Purpose: Determining the extent of radical lymphadenectomy at clinical early stage is challenging. We aimed to investigate the appropriate extent of lymphadenectomy in clinical early-stage right colon cancer. Methods: Patients with clinical stage 0 or I right colon cancer who underwent curative surgery from January 2007 to December 2021 were included in this retrospective study. The extent of lymph node (LN) metastases based on the distribution of LN metastases (LND: LND1 pericolic nodes, LND2 intermediate nodes, LND3 apical nodes), along with the depth of submucosal (SM) invasion (classed into SM1–3), were analyzed. Results: Of the 348 patients, distribution across pathologic stages was as follows: 30 patients (8.6%) at stage 0, 207 (59.5%) at stage I, 52 (14.9%) at stage II, and 59 (17.0%) at stage III. In pT1 tumor patients, LN metastases varied by SM invasion depth: 3.6% in SM1 (all LND1), 5.1% in SM2 (all LND1), and 17.5% in SM3 (LND1 10%, LND2 5%, LND3 2.5%). For pT2, pT3, and pT4 stages, LN metastasis rates were 16.2% (LND1 11.3%, LND2 3.8%, LND3 1.3%), 39.7% (LND1 28.9%, LND2 8.4%, LND3 2.4%), and 50% (LND1 25%, LND2 25%), respectively. Tumor invasion depth and lymphovascular invasion were identified as significant risk factors for LN metastasis extending to LND2–3. Conclusion Complete mesocolic excision should be considered for right-sided colon cancer because tumor infiltration deeper than SM2 could metastasize to LND2 or further. If preoperative endoscopy confirms SM1 or SM2 invasion, D2 lymphadenectomy could be a limited surgical option.

Purpose: Determining the extent of radical lymphadenectomy at clinical early stage is challenging. We aimed to investigate the appropriate extent of lymphadenectomy in clinical early-stage right colon cancer. Methods: Patients with clinical stage 0 or I right colon cancer who underwent curative surgery from January 2007 to December 2021 were included in this retrospective study. The extent of lymph node (LN) metastases based on the distribution of LN metastases (LND: LND1 pericolic nodes, LND2 intermediate nodes, LND3 apical nodes), along with the depth of submucosal (SM) invasion (classed into SM1–3), were analyzed. Results: Of the 348 patients, distribution across pathologic stages was as follows: 30 patients (8.6%) at stage 0, 207 (59.5%) at stage I, 52 (14.9%) at stage II, and 59 (17.0%) at stage III. In pT1 tumor patients, LN metastases varied by SM invasion depth: 3.6% in SM1 (all LND1), 5.1% in SM2 (all LND1), and 17.5% in SM3 (LND1 10%, LND2 5%, LND3 2.5%). For pT2, pT3, and pT4 stages, LN metastasis rates were 16.2% (LND1 11.3%, LND2 3.8%, LND3 1.3%), 39.7% (LND1 28.9%, LND2 8.4%, LND3 2.4%), and 50% (LND1 25%, LND2 25%), respectively. Tumor invasion depth and lymphovascular invasion were identified as significant risk factors for LN metastasis extending to LND2–3. Conclusion Complete mesocolic excision should be considered for right-sided colon cancer because tumor infiltration deeper than SM2 could metastasize to LND2 or further. If preoperative endoscopy confirms SM1 or SM2 invasion, D2 lymphadenectomy could be a limited surgical option.

Purpose: Determining the extent of radical lymphadenectomy at clinical early stage is challenging. We aimed to investigate the appropriate extent of lymphadenectomy in clinical early-stage right colon cancer. Methods: Patients with clinical stage 0 or I right colon cancer who underwent curative surgery from January 2007 to December 2021 were included in this retrospective study. The extent of lymph node (LN) metastases based on the distribution of LN metastases (LND: LND1 pericolic nodes, LND2 intermediate nodes, LND3 apical nodes), along with the depth of submucosal (SM) invasion (classed into SM1–3), were analyzed. Results: Of the 348 patients, distribution across pathologic stages was as follows: 30 patients (8.6%) at stage 0, 207 (59.5%) at stage I, 52 (14.9%) at stage II, and 59 (17.0%) at stage III. In pT1 tumor patients, LN metastases varied by SM invasion depth: 3.6% in SM1 (all LND1), 5.1% in SM2 (all LND1), and 17.5% in SM3 (LND1 10%, LND2 5%, LND3 2.5%). For pT2, pT3, and pT4 stages, LN metastasis rates were 16.2% (LND1 11.3%, LND2 3.8%, LND3 1.3%), 39.7% (LND1 28.9%, LND2 8.4%, LND3 2.4%), and 50% (LND1 25%, LND2 25%), respectively. Tumor invasion depth and lymphovascular invasion were identified as significant risk factors for LN metastasis extending to LND2–3. Conclusion Complete mesocolic excision should be considered for right-sided colon cancer because tumor infiltration deeper than SM2 could metastasize to LND2 or further. If preoperative endoscopy confirms SM1 or SM2 invasion, D2 lymphadenectomy could be a limited surgical option.

