1989, suggested that reduced exposure to infections in early life leads to allergic diseases by the defects in the establishment of immune tolerance. Although many studies provided evidence that some exposure conditions, including family size, antibiotics, probiotics, and viral or bacterial infections, are strongly related to the prevalence of allergic diseases, thereby supporting the hygiene hypothesis, some evidence does not provide acceptable results for the hygiene hypothesis. Further, most studies have focused on patients with asthma or atopic dermatitis, not allergic rhinitis. In this review, we summarize the recent studies for and against the ‘hygiene hypothesis’ and identify causal association with the prevalence of allergic rhinitis.

Background: An autologous abdominal flap can provide an aesthetically pleasing breast with a natural feel. However, contracted scars and hourglass contour deformities at the abdominal donor site can sometimes occur. These complications can reduce patient satisfaction and quality of life. Therefore, we performed different oblique plane closure of the abdominal donor site and evaluated the aesthetic scores in comparison with the conventional vertical single plane closure. Methods: The procedures begin with a beveled incision down to the fascia level during transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap elevation. At the time of donor site closure, Scarpa’s fascia and the subcutaneous layers are sutured while being pulled downward. Sixty patients were divided into two groups: group A (single vertical plane closure) and group B (different oblique plane closure). Abdominal scars were scored by five reviewers using the scar scale. Results: There were no significant differences in scores for vascularization, dog-ear presence, and umbilical shape of the scar between the two groups. However, group B showed marked improvements in flatness, contracture, and thickness of the scar surface. Notably, the different oblique plane closure in group B achieved much higher scores for the abdominal contour than group A. Conclusions The vertical single plane suture of the abdominal donor site may result in depressive contracture with poor cosmetic outcomes. The different oblique plane closure technique markedly improved the appearance of scars on the abdomen. This technique is likely to enhance patient satisfaction with both the breast and abdominal outcomes of breast reconstruction using an abdominal flap.

Background: Atherogenic dyslipidemia, which is frequently associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and insulin resistance, contributes to the development of vascular complications. Statin therapy is the primary approach to dyslipidemia management in T2D, however, the role of non-statin therapy remains unclear. Ezetimibe reduces cholesterol burden by inhibiting intestinal cholesterol absorption. Fibrates lower triglyceride levels and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels via peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor alpha agonism. Therefore, when combined, these drugs effectively lower non-HDL-C levels. Despite this, few clinical trials have specifically targeted non-HDL-C, and the efficacy of triple combination therapies, including statins, ezetimibe, and fibrates, has yet to be determined. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, active-comparator controlled trial involving 3,958 eligible participants with T2D, cardiovascular risk factors, and elevated non-HDL-C (≥100 mg/dL). Participants, already on moderate-intensity statins, will be randomly assigned to either Ezefeno (ezetimibe/fenofibrate) addition or statin dose-escalation. The primary end point is the development of a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and diabetic microvascular events over 48 months. Conclusion This trial aims to assess whether combining statins, ezetimibe, and fenofibrate is as effective as, or possibly superior to, statin monotherapy intensification in lowering cardiovascular and microvascular disease risk for patients with T2D. This could propose a novel therapeutic approach for managing dyslipidemia in T2D.