Objective Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist with sedative and analgesic properties but without respiratory depression effect and has been widely used in perioperative anesthesia. Here we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on maintaining perioperative hemodynamic stability in elderly patients.Methods PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data were searched for randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) on the application of dexmedetomidine in maintaining perioperative hemodynamic stability in elderly patients from their inception to September, 2021. The standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were employed to analyze the data. The random-effect model was used for the potential clinical inconsistency.Results A total of 12 RCTs with 833 elderly patients (dexmedetomidine group, 546 patients; control group, 287 patients) were included. There was no significant increase in perioperative heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in the dexmedetomidine group before and during the operation. In addition, the variations of hemodynamic indexes including HR, MAP, SBP (systolic blood pressure), and DBP were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the control group (HR: SMD = -0.87, 95% CI: -1.13 to -0.62; MAP: SMD = -1.12, 95% CI: -1.60 to -0.63; SBP: SMD = -1.27, 95% CI: -2.26 to -0.27; DBP: SMD = -0.96, 95% CI: -1.33 to -0.59). Subgroup analysis found that with the prolongation of 1.0 μg/kg dexmedetomidine infusion, the patient's heart rate declined in a time-dependent way.Conclusion Dexmedetomidine provides more stable hemodynamics during perioperative period in elderly patients. However, further well-conducted trials are required to assess the effective and safer doses of dexmedetomidine in elderly patients.
Humans ; Aged ; Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects* ; Hemodynamics ; Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology* ; Blood Pressure ; Heart Rate

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of sequential sedative and analgesic drugs in preventing delirium and withdrawal symptoms in children after ventilator weaning. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 61 children who were admitted and received mechanical ventilation support for ≥5 days in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of Dongguan Children's Hospital Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University from December 2019 to September 2021. The children were divided into a control group (30 children with no maintenance of analgesic and sedative drugs after ventilator weaning) and an observation group (31 children with sequential sedative and analgesic drugs maintained for 48 hours after ventilator weaning). The two groups were compared in terms of the Sophia Observation Withdrawal Symptoms Scale (SOS) score, the Pediatric Delirium Scale (PD) score, the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score, and the incidence rates of delirium or withdrawal symptoms at 24 and 72 hours after ventilator weaning. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of delirium at 24 hours and 72 hours after ventilator weaning between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the observation group had significantly lower incidence rate of withdrawal symptoms and scores of SOS, PD, and RASS scales at 24 hours and 72 hours after ventilator weaning (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Sequential sedation and analgesia after ventilator weaning can reduce the incidence of withdrawal symptoms within 72 hours after ventilator weaning, but it cannot reduce the incidence rate of delirium.
Analgesia ; Analgesics/therapeutic use* ; Child ; Delirium/prevention & control* ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use* ; Intensive Care Units, Pediatric ; Pain ; Prospective Studies ; Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects* ; Retrospective Studies ; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/prevention & control* ; Ventilator Weaning

Anesthesia ; Conscious Sedation ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects*

OBJECTIVES: To study the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride combined with midazolam in fiberoptic bronchoscopy in children. METHODS: A total of 118 children who planned to undergo fiberoptic bronchoscopy from September 2018 to February 2021 were enrolled. They were divided into a control group ( RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the observation group had significantly decreased MAP at T CONCLUSIONS Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride combined with midazolam is a safe and effective way to administer general anesthesia for fiberoptic bronchoscopy in children, which can ensure stable vital signs during examination, reduce intraoperative adverse reactions and postoperative agitation, shorten examination time, and increase amnesic effect.
Bronchi ; Bronchoscopy ; Child ; Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects* ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects* ; Midazolam ; Prospective Studies

Drug poisoning has a high incidence and serious consequences in medical institutions; its epidemiological characteristics also directly affect the changes in national laws and policies and the implementation of local management policies. Chinese statistics on drug-related abnormal death cases generally come from judicial appraisal centers and medical units. However, due to differences in work content and professional restrictions, there are differences in information management forms, which makes it difficult for appraisers to conduct a professional and systematic analysis of drug-related cases. This article focuses on the analysis of epidemiological characteristics of sedative-hypnotics and opioid painkillers and their exposure patterns in cases of poisoning death by analyzing the annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Center, combined with the characteristics of drug exposure in China.
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects* ; China/epidemiology* ; Databases, Factual ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Poison Control Centers ; United States

BACKGROUNDEtomidate (R-1-[1-ethylphenyl] imidazole-5-ethyl ester) is a widely used anesthetic drug that had been reported to contribute to cognitive deficits after general surgery. However, its underlying mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. In this study, we aimed to explore the neurobiological mechanisms of cognitive impairments that caused by etomidate.

METHODSA total of 30 Sprague-Dawley rats were used and divided into two groups randomly to receive a single injection of etomidate or vehicle. Then, the rats' spatial memory ability and neuronal survival were evaluated using the Morris water maze test and Nissl staining, respectively. Furthermore, we analyzed levels of oxidative stress, as well as cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate response element-binding (CREB) protein phosphorylation and immediate early gene (IEG, including Arc, c-fos, and Egr1) expression levels using Western blot analysis.

