2.Metformin treatment of antipsychotic-induced dyslipidemia: analysis of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials.
Ye YANG ; Xiaoyi WANG ; Dongyu KANG ; Yujun LONG ; Jianjun OU ; Wenbin GUO ; Jingping ZHAO ; Renrong WU
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2019;44(10):1128-1136
To examine the efficacy and safety for metformin in treating antipsychotic-induced dyslipidemia.
Methods: Two randomized placebo-controlled trials were included in the analysis. A total of 201 schizophrenia patients with dyslipidemia after treatment with an antipsychotic were collected, and the patients were divided into two groups: a 1 000 mg/d metformin group (n=103) and a placebo group (n=98). The clinical symptoms and metabolic indicators such as body weight, blood glucose, and blood lipids were assessed at baseline, the 12th week and the 24th week after treatment respectively.
Results: After metformin treatment, the mean difference in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) value between the metformin group and the placebo group was from 0.16 mmol/L at baseline to -0.86 mmol/L at the end of the 24th week, which was decreased by 1.02 mmol/L
(P<0.01). At the 24th week, the LDL-C was more than 3.37 mmol/L in 25.3% patients in the metformin group, which was significantly lower than that in the placebo group (64.8%) (P<0.01). Compared with the placebo group, there were significant changes in the weight, body mass index (BMI), insulin, insulin resistance index, total cholesterol and triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in the metformin group (all P<0.05). The treatment effects on weight and insulin resistance appeared at the 12th week and further improved at the 24th week, but the effects on improving dyslipidemia only significantly occurred at the end of the 24th week.
Conclusion: The metformin treatment is effective in improving antipsychotic-induced dyslipidemia and insulin resistance, and the effect to reduce the antipsychotic-induced insulin resistance appears earlier than the effect to improve dyslipidemia.
Antipsychotic Agents
;
adverse effects
;
Blood Glucose
;
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
;
Double-Blind Method
;
Dyslipidemias
;
chemically induced
;
drug therapy
;
Humans
;
Hypoglycemic Agents
;
Metformin
;
therapeutic use
4.Can Fundus Fluorescein Angiography be Performed for Diabetic Patients on Oral Metformin?.
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal 2017;32(2):119-112
Metformin is a kind of biguanide hypoglycemic agent that has been widely used in patients with diabetes mellitus. In clinical practice, whether metformin should be stopped before Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) remains largely unclear. Some endocrinologists suggest stop metformin before FFA. However, ophthalmologists do not always adopt this opinion in their practice. This situation may lead to disputes between physicians and patients. This article analyzed contrast-induced nephropathy(CIN) and the related contrast agent, as well as the adverse reactions of fluorescein angiography. It pointed out that the discrepancy may be caused by misunderstanding of contrast agents used in FFA. For angiography using iodine contrast agent, metformin must be stopped because of the increased possibility of CIN, while for FFA using fluorescein sodium, no CIN has been reported yet. Therefore, the authors believe FFA is safe for diabetic patients with oral metformin and it is unnecessary to stop metformin before the examination.