Purpose: Early nutritional support (ENS) for critically ill patients is promoted by many studies. However, there is a lack of data evaluating its necessity in general wards. This study aims to determine the impact of ENS on patients in general wards. Methods: Patients aged 18 and above, admitted to the Jeonbuk National University Hospital in Jeonju from January 2020 to December 2020, who were eligible for nutritional support and hospitalized for at least 7 days were included in the study. We divided the patients into two groups: the ENS group, who received nutritional support within 48 hours of admission, and the control group, who received it after 48 hours. Results: Among 1,077 patients, 146 met the inclusion criteria. The ENS group (n=38) and the control group (n=108) were compared retrospectively. There was a significant age difference between the two groups (P=0.028). The admission ratio to the intensive care unit (ICU) in the ENS group was significantly lower than that in the control group (10.2% vs.26.3%, P=0.019). The calorie support rate (%) and protein support rate (%) in the ENS group were significantly higher than in the control group (50.12%±23.30% vs. 38.56%±18.02%, P=0.006; 44.61%±25.07% vs. 32.07%±22.76%, P=0.002, respectively). After propensity score matching, the ENS was significantly associated with ICU low admissions (odds ratio 0.08, 95% confidence interval 0.01–0.69, P=0.022). Conclusion A future multi-center study considering underlying diseases is needed to provide additional scientific evidence to support the effects of ENS.

Background: Atherogenic dyslipidemia, which is frequently associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and insulin resistance, contributes to the development of vascular complications. Statin therapy is the primary approach to dyslipidemia management in T2D, however, the role of non-statin therapy remains unclear. Ezetimibe reduces cholesterol burden by inhibiting intestinal cholesterol absorption. Fibrates lower triglyceride levels and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels via peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor alpha agonism. Therefore, when combined, these drugs effectively lower non-HDL-C levels. Despite this, few clinical trials have specifically targeted non-HDL-C, and the efficacy of triple combination therapies, including statins, ezetimibe, and fibrates, has yet to be determined. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, active-comparator controlled trial involving 3,958 eligible participants with T2D, cardiovascular risk factors, and elevated non-HDL-C (≥100 mg/dL). Participants, already on moderate-intensity statins, will be randomly assigned to either Ezefeno (ezetimibe/fenofibrate) addition or statin dose-escalation. The primary end point is the development of a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and diabetic microvascular events over 48 months. Conclusion This trial aims to assess whether combining statins, ezetimibe, and fenofibrate is as effective as, or possibly superior to, statin monotherapy intensification in lowering cardiovascular and microvascular disease risk for patients with T2D. This could propose a novel therapeutic approach for managing dyslipidemia in T2D.

Background/Aims: Synchronous multiple gastric cancer (SMGC) accounts for approximately 6% to 14% of gastric cancer (GC) cases. This study aimed to identify risk factors for SMGC. Methods: A total of 14,603 patients diagnosed with GC were prospectively enrolled. Data including age, sex, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, family history, p53 expression, microsatellite instability, cancer classification, lymph node metastasis, and treatment were collected. Risk factors were analyzed using logistic regression analysis between a single GC and SMGC. Results: The incidence of SMGC was 4.04%, and that of early GC (EGC) and advanced GC (AGC) was 5.43% and 3.11%, respectively. Patients with SMGC were older (65.33 years vs 61.75 years, p<0.001) and more likely to be male. Lymph node metastasis was found in 27% of patients with SMGC and 32% of patients with single GC. Multivariate analysis showed that SMGC was associated with sex (male odds ratio [OR], 1.669; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.223 to 2.278; p=0.001), age (≥65 years OR, 1.532; 95% CI, 1.169 to 2.008; p=0.002), and EGC (OR, 1.929; 95% CI, 1.432 to 2.600; p<0.001). Survival rates were affected by Lauren classification, sex, tumor size, cancer type, distant metastasis, and venous invasion but were not related to the number of GCs. However, the survival rate of AGC with SMGC was very high. Conclusions SMGC had unique characteristics such as male sex, older age, and EGC, and the survival rate of AGC, in which the intestinal type was much more frequent, was very good (Trial registration number: NCT04973631).