Background: Sarcopenia, a multifactorial disorder involving metabolic disturbance, suggests potential for metabolite biomarkers. Carnitine (CN), essential for skeletal muscle energy metabolism, may be a candidate biomarker. We investigated whether CN metabolites are biomarkers for sarcopenia. Methods: Associations between the CN metabolites identified from an animal model of sarcopenia and muscle cells and sarcopenia status were evaluated in men from an age-matched discovery (72 cases, 72 controls) and a validation (21 cases, 47 controls) cohort. Results: An association between CN metabolites and sarcopenia showed in mouse and cell studies. In the discovery cohort, plasma C5-CN levels were lower in sarcopenic men (P=0.005). C5-CN levels in men tended to be associated with handgrip strength (HGS) (P=0.098) and were significantly associated with skeletal muscle mass (P=0.003). Each standard deviation increase in C5-CN levels reduced the odds of low muscle mass (odd ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.89). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of CN score using a regression equation of C5-CN levels, for sarcopenia was 0.635 (95% CI, 0.544 to 0.726). In the discovery cohort, addition of CN score to HGS significantly improved AUROC from 0.646 (95% CI, 0.575 to 0.717; HGS only) to 0.727 (95% CI, 0.643 to 0.810; P=0.006; HGS+CN score). The improvement was confirmed in the validation cohort (AUROC=0.563; 95% CI, 0.470 to 0.656 for HGS; and AUROC=0.712; 95% CI, 0.569 to 0.855 for HGS+CN score; P=0.027). Conclusion C5-CN, indicative of low muscle mass, is a potential circulating biomarker for sarcopenia in men. Further studies are required to confirm these results and explore sarcopenia-related metabolomic changes.

Purpose: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been an important method of treatment in the advance of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The indications for HSCT are evolving and require updated establishment. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of HSCT on the treatment outcome of pediatric ALL, considering the indications for HSCT and subgroups. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on ALL patients diagnosed and treated at a single center. Risk groups were categorized based on age at diagnosis, initial white blood cell count, disease lineage (B/T), and cytogenetic study results. Data on the patients’ disease status at HSCT and indications of HSCT were collected. Indications for HSCT were categorized as upfront HSCT at 1st complete remission, relapse, and refractory disease. Results: Among the 549 screened patients, a total of 418 patients were included in the study; B-cell ALL (n=379) and T-cell ALL (T-ALL) (n=39). HSCT was conducted on a total of 106 patients (25.4%), with a higher frequency as upfront HSCT in higher-risk groups and specific cytogenetics. The overall survival (OS) was significantly better when done upfront than in relapsed or refractory state in T-ALL patients (p=0.002). The KMT2A-rearranged ALL patients showed superior event-free survival (p=0.002) and OS (p=0.022) when HSCT was done as upfront treatment. Conclusion HSCT had a substantial positive effect in a specific subset of pediatric ALL. In particular, frontline HSCT for T-ALL and KMT2A-rearranged ALL offered a better prognosis than when HSCT was conducted in a relapsed or refractory setting.

Background and Objectives: The Valsalva test, although commonly utilized to assess the Eustachian tube function, is limited by drawbacks such as inconsistent pressure increases in the nasal cavity. Thus we introduced the “Popper test,” a tympanic membrane inflation test using the automatic middle ear inflation device known as middle ear inflation device (MEID), to explore its viability as an alternative to the Valsalva test.Subjects and Method We sampled 80 ears from patients between June 1, 2023, and August 1, 2023. Each patient underwent both the Valsalva and Popper tests using the MEID. Participants were divided into three categories: the “unable” group (patients who could not follow the Valsalva maneuver) and the “successful” and “unsuccessful” groups (patients whose attempts at the Valsalva or Popper tests either successed or failed). Success or failure was determined using an otoscope to assess the bulging of the tympanic membrane. Results: Of the 68 ears with normal middle ear pressure, 30.9% (21 ears) showed an inability to perform the Valsalva test, 45.6% (31 ears) successfully inflated the tympanic membrane via the Valsalva test, and 23.5% (16 ears) failed. Conversely, the Popper test resulted in an 88.2% (60 ears) success rate for inflating the tympanic membrane, with only 11.8% (8 ears) failing. Conclusion Variability observed in the Valsalva test outcomes may be attributed to individual differences and the instructor’s technique. MEID, as utilized in the Popper test, offers a promising alternative to the Valsalva test, potentially enhancing the reliability by minimizing individual variation. However, the diagnostic performance may be dependent on the properties of the MEID.

Background and Objectives: The Valsalva test, although commonly utilized to assess the Eustachian tube function, is limited by drawbacks such as inconsistent pressure increases in the nasal cavity. Thus we introduced the “Popper test,” a tympanic membrane inflation test using the automatic middle ear inflation device known as middle ear inflation device (MEID), to explore its viability as an alternative to the Valsalva test.Subjects and Method We sampled 80 ears from patients between June 1, 2023, and August 1, 2023. Each patient underwent both the Valsalva and Popper tests using the MEID. Participants were divided into three categories: the “unable” group (patients who could not follow the Valsalva maneuver) and the “successful” and “unsuccessful” groups (patients whose attempts at the Valsalva or Popper tests either successed or failed). Success or failure was determined using an otoscope to assess the bulging of the tympanic membrane. Results: Of the 68 ears with normal middle ear pressure, 30.9% (21 ears) showed an inability to perform the Valsalva test, 45.6% (31 ears) successfully inflated the tympanic membrane via the Valsalva test, and 23.5% (16 ears) failed. Conversely, the Popper test resulted in an 88.2% (60 ears) success rate for inflating the tympanic membrane, with only 11.8% (8 ears) failing. Conclusion Variability observed in the Valsalva test outcomes may be attributed to individual differences and the instructor’s technique. MEID, as utilized in the Popper test, offers a promising alternative to the Valsalva test, potentially enhancing the reliability by minimizing individual variation. However, the diagnostic performance may be dependent on the properties of the MEID.

Background and Objectives: The Valsalva test, although commonly utilized to assess the Eustachian tube function, is limited by drawbacks such as inconsistent pressure increases in the nasal cavity. Thus we introduced the “Popper test,” a tympanic membrane inflation test using the automatic middle ear inflation device known as middle ear inflation device (MEID), to explore its viability as an alternative to the Valsalva test.Subjects and Method We sampled 80 ears from patients between June 1, 2023, and August 1, 2023. Each patient underwent both the Valsalva and Popper tests using the MEID. Participants were divided into three categories: the “unable” group (patients who could not follow the Valsalva maneuver) and the “successful” and “unsuccessful” groups (patients whose attempts at the Valsalva or Popper tests either successed or failed). Success or failure was determined using an otoscope to assess the bulging of the tympanic membrane. Results: Of the 68 ears with normal middle ear pressure, 30.9% (21 ears) showed an inability to perform the Valsalva test, 45.6% (31 ears) successfully inflated the tympanic membrane via the Valsalva test, and 23.5% (16 ears) failed. Conversely, the Popper test resulted in an 88.2% (60 ears) success rate for inflating the tympanic membrane, with only 11.8% (8 ears) failing. Conclusion Variability observed in the Valsalva test outcomes may be attributed to individual differences and the instructor’s technique. MEID, as utilized in the Popper test, offers a promising alternative to the Valsalva test, potentially enhancing the reliability by minimizing individual variation. However, the diagnostic performance may be dependent on the properties of the MEID.

Background: and Purpose Treatments for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) such as eculizumab, ravulizumab, satralizumab, and inebilizumab have significantly advanced relapse prevention, but they remain expensive. Rituximab is an off-label yet popular alternative that offers a cost-effective solution, but its real-world efficacy needs better quantification for guiding the application of newer approved NMOSD treatments (ANTs). This study aimed to determine real-world rituximab failure rates to anticipate the demand for ANTs and aid in resource allocation. Methods: We conducted a nationwide retrospective study involving 605 aquaporin-4-antibody-positive NMOSD patients from 22 centers in South Korea that assessed the efficacy and safety of rituximab over a median follow-up of 47 months. Results: The 605 patients treated with rituximab included 525 (87%) who received continuous therapy throughout the follow-up period (median=47 months, interquartile range=15–87 months). During this period, 117 patients (19%) experienced at least 1 relapse. Notably, 68 of these patients (11% of the total cohort) experienced multiple relapses or at least 1 severe relapse.Additionally, 2% of the patients discontinued rituximab due to adverse events, which included severe infusion reactions, neutropenia, and infections. Conclusions This study has confirmed the efficacy of rituximab in treating NMOSD, as evidenced by an 87% continuation rate among patients over a 4-year follow-up period. Nevertheless, the occurrence of at least one relapse in 19% of the cohort, including 11% who experienced multiple or severe relapses, and a 2% discontinuation rate due to adverse events highlight the urgent need for alternative therapeutic options.

Purpose: Since 1995, the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA) has been periodically conducting nationwide surveys on patients with surgically treated gastric cancer. This study details the results of the survey conducted in 2023. Materials and Methods: The survey was conducted from March to December 2024 using a standardized case report form. Data were collected on 86 items, including patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical procedures, and surgical outcomes. The results of the 2023 survey were compared with those of previous surveys. Results: Data from 12,751 cases were collected from 66 institutions. The mean patient age was 64.6 years, and the proportion of patients aged ≥71 years increased from 9.1% in 1995 to 31.7% in 2023. The proportion of upper-third tumors slightly decreased to 16.8% compared to 20.9% in 2019. Early gastric cancer accounted for 63.1% of cases in 2023.Regarding operative procedures, a totally laparoscopic approach was most frequently applied (63.2%) in 2023, while robotic gastrectomy steadily increased to 9.5% from 2.1% in 2014.The most common anastomotic method was the Billroth II procedure (48.8%) after distal gastrectomy and double-tract reconstruction (51.9%) after proximal gastrectomy in 2023.However, the proportion of esophago-gastrostomy with anti-reflux procedures increased to 30.9%. The rates of post-operative mortality and overall complications were 1.0% and 15.3%, respectively. Conclusions The results of the 2023 nationwide survey demonstrate the current status of gastric cancer treatment in Korea. This information will provide a basis for future gastric cancer research.

Background and Objectives: The Valsalva test, although commonly utilized to assess the Eustachian tube function, is limited by drawbacks such as inconsistent pressure increases in the nasal cavity. Thus we introduced the “Popper test,” a tympanic membrane inflation test using the automatic middle ear inflation device known as middle ear inflation device (MEID), to explore its viability as an alternative to the Valsalva test.Subjects and Method We sampled 80 ears from patients between June 1, 2023, and August 1, 2023. Each patient underwent both the Valsalva and Popper tests using the MEID. Participants were divided into three categories: the “unable” group (patients who could not follow the Valsalva maneuver) and the “successful” and “unsuccessful” groups (patients whose attempts at the Valsalva or Popper tests either successed or failed). Success or failure was determined using an otoscope to assess the bulging of the tympanic membrane. Results: Of the 68 ears with normal middle ear pressure, 30.9% (21 ears) showed an inability to perform the Valsalva test, 45.6% (31 ears) successfully inflated the tympanic membrane via the Valsalva test, and 23.5% (16 ears) failed. Conversely, the Popper test resulted in an 88.2% (60 ears) success rate for inflating the tympanic membrane, with only 11.8% (8 ears) failing. Conclusion Variability observed in the Valsalva test outcomes may be attributed to individual differences and the instructor’s technique. MEID, as utilized in the Popper test, offers a promising alternative to the Valsalva test, potentially enhancing the reliability by minimizing individual variation. However, the diagnostic performance may be dependent on the properties of the MEID.

This study explores the development, roles, and key initiatives of the Regional Environmental Health Centers in Korea, detailing their evolution through four distinct phases and their impact on environmental health policy and local governance. It chronicles the establishment and transformation of these centers from their inception in May 2007, through four developmental stages. Originally named Environmental Disease Research Centers, they were subsequently renamed Environmental Health Centers following legislative changes. The analysis includes the expansion in the number of centers, the transfer of responsibilities to local governments, and the launch of significant projects such as the Korean Children’s Environmental Health Study (Ko-CHENS ). During the initial phase (May 2007–February 2009), the 10 centers concentrated on research-driven activities, shifting from a media-centered to a receptor-centered approach. In the second phase, prompted by the enactment of the Environmental Health Act, six additional centers were established, broadening their scope to address national environmental health issues. The third phase introduced Ko-CHENS, a 20-year national cohort project designed to influence environmental health policy by integrating research findings into policy frameworks. The fourth phase marked a decentralization of authority, empowering local governments and redefining the centers' roles to focus on regional environmental health challenges. The Regional Environmental Health Centers have significantly evolved and now play a crucial role in addressing local environmental health issues and supporting local government policies. Their capacity to adapt and respond to region-specific challenges is essential for the effective implementation of environmental health policies, reflecting geographical, socioeconomic, and demographic differences.