Administration, Oral
;
Contrast Media
;
adverse effects
;
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
;
diagnostic imaging
;
drug therapy
;
Diabetic Retinopathy
;
diagnostic imaging
;
Fluorescein Angiography
;
adverse effects
;
methods
;
Humans
;
Hypoglycemic Agents
;
therapeutic use
;
Kidney Diseases
;
chemically induced
;
Metformin
;
therapeutic use
5.Efficacy and Safety of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Yingying YANG ; Hui PAN ; Bo WANG ; Shi CHEN ; Huijuan ZHU
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal 2017;32(1):22-27
Objective To assess the efficiency and safety of a novel sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor-SGLT2 inhibitors, in combination with insulin for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Methods We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Library to identify the eligible studies published between January 2010 and July 2016 without restriction of language. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) data and ClinicalTrials (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov) were also searched. The included studies met the following criteria: randomized controlled trials; T1DM patients aged between 18 and 65 years old; patients were treated with insulin plus SGLT2 inhibitors for more than 2 weeks; patients' glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were between 7% and 12%. The SGLT2 inhibitors group was treated with SGLT2 inhibitors plus insulin, and the placebo group received placebo plus insulin treatment. The outcomes should include one of the following items: fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, glycosuria, or adverse effects. Data were analyzed by two physicians independently. The risk of bias was evaluated by using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool and heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Chi-square test. Random effect model was used to analyze the treatment effects with Revman 5.3.Results Three trials including 178 patients were enrolled. As compared to the placebo group, SGLT2 inhibitor absolutely decreased fasting blood glucose [mean differences (MD) -2.47 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.65 to -1.28, P<0.001] and insulin dosage (standardized MD -0.75 U, 95%CI -1.17 to -0.33, P<0.001). SGLT2 inhibitors could also increase the excretion of urine glucose (MD 131.09 g/24 h, 95%CI 91.79 to 170.39, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidences of hyperglycemia [odds ratio (OR) 1.82, 95%CI 0.63 to 5.29, P=0.27], urinary tract infection (OR 0.95, 95%CI 0.19 to 4.85, P=0.95), genital tract infection (OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.01 to 7.19, P=0.43), and diabetic ketoacidosis (OR 6.03, 95%CI 0.27 to 135.99, P=0.26) between the two groups.Conclusion SGLT2 inhibitors combined with insulin might be an efficient and safe treatment modality for T1DM patients.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Blood Glucose
;
metabolism
;
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
;
blood
;
drug therapy
;
Drug Therapy, Combination
;
methods
;
Fasting
;
blood
;
Female
;
Glycated Hemoglobin A
;
metabolism
;
Humans
;
Hypoglycemic Agents
;
adverse effects
;
therapeutic use
;
Insulin
;
adverse effects
;
therapeutic use
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
;
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2
;
antagonists & inhibitors
6.Efficacy and safety of avandamet or uptitrated metformin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin alone: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
Xiao-Ling CAI ; Ying-Li CHEN ; Jia-Jun ZHAO ; Zhong-Yan SHAN ; Ming-Cai QIU ; Cheng-Jiang LI ; Wei GU ; Hao-Ming TIAN ; Hua-Zhang YANG ; Yao-Ming XUE ; Jin-Kui YANG ; Tian-Pei HONG ; Li-Nong JI
Chinese Medical Journal 2015;128(10):1279-1287
BACKGROUNDAt present, China has listed the compound tablet containing a fixed dose of rosiglitazone and metformin, Avandamet, which may improve patient compliance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Avandamet or uptitrated metformin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin alone.
METHODSThis study was a 48-week, multicenter, randomized, open-labeled, active-controlled trial. Patients with inadequate glycaemic control (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] 7.5-9.5%) receiving a stable dose of metformin (≥1500 mg) were recruited from 21 centers in China (from 19 November, 2009 to 15 March, 2011). The primary objective was to compare the proportion of patients who reached the target of HbA1c ≤7% between Avandamet and metformin treatment.
RESULTSAt week 48, 83.33% of patients reached the target of HbA1c ≤7% in Avandamet treatment and 70.00% in uptitrated metformin treatment, with significantly difference between groups. The target of HbA1c ≤6.5% was reached in 66.03% of patients in Avandamet treatment and 46.88% in uptitrated metformin treatment. The target of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≤6.1 mmol/L was reached in 26.97% of patients in Avandamet treatment and 19.33% in uptitrated metformin treatment. The target of FPG ≤7.0 mmol/L was reached in 63.16% of patients in Avandamet treatment and 43.33% in uptitrated metformin treatment. Fasting insulin decreased 3.24 ± 0.98 μU/ml from baseline in Avandamet treatment and 0.72 ± 1.10 μU/ml in uptitrated metformin treatment. Overall adverse event (AE) rates and serious AE rates were similar between groups. Hypoglycaemia occurred rarely in both groups.
CONCLUSIONSCompared with uptitrated metformin, Avandamet treatment provided significant improvements in key parameters of glycemic control and was generally well tolerated.
REGISTRATION NUMBERChiCTR-TRC-13003776.
