Objectives: To propose age group classification criteria for efficient tooth loss management by ana-lyzing the distribution of tooth loss in Korean adults by age group and causes of tooth loss. In addi-tion, to determine the efficacy of a Significant Tooth Loss index. Methods: The study included 13,199 adults who participated in the seventh Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2016-2018). The mean number of missing teeth was compared by classifying the ages into 10- and 5-year intervals. Based on this analysis, the distribution of missing teeth was determined by classifying the age groups into 15-year intervals. Subsequently, the causes of tooth loss by age group at 15-year intervals and the efficacy of the Significant Tooth Loss Index were determined. Results: Classification at 5-year age intervals was more appropriate for analyzing changes in the distribution of missing teeth than classification at 10-year age intervals. However, establishing a public oral health program for the management of tooth loss on a 5-year or 10-year basis is im-practical. Therefore, a classification method with 15-year age intervals was proposed, in which the groups were young (19-34 years), middle-aged (35-49 years), older adult (50-64 years), and elderly (65 years or older). Although the criteria for the Significant Tooth Loss Index were appropri-ate for the young, older adults, and elderly groups, modifications were required for the middle-aged group. Conclusions Age-based oral health programs for adults should be promoted to prevent tooth loss by classifying adults into different age groups based on their clinical characteristics.

Objectives: To propose age group classification criteria for efficient tooth loss management by ana-lyzing the distribution of tooth loss in Korean adults by age group and causes of tooth loss. In addi-tion, to determine the efficacy of a Significant Tooth Loss index. Methods: The study included 13,199 adults who participated in the seventh Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2016-2018). The mean number of missing teeth was compared by classifying the ages into 10- and 5-year intervals. Based on this analysis, the distribution of missing teeth was determined by classifying the age groups into 15-year intervals. Subsequently, the causes of tooth loss by age group at 15-year intervals and the efficacy of the Significant Tooth Loss Index were determined. Results: Classification at 5-year age intervals was more appropriate for analyzing changes in the distribution of missing teeth than classification at 10-year age intervals. However, establishing a public oral health program for the management of tooth loss on a 5-year or 10-year basis is im-practical. Therefore, a classification method with 15-year age intervals was proposed, in which the groups were young (19-34 years), middle-aged (35-49 years), older adult (50-64 years), and elderly (65 years or older). Although the criteria for the Significant Tooth Loss Index were appropri-ate for the young, older adults, and elderly groups, modifications were required for the middle-aged group. Conclusions Age-based oral health programs for adults should be promoted to prevent tooth loss by classifying adults into different age groups based on their clinical characteristics.

Objectives: To propose age group classification criteria for efficient tooth loss management by ana-lyzing the distribution of tooth loss in Korean adults by age group and causes of tooth loss. In addi-tion, to determine the efficacy of a Significant Tooth Loss index. Methods: The study included 13,199 adults who participated in the seventh Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2016-2018). The mean number of missing teeth was compared by classifying the ages into 10- and 5-year intervals. Based on this analysis, the distribution of missing teeth was determined by classifying the age groups into 15-year intervals. Subsequently, the causes of tooth loss by age group at 15-year intervals and the efficacy of the Significant Tooth Loss Index were determined. Results: Classification at 5-year age intervals was more appropriate for analyzing changes in the distribution of missing teeth than classification at 10-year age intervals. However, establishing a public oral health program for the management of tooth loss on a 5-year or 10-year basis is im-practical. Therefore, a classification method with 15-year age intervals was proposed, in which the groups were young (19-34 years), middle-aged (35-49 years), older adult (50-64 years), and elderly (65 years or older). Although the criteria for the Significant Tooth Loss Index were appropri-ate for the young, older adults, and elderly groups, modifications were required for the middle-aged group. Conclusions Age-based oral health programs for adults should be promoted to prevent tooth loss by classifying adults into different age groups based on their clinical characteristics.

Objectives: To propose age group classification criteria for efficient tooth loss management by ana-lyzing the distribution of tooth loss in Korean adults by age group and causes of tooth loss. In addi-tion, to determine the efficacy of a Significant Tooth Loss index. Methods: The study included 13,199 adults who participated in the seventh Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2016-2018). The mean number of missing teeth was compared by classifying the ages into 10- and 5-year intervals. Based on this analysis, the distribution of missing teeth was determined by classifying the age groups into 15-year intervals. Subsequently, the causes of tooth loss by age group at 15-year intervals and the efficacy of the Significant Tooth Loss Index were determined. Results: Classification at 5-year age intervals was more appropriate for analyzing changes in the distribution of missing teeth than classification at 10-year age intervals. However, establishing a public oral health program for the management of tooth loss on a 5-year or 10-year basis is im-practical. Therefore, a classification method with 15-year age intervals was proposed, in which the groups were young (19-34 years), middle-aged (35-49 years), older adult (50-64 years), and elderly (65 years or older). Although the criteria for the Significant Tooth Loss Index were appropri-ate for the young, older adults, and elderly groups, modifications were required for the middle-aged group. Conclusions Age-based oral health programs for adults should be promoted to prevent tooth loss by classifying adults into different age groups based on their clinical characteristics.

