Objectives: This study investigated how the mediating effect of health literacy (HL) on the association between income and cancer screening participation varies by age among Korean adults aged 40 years and older, with the aim of identifying the optimal timing for HL interventions. Methods: Data from 4171 adults aged ≥40 years in the 2023 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed using moderated mediation analysis implemented with the lavaan.survey package, accounting for the complex sampling design. The Johnson–Neyman technique was used to identify age thresholds at which the mediation effect became statistically significant, and the number needed to benefit (NNB) was calculated to estimate the potential efficiency of interventions targeting this pathway. Results: Each 1-quintile increase in income was associated with a 16.0% higher likelihood of undergoing cancer screening (odds ratio=1.16, p<0.001). The mediating effect of HL increased significantly with age (index of moderated mediation=0.000438, p=0.048). Mediation became statistically significant from age 54.2 years (Johnson–Neyman threshold), with the proportion of the total effect mediated rising from 0.1% among adults aged 40–49 years to 8.1% among those aged ≥70 years. The NNB for this pathway indicated substantial intervention efficiency in older adults (NNB=372 for ages ≥70), whereas the mediation effect was not statistically significant in the 50–59 age group. Conclusions HL significantly mediated the relationship between income and cancer screening participation from the mid-50s onward, with progressively greater contributions at older ages. These findings support age-differentiated strategies, including structural accessibility improvements for adults in their 40s and early 50s and integrated income–HL interventions for individuals aged ≥55 years. Experimental studies are warranted to confirm these associations.

Background: Handgrip strength (HGS) is an indicator of late-life health, associated with disability, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. While exercise helps maintain HGS, diabetes may reduce its benefits. This study investigated the association between exercise and low HGS (LHGS) stratified by diabetes status and sex. Methods: Data from 16,443 participants in the 2017–2019 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed. HGS was measured using a digital dynamometer. Exercise type and frequency were assessed by questionnaire. Three-way and twoway interaction terms were analyzed for exercise, sex and diabetes. Results: Aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, and diabetes were significantly associated with LHGS (P<0.05). A significant interaction between diabetes and aerobic exercise was observed in females (odds ratio [OR] of LHGS=1.704, 95% confidence interval= 1.073–2.707). Among males, both exercise types were associated with lower odds of LHGS regardless of diabetes status, except for aerobic exercise in non-diabetic males. Among males, the ORs of LHGS for aerobic and resistance exercise were 0.479 (0.278– 0.827) and 0.317 (0.165–0.611) with diabetes, 0.757 (0.554–1.035) and 0.536 (0.360–0.798) without diabetes. Among females, the ORs of LHGS for aerobic exercise and resistance exercise were 1.109 (0.716–1.719) and 0.529 (0.224–1.249) with diabetes, 0.676 (0.539–0.848) and 0.795 (0.564–1.121) without diabetes. Conclusions The modifying effect of diabetes on the relationship between exercise and grip strength was observed in females but not in males. Females with diabetes may require tailored exercise guideline to prevent LHGS.

OBJECTIVES: Poor cardiovascular health (CVH) and the high prevalence of depressive symptoms represent significant public health concerns, underscoring the importance of examining their association. This study aimed to investigate the association between CVH, as defined by the American Heart Association’s 2022 Life’s Essential 8 (LE8) framework, and depressive symptoms. METHODS: This study used data from the 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Overall CVH, measured using LE8, was categorized into 3 groups: low score (0–<50), moderate score (50–<80), and high score (80–100). LE8 comprises 2 subdomains: health behaviors and health factors. Depressive symptoms were defined as a total score ≥10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusting for sex, age, socioeconomic status, and current drinking status. RESULTS: Among 17,294 adults, 257 male and 681 female reported significant depressive symptoms. Compared with individuals in the low LE8 category (reference), the odds ratio (OR) for depressive symptoms was 0.29 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 to 0.40) for those in the high LE8 category. The OR for depressive symptoms was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.53) for individuals with a high health behavior score compared with those with a low health behavior score. In contrast, the health factor score was not significantly associated with depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that overall CVH, particularly the health behavior subdomain, was associated with lower odds of depressive symptoms. Prospective longitudinal studies are warranted to validate these findings and clarify the directionality of the observed associations.

