Bipolar disorder is the main approved indication of mood stabilizers. In clinical practice, however, they are commonly used for 1) patients showing aggressive behavior regardless of the diagnosis and 2) schizophrenia patients. A literature review was performed to find evidence supporting this clinical “common sense.” The authors found no sufficient evidence supporting the efficacy of mood stabilizers either for aggressive behavior or for schizophrenia. The authors suggest that off-label use of mood stabilizers should be based on judicious clinical judgment, based on the understanding “what particular treatment for this patient does the behavior warrant at this time?”

Bipolar disorder is the main approved indication of mood stabilizers. In clinical practice, however, they are commonly used for 1) patients showing aggressive behavior regardless of the diagnosis and 2) schizophrenia patients. A literature review was performed to find evidence supporting this clinical “common sense.” The authors found no sufficient evidence supporting the efficacy of mood stabilizers either for aggressive behavior or for schizophrenia. The authors suggest that off-label use of mood stabilizers should be based on judicious clinical judgment, based on the understanding “what particular treatment for this patient does the behavior warrant at this time?”

Bipolar disorder is the main approved indication of mood stabilizers. In clinical practice, however, they are commonly used for 1) patients showing aggressive behavior regardless of the diagnosis and 2) schizophrenia patients. A literature review was performed to find evidence supporting this clinical “common sense.” The authors found no sufficient evidence supporting the efficacy of mood stabilizers either for aggressive behavior or for schizophrenia. The authors suggest that off-label use of mood stabilizers should be based on judicious clinical judgment, based on the understanding “what particular treatment for this patient does the behavior warrant at this time?”

Bipolar disorder is the main approved indication of mood stabilizers. In clinical practice, however, they are commonly used for 1) patients showing aggressive behavior regardless of the diagnosis and 2) schizophrenia patients. A literature review was performed to find evidence supporting this clinical “common sense.” The authors found no sufficient evidence supporting the efficacy of mood stabilizers either for aggressive behavior or for schizophrenia. The authors suggest that off-label use of mood stabilizers should be based on judicious clinical judgment, based on the understanding “what particular treatment for this patient does the behavior warrant at this time?”

Objective: This study aimed to validate the risk stratification system (RSS) and biopsy criteria for cervical lymph nodes (LNs) proposed by the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included a consecutive series of preoperative patients with thyroid cancer who underwent LN biopsy, ultrasound (US), and computed tomography (CT) between December 2006 and June 2015. LNs were categorized as probably benign, indeterminate, or suspicious according to the current US- and CT-based RSS and the size thresholds for cervical LN biopsy as suggested by the KSThR. The diagnostic performance and unnecessary biopsy rates were calculated. Results: A total of 277 LNs (53.1% metastatic) in 228 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 47.4 years ± 14) were analyzed. In US, the malignancy risks were significantly different among the three categories (all P < 0.001); however, CTdetected probably benign and indeterminate LNs showed similarly low malignancy risks (P = 0.468). The combined US + CT criteria stratified the malignancy risks among the three categories (all P < 0.001) and reduced the proportion of indeterminate LNs (from 20.6% to 14.4%) and the malignancy risk in the indeterminate LNs (from 31.6% to 12.5%) compared with US alone. In all image-based classifications, nodal size did not affect the malignancy risks (short diameter [SD] ≤ 5 mm LNs vs. SD > 5 mm LNs, P ≥ 0.177). The criteria covering only suspicious LNs showed higher specificity and lower unnecessary biopsy rates than the current criteria, while maintaining sensitivity in all imaging modalities. Conclusion Integrative evaluation of US and CT helps in reducing the proportion of indeterminate LNs and the malignancy risk among them. Nodal size did not affect the malignancy risk of LNs, and the addition of indeterminate LNs to biopsy candidates did not have an advantage in detecting LN metastases in all imaging modalities.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the swallowing problems after a primary resection in patients with tongue cancer. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with primary tongue cancer, who underwent a glossectomy and had undergone a Video Fluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS) prior to surgery in a university hospital between January 2010 and May 2015, were included retrospectively. The clinical and swallowing features, including the VFSS parameters before and after surgery, were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 38 patients, 33 patients were T1 and T2 stage. Thirty-one, six and one patient underwent a partial glossectomy, hemiglossectomy, and total glossectomy, respectively. More than ninety percent of the patients had a selective neck dissection. All the patients were on a regular diet before surgery and showed no penetration or aspiration on the VFSS. Immediately after surgery, 33 patients (87%) had to change to non-oral feeding. At discharge, 8 patients (21%) maintained non-oral feeding, and 30 patients ate a limited diet. In a telephone survey (mean 19 months after surgery), among the 25 survey participants, 24 patients (96%) reported no problems with their regular diet. CONCLUSION: In tongue cancer patients with low Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stages, a primary resection of tongue cancer did not cause statistically significant dysphagia after surgery. Although many patients had to change their diet to limited or non-oral feeding immediately after surgery, almost all patients improved and could eat a regular diet after the long term follow up.
Deglutition ; Deglutition Disorders* ; Diet ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glossectomy ; Head and Neck Neoplasms ; Humans ; Joints ; Neck Dissection ; Retrospective Studies ; Telephone ; Tongue Neoplasms* ; Tongue*

PURPOSE: Few studies have reported on predicting prognosis using myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) during coronary artery disease (CAD) treatment. Therefore, we aimed to assess the clinical implications of myocardial perfusion SPECT during follow-up for CAD treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 1153 patients who had abnormal results at index SPECT and underwent follow-up SPECT at intervals ≥6 months. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were compared in overall and 346 patient pairs after propensity-score (PS) matching. RESULTS: Abnormal SPECT was associated with a significantly higher risk of MACE in comparison with normal SPECT over the median of 6.3 years (32.3% vs. 19.8%; unadjusted p<0.001). After PS matching, abnormal SPECT posed a higher risk of MACE [32.1% vs. 19.1%; adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=1.73; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.27–2.34; p<0.001] than normal SPECT. After PS matching, the risk of MACE was still higher in patients with abnormal follow-up SPECT in the revascularization group (30.2% vs. 17.9%; adjusted HR=1.73; 95% CI=1.15–2.59; p=0.008). Low ejection fraction [odds ratio (OR)=5.33; 95% CI=3.39–8.37; p<0.001] and medical treatment (OR=2.68; 95% CI=1.93–3.72; p<0.001) were independent clinical predictors of having an abnormal result on follow-up SPECT. CONCLUSION: Abnormal follow-up SPECT appears to be associated with a high risk of MACE during CAD treatment. Follow-up SPECT may play a potential role in identifying patients at high cardiovascular risk.
Coronary Artery Disease* ; Coronary Vessels* ; Follow-Up Studies* ; Humans ; Ischemia* ; Perfusion* ; Prognosis ; Tomography, Emission-Computed* ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery appointed a Task Force to develop clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer. This Task Force conducted a systematic search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases to identify relevant articles, using search terms selected according to the key questions. Evidence-based recommendations were then created on the basis of these articles. An external expert review and Delphi questionnaire were applied to reach consensus regarding the recommendations. The resulting guidelines focus on the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer with the assumption that surgery is the selected treatment modality after a multidisciplinary discussion in any context. These guidelines do not, therefore, address non-surgical treatment such as radiation therapy or chemotherapy. The committee developed 62 evidence-based recommendations in 32 categories intended to assist clinicians during management of patients with laryngeal cancer and patients with laryngeal cancer, and counselors and health policy-makers.
Advisory Committees ; Consensus ; Counseling ; Drug Therapy ; Glottis ; Humans ; Laryngeal Neoplasms* ; Neck*