1.A Nomogram for Predicting Extraperigastric Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Early Gastric Cancer
Hyun Joo YOO ; Hayemin LEE ; Han Hong LEE ; Jun Hyun LEE ; Kyong-Hwa JUN ; Jin-jo KIM ; Kyo-young SONG ; Dong Jin KIM
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2023;23(2):355-364
Background:
There are no clear guidelines to determine whether to perform D1 or D1+ lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to develop a nomogram for estimating the risk of extraperigastric lymph node metastasis (LNM).
Materials and Methods:
Between 2009 and 2019, a total of 4,482 patients with pathologically confirmed T1 disease at 6 affiliated hospitals were included in this study. The basic clinicopathological characteristics of the positive and negative extraperigastric LNM groups were compared. The possible risk factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Based on these results, a risk prediction model was developed. A nomogram predicting extraperigastric LNM was used for internal validation.
Results:
Multivariate analyses showed that tumor size (cut-off value 3.0 cm, odds ratio [OR]=1.886, P=0.030), tumor depth (OR=1.853 for tumors with sm2 and sm3 invasion, P=0.010), cross-sectional location (OR=0.490 for tumors located on the greater curvature, P=0.0303), differentiation (OR=0.584 for differentiated tumors, P=0.0070), and lymphovascular invasion (OR=11.125, P<0.001) are possible risk factors for extraperigastric LNM. An equation for estimating the risk of extraperigastric LNM was derived from these risk factors. The equation was internally validated by comparing the actual metastatic rate with the predicted rate, which showed good agreement.
Conclusions
A nomogram for estimating the risk of extraperigastric LNM in EGC was successfully developed. Although there are some limitations to applying this model because it was developed based on pathological data, it can be optimally adapted for patients who require curative gastrectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection.
2.Clinicopathological features and management strategy for superficial nonampullary duodenal tumors: a multi-center retrospective study
Eun Young KIM ; Dong Jin KIM ; Han Hong LEE ; Jun Hyun LEE ; Jeong Goo KIM ; Kyo Young SONG ; Jin Jo KIM ; Hyung Min CHIN ; Wook KIM
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2022;102(5):263-270
Purpose:
We investigated the clinicopathological features and management for superficial nonampullary duodenal tumors (SNADTs). The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic management, especially laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS), were evaluated.
Methods:
A total of 59 patients with SNADTs who underwent operations from January 2009 to December 2018 at all 8 institutions of the Catholic Medical Center were identified in our comprehensive multi-institutional database. Clinicopathological and surgical data on the 4 anatomical regions of the duodenum were collected and compared.Characteristics of laparoscopic procedure (laparoscopy-only) and LECS procedures were also compared.
Results:
There were significantly more asymptomatic patients with tumors in the first and second vs. third and fourth duodenal regions. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), carcinoids, and ectopic pancreatic tumors were identified in 32, 12, and 5 cases, respectively. Forty-two patients (71.2%) underwent laparoscopy. Of patients undergoing laparoscopy, the LECS group exhibited significantly more endophytic features and smaller tumor sizes (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Although no significant difference in the wedge resection or postoperative complication rate was seen between the 2 groups (P = 0.096 and P = 0.227, respectively), the wedge resection rate was higher, and the complication rate lower, in the LECS group than the conventional laparoscopic surgery group.
Conclusion
Most of the SNADTs located in proximal duodenum were detected incidentally. GISTs were the most common diagnoses of SNADTs in all locations. In treating these tumors, laparoscopic resection is safe and feasible. Especially, LECS may be ideal for treating small endophytic tumors, minimizing over-resection and postoperative complications.
3.The pattern of postoperative quality of life following minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective cohort from Korean multicenter robotic gastrectomy trial
Jong-Ho CHOI ; Sang-Uk HAN ; Han-Kwang YANG ; Young-Woo KIM ; Keun Won RYU ; Joong-Min PARK ; Ji Yeong AN ; Min-Chan KIM ; Sungsoo PARK ; Kyo Young SONG ; Sung Jin OH ; Seong-Ho KONG ; Byoung Jo SUH ; Dae Hyun YANG ; Tae Kyung HA ; Hyoung-Il KIM ; Woo Jin HYUNG ; Hyuk-Joon LEE
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2020;99(5):275-284
Purpose:
Quality of life (QOL) has become important in the trend of emphasizing patient satisfaction. This study aimed to evaluate the QOL in patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Methods:
A prospective trial was performed involving patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic gastrectomy for primary gastric cancer at 11 hospitals in Korea. Within this comparative trial, QOL, postoperative pain, and long-term complications were exanimated. The quality-of-life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and QLQ-STO22 developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer were used for the QOL survey. We compared the data after dividing it into several types of characteristics as follows; device (robotic or laparoscopic), operation type, pathological stage, and sex.Biased components were extracted by logistic regression analysis. Propensity score matching was applied to the data set with the biased components.