Objective: Perinatal depression often remains undertreated due to concerns about antidepressant exposure during fertility treatment, pregnancy, or breastfeeding. Non-pharmacological, home-based interventions such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) present a promising alternative; however, real-world evidence in perinatal populations remains limited. Methods: This prospective observational study included 38 women who received infertility, pregnancy, or postpartum treatment at four hospitals in South Korea. Participants self-administered anodal tDCS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 20–28 sessions over 4 weeks. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) at baseline and weeks 2, 4, and 8. Subjective health perception was measured at baseline using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Time had a significant effect on depressive symptoms (Wald χ2=90.75, p<0.001), with the largest reduction observed during the first 2 weeks. The CES-D scores remained significantly lower than baseline at week 8, 4 weeks after treatment ended. Subjective health perception was significantly associated with baseline depression severity (Wald χ2=26.41, p<0.001), and its interaction with time was also significant (Wald χ2=320.18, p<0.001). Participants with poorer perceived health (scores 4–5) experienced greater depressive symptom reductions than those with more favorable perceptions (scores 1–2). Conclusion Home-based tDCS was feasible and associated with clinically meaningful improvement in depressive symptoms among perinatal women. Those who initially perceived their health more negatively showed greater response, suggesting subjective health perception may serve as a useful moderator and potential marker to inform personalized treatment strategies.

Objectives: Transitional periods, such as patient discharge, are notably challenging. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of providers involved in hospital discharge support programs, identify the primary obstacles, and propose strategies for improvement. Methods: In this qualitative cross-sectional study, we interviewed 49 healthcare professionals, comprising doctors, nurses, and social workers, who participated in two pilot programs. We organized focus group interviews with 3-6 participants per group, segmented by the type of discharge support program and profession. For data analysis, we employed phenomenological analysis, a qualitative method. Results: Participants recognized the importance of the discharge support program and anticipated its benefits. The Rehabilitation Hospital Discharge Patient Support program saw more active involvement from doctors than the Establishment of a Public Health-Medical Collaboration System program. Both programs highlighted the critical need for more staff and better compensation, as identified by the doctors. Nurses and social workers cited the heavy documentation burden, uncooperative attitudes from patients and local governments, and other issues. They also anticipated that program improvements could be achieved through the standardization of regional welfare services and better coordination by local governments serving as welfare service regulators. All groups—doctors, nurses, and social workers—underscored the significance of promoting these programs. Conclusions Discharge support programs are crucial for patients with functional impairments and severe illnesses, particularly in ensuring continuity of care. Policy support is essential for the successful implementation of these programs in Korea.

Background: Preventing intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV) is crucial for maternal safety during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. While midazolam is known to prevent IONV, we hypothesized that remimazolam would be superior due to its minimal hemodynamic effects. We compared the effects of the two drugs on IONV. Methods: Parturients scheduled for cesarean section were randomly assigned to receive either midazolam or remimazolam. They received midazolam 2 mg or remimazolam 5 mg, with additional doses administered upon request. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of newly developed IONV during sedation. Other outcomes included overall IONV, rescue antiemetic use, shivering, hemodynamic variables, sedation scale scores, and satisfaction scores. Results: Data from 80 participants were analyzed. Deeper sedation was induced in the remimazolam group (PGroup × Time < 0.001) despite comparable hemodynamic trends between the groups. The incidence of overall IONV was comparable between the two groups (27.5% in the midazolam group vs. 17.5% in the remimazolam group, absolute risk reduction [ARR]: 0.100, 95% CI [−0.082, 0.282], P = 0.284); however, newly developed IONV during sedation was significantly reduced in the remimazolam group (20.0% vs. 5.0%, ARR: 0.150, 95% CI [0.009, 0.291], P = 0.043). The need for rescue antiemetics was also lower in the remimazolam group (15.0% vs. 2.5%, ARR: 0.125, 95% CI [0.004, 0.246], P = 0.048). Conclusion Remimazolam significantly reduced the incidence and severity of newly developed IONV compared with midazolam, with minimal impact on hemodynamics, making it a useful sedative option for cesarean section.

Purpose: This longitudinal cohort study aimed to evaluate the relationship between osteonecrosis of the jaw and pulp and periapical disease in patients who were administered bisphosphonates. Methods: Using data from a nationwide cohort, we examined the association among dental caries, pulp and periapical disease, and osteonecrosis of the jaw in women aged >50 years who received bisphosphonates for more than 1 year between 2002 and 2015.Because of ambiguities in the diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the jaw in population-based data, we operationally defined and categorized the condition into established and potential osteonecrosis of the jaw. Results: Pulp and periapical disease significantly increased the development of both established and potential osteonecrosis of the jaw (hazard ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.40–3.48; and hazard ratio, 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.65–2.98, respectively). Root canal treatment did not have any influence on the development of osteonecrosis of the jaw. Conclusions Pulp and periapical disease may be a major risk factor for osteonecrosis of the jaw. The study findings suggest that patients should undergo regular dental examinations to detect pulp and periapical disease before or during the administration of bisphosphonates and that root canal treatment should be considered to decrease the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw.

Objectives: Transitional periods, such as patient discharge, are notably challenging. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of providers involved in hospital discharge support programs, identify the primary obstacles, and propose strategies for improvement. Methods: In this qualitative cross-sectional study, we interviewed 49 healthcare professionals, comprising doctors, nurses, and social workers, who participated in two pilot programs. We organized focus group interviews with 3-6 participants per group, segmented by the type of discharge support program and profession. For data analysis, we employed phenomenological analysis, a qualitative method. Results: Participants recognized the importance of the discharge support program and anticipated its benefits. The Rehabilitation Hospital Discharge Patient Support program saw more active involvement from doctors than the Establishment of a Public Health-Medical Collaboration System program. Both programs highlighted the critical need for more staff and better compensation, as identified by the doctors. Nurses and social workers cited the heavy documentation burden, uncooperative attitudes from patients and local governments, and other issues. They also anticipated that program improvements could be achieved through the standardization of regional welfare services and better coordination by local governments serving as welfare service regulators. All groups—doctors, nurses, and social workers—underscored the significance of promoting these programs. Conclusions Discharge support programs are crucial for patients with functional impairments and severe illnesses, particularly in ensuring continuity of care. Policy support is essential for the successful implementation of these programs in Korea.

Background: Preventing intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV) is crucial for maternal safety during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. While midazolam is known to prevent IONV, we hypothesized that remimazolam would be superior due to its minimal hemodynamic effects. We compared the effects of the two drugs on IONV. Methods: Parturients scheduled for cesarean section were randomly assigned to receive either midazolam or remimazolam. They received midazolam 2 mg or remimazolam 5 mg, with additional doses administered upon request. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of newly developed IONV during sedation. Other outcomes included overall IONV, rescue antiemetic use, shivering, hemodynamic variables, sedation scale scores, and satisfaction scores. Results: Data from 80 participants were analyzed. Deeper sedation was induced in the remimazolam group (PGroup × Time < 0.001) despite comparable hemodynamic trends between the groups. The incidence of overall IONV was comparable between the two groups (27.5% in the midazolam group vs. 17.5% in the remimazolam group, absolute risk reduction [ARR]: 0.100, 95% CI [−0.082, 0.282], P = 0.284); however, newly developed IONV during sedation was significantly reduced in the remimazolam group (20.0% vs. 5.0%, ARR: 0.150, 95% CI [0.009, 0.291], P = 0.043). The need for rescue antiemetics was also lower in the remimazolam group (15.0% vs. 2.5%, ARR: 0.125, 95% CI [0.004, 0.246], P = 0.048). Conclusion Remimazolam significantly reduced the incidence and severity of newly developed IONV compared with midazolam, with minimal impact on hemodynamics, making it a useful sedative option for cesarean section.

Background: Preventing intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV) is crucial for maternal safety during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. While midazolam is known to prevent IONV, we hypothesized that remimazolam would be superior due to its minimal hemodynamic effects. We compared the effects of the two drugs on IONV. Methods: Parturients scheduled for cesarean section were randomly assigned to receive either midazolam or remimazolam. They received midazolam 2 mg or remimazolam 5 mg, with additional doses administered upon request. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of newly developed IONV during sedation. Other outcomes included overall IONV, rescue antiemetic use, shivering, hemodynamic variables, sedation scale scores, and satisfaction scores. Results: Data from 80 participants were analyzed. Deeper sedation was induced in the remimazolam group (PGroup × Time < 0.001) despite comparable hemodynamic trends between the groups. The incidence of overall IONV was comparable between the two groups (27.5% in the midazolam group vs. 17.5% in the remimazolam group, absolute risk reduction [ARR]: 0.100, 95% CI [−0.082, 0.282], P = 0.284); however, newly developed IONV during sedation was significantly reduced in the remimazolam group (20.0% vs. 5.0%, ARR: 0.150, 95% CI [0.009, 0.291], P = 0.043). The need for rescue antiemetics was also lower in the remimazolam group (15.0% vs. 2.5%, ARR: 0.125, 95% CI [0.004, 0.246], P = 0.048). Conclusion Remimazolam significantly reduced the incidence and severity of newly developed IONV compared with midazolam, with minimal impact on hemodynamics, making it a useful sedative option for cesarean section.