Objectives: Clinical examination is considered the gold standard for monitoring periodontal disease. However, it requires significant resources. Self-reported assessment serves as a useful method for screening periodontal diseases in different cohorts. We aimed to evaluate the validity of a selfreported questionnaire for the surveillance of periodontal disease among Korean adults. Methods: The participants were 120 patients aged ≥19 years old who were examined using the community periodontal index. The questionnaire comprised 10 questions, translated from an English-version, that was used to identify periodontitis. The predictiveness of the measures from the self-reported questions was assessed by multivariable logistic regression modeling using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: For item 3, “Have you ever had treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, the adjusted odds ratio was 4.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-17.67; and AUROC, 0.82. The sensitivity and specificity of this item were, 0.93 and 0.42, respectively. In Kendall’s Tau-b correlation analysis, items 1 (“Have gum disease”) and 10 Periodontal treatment and surgery under anesthesia”) had the strongest correlations with item 3, with correlation coefficients of 0.48 and 0.42, respectively. A model combining items 1, 3, and 10, adjusted for demographic variables, resulted in an AUROC of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.86, and specificity of 0.26. Conclusions An adapted Korean version (“Have gum disease”, “Treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, and “periodontal treatment under anesthesia”) of the self-reported questionnaire demonstrated its capacity for epidemiological surveillance of periodontal disease in this study cohort.

Objectives: Clinical examination is considered the gold standard for monitoring periodontal disease. However, it requires significant resources. Self-reported assessment serves as a useful method for screening periodontal diseases in different cohorts. We aimed to evaluate the validity of a selfreported questionnaire for the surveillance of periodontal disease among Korean adults. Methods: The participants were 120 patients aged ≥19 years old who were examined using the community periodontal index. The questionnaire comprised 10 questions, translated from an English-version, that was used to identify periodontitis. The predictiveness of the measures from the self-reported questions was assessed by multivariable logistic regression modeling using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: For item 3, “Have you ever had treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, the adjusted odds ratio was 4.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-17.67; and AUROC, 0.82. The sensitivity and specificity of this item were, 0.93 and 0.42, respectively. In Kendall’s Tau-b correlation analysis, items 1 (“Have gum disease”) and 10 Periodontal treatment and surgery under anesthesia”) had the strongest correlations with item 3, with correlation coefficients of 0.48 and 0.42, respectively. A model combining items 1, 3, and 10, adjusted for demographic variables, resulted in an AUROC of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.86, and specificity of 0.26. Conclusions An adapted Korean version (“Have gum disease”, “Treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, and “periodontal treatment under anesthesia”) of the self-reported questionnaire demonstrated its capacity for epidemiological surveillance of periodontal disease in this study cohort.

Objectives: Clinical examination is considered the gold standard for monitoring periodontal disease. However, it requires significant resources. Self-reported assessment serves as a useful method for screening periodontal diseases in different cohorts. We aimed to evaluate the validity of a selfreported questionnaire for the surveillance of periodontal disease among Korean adults. Methods: The participants were 120 patients aged ≥19 years old who were examined using the community periodontal index. The questionnaire comprised 10 questions, translated from an English-version, that was used to identify periodontitis. The predictiveness of the measures from the self-reported questions was assessed by multivariable logistic regression modeling using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: For item 3, “Have you ever had treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, the adjusted odds ratio was 4.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-17.67; and AUROC, 0.82. The sensitivity and specificity of this item were, 0.93 and 0.42, respectively. In Kendall’s Tau-b correlation analysis, items 1 (“Have gum disease”) and 10 Periodontal treatment and surgery under anesthesia”) had the strongest correlations with item 3, with correlation coefficients of 0.48 and 0.42, respectively. A model combining items 1, 3, and 10, adjusted for demographic variables, resulted in an AUROC of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.86, and specificity of 0.26. Conclusions An adapted Korean version (“Have gum disease”, “Treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, and “periodontal treatment under anesthesia”) of the self-reported questionnaire demonstrated its capacity for epidemiological surveillance of periodontal disease in this study cohort.

