Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and immunological outcomes of low-dose cow’s milk oral immunotherapy (CM OIT) in school-aged children and adolescents with severe, persistent cow’s milk allergy (CMA), a group typically considered at a high risk for OIT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 12 patients (median age, 11.4 years) with immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated CMA, who underwent individualized low-dose CM OIT in the outpatient setting at a single tertiary hospital. Baseline and longitudinal clinical and immunological data, including casein-specific IgE and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) levels, were analyzed. Patients were classified as either desensitized or unsuccessful based on treatment outcomes. Results: Of the 12 patients with severe CMA, 6 achieved desensitization up to the target dose, while the remaining 6 discontinued treatment because of intolerance or poor adherence. The desensitized and unsuccessful groups showed no significant differences in baseline age, OIT starting dose, or serum casein-specific IgE level. Immunological evaluation revealed a significantly greater increase in serum casein-specific IgG4 (0.87 vs. -0.37 mg/L, P = 0.004) and a significantly lower natural log-transformed fold change in the IgE/IgG4 ratio (-1.38 vs. 0.44, P = 0.008) in the desensitized group. None of the patients required epinephrine during OIT, and adverse events were generally mild. Conclusion In selected high-risk pediatric populations with severe CMA, outpatient-based low-dose OIT using individualized flexible protocols may provide a relatively safe approach that improves tolerability and adherence. Increased casein-specific IgG4 levels and a reduced casein-specific IgE/IgG4 ratio may serve as valuable biomarkers for treatment response.

Purpose: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are frequently employed to counteract the detrimental effects of proteinuria on glomerular diseases. However, the effects of ARBs remain poorly examined in pediatric patients with immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of losartan, an ARB, in pediatric IgA nephropathy with proteinuria. Methods: This prospective, single-arm, multicenter study included children with IgA nephropathy exhibiting proteinuria. Changes in proteinuria, blood pressure, and kidney function were prospectively evaluated before and 4 and 24 weeks after losartan administration. The primary endpoint was the difference in proteinuria between baseline and 24 weeks. Results: In total, 29 patients were enrolled and received losartan treatment. The full analysis set included 28 patients who received losartan at least once and had pre- and post-urinary protein to creatinine ratio measurements (n=28). The per-protocol analysis group included 22 patients who completed all scheduled visits without any serious violations during the study period. In both groups, the mean log (urine protein to creatinine ratio) value decreased significantly at 6 months. After 24 weeks, the urinary protein to creatinine ratio decreased by more than 50% in approximately 40% of the patients. The glomerular filtration rate was not significantly altered during the observation period. Conclusions Losartan decreased proteinuria without decreasing kidney function in patients with IgA nephropathy over 24 weeks. Losartan could be safely employed to reduce proteinuria in this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov trial registration (NCT0223277)

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a neuroinflammatory disease mediated by autoantibodies against the NMDAR, typically presenting with psychiatric symptoms, cognitive dysfunction, and motor dysfunction. These neuropsychiatric symptoms may be mimicked by drug abuse, and the development of anti-NMDAR encephalitis may be triggered by certain substance use. Here we report a case of anti-NMDAR encephalitis who developed neuropsychiatric symptoms after illicit substance use, the first report in Korea.

Purpose: We investigated the consistent efficacy and safety of eflapegrastim, a novel long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), in Koreans and Asians compared with the pooled population of two global phase 3 trials. Materials and Methods: Two phase 3 trials (ADVANCE and RECOVER) evaluated the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose eflapegrastim (13.2 mg/0.6 mL [3.6 mg G-CSF equivalent]) compared to pegfilgrastim (6 mg based on G-CSF) in breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant docetaxel/cyclophosphamide. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of eflapegrastim compared to pegfilgrastim in mean duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in cycle 1, in Korean and Asian subpopulations. Results: Among a total of 643 patients randomized to eflapegrastim (n=314) or pegfilgrastim (n=329), 54 Asians (29 to eflapegrastim and 25 to pegfilgrastim) including 28 Koreans (14 to both eflapegrastim and pegfilgrastim) were enrolled. The primary endpoint, DSN in cycle 1 in the eflapegrastim arm was non-inferior to the pegfilgrastim arm in Koreans and Asians. The DSN difference between the eflapegrastim and pegfilgrastim arms was consistent across populations: –0.120 days (95% confidence interval [CI], –0.227 to –0.016), –0.288 (95% CI, –0.714 to 0.143), and –0.267 (95% CI, –0.697 to 0.110) for pooled population, Koreans and Asians, respectively. There were few treatment-related adverse events that caused discontinuation of eflapegrastim (1.9%) or pegfilgrastim (1.5%) in total and no notable trends or differences across patient populations. Conclusion This study may suggest that eflapegrastim showed non-inferior efficacy and similar safety compared to pegfilgrastim in Koreans and Asians, consistently with those of pooled population.