RESULTSCompared with vehicle-treated rats, the etomidate-treated rats displayed impaired spatial learning (day 4: 27.26 ± 5.33 s vs. 35.52 ± 3.88 s, t = 2.988, P = 0.0068; day 5: 15.84 ± 4.02 s vs. 30.67 ± 4.23 s, t = 3.013, P = 0.0057; day 6: 9.47 ± 2.35 s vs. 25.66 ± 4.16 s, t = 3.567, P = 0.0036) and memory ability (crossing times: 4.40 ± 1.18 vs. 2.06 ± 0.80, t = 2.896, P = 0.0072; duration: 34.00 ± 4.24 s vs. 18.07 ± 4.79 s, t = 3.023, P = 0.0053; total swimming distance: 40.73 ± 3.45 cm vs. 27.40 ± 6.56 cm, t = 2.798, P = 0.0086) but no neuronal death. Furthermore, etomidate did not cause oxidative stress or deficits in CREB phosphorylation. The levels of multiple IEGs (Arc: vehicle treated rats 100%, etomidate treated rats 86%, t = 2.876, P = 0.0086; c-fos: Vehicle treated rats 100%, etomidate treated rats 72%, t = 2.996, P = 0.0076; Egr1: Vehicle treated rats 100%, etomidate treated rats 58%, t = 3.011, P = 0.0057) were significantly reduced in hippocampi of etomidate-treated rats.

CONCLUSIONOur data suggested that etomidate might induce memory impairment in rats via inhibition of IEG expression.

Anesthesia ; adverse effects ; Animals ; Etomidate ; adverse effects ; Hippocampus ; drug effects ; metabolism ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; adverse effects ; Immediate-Early Proteins ; genetics ; metabolism ; Maze Learning ; drug effects ; Memory Disorders ; chemically induced ; genetics ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley

Tapentadol is a novel oral analgesic with a dual mode of action as an agonist of the µ-opioid receptor (MOR), and as a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (NRI) all in a single molecule. Immediate release (IR) tapentadol shows its analgesic effect quickly, at around 30 minutes. Its MOR agonistic action produces acute nociceptive pain relief; its role as an NRI brings about chronic neuropathic pain relief. Absorption is rapid, with a mean maximal serum concentration at 1.25-1.5 h after oral intake. It is present primarily in the form of conjugated metabolites after glucuronidation, and excretes rapidly and completely via the kidneys. The most common adverse reactions are nausea, dizziness, vomiting, and somnolence. Constipation is more common in use of the ER formulation. Precautions against concomitant use of central nervous system depressants, including sedatives, hypnotics, tranquilizers, general anesthetics, phenothiazines, other opioids, and alcohol, or use of tapentadol within 14 days of the cessation of monoamine oxidase inhibitors, are advised. The safety and efficacy have not been established for use during pregnancy, labor, and delivery, or for nursing mothers, pediatric patients less than 18 years of age, and cases of severe renal impairment and severe hepatic impairment. The major concerns for tapentadol are abuse, addiction, seeking behavior, withdrawal, and physical dependence. The presumed problem for use of tapentadol is to control the ratio of MOR agonist and NRI. In conclusion, tapentadol produces both nociceptive and neuropathic pain relief, but with worries about abuse and dependence.
Absorption ; Acute Pain ; Analgesics, Opioid ; Anesthetics, General ; Behavior, Addictive ; Birds* ; Central Nervous System Depressants ; Chronic Pain ; Constipation ; Dizziness ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Humans ; Hyperalgesia ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Kidney ; Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors ; Mothers ; Nausea ; Neuralgia ; Nociceptive Pain ; Norepinephrine ; Nursing ; Phenothiazines ; Pregnancy ; Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha ; Receptors, Opioid, mu ; Vomiting

PURPOSE: The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is increasing. However, studies on the prevalence of ADRs in children are rare. The aim of this study was to investigate the causative drugs and clinical features of ADRs for children in a tertiary university hospital of Korea. METHODS: We retrospectively collected ADRs by a computerized self-reporting system in Asan Medical Center. ADRs of children under the age 18 were collected from January 2005 to August 2015, and we analyzed only ADRs containing current symptoms among total ADR data. RESULTS: A total of 1,408 ADR cases were reported, There were 764 male (54.3%) and 644 female patients (45.7%), and the mean age was 11.5±5.8 years (range, 0–18 years). Antibiotics (n=479, 34.0%) were the most common causative drugs, followed by tramadol (n=173, 12.3%), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) and acetylsalicylic acid (n=103, 7.3%), narcotics (n=91, 6.5%), antineoplastics (n=87, 6.2%), and sedatives (n=82, 5.8%). The most common clinical features were skin manifestations (n=500, 34.4%). Gastrointestinal symptoms (n=435, 29.9%) were the second most common clinical features, followed by neuropsychiatric symptoms (n=155, 10.7%) and respiratory symptoms (n=123, 8.5%). Among antibiotics, glycopeptides (n=110, 23.0%), third-generation cephalosporins (n=83, 17.3%), and penicillin/β-lactamase inhibitors (n=60, 12.7%) were the most frequently reported causative drugs. CONCLUSION: Antibiotics were the most reported common causative drugs of ADRs in children, followed by tramadol, NSAID, and narcortics. Compared with adults, the prevalence of contrast medium-induced ADR was lower in children with a higher prevalence of sedative-associated ADR. Greater attention to possible ADRs in children is needed among medical personnel.
Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal ; Antineoplastic Agents ; Aspirin ; Cephalosporins ; Child ; Chungcheongnam-do ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions* ; Female ; Glycopeptides ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Incidence ; Korea ; Male ; Narcotics ; Prevalence ; Retrospective Studies ; Skin Manifestations ; Tramadol