Objectives: Clinical examination is considered the gold standard for monitoring periodontal disease. However, it requires significant resources. Self-reported assessment serves as a useful method for screening periodontal diseases in different cohorts. We aimed to evaluate the validity of a selfreported questionnaire for the surveillance of periodontal disease among Korean adults. Methods: The participants were 120 patients aged ≥19 years old who were examined using the community periodontal index. The questionnaire comprised 10 questions, translated from an English-version, that was used to identify periodontitis. The predictiveness of the measures from the self-reported questions was assessed by multivariable logistic regression modeling using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: For item 3, “Have you ever had treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, the adjusted odds ratio was 4.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-17.67; and AUROC, 0.82. The sensitivity and specificity of this item were, 0.93 and 0.42, respectively. In Kendall’s Tau-b correlation analysis, items 1 (“Have gum disease”) and 10 Periodontal treatment and surgery under anesthesia”) had the strongest correlations with item 3, with correlation coefficients of 0.48 and 0.42, respectively. A model combining items 1, 3, and 10, adjusted for demographic variables, resulted in an AUROC of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.86, and specificity of 0.26. Conclusions An adapted Korean version (“Have gum disease”, “Treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, and “periodontal treatment under anesthesia”) of the self-reported questionnaire demonstrated its capacity for epidemiological surveillance of periodontal disease in this study cohort.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of prophylactic abdominal drainage (AD) in laparoscopic hemicolectomy, focusing on assessing postoperative pain outcomes. Methods: Patients were categorized into two groups: those with and without AD (AD group vs.no-AD group). A numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to assess postoperative pain on each postoperative day (POD). Further, the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce intergroup bias. Results: In total, 204 patients who underwent laparoscopic hemicolectomies by a single surgeon between June 2013 and September 2022 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. After adjusting for IPTW, NRS scores on POD 2 were significantly lower in the no-AD group (3.2 ± 0.8 vs. 3.4 ± 0.8, p = 0.043). Further examination of postoperative outcomes showed no statistically significant differences in complications between the AD (17.3%) and no-AD (12.4%) groups (p = 0.170). The postoperative length of hospital stay was 7.3 ± 2.8 days in the AD group and 6.9 ± 3.0 days in the no-AD group, with no significant difference (p = 0.298). Time to first flatus was 3.0 ± 0.9 days in the AD group and 2.7 ± 0.9 days in the no-AD group, with no significant difference (p = 0.078). Regarding readmission within 1 month, there were four cases each in the AD (2.3%) and no-AD (1.7%) groups, with no significant difference (p = 0.733). Conclusion Laparoscopic hemicolectomy without AD resulted in no significant differences in postoperative clinical outcomes, except for postoperative pain. This finding suggests that prophylactic AD may exacerbate postoperative pain.

Background/Aims: While most cancer patients with end-of-life (EOL) care receive antibiotic treatments, antibiotic use should be decided appropriately considering the benefits, side effects, resistance, and cost effects. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) are important for patients with EOL care, but there is limited study analyzing actual antibiotic use in EOL care and the perceptions of Korean medical staff. Methods: Electronic medical records of 149 deceased cancer patients hospitalized in the medical hospitalist units at Asan Medical Center in Seoul from May 2019 to September 2021 were reviewed. Basic information, antibiotic use, duration, and changes were investigated. We surveyed medical staff’s perceptions of antibiotics in cancer patients with EOL. Results: Of the 149 cancer patients with EOL care, 146 (98.0%) agreed with physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST). In total, 143 (95.9%) received antibiotics, 110 (76.9%) received combination antibiotic treatment, and 116 (81.1%) were given antibiotics until the day of death. In a survey of 60 medical staff, 42 (70.0%) did not know about ASP, and 24 (40.0%) thought ASP was important in EOL care. Nineteen doctors (31.7%) discussed the use or discontinuation of antibiotics with patients or caregivers when writing POLST, but only 8 patients (5.6%) stopped antibiotics after POLST. Conclusions Most cancer patients with EOL care continue to receive antibiotics until just before their death. A careful approach is needed, considering the benefits and side effects of antibiotic use, and the patient’s right to self-decision. It is necessary to actively improve awareness of ASP and its importance for medical staff.

