Essential medical care is a concept referring to indispensable medical care. World Health Organization has defined essential healthcare services as the evidence-based technologies needed to cost-effectively solve health problems. However, most countries have no such term that describes essential healthcare services. Rather, it has been used to efficiently allocate medical resources in countries with limited resources. Therefore, a clear definition of essential healthcare services must be accompanied by a specific purpose and a clear direction for the need. The target to whom medical services are to be provided, the region and institution to be provided, the content of medical services, and the purpose of provision should be distinguished. Recently, as public interest in essential healthcare services has increased, the government announced “the Essential Healthcare Policy Package” and “the 1st Healthcare Reform Implementation Plan” to specifically promote it. But concerns of feasibility and financial estimates are being raised. So, here, I analyze the government policy package and its 1st implantation plan, and suggest policy proposals for them.

Essential medical care is a concept referring to indispensable medical care. World Health Organization has defined essential healthcare services as the evidence-based technologies needed to cost-effectively solve health problems. However, most countries have no such term that describes essential healthcare services. Rather, it has been used to efficiently allocate medical resources in countries with limited resources. Therefore, a clear definition of essential healthcare services must be accompanied by a specific purpose and a clear direction for the need. The target to whom medical services are to be provided, the region and institution to be provided, the content of medical services, and the purpose of provision should be distinguished. Recently, as public interest in essential healthcare services has increased, the government announced “the Essential Healthcare Policy Package” and “the 1st Healthcare Reform Implementation Plan” to specifically promote it. But concerns of feasibility and financial estimates are being raised. So, here, I analyze the government policy package and its 1st implantation plan, and suggest policy proposals for them.

Essential medical care is a concept referring to indispensable medical care. World Health Organization has defined essential healthcare services as the evidence-based technologies needed to cost-effectively solve health problems. However, most countries have no such term that describes essential healthcare services. Rather, it has been used to efficiently allocate medical resources in countries with limited resources. Therefore, a clear definition of essential healthcare services must be accompanied by a specific purpose and a clear direction for the need. The target to whom medical services are to be provided, the region and institution to be provided, the content of medical services, and the purpose of provision should be distinguished. Recently, as public interest in essential healthcare services has increased, the government announced “the Essential Healthcare Policy Package” and “the 1st Healthcare Reform Implementation Plan” to specifically promote it. But concerns of feasibility and financial estimates are being raised. So, here, I analyze the government policy package and its 1st implantation plan, and suggest policy proposals for them.

Essential medical care is a concept referring to indispensable medical care. World Health Organization has defined essential healthcare services as the evidence-based technologies needed to cost-effectively solve health problems. However, most countries have no such term that describes essential healthcare services. Rather, it has been used to efficiently allocate medical resources in countries with limited resources. Therefore, a clear definition of essential healthcare services must be accompanied by a specific purpose and a clear direction for the need. The target to whom medical services are to be provided, the region and institution to be provided, the content of medical services, and the purpose of provision should be distinguished. Recently, as public interest in essential healthcare services has increased, the government announced “the Essential Healthcare Policy Package” and “the 1st Healthcare Reform Implementation Plan” to specifically promote it. But concerns of feasibility and financial estimates are being raised. So, here, I analyze the government policy package and its 1st implantation plan, and suggest policy proposals for them.

Essential medical care is a concept referring to indispensable medical care. World Health Organization has defined essential healthcare services as the evidence-based technologies needed to cost-effectively solve health problems. However, most countries have no such term that describes essential healthcare services. Rather, it has been used to efficiently allocate medical resources in countries with limited resources. Therefore, a clear definition of essential healthcare services must be accompanied by a specific purpose and a clear direction for the need. The target to whom medical services are to be provided, the region and institution to be provided, the content of medical services, and the purpose of provision should be distinguished. Recently, as public interest in essential healthcare services has increased, the government announced “the Essential Healthcare Policy Package” and “the 1st Healthcare Reform Implementation Plan” to specifically promote it. But concerns of feasibility and financial estimates are being raised. So, here, I analyze the government policy package and its 1st implantation plan, and suggest policy proposals for them.

Background/Aims: This study aimed to assess the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic on nationally notifiable infectious diseases (NNIDs) in South Korea. Methods: Long-term data on seven NNIDs from 2018 to 2021 were analyzed to identify trends and change points using a change point detection technique. The timings of the NPI implementations were compared to the identified change points to determine their association. Results: Varicella, mumps, and scarlet fever showed a significant decrease in incidence following the implementation of NPIs during the COVID-19 pandemic. These diseases, which are primarily transmitted through respiratory droplets, demonstrated a clear response to NPIs. However, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) showed an increasing trend unrelated to the timing of NPI implementation, suggesting the complex nature of controlling healthcare-associated infections. Hepatitis A, hepatitis C, and scrub typhus did not show significant changes associated with NPIs, likely due to their non-respiratory route of transmission. Conclusions NPIs effectively controlled NNIDs, particularly those transmitted through respiratory infections. However, the impact varied depending on the disease. Understanding the effectiveness and limitations of NPIs is crucial for developing comprehensive public health strategies during infectious disease outbreaks.