Background: Acute deterioration of patients in general wards often leads to major adverse events (MAEs), including unplanned intensive care unit transfers, cardiac arrest, or death. Traditional early warning scores (EWSs) have shown limited predictive accuracy, with frequent false positives. We conducted a prospective observational external validation study of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based EWS, the VitalCare - Major Adverse Event Score (VC-MAES), at a tertiary medical center in the Republic of Korea. Methods: Adult patients from general wards, including internal medicine (IM) and obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN)—the latter were rarely investigated in prior AI-based EWS studies—were included. The VC-MAES predictions were compared with National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) predictions using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and logistic regression for baseline EWS values. False-positives per true positive (FPpTP) were assessed based on the power threshold. Results: Of 6,039 encounters, 217 (3.6%) had MAEs (IM: 9.5%, OBGYN: 0.26%). Six hours prior to MAEs, the VC-MAES achieved an AUROC of 0.918 and an AUPRC of 0.352, including the OBGYN subgroup (AUROC, 0.964; AUPRC, 0.388), outperforming the NEWS (0.797 and 0.124) and MEWS (0.722 and 0.079). The FPpTP was reduced by up to 71%. Baseline VC-MAES was strongly associated with MAEs (P<0.001). Conclusions The VC-MAES significantly outperformed traditional EWSs in predicting adverse events in general ward patients. The robust performance and lower FPpTP suggest that broader adoption of the VC-MAES may improve clinical efficiency and resource allocation in general wards.

Background: s/Aims: Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021. Methods: Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop. Results: In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing. Conclusions The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify factors related to severe tooth loss among sociodemographic, oral health behavior, and systemic disease factors. Methods: This study used raw data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2016-2018), which included 13,199 adults aged ≥19 years. The severe tooth loss was defined as a group with more than a third quartile (top 1/4) of the total number of tooth loss. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the correlations. Results: Sociodemographic factors had a were more factors significantly correlated on severe tooth loss than oral health behavior-related and systemic disease-related factors. Among the assessed sociodemographic factors, age, resident area, household income, education level, and household type were correlated with severe tooth loss, with education level having the greatest impact. Among the oral health behavior-related factors, smoking had the greatest impact on severe tooth loss; tooth brushing frequency was also an important factor. Among the systemic disease-related factors, only diabetes incidence was associated with severe tooth loss. Conclusions Promoting smoking cessation, proper tooth brushing, and diabetes management could reduce severe tooth loss. Moreover, sociodemographic factors should be taken into account while planning oral health promotion projects.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the applicability of the Significant Tooth Loss index as a new statistical indicator and to analyze the socio-economic factors of the participants included in the Significant Tooth Loss. Methods: This study used raw data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2016-2018). The survey included 13,199 adults aged ≥19 years. The Significant Tooth Loss was defined as a group with more than a third quartile (top 1/4) of the total number of tooth loss. The Significant Tooth Loss index was defined as the mean tooth loss in the group. Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the socio-economic factors of the Significant Tooth Loss, and absolute and relative differences were calculated to confirm oral health inequality. Results: Among overall tooth loss in adults, the proportion of tooth loss in the Significant Tooth Loss was 83.8%. The Significant Tooth Loss index was a useful indicator to determine oral health statistics. Socio-economic factors that were associated with significant tooth loss were age, gender, region, household income, and education. Oral health inequality was observed based on household income and education. Conclusions The Significant Tooth Loss index should be used to measure the level of oral health. Measures to reduce tooth loss should be investigated.

Objective: Dysphagia is a common clinical condition characterized by difficulty in swallowing. It is sub-classified into oropharyngeal dysphagia, which refers to problems in the mouth and pharynx, and esophageal dysphagia, which refers to problems in the esophageal body and esophagogastric junction. Dysphagia can have a significant negative impact one’s physical health and quality of life as its severity increases. Therefore, proper assessment and management of dysphagia are critical for improving swallowing function and preventing complications. Thus a guideline was developed to provide evidence-based recommendations for assessment and management in patients with dysphagia. Methods: Nineteen key questions on dysphagia were developed. These questions dealt with various aspects of problems related to dysphagia, including assessment, management, and complications. A literature search for relevant articles was conducted using Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and one domestic database of KoreaMed, until April 2021. The level of evidence and recommendation grade were established according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Results: Early screening and assessment of videofluoroscopic swallowing were recommended for assessing the presence of dysphagia. Therapeutic methods, such as tongue and pharyngeal muscle strengthening exercises and neuromuscular electrical stimulation with swallowing therapy, were effective in improving swallowing function and quality of life in patients with dysphagia. Nutritional intervention and an oral care program were also recommended. Conclusion This guideline presents recommendations for the assessment and management of patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia, including rehabilitative strategies.

Purpose: This single-arm phase II trial investigate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Materials and Methods: Patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes were enrolled. Patients received S-1 (40-60 mg depending on patient’s body surface area, twice a day, day 1-14) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2, day 1) in 3 weeks cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor 1.1. Secondary endpoints included time-to-progression (TTP), duration-of-response (DoR), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Results: A total of 87 patients were enrolled from 11 institutions in Korea. Hormone receptor was positive in 54 (62.1%) patients and six (6.9%) had human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive disease. Forty-eight patients (85.1%) had visceral metastasis and 74 (55.2%) had more than three sites of metastases. The ORR of SOX regimen was 38.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.9 to 50.0) with a median TTP of 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 6.9). Median DoR and OS were 10.3 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 15.1) and 19.4 (95% CI, not estimated) months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was reported in 28 patients (32.1%) and thrombocytopenia was observed in 23 patients (26.6%). Conclusion This phase II study showed that SOX regimen is a reasonable option in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes.