Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to iodinated contrast media (ICM) can range from mild cutaneous symptoms to life-threatening anaphylaxis. In patients with a history of ICM hypersensitivity, avoidance of the culprit agent is generally recommended. This case report describes a successful desensitization in a 56-year-old man with recurrent HSRs to multiple agents including ioversol, iohexol, iobitridol, and iopamidol. Intradermal testing was performed to identify potentially safe alternatives; however, all tested agents, including iohexol, ioversol, iobitridol, iopamidol, iodixanol, iomeprol, and iopromide, yielded positive results. Given the clinical necessity of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, a 13-step rapid desensitization protocol with iodixanol was implemented. The procedure was completed without any breakthrough reactions. This case highlights desensitization as a feasible and effective strategy for patients with hypersensitivity to multiple ICM agents.

Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

Background: A novel botulinum toxin type A (Protoxin; Protox Inc.) has been developed. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the newly developed Protoxin compared to the approved drug onabotulinumtoxinA (OBoNT) in moderate to severe glabellar lines. Methods: Adults with a glabellar line Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) score of 2 (moderate) or 3 (severe) were enrolled in the study. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Protoxin or OBoNT. A total of 20 units of botulinum toxin was injected at five sites in the glabellar region (4 units at each site). FWS scores were assessed at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 post-injection. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects at week 4 who had a reduction of 2 or more points in FWS and a final score of 0 (none) or 1 (mild). Results: A total of 274 subjects were randomized, of whom 78.1% were female. At week 4 post-treatment, the improvement rate of glabellar lines was 62.22% in the Protoxin group and 62.96% in the OBoNT group. The lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (−12.24%) exceeded the −15% margin, confirming the non-inferiority of the new drug. Safety profiles were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion Protoxin demonstrated efficacy and safety profiles comparable to those of OBoNT in the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines.

Background: Despite widespread vaccination efforts against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, variants with increased transmissibility or immune evasion continue to emerge, posing a considerable challenge. Understanding the immunological factors associated with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) progression is essential for improving patient management and treatment strategies. We explored the dynamic changes in the peripheral white blood cell (WBC) profile, including T lymphocyte subsets, to assess their potential as predictors of disease severity and progression. Methods: Two hundred fifty-eight patients hospitalized for confirmed COVID-19 were classified into four sub-cohorts based on changes in disease severity over 7 days. WBC parameters, including absolute neutrophil, total lymphocyte, and T cell subset counts, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were assessed at admission and after 7 days. Results: Patients with persistent mild-to-moderate illness exhibited a marked increase in the lymphocyte count and a decrease in the NLR over time. In contrast, patients with sustained severe-to-critical illness showed an increasing WBC count without a corresponding increase in the lymphocyte count, in addition to a marked elevation in the NLR. Patients whose condition improved from severe-to-critical to mild-to-moderate illness showed increased cluster of differentiation (CD)3+ and CD4+ T cell counts and an elevated CD4/CD8 ratio, whereas the NLR did not significantly change. Conclusions The early-phase dynamics of T cell subsets may serve as a useful biomarker of disease severity and recovery in patients with COVID-19. Monitoring these immunological changes may help support clinical decision-making and inform the timing of therapeutic interventions.

Background: The objective of this study was to establish criteria for designing health examination programs and selecting appropriate examination items for high-risk occupational groups and to apply these criteria specifically to female fishers. Methods: The first Delphi survey comprised five domains and 15 specific criteria for identifying relevant health screening items for high-risk occupations. The second survey included open-ended questions addressing inconsistencies identified in the first survey and sought suggestions for additional items. In the third Delphi survey, specific health screening items were proposed for female fishers, and experts directly evaluated these items according to the finalized selection criteria. Results: Twenty-eight experts participated in this study. The first and second Delphi rounds facilitated the finalization of selection criteria for health screening items, consisting of five domains: Domain 1, Priority of target disease; Domain 2, Applicability of early detection and intervention; Domain 3, Scientific evidence of medical test method; Domain 4, Acceptability of medical test method; and Domain 5, Effectiveness of examination. Content validity ratios for these criteria ranged between 0.429 and 1.000. Based on the established criteria, experts evaluated eight proposed screening items for female fishers in the third round of the Delphi survey. Bone density, bioelectrical impedance analysis, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and fundoscopy were evaluated as appropriate; however, no agreement was reached on the early detection and intervention areas for degenerative lumbar disease, knee osteoarthritis, and upper extremity disease, as well as on the effectiveness for upper extremity disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Conclusion This study successfully established comprehensive criteria for selecting diseases targeted by health examinations in high-risk occupational groups. The practical application of these criteria proved effective in assessing the appropriateness of specific health screening items.

The gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is one of the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Between the 1990s and early 2000s, GIST was identified as a tumor characterized by KIT or PDGFRA mutations, resulting in imatinib being established as an effective targeted therapy. However, with advances in molecular diagnostics, approximately 10%–15% of GISTs have been reported to harbor alternative mutations, such as those in the succinate dehydrogenase subunit genes and BRAF, leading to the development of additional targeted therapies. GISTs exhibit a wide spectrum of clinical behaviors, ranging from indolent to highly aggressive, prompting the development of diverse risk classification systems. However, multiple systems remain in use, leading to inconsistent pathologic reports. Moreover, the mitotic counting method—a key factor in risk stratification—has become a major source of confusion among pathologists owing to the adoption of digital pathology and discrepancies between updated international guidelines and outdated reimbursement requirements. These inconsistencies have hindered pathologic reporting and communication between pathologists and clinicians. This review comprehensively overviews the historical background, molecular subtypes, and risk classification systems of GIST, focusing on evolving issues in mitotic rate evaluation and the application of risk classification systems in clinical practice.

Persistent idiopathic dentoalveolar pain (PIDAP) is a chronic orofacial pain condition characterized by persistent pain in the absence of detectable dental pathology. Due to its ambiguous clinical presentation, PIDAP is frequently overlooked or misdiagnosed, leading to prolonged patient suffering and unnecessary dental treatments. This review provides a structured educational overview of PIDAP for dental students and early-career clinicians, covering its definition, taxonomy, differential diagnosis, pathophysiology, clinical significance, and management principles. A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases with the following search terms: “persistent dentoalveolar pain,” “atypical odontalgia,” “PIDAP,” “orofacial pain,” and “chronic overlapping pain conditions.” The search covered publications up to December 2024, limited to English-language articles. Priority was given to relevant classification guidelines, epidemiological data, and studies addressing diagnostic challenges, nomenclature changes, pathophysiology, and the relationship between PIDAP and chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs). Thirty-four key references were included after screening. Current diagnostic criteria, the historical evolution of PIDAP taxonomy, and major pathophysiological hypotheses—including peripheral sensitization, central sensitization, and nociplastic pain mechanisms—are summarized. The high rate of comorbidity with COPCs and the frequent misdiagnosis of PIDAP highlight its clinical importance, as epidemiological data indicate that diagnostic delays may range from several months to years. Improving awareness and understanding of PIDAP among dental students and clinicians can facilitate early recognition, reduce misdiagnosis, and contribute to more effective management. Incorporating PIDAP-related education into undergraduate dental curricula and continuing education programs may further bridge current knowledge gaps and improve patient outcomes.

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–ultralow breast cancer among cases initially classified as HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0 and assess interobserver variability in interpreting low-level HER2 expression. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, all invasive breast cancer cases diagnosed between January and December 2022 across 10 Korean institutions were retrieved. Institutional pathologists reexamined HER2 IHC slides originally reported as IHC 0 according to the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines and reclassified them as HER2-null (0), HER2-ultralow (0+), or HER2-low (1+). Slides from 10% of HER2-null and HER2-ultralow cases were digitized for central review and independently assessed by two pathologists, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Results: Among 8,026 cases, 2,836 cases (35.5%) were initially reported as IHC 0. Upon re-review, 1,673 (59.0%), 1,139 (40.2%), and 24 (0.8%) cases were reclassified as HER2-null, HER2-ultralow, and HER2-low, respectively. The prevalence of HER2-ultralow breast cancer varied considerably across institutions (23.7%–78.1%). Central review of 268 digitized cases showed concordance in 193 cases (72.0%). Among the 75 discordant cases, 54 tumors (72.0%) were upgraded from HER2-null to HER2-ultralow, and 18 (24.0%) tumors were upgraded from HER2-ultralow to HER2-low. Furthermore, two tumors (2.7%) were downgraded from HER2-ultralow to HER2-null. Conclusions: Approximately 40% of cases initially categorized as IHC 0 were reclassified as HER2-ultralow. The substantial inter-institutional variability observed in interpreting low-level HER2 expression highlights the need for standardized training and quality assurance to ensure accurate identification of patients eligible for HER2-targeted antibody–drug conjugates.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of predicting final adult height (FAH) in Korean girls with central precocious puberty (CPP) using artificial intelligence (AI)-derived bone age assessments integrated into the Bayley–Pinneau (BP) or Korean National Growth Chart (KGC) prediction models. Materials and Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included 122 Korean girls with CPP who received gonadotropinreleasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) treatment for at least two years between January 2000 and November 2022. We assessed bone age and predicted adult height at the initiation and completion of GnRHa treatment. We used three bone age assessment methods: human expert assessment based on the Greulich-Pyle (GP) atlas (Human-GP), AI-derived GP (AI-GP), and AI-weighted GP scoring (AI-GPw). We calculated predicted adult heights (PAHs) using both the BP and KGC models, generating 12 PAH estimates per patient (2 time points x 3 bone-age methods x 2 height-prediction models). We assessed prediction accuracy and agreement with FAH using linear regression analysis and Bland–Altman plots and performed multivariable analysis to identify significant predictors of FAH. Results: Human-GP, AI-GP, and AI-GPw demonstrated comparable overall performance in predicting FAH (R 2 : 0.470–0.646 and 0.691–0.822 for treatment initiation and completion, respectively). AI-GPw combined with BP yielded slightly better point estimates but showed no statistically significant differences. At both time points, the BP model demonstrated consistently narrower 95% limits of agreement (LoA) than the KGC model. Multivariable analysis identified AI-GPw-BP and height percentile score as significant predictors of FAH at both time points; mid-parental height was significant only at treatment initiation. Conclusion Human-GP, AI-GP, and AI-GPw demonstrated comparable accuracy in predicting FAH. The BP model demonstrated consistently narrower 95% LoA than did the KGC model. AI-GPw-BP was an independent predictor of FAH. These findings support the clinical utility of AI-derived bone age assessments for individualized FAH prediction in patients with CPP.