South Korea implemented interventions to curb the spread of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with discovery of the first case in early 2020. Mathematical modeling designed to reflect the dynamics of disease transmission has been shown to be an important tool for responding to COVID-19. This study aimed to review publications on the structure, method, and role of mathematical models focusing on COVID-19 transmission dynamics in Korea. In total, 42 papers published between August 7, 2020 and August 21, 2022 were studied and reviewed. This study highlights the construction and utilization of mathematical models to help craft strategies for predicting the course of an epidemic and evaluating the effectiveness of control strategies. Despite the limitations caused by a lack of available epidemiological and surveillance data, modeling studies could contribute to providing scientific evidence for policymaking by simulating various scenarios.

Background: The symptoms of adrenal insufficiency (AI) overlap with the common effects of advanced cancer and chemotherapy. Considering that AI may negatively affect the overall prognosis of cancer patients if not diagnosed in a timely manner, we analyzed the incidence, risk factors, and predictive methods of AI in cancer patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 184 adult patients with malignancy who underwent a rapid adrenocorticotrophic hormone stimulation test in the medical hospitalist units of a tertiary hospital. Their baseline characteristics and clinical features were evaluated, and the risk factors for AI were identified using logistic regression analysis. Results: Of the study patients, 65 (35%) were diagnosed with AI, in whom general weakness (63%) was the most common symptom. Multivariate logistic regression showed that eosinophilia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–16.63; P = 0.036), history of steroid use (aOR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.10–5.15; P = 0.028), and history of megestrol acetate use (aOR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.38–5.33; P = 0.004) were associated with AI. Baseline cortisol levels of 6.2 μg/dL and 12.85 μg/dL showed a specificity of 95.0% and 95.4% for AI diagnosis, respectively. Conclusion AI was found in about one-third of patients with cancer who showed general symptoms that may be easily masked by cancer or chemotherapy, suggesting that clinical suspicion of AI is important while treating cancer patients. History of corticosteroids or megestrol acetate were risk factors for AI and eosinophilia was a pre-test predictor of AI.Baseline cortisol level appears to be a useful adjunct marker for AI.

A 34-year-old female with multiple sclerosis (MS) was scheduled Cesarean section. She had been suffering from MS for 10 years and the symptoms of MS were paraplegia and urinary incontinence. After informed consent, anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with nitrous oxide, sevoflurane and fentanyl. Rocuronium was used for muscle relaxation and tracheal intubation. Train of four (TOF) ratio and bispectral index scale were monitored for adequate muscle relaxation and depth of anesthesia. She gave birth to a baby within 7 minutes after skin incision. When operation was over, TOF ratio was 0.8. She emerged from general anesthesia smoothly and was extubated. There was no febrile event or exacerbation of MS after Cesarean section under general anesthesia. We report a safe anesthetic management of the parturient with MS, using sevoflurane.
Adult ; Androstanols ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, General ; Cesarean Section ; Female ; Fentanyl ; Humans ; Informed Consent ; Intubation ; Methyl Ethers ; Multiple Sclerosis ; Muscle Relaxation ; Nitrous Oxide ; Paraplegia ; Parturition ; Pregnancy ; Propofol ; Skin ; Stress, Psychological ; Urinary Incontinence

Topical epinephrine is useful to reduce bleeding during skin grafting. However, even though a clear operative field is obtained, systemic absorption of topical epinephrine can occur and this may cause severe hypertension, arrhythmias, ventricular tachycardia, myocardial ischemia, pulmonary edema, or cardiac arrest. We managed a case of cardiac arrhythmia during general anesthesia, which was induced by gauze soaked in topical epinephrine used for skin grafting of burn wounds. A 26-year-old woman developed premature ventricular complexes and ventricular tachycardia during surgery when epinephrine-soaked gauze was applied to the skin donor and burn wound sites to control oozing. The patient was resuscitated immediately and within 10 minutes the vital signs had normalized. It is recommended that caution is exercised when epinephrine-soaked gauze is applied to a large area of skin.
Absorption ; Adult ; Anesthesia, General ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac ; Burns ; Epinephrine ; Female ; Heart Arrest ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Myocardial Ischemia ; Pulmonary Edema ; Skin ; Skin Transplantation ; Tachycardia, Ventricular ; Tissue Donors ; Ventricular Premature Complexes ; Vital Signs