Results:
In total, 434 patients (211 for laparoscopic surgery and 223 for robotic surgery) were enrolled, out of which 321 patients who responded to both preoperative and postoperative surveys were selected for analysis. Robotic gastrectomy was not different from laparoscopic gastrectomy with respect to postoperative QOL. Distal gastrectomy showed better scores than total gastrectomy in terms of role functioning, social functioning, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, constipation, financial difficulties, dysphagia, eating restrictions, anxiety, taste, and body image. Male patients showed better scores on the 19 scales compared to female patients.
Conclusion
Robotic and laparoscopic approaches for gastric cancer surgery did not differ from each other with respect to QOL. Distal gastrectomy resulted in better QOL than total gastrectomy.
4.Safety of Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.
Hayemin LEE ; Cho Hyun PARK ; Seung Man PARK ; Wook KIM ; Hyung Min CHIN ; Jin Jo KIM ; Kyo Young SONG ; Sung Geun KIM ; Kyong Hwa JUN ; Jeong Goo KIM ; Han Hong LEE ; Junhyun LEE ; Dong Jin KIM
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2018;18(3):287-295
PURPOSE: The surgical outcomes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer were inferior compared with those of non-ESRD patients. This study aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term surgical outcomes of ESRD patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) for gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2014, 38 patients (OG: 21 patients, LG: 17 patients) with ESRD underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Comparisons were made based on the clinicopathological characteristics, surgical outcomes, and long-term survival rates. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted in the clinicopathological characteristics of either group. LG patients had lower estimated blood loss volumes than OG patients (LG vs. OG: 94 vs. 275 mL, P=0.005). The operation time and postoperative hospital stay were similar in both the groups. The postoperative morbidity for LG and OG patients was 41.1% and 33.3%, respectively (P=0.873). No significant difference was observed in the long-term overall survival rates between the 2 groups (5-year overall survival, LG vs. OG: 82.4% vs. 64.7%, P=0.947). CONCLUSIONS: In ESRD patients, LG yielded non-inferior short- and long-term surgical outcomes compared to OG. Laparoscopic procedures might be safely adopted for ESRD patients who can benefit from the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.
Gastrectomy*
;
Humans
;
Kidney Failure, Chronic*
;
Laparoscopy
;
Length of Stay
;
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
;
Renal Insufficiency
;
Stomach Neoplasms*
;
Survival Rate
5.Antireflux Surgery in Korea: A Nationwide Study from 2011 to 2014.
Jun Hyun LEE ; Joong Min PARK ; Sang Uk HAN ; Jin Jo KIM ; Kyo Young SONG ; Seung Wan RYU ; Kyung Won SEO ; Hyoung Il KIM ; Wook KIM
Gut and Liver 2016;10(5):726-730
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although laparoscopic fundoplication is a well-established therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Western countries, the mainstay of GERD treatment in Korea is long-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use. The aim of the present study was to evaluate nationwide data regarding antireflux surgery in Korea. METHODS: Data from 2011 to 2014 were collected from the Korean Antireflux Surgery Study Group and then analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for the treatment of GERD. Preoperatively, typical symptoms were present in 81 patients (93%) and atypical symptoms were present in 51 patients (59%). Twenty-seven patients (31%) had poor PPI responses. The average surgical time and postoperative hospital stay were 116.3±42.3 minutes and 4.3±3.1 days, respectively. At 3 months after surgery, typical symptoms were completely controlled in 86.3% of patients and partially controlled in 11.7%, whereas atypical symptoms were completely controlled in 63.3% of patients and partially controlled in 23.3%. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that although atypical symptoms and PPI nonresponders are common, the complete control rates of typical and atypical symptoms were 86.3% and 63.3%, respectively. Laparoscopic fundoplication is an efficacious method of controlling the symptoms of GERD and has an acceptable rate of postoperative morbidity and adverse symptoms.
Fundoplication
;
Gastroesophageal Reflux
;
Humans
;
Korea*
;
Length of Stay
;
Methods
;
Operative Time
;
Proton Pump Inhibitors
;
Proton Pumps
6.A Comparison of Outcomes of Three Reconstruction Methods after Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy.
Chang Hyun KIM ; Kyo Young SONG ; Cho Hyun PARK ; Young Joo SEO ; Seung Man PARK ; Jin Jo KIM
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2015;15(1):46-52
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the short-term surgical and long-term functional outcomes of Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 697 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for operable gastric cancer between January 2009 and December 2012. The patients were classified into three groups according to the reconstruction methods: Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y. The parameters evaluated included patient and tumor characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Endoscopic findings of the remnant stomach were evaluated according to the residue, gastritis, bile (RGB) classification and the Los Angeles classification 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y were performed in 165 (23.7%), 371 (53.2%), and 161 patients (23.1%), respectively. Operation time was significantly shorter (173.4+/-44.7 minute, P<0.001) as was time to first flatus (2.8+/-0.8 days, P=0.009), time to first soft diet was significantly faster (4.3+/-1.0 days, P<0.001), and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (7.7+/-4.0 days, P=0.004) in Billroth I in comparison to the other methods. Postoperative complications higher than Clavien-Dindo grade III occurred in 61 patients (8.8%) with no statistically significant differences between groups (P=0.797). Endoscopic findings confirmed that gastric residue, gastritis, bile reflux, and reflux esophagitis were significantly lower in Roux-en-Y (P<0.001) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer is beneficial in terms of long-term functional outcome, whereas Billroth I reconstruction for distal-third gastric cancer has a superior short-term surgical outcome and postoperative weight change.
Anastomosis, Surgical
;
Bile
;
Bile Reflux
;
Classification
;
Diet
;
Esophagitis, Peptic
;
Flatulence
;
Gastrectomy*
;
Gastric Stump
;
Gastritis
;
Gastroenterostomy
;
Humans
;
Laparoscopy
;
Length of Stay
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Stomach Neoplasms
7.Risk Acceptance and Expectations of Laryngeal Allotransplantation.
Hyun Kyo JO ; Jang Wan PARK ; Jae Ha HWANG ; Kwang Seog KIM ; Sam Yong LEE ; Jun Ho SHIN
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2014;41(5):505-512
BACKGROUND: Laryngeal allotransplantation (LA) is a technique involving transplantation of a deceased donor's larynx into a recipient, and it may be substituted for conventional laryngeal reconstruction. There are widely different views on LA, as the recipient is administered continuous, potentially life-threatening, immunosuppressive therapy for a functional or aesthetic result, which is not directly related to life extension. The purpose of this study was to analyze the difference in risk acceptance and expectations of LA between four population groups. METHODS: A survey was performed to examine patients' risk acceptance and expectations of LA. The survey included 287 subjects in total (general public, n=100; kidney transplant recipients, n=53; post-laryngectomy patients, n=34; doctors, n=100), using a Korean translated version of the louisville instrument for transplantation (LIFT) questionnaire. RESULTS: All four groups responded differently at various levels of their perception in risk acceptance and expectations. The kidney transplant recipients reported the highest risk acceptance and expectations, and the doctor group the lowest. CONCLUSIONS: This study examined the disparate perception between specific population groups of the risks and benefits of using LA for the promotion of the quality of life. By addressing the information gaps about LA in the different populations that have been highlighted from this survey, we suggest that LA can become a more viable alternative to classical surgery with resultant improved quality of life for patients.
Data Collection
;
Humans
;
Kidney
;
Larynx
;
Life Expectancy
;
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
;
Population Groups
;
Quality of Life
;
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
;
Risk Assessment
;
Transplantation
;
Surveys and Questionnaires
8.Efficacy of Minilaparotomy for Early Gastric Cancer.
Hoon HUR ; Sung Bae JEE ; Kyo Young SONG ; Jin Jo KIM ; Hyung Min CHIN ; Wook KIM ; Cho Hyun PARK ; Seung Man PARK ; Hae Myung JEON
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 2008;74(3):192-198
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic gastrectomy has oncologic unreliability, technical problems, and is expensive. To overcome these drawbacks, we performed operations through a small laparotomy without using a laparoscopic procedure. METHODS: From March to August, 2003, we successfully performed distal gastrectomy with minilaparotomy for 21 patients diagnosed with early gastric cancer in our hospital. An additional 24 patients with advanced gastric cancer underwent conventional laparotomy for distal gastrectomy. We performed distal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection, moving the abdominal window to the surgical site. We compared BMI, operating time, bleeding volume, and postoperative pain, and followed minilaparotomy patients for an average of 48 months. RESULTS: There were no postoperative complications in minilaparotomy patients. The minilaparotomy group had a shorter hospital stay lower analgesic use than conventional laparotomy, but there were no differences in BMI, bleeding volume, or the number of harvested lymph nodes. Minilaparotomy alleviated the severity of postoperative pain, and there were no recurrences during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Minilaparotomy for early gastric cancer improved postoperative outcome without oncologic inadequacy compared with conventional laparotomy. Therefore, distal gastrectomy via a minilaparotomy may become a minimally invasive therapeutic strategy for early gastric cancer.
Bleeding Time
;
Gastrectomy
;
Hemorrhage
;
Humans
;
Laparotomy
;
Length of Stay
;
Lymph Node Excision
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Pain, Postoperative
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Recurrence
;
Stomach Neoplasms
9.Clinical Significance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors (VEGF)-C and -D in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Yoon Ho KO ; Chan Kwon JUNG ; Myung Ah LEE ; Jae Ho BYUN ; Jin Hyoung KANG ; Kyo Young LEE ; Keon Hyun JO ; Young Pil WANG ; Young Seon HONG
Cancer Research and Treatment 2008;40(3):133-140
PURPOSE: Lymphatic spread of tumor is an important prognostic factor for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) and VEGF-D play important roles in lymphangiogenesis via the VEGF receptor 3 (VEGFR-3). We sought to determine whether VEGF-C, VEGF-D and VEGFR-3 are involved in the clinical outcomes of patients with resected NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using immunohistochemical staining, we investigated the protein expressions of VEGF-C, VEGF-D and VEGFR-3 in the tissue array specimens from patients who underwent resection for NSCLC. The immunoreactivity for p53 was also examined. The clinicopathological implications of these molecules were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Analysis of a total of 118 specimens showed that VEGF-C, VEGF-D and their co-expression were significantly associated with more advanced regional lymph node metastasis (p=0.019, p=0.044 and p=0.026, respectively, N2 versus N0 and N1). A VEGFR-3 expression had a strong correlation with peritumoral lymphatic invasion (p=0.047). On the multivariate analysis for survival and recurrence, pathologic N2 lymph node metastasis was the only independent prognostic factor, but none of the investigated molecules showed any statistical correlation with recurrence and survival. CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed that high expressions of VEGF-C and VEGF-D were strongly associated with more advanced regional lymph node metastasis in patients with resected NSCLC.
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
;
Humans
;
Lung
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Lymphangiogenesis
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
;
Recurrence
;
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
;
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C
;
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor D
;
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3
;
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors
10.Comparison of the Results in Gastric Carcinoma Patients undergoing Billroth I and Billroth II Gastrectomiesy.
Sung Geun KIM ; Young Kyun KIM ; Youn Jung HEO ; Kyo Young SONG ; Jin Jo KIM ; Hyung Min JIN ; Wook KIM ; Cho Hyun PARK ; Seung Man PARK ; Keun Woo LIM ; Seung Nam KIM ; Hae Myung JEON
Journal of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2007;7(1):16-22
PURPOSE: The proper reconstruction technique to use after a distal subtotal gastrectomy for a gastric carcinoma, there has been a subject for debated what is the proper reconstruction technique. The aim of this study was to compare the gastric- emptying time and the quality of life following both B-I and B-II reconstructions after a distal gastrectomy for a gastric adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 122 patients who had undergone a distal gastrectomy for a gastric adenocarcinoma between June 1999 and July 2002 at our hospital. 51 patients underwent B-I group, and 71 patients underwent B-II group. To evaluate the gastric-emptying time, we analyzed the T1/2 time by means of radionuclide scintigraphy using a gamma camera after ingestion of an (99m)Tc-tin-colloid steamed egg. The nutritional status was measured by the weight change. Postgastrectomy syndrome was evaluated using an abdominal symptoms survey. Dumping syndrome was measured using the Sigstad dumping score. RESULTS: The gastric-emptying time was somewhat delayed in the B-I group after a 6 month period, but there was no difference after 12 months between the two groups. There was less weight loss in the B-I group than in the B-II group (P=0.023). Fewer abdominal symptoms were occurred in the B-I group than in the B-II group. Dumping syndrome occurred less frequently in the B-I group than in the B-II group (P=0.013). CONCLUSION: In our study, the Billroth I reconstruction led to less weight loss, a better nutritional status, and a better quality of life than the Billroth II reconstruction. We concluded that after a distal subtotal gastrectomy, the Billroth I reconstruction would be considered when the procedure is oncologically suitable.
Adenocarcinoma
;
Dumping Syndrome
;
Eating
;
Gamma Cameras
;
Gastrectomy
;
Gastroenterostomy*
;
Humans
;
Nutritional Status
;
Ovum
;
Postgastrectomy Syndromes
;
Quality of Life
;
Radionuclide Imaging
;
Steam
;
Stomach Neoplasms
;
Weight Loss

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail