Ultrasound (US) is a patient-friendly imaging modality that is well suited for structural assessments of skeletal muscle and surrounding tissues, and its use for both diagnostic and monitoring in neuromuscular medicine is steadily expanding. Despite its advantages, the broader clinical implementation of muscle US is still hinder by the obtained images and their interpretation varying between operators. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI)-particularly in deep learning (DL)-have led to significant innovations in medical imaging. These developments hold considerable promise for addressing the inherent limitations of muscle US and for improving its clinical applicability. This review summarizes key muscle US biomarkers, encompassing both qualitative visual assessments and quantitative parameters. We discuss their utility in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders and their potential role as responsive biomarkers for monitoring disease progression, based on findings from previous studies. We also introduce foundational concepts of AI and DL and review recent studies that have applied these technologies in muscle US for the automated segmentation of muscle boundaries, feature extraction, and disease classification. Finally, we highlight current challenges and outline future directions needed to fully realize the potential of AI-enhanced muscle US as a standardized and widely applicable tool for assessing neuromuscular diseases.

Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

Background: A novel botulinum toxin type A (Protoxin; Protox Inc.) has been developed. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the newly developed Protoxin compared to the approved drug onabotulinumtoxinA (OBoNT) in moderate to severe glabellar lines. Methods: Adults with a glabellar line Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) score of 2 (moderate) or 3 (severe) were enrolled in the study. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Protoxin or OBoNT. A total of 20 units of botulinum toxin was injected at five sites in the glabellar region (4 units at each site). FWS scores were assessed at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 post-injection. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects at week 4 who had a reduction of 2 or more points in FWS and a final score of 0 (none) or 1 (mild). Results: A total of 274 subjects were randomized, of whom 78.1% were female. At week 4 post-treatment, the improvement rate of glabellar lines was 62.22% in the Protoxin group and 62.96% in the OBoNT group. The lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (−12.24%) exceeded the −15% margin, confirming the non-inferiority of the new drug. Safety profiles were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion Protoxin demonstrated efficacy and safety profiles comparable to those of OBoNT in the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines.

Background: Carbon suspension with laser irradiation was used for facial melasma, but it produces harmful fumes. Gold and diamond are biocompatible and chemically inert, and expected to act as potent chromophores and microdermabrasion agents, respectively. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of microgold and microdiamond suspensions with a 1,064 nm picosecond neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser for melasma. Methods: Ten Korean patients received 2 laser sessions using gold and diamond suspension at 2-week intervals. Melasma area severity index (MASI), melanin index (MI), erythema index (EI), Physician/Subject global aesthetic improvement scale (PGAIS/SGAIS), and adverse events were assessed at baseline, week 2 and week 4. Results: MASI and MI scores significantly improved. EI score showed no significant changes.All patients showed aesthetic improvement by PGAIS and SGAIS. No severe or unexpected adverse events were reported. Conclusion The topical microgold and microdiamond suspension combined with a 1,064 nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for facial melasma.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic and relapsing gastrointestinal disorder characterized by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus, leading to troublesome symptoms and/or complications. Since the publication of the 2020 Seoul Consensus on GERD, significant new evidence has emerged, particularly regarding acid-suppressive therapies and diagnostic approaches. This 2025 focused update aims to refine GERD management strategies by incorporating the latest evidence on acid suppressive therapies and regional considerations in Asian populations. This study builds on the 2020 Seoul Consensus by integrating systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and expert consensuses to offer updated recommendations for the definition and medical treatment of GERD. These guidelines incorporate recent advances in acid-suppressive therapies, particularly potassium-competitive acid blockers, and adopt updated diagnostic frameworks in accordance with the Lyon Consensus 2.0. Key clinical questions were identified and structured using the following format: Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome. The resulting recommendations address the initial treatment, long-term maintenance strategies, and role of personalized therapy based on disease severity, such as the grade of reflux esophagitis. Six key statements are presented: updated definition and classification of GERD (Statement 1); initial and long-term treatment strategies tailored to GERD phenotypes, such as non-erosive reflux disease, mild erosive esophagitis, and severe erosive esophagitis (Statements 2-5); and dose optimization strategies for long-term safety (Statement 6). These guidelines aim to support gastroenterologists and general healthcare providers in making individualized evidence-based decisions for GERD management.

Burning mouth syndrome remains a frequent source of diagnostic delay, repeated consultations, and fragmented care because it has long been treated as a “diagnosis of exclusion.” Recent updates in orofacial pain classification and research diagnostic frameworks support a practical shift: from an exclusionary label toward a structured diagnostic algorithm and staged, phenotype-guided management. This narrative, algorithm-focused clinical review aims to summarize clinically actionable evidence and to propose a “minimum sufficient workup” that prioritizes safety, efficiency, and patient-centered communication.We first outline pragmatic diagnostic criteria and key symptom patterns, then integrate current concepts of mixed mechanisms—peripheral neuropathic features, centralociplastic amplification, and psychosocial modulators—that account for symptom fluctuation and discordance between symptom severity and objective findings. The core of this review is a one-page stepwise algorithm: (1) confirm chronicity and absence of visible mucosal disease, (2) screen for red flags requiring urgent evaluation, (3) address common local contributors (e.g., candidiasis, irritants, contact allergy, xerostomia), (4) perform a targeted systemic/medication/deficiency panel, and (5) phenotype patients to guide staged treatment choices and follow-up. Finally, we provide a practical management framework emphasizing education, trigger control, and individualized combinations of topical, systemic, and behavioral interventions with predefined reassessment intervals. Future priorities include phenotype-stratified randomized trials and implementation outcomes that quantify reductions in diagnostic delay, misdiagnosis, and unnecessary testing.

Background: Baricitinib is one of the front-runners among targeted agents for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). Although many studies have been conducted on the real-world use of baricitinib, the sample size is often small and data is focused primarily on Caucasians. Objective: The objective of this study was to demonstrate the real-world itch-relieving property of baricitinib in adult AD patients in South Korea. Methods: Electronic medical records of AD patients treated with baricitinib at the National Medical Center in Korea from May 2021 to April 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Seventy patients completed 16 to 52 weeks of baricitinib treatment, with most patients showing mild-to-moderate baseline lesions and moderate-to-severe baseline itch. At Week 16 of baricitinib treatment, there was a 50% reduction in Itch numerical rating scale from baseline, and 50.7% of patients showed 50% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index score.The efficacy of baricitinib was also reflected in the patient reported outcomes, with 55%–58% improvements in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool, and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores seen within 2 weeks of treatment. No new safety signals were detected in this study. Conclusion Baricitinib treatment for 52 weeks in Korean patients with itch dominant AD confirmed long term effectiveness and safety.

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a key intervention for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, adherence remains suboptimal, particularly in patients with low physical activity (PA) despite preserved physical capacity (PC). This study aimed to identify factors associated with low PA, with a focus on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods: In this prospective study, COPD patients were categorized according to daily moderate-to-vigorous PA measured using Fitbit devices: ≥30 minutes/day (‘Do do’) and <30 minutes/day (‘Don’t do’). Baseline characteristics, pulmonary function, and exercise capacity assessed by 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) were evaluated. PROs included the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with low PA. Results: Among 96 patients, 44 were classified as ‘Do do’ and 52 as ‘Don’t do.’ The ‘Don’t do’ group showed significantly lower 6MWD (424 m vs. 488 m, p=0.005) and lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (46.73% vs. 54.48%, p=0.005). They also reported higher dyspnea scores (mMRC 1.77 vs. 1.30, p=0.019). Greater breathlessness measured by CAT was independently associated with low PA (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.62), even after adjustment for 6MWD and pulmonary function. This association persisted in patients with preserved PC. Conclusion Low PA in COPD is influenced not only by objective physical limitations but also by subjective symptom burden, particularly dyspnea. Integrating PROs into PR assessment may facilitate identification of barriers and improve adherence to rehabilitation programs.

Background/Aims: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis. We investigated genomic determinants of clinical benefit from gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel (GAP) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in advanced BTC. Methods: Clinical and genomic data using TruSight Oncology 500 were analyzed from patients treated with GAP (N=198) or GC (N=89) as first-line therapy. Results: With a median follow-up of 33.0 months, GAP modestly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.764; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.591–0.989) without significant overall survival (OS) difference compared to GC. Genomic profiling revealed frequent alterations in TP53 (35.2%), KRAS (16.4%), SMAD4 (10.5%), and TNFRSF14 (10.5%), involving RTK/RAS (44.3%), TP53 (41.8%), and PI3K (20.2%) pathways. Single-gene mutations did not predict treatment benefit. However, pathway-level analysis identified PI3K pathway activation as significantly associated with inferior PFS (HR 2.148; 95% CI 1.478–3.124) and OS (HR 2.096; 95% CI 1.413–3.109) in patients receiving GAP, an effect not observed with GC. Importantly, GAP conferred clinical benefit only in patients without PI3K pathway activation, while no survival advantage was seen in those with such alterations (Pinteraction=0.023 for PFS, Pinteraction=0.003 for OS). Similar results were obtained in the independent validation cohort treated with GAP (N=103) or GC (N=64) for BTC. Conclusions Genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing identified PI3K pathway activation as key molecular determinant that differentiates patient outcomes between GAP and GC treatments in advanced BTC.

For decades, vitamin D has been a cornerstone of preventive medicine. However, recent large-scale randomized controlled trials have failed to replicate the broad benefits previously observed in epidemiological studies, particularly with respect to fracture and fall prevention in vitamin D-replete populations. Moreover, growing evidence suggesting an increased fall risk associated with high-dose bolus administration has necessitated a re-evaluation of safety assumptions. This review synthesizes these discordant findings to propose a framework grounded in precision medicine. We explore the ‘divergent threshold’ hypothesis, whereby a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of 20 to 30 ng/mL may be sufficient for skeletal health, whereas a higher threshold of 40 to 50 ng/mL appears necessary to achieve metabolic benefits, such as diabetes prevention in non-obese individuals. Ultimately, we advocate a shift away from a ‘one-size-fits-all’ paradigm toward targeted strategies that maximize efficacy while minimizing the risks associated with excess supplementation.