Transurethral resection has been the gold standard in the operative management of benign prostatic hyperplasia and bladder tumor; however, it is associated with several complications that may cause patient discomfort. We evaluated the usefulness of continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation, hemodynamic status, and recovery profiles in patients undergoing elective surgery by a randomized clinical trial. Sixty patients aged 30 to 80 yr who were scheduled for elective transurethral resection under general anesthesia were included in this study. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups (control group, group C; dexmedetomidine group, group D). A total of 60 male patients were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to group C (n=30) or group D (n=30). The quality of emergence in group D was marked by a significantly lower incidence of emergence agitation than in group C (P=0.015). Patients in group D therefore felt less discomfort induced by the indwelling Foley catheter than those in group C (P=0.022). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to side effects including bradycardia (P=0.085), hypotension (P=0.640), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (P=0.389). Our study showed that intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion effectively reduced the incidence and intensity of emergence agitation and catheter-induced bladder discomfort without delaying recovery time and discharge time, thus providing smooth emergence during the recovery period in patients undergoing transurethral resection (Clinical Trial Registry No. KT0001683).
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Blood Pressure ; Bradycardia/etiology ; Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Hypotension/etiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nausea/etiology ; Prostatic Hyperplasia/*surgery ; Psychomotor Agitation/*drug therapy ; *Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; Vomiting/etiology

PURPOSETo evaluate midazolam sequential with dexmedetomidine for agitated patients undergoing weaning to implement light sedation in ICU.

METHODSThis randomized, prospective study was conducted in Tianjin Third Central Hospital, China. Using a sealed-envelope method, the patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (40 patients per group). Each patient of group A received an initial loading dose of midazolam at 0.3-3mg/kg·h 24 h before extubation, followed by an infusion of dexmedetomidine at a rate of 0.2-1 μg/kg·h until extubation. Each patient of group B received midazolam at a dose of 0.3-3 mg/kg·h until extubation. The dose of sedation was regulated according to RASS sedative scores maintaining in the range of -2-1. All patients were continuously monitored for 60 min after extubation. During the course, heart rate (HR), mean artery pressure (MAP), extubation time, adverse reactions, ICU stay, and hospital stay were observed and recorded continuously at the following time points: 24 h before extubation (T1), 12 h before extubation (T2), extubation (T3), 30 min after extubation (T4), 60 min after extubation (T5).

RESULTSBoth groups reached the goal of sedation needed for ICU patients. Dexmedetomidine was associated with a significant increase in extubation quality compared with midazolam, reflected in the prevalence of delirium after extubation (20% (8/40) vs 45% (18/40)), respectively (p= 0.017). There were no clinically significant decreases in HR and MAP after infusing dexmedetomidine or midazolam. In the group A, HR was not significantly increased after extubation; however, in the group B, HR was significantly increased compared with the preextubation values (p < 0.05). HR was significantly higher in the group B compared with the group A at 30 and 60 min after extubation (both, p <0.05). Compared with preextubation values, MAP was significantly increased at extubation in the group B (p < 0.05) and MAP was significantly higher at T3, T4, T5 in the group B than group A (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in extubation time ((3.0 ± 1.5) d vs (4.3 ± 2.2) d, p < 0.05), ICU stay ((5.4 ± 2.1) d vs (8.0 ± 1.4) d, p < 0.05), hospital stay ((10.1 ± 3.0) d vs (15.3 ± 2.6) d, p <0.05) between group A and B.

CONCLUSIONMidazolam sequential with dexmedetomidine can reach the goal of sedation for ICU agitated patients, meanwhile it can maintain the respiratory and circulation parameters and reduce adverse reactions.

Adult ; Aged ; Critical Care ; methods ; Delirium ; drug therapy ; etiology ; Dexmedetomidine ; administration & dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; administration & dosage ; Intensive Care Units ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Midazolam ; administration & dosage ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Respiration, Artificial ; adverse effects ; methods ; Risk Assessment ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventilator Weaning ; adverse effects ; psychology