Adult ; Blood Glucose ; drug effects ; C-Reactive Protein ; metabolism ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; blood ; drug therapy ; Drug Combinations ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Metformin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Thiazoles ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use
7.Progress of berberine for treatment of type 2 diabetes.
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica 2014;39(8):1374-1378
Berberine is the major component of Coptidis Rhizoma and it has been used as anti-infection, anti-inflammation drug for gastrointestinal diseases. In recent years, evidence showed that it could regulate glucose and lipid metabolism. Moreover, its activity had been tested by clinical trials and animal researches. The mechanisms of berberine in diabetes include: improving the function of beta-cell; prompting insulin secretion and islets regeneration, lowing lipid level, regulating glucose and lipid metabolic by influence transcriptional factors expression such as PPARgamma, C/EBPalpha, SREBP-1c, LXR, having the activities of anti-oxidation and inhibiting reductase to repress oxidative stress state and regulate metabolic signal pathway. Although numbers of data supported that berberine could improving insulin resistance by clinical trials and animal studies, the large scale, multicenter clinical trials are needed to evaluate the effects of berberine for diabetes and its complications in the time of evidence-based medicine.
Animals
;
Berberine
;
adverse effects
;
therapeutic use
;
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
;
drug therapy
;
genetics
;
metabolism
;
Glucose
;
metabolism
;
Humans
;
Hypoglycemic Agents
;
adverse effects
;
therapeutic use
;
Insulin
;
metabolism
;
Lipid Metabolism
;
drug effects
8.Association of Vitamin B12 Deficiency and Metformin Use in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Sun Hye KO ; Sun Hee KO ; Yu Bae AHN ; Ki Ho SONG ; Kyung Do HAN ; Yong Moon PARK ; Seung Hyun KO ; Hye Soo KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2014;29(7):965-972
We evaluated the prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency and associated factors in type 2 diabetes patients using metformin. A total of 799 type 2 diabetes patients using metformin was enrolled. Vitamin B12 and folate levels were quantified by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay. Vitamin B12 deficiency was defined as vitamin B12 < or = 300 pg/mL without folate deficiency (folate > 4 ng/mL). The prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency in metformin-treated type 2 diabetes patients was 9.5% (n = 76), and the mean vitamin B12 level was 662.5 +/- 246.7 pg/mL. Vitamin B12 deficient patients had longer duration of metformin use (P < 0.001) and higher daily metformin dose (P < 0.001) than non-deficient patients. Compared with daily metformin dose of < or = 1,000 mg, the adjusted odds ratio for 1,000-2,000 mg, and > or = 2,000 mg were 2.52 (95% CI, 1.27-4.99, P = 0.008) and 3.80 (95% CI, 1.82-7.92, P < 0.001). Compared with metformin use of < 4 yr, the adjusted odds ratios for 4-10 yr, and > or = 10 yr were 4.65 (95% CI, 2.36-9.16, P < 0.001) and 9.21 (95% CI, 3.38-25.11, P < 0.001), respectively. In conclusion, our study indicates that patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin should be screened for vitamin B12 deficiency, especially at higher dosages (> 1,000 mg) and longer durations (> or = 4 yr) of treatment.
Aged
;
Area Under Curve
;
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications/diagnosis/*drug therapy
;
Female
;
Folic Acid/blood
;
Humans
;
Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use
;
Immunoassay
;
Male
;
Metformin/adverse effects/*therapeutic use
;
Middle Aged
;
Odds Ratio
;
Patients
;
Prevalence
;
ROC Curve
;
Time Factors
;
Vitamin B 12/blood
;
Vitamin B 12 Deficiency/diagnosis/epidemiology/*etiology
9.Association of C(-106)T polymorphism in aldose reductase gene with diabetic retinopathy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Yu DENG ; Xiu-fen YANG ; Hong GU ; Apiradee LIM ; Munkhtulga ULZIIBAT ; Torkel SNELLINGEN ; Jun XU ; Kai MA ; Ning-pu LIU
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal 2014;29(1):1-6
OBJECTIVETo identify the possible association between C(-106)T polymorphism of the aldose reductase (ALR) gene and diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a cohort of Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
METHODSFrom November 2009 to September 2010, patients with T2DM were recruited and assigned to DR group or diabetic without retinopathy (DWR) group according to the duration of diabetes and the grading of 7-field fundus color photographs of both eyes. Genotypes of the C(-106)T polymorphism (rs759853) in ALR gene were analyzed using the MassARRAY genotyping system and an association study was performed.