Purpose: Varlitinib is a pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) inhibitor targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and HER4. We present a phase Ib/II study of a combination of varlitinib and weekly paclitaxel as a second-line treatment for patients with EGFR/HER2 co-expressing advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Materials and Methods: Patients whose tumors with EGFR and HER2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry (≥ 1+) were enrolled. Varlitinib and paclitaxel were investigated every 4 weeks. After determining the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in phase Ib, a phase II study was conducted to evaluate the antitumor activity. Results: RP2D was treated with a combination of varlitinib (300 mg twice daily) and paclitaxel. Among 27 patients treated with RP2D, the median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 3.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 4.9) and 7.9 months (95% CI, 5.0 to 10.8), respectively, with a median follow-up of 15.7 months. Among 16 patients with measurable disease, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were 31% and 88%, respectively. Patients with strong HER2 expression (n=8) had a higher ORR and longer OS, whereas those with strong EGFR expression (n=3) had poorer outcomes. The most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade were neutropenia (52%), diarrhea (27%), aspartate aminotransferase/alanine transaminase elevation (22%), and nausea (19%). No treatment-related deaths or unexpected AEs resulting from treatment cessation were observed in patients with RP2D. Conclusion A combination of varlitinib and paclitaxel displayed manageable toxicity and modest antitumor activity in patients with EGFR/HER2 co-expressing AGC who progressed after first-line chemotherapy.

This study was conducted to investigate potential differences in vaccine efficacy between patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy and receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, the study proved the influence of vaccination timing on vaccine efficacy during active chemotherapy. Anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG binding antibody assays and surrogate neutralizing antibody assays were performed after BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination in 45 solid cancer patients (23 adjuvant and 22 palliative chemotherapy) and in 24 healthy controls before vaccination (baseline), at every two to four weeks after the first (post-dose 1) and the second vaccination (post-dose 2). The levels of anti-RBD IgG and neutralizing antibodies increased significantly from baseline through post-dose 1 to post-dose 2 in all three groups. At the post-dose 1, the anti-RBD IgG and neutralizing antibody levels were significantly lower in cancer patients than in healthy controls. However, by post-dose 2, the seropositivity of anti-RBD IgG and neutralizing antibodies uniformly reached 100% across all groups, with no significant disparity in antibody levels among the three groups. Moreover, the antibody titers were not significantly different between patients with a vaccine and chemotherapy interval of more than 14 days or those with less than 14 days. This study demonstrated that after second doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, humoral immune responses in patients receiving chemotherapy were comparable to those of healthy controls, regardless of whether the purpose of the anti-cancer treatment was palliative or adjuvant. Furthermore, the timing of vaccination did not affect the level of humoral immunity after the second vaccination.

Objectives: . Facial nerve sacrifice during radical parotidectomy can impair quality of life. This study assessed the effectiveness of single-stage facial reanimation surgery performed concurrently with radical parotidectomy in restoring facial function. Methods: . A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent single-stage facial reanimation combined with radical parotidectomy. The techniques employed included selective reinnervation and orthodromic temporalis tendon transfer. Outcomes were evaluated using the modified House-Brackmann and Terzis grading systems, Emotrics facial assessment, and the Facial Disability Index (FDI). Results: . Among the 13 patients studied (median age, 54 years; 69% male), 10 underwent selective reinnervation. Of these, nine patients demonstrated improvement, achieving House-Brackmann grade III and Terzis grade 4 or 5. The other three patients underwent tendon transfer and achieved moderate functional outcomes. Emotrics analysis revealed balanced facial symmetry in the selective reinnervation group. Furthermore, FDI scores indicated satisfactory physical and social/well-being functions. Conclusion . Single-stage facial reanimation effectively restores facial function in patients undergoing radical parotidectomy. This approach offers meaningful benefits in the early recovery of facial function.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the most effective treatment approach by comparing the impacts of various otolith reduction techniques in patients with apogeotropic lateral semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (LC-BPPV). Methods: We performed a multicenter randomized prospective study from January to December 2015, involving 72 consecutive patients with apogeotropic LC-BPPV. The patients were divided into three treatment groups: therapeutic head-shaking (group A), the Gufoni-Appiani maneuver (group B), and the cupulolith repositioning maneuver (CuRM; group C). Each group underwent evaluation and treatment up to the fourth week. Treatment success was defined as the disappearance of positional vertigo and nystagmus. Results: This study included 72 patients (49 male and 23 female), with a mean (±standard deviation) age of 55.4±13.5 years. The mean duration of vertigo experienced prior to treatment was 3.9±4.4 days. The mean latency and duration of nystagmus were 2.7±3.0 seconds and 47.9±15.8 seconds, respectively. The overall treatment frequency was 2.0±0.9. The number of treatments differed significantly among the three groups (P<0.05). After 4 weeks, the success rates for groups A, B, and C were 90.5%, 92.3%, and 100%, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the success rate across treatment methods and periods (P>0.05). However, CuRM was the only method with a 100% treatment success rate. Conclusion While no clear difference was observed among the three treatments for LC-BPPV, CuRM was found to be superior to the other approaches in the long term.