RESULTSA total of 268 T2DM patients (129 in the DR group and 139 in the DWR group) were included in this study. No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in the age of diabetes onset (P=0.10) and gender (P=0.78). The success rate of genotyping for the study subjects was 99.6% (267/268), with one case of failure in the DR group. The frequencies of the T allele in the C(-106)T polymorphism were 16.0% (41/256) in the DR group and 19.4% (54/278) in the DWR group (P=0.36). There was no significant difference in the C(-106)T genotypes between the 2 groups (P=0.40). Compared with the wild-type genotype, odds ratio (OR) for the risk of DR was 0.7 (95% CI, 0.38-1.3) for the heterozygous CT genotype and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.18-3.25) for the homozygous TT genotype. The risk of DR was positively associated with microalbuminuria (OR=4.61; 95% CI, 2.34-9.05) and insulin therapy (OR=3.43; 95% CI, 1.94-6.09).
CONCLUSIONSMicroalbuminuria and insulin therapy are associated with the risk of DR in Chinese patients with T2DM. C(-106)T polymorphism of the ALR gene may not be significantly associated with DR in Chinese patients with T2DM.
Albuminuria ; epidemiology ; urine ; Aldehyde Reductase ; genetics ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; China ; Cohort Studies ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; complications ; drug therapy ; ethnology ; genetics ; Diabetic Retinopathy ; drug therapy ; ethnology ; etiology ; genetics ; Female ; Gene Frequency ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Insulin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Multivariate Analysis ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ; Risk
10.Comparison of Acarbose and Voglibose in Diabetes Patients Who Are Inadequately Controlled with Basal Insulin Treatment: Randomized, Parallel, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study.
Mi Young LEE ; Dong Seop CHOI ; Moon Kyu LEE ; Hyoung Woo LEE ; Tae Sun PARK ; Doo Man KIM ; Choon Hee CHUNG ; Duk Kyu KIM ; In Joo KIM ; Hak Chul JANG ; Yong Soo PARK ; Hyuk Sang KWON ; Seung Hun LEE ; Hee Kang SHIN
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2014;29(1):90-97
We studied the efficacy and safety of acarbose in comparison with voglibose in type 2 diabetes patients whose blood glucose levels were inadequately controlled with basal insulin alone or in combination with metformin (or a sulfonylurea). This study was a 24-week prospective, open-label, randomized, active-controlled multi-center study. Participants were randomized to receive either acarbose (n=59, 300 mg/day) or voglibose (n=62, 0.9 mg/day). The mean HbA1c at week 24 was significantly decreased approximately 0.7% from baseline in both acarbose (from 8.43% +/- 0.71% to 7.71% +/- 0.93%) and voglibose groups (from 8.38% +/- 0.73% to 7.68% +/- 0.94%). The mean fasting plasma glucose level and self-monitoring of blood glucose data from 1 hr before and after each meal were significantly decreased at week 24 in comparison to baseline in both groups. The levels 1 hr after dinner at week 24 were significantly decreased in the acarbose group (from 233.54 +/- 69.38 to 176.80 +/- 46.63 mg/dL) compared with the voglibose group (from 224.18 +/- 70.07 to 193.01 +/- 55.39 mg/dL). In conclusion, both acarbose and voglibose are efficacious and safe in patients with type 2 diabetes who are inadequately controlled with basal insulin. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00970528)
Acarbose/adverse effects/*therapeutic use
;
Blood Glucose
;
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood/*drug therapy
;
Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects/therapeutic use
;
Female
;
Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated/analysis
;
Humans
;
Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects/therapeutic use
;
Inositol/adverse effects/*analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use
;
Insulin/*blood/therapeutic use
;
Male
;
Metformin/therapeutic use
;
Middle Aged
;
Prospective Studies
;
alpha-Glucosidases/antagonists & inhibitors

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail