OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and effectiveness of active migration technique and in situ lithotripsy technique in the treatment of 1-2 cm upper ureteral calculi by retrograde flexible ureteroscopy. METHODS: A total of 90 patients with 1-2 cm upper ureteral calculi treated in the urology department of Beijing Friendship Hospital from August 2018 to August 2020 were selected as the subjects. The patients were divided into two groups using random number table: 45 patients in group A were treated with in situ lithotripsy and 45 patients in group B were treated with active migration technique. The active migration technique was to reposition the stones in the renal calyces convenient for lithotripsy with the help of body position change, water flow scouring, laser impact or basket displacement, and then conduct laser lithotripsy and stone extraction. The data of the patients before and after operation were collected and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The age of the patients in group A was (51.6±14.1) years, including 34 males and 11 females. The stone diameter was (1.48±0.24) cm, and the stone density was (897.8±175.9) Hu. The stones were located on the left in 26 cases and on the right in 19 cases. There were 8 cases with no hydronephrosis, 20 cases with grade Ⅰ hydronephrosis, 11 cases with grade Ⅱ hydronephrosis, and 6 cases with grade Ⅲ hydronephrosis. The age of the patients in group B was (51.8±13.7) years, including 30 males and 15 females. The stone diameter was (1.52±0.22) cm, and the stone density was (964.6±214.2) Hu. The stones were located on the left in 22 cases and on the right in 23 cases. There were 10 cases with no hydronephrosis, 23 cases with grade Ⅰ hydronephrosis, 8 cases with grade Ⅱ hydronephrosis, and 4 cases with grade Ⅲ hydronephrosis. There was no significant diffe-rence in general parameters and stone indexes between the two groups. The operation time of group A was (67.1±16.9) min and the lithotripsy time was (38.0±13.2) min. The operation time of group B was (72.2±14.8) min and the lithotripsy time was (40.6±12.6) min. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Four weeks after operation, the stone-free rate in group A was 86.7%, and in group B was 97.8%. There was no significant difference between the two groups. In terms of complications, 25 cases of hematuria, 16 cases of pain, 10 cases of bladder spasm and 4 cases of mild fever occurred in group A. There were 22 cases of hematuria, 13 cases of pain, 12 cases of bladder spasm and 2 cases of mild fever in group B. There was no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION Active migration technique is safe and effective in the treatment of 1-2 cm upper ureteral calculi.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Ureteral Calculi/surgery* ; Hematuria/therapy* ; Ureteroscopy/methods* ; Lithotripsy/methods* ; Lithotripsy, Laser/methods* ; Hydronephrosis/complications* ; Pain ; Treatment Outcome ; Retrospective Studies

Ureteral stenosis is a comparatively rare complication following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The etiology is still unclear and most believe that this may be due to the reactivation of BK virus in a state of immunodeficiency. In the later stages of ureteral stenosis with scarring, invasive interventions must be taken to relieve the hydronephrosis. Common treatments, such as D-J stent placement and permanent nephrostomy may not only entail the risk of infection, but also seriously affect the quality of life. Few cases of surgical intervention have been reported. In this article, a 25-year-old female was admitted to Peking University First Hospital suffering from recurrent flank pain. Seven years before, she developed hemorrhagic cystitis and bilateral urethritis 40 days after allogeneic HSCT. After continuous bladder irrigation and antiviral therapy, the left-sided hydronephrosis gradually alleviated while the right-sided one did not improve. D-J stents were used for urine drainage for 7 years before percuta-neous nephrostomy. Preoperative antegrade pyelography revealed significant hydronephrosis in the right kidney with long stricture of proximal-middle ureter. After comprehensive decision, she underwent ileal ureter replacement. The operation was successful. The segmental lesion was dissected and the scar tissue was removed. A 25 cm intestinal tube was isolated to connect the pelvis and bladder. An anti-reflux nipple was created at the distal end of ileal ureter to prevent the potential infection. The blood loss was minimal. After surgery, the drainage tube was removed in 2 weeks, the nephrostomy tube and the D-J stent was removed in 3 months. Follow-up mainly included clinical assessment, serologic testing, renal ultrasonography, blood gas analysis and radiological examination. During the follow-up of 6 years, she was symptom-free and no postoperative complications occurred. The serum creatinine level was stable. No hydronephrosis was observed under ultrasonography. Obvious peristaltic waves and ureteral jets of the ileal ureter was confirmed on cine magnetic resonance urography. To sum up, ureteral stenosis after HSCT is relatively rare. Obstruction caused by scarring is usually irreversible and surgical intervention should be designed according to the location and length of the lesion. Ileal ureter replacement can be a safe, feasible and effective method to solve this kind of complex stricture.
Adult ; Cicatrix ; Constriction, Pathologic/etiology* ; Female ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects* ; Humans ; Hydronephrosis/surgery* ; Quality of Life ; Ureter/surgery* ; Ureteral Obstruction/surgery*

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is characterized by decreased flow of urine down the ureter and increased fluid pressure inside the kidney. Open pyeloplasty had been regarded as the standard management of UPJO for a long time. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty reports high success rates, for both retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches, which are comparable to those of open pyeloplasty. However, open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty have yielded disappointing failure rates of 2.5%-10%. The main causes for recurrent UPJO are severe peripelvic and periureteric fibrosis due to urinary extravasation, ureteral ischemia, and inadequate hemostasis. In addition, failing to diagnose lower pole crossing vessels before or during the primary procedure is also responsible for recurrent UPJO. In addition, poor preoperative split renal function, hydronephrosis, presence of renal stones, patient age, diabetes, prior endopyelotomy history, and retrograde pyelography history were considered as predictors of pyeloplasty failure. The failure is usually defined by persistent pain, persistent radiographic obstruction (infection or stones), continued decline in split renal function, or a combination of the above. And the failure of pye-loplasty often occurs in the first 2 years after the surgery. The available options for managing recurrent UPJO with a salvageable renal unit include endopyelotomy, re-do pyeloplasty, stent implantation, percutaneous nephrostomy, ureterocalicostomy, and nephrectomy. Re-do pyeloplasty has such merits as high successful rates and rare complications, compared with endopyelotomy or ureterocalicostomy. And some investigators think that re-do pyeloplasty should be regarded as the gold standard for secondary therapy if feasible. Open pyeloplasty can enlarge the operating field, facilitate the exposure of the ureteropelvic junction, reduce the difficulty of operation, and thus reduce the occurrence of complications. There are no significant differences among the success rates of re-do pyeloplasty under open approach, traditional laparoscopy and robot-assisted laparoscopy, according to previous reports. However, traditional laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty give advantages of cosmetology, small trauma, less postoperative pain, speedy recovery and shorter hospitalization, fewer complications and lower recurrent rates. If the primary pyeloplasty is an open operation in retroperitoneal approach, the traditional laparoscopic and robotic operation with retroperitoneal approach should be considered for secondary repair. The cause of recurrent UPJO should be evaluated before surgery and identified intraoperatively to minimize the possibility of recurrence.
Humans ; Hydronephrosis ; Kidney Pelvis ; Laparoscopy ; Ureter ; Ureteral Obstruction/surgery* ; Urologic Surgical Procedures

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of fetal anteroposterior renal pelvic diameter (APD) in predicting antenatal hydronephrosis requiring surgical treatment after birth. METHODS: A total of 525 cases of antenatal hydronephrosis detected by prenatal ultrasonography (ultrasound index APD ≥ 4 mm in the second trimester and APD ≥ 7 mm in the third trimester) in Zhejiang Prenatal Diagnosis Center from June 2007 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. ROC curve was used to analyze the relationship between these ultrasound indicators and the requirement for surgical treatment after birth. RESULTS: There were 162 cases (30.9%) diagnosed in the second trimester and 363 cases (69.1%) diagnosed in the third trimester; 131 cases were diagnosed pathologically after birth, of which 121 finally underwent surgical treatment. The area under ROC curve (AUC) of APD in middle pregnancy for prediction of requiring surgery 1-12 years after birth was 0.910; the cut-off value of APD was 8.45 mm with a sensitivity of 97.1%, specificity of 70.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 47.9%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.9%. The AUC of APD in late pregnancy for prediction of requiring surgery 1-12 years after birth was 0.800; the cut-off value of APD was 12.25 mm with a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 81.2%, PPV of 51.7%, and NPV of 89.1%. CONCLUSIONS APD in pregnancy can be used to predict whether the fetus with hydronephrosis needs surgical treatment after birth, and the prediction value of APD in the middle pregnancy is better.
Female ; Fetus ; diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Hydronephrosis ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Kidney Pelvis ; diagnostic imaging ; Pregnancy ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in differential renal function (DRF), as a functional outcome, in children who underwent redo pyeloplasty for management of failed pyeloplasty and to examine the factors that affect functional outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2002 and November 2010, a total of 18 patients who underwent redo pyeloplasty for persistent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed pyeloplasty were enrolled in this study. We assessed perioperative factors and evaluated changes in renal cortical thickness (RCT), renal function, and hydronephrosis by use of serial ultrasound and diuretic renography. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 44.83+/-28.86 months. After redo pyeloplasty, prevention of further functional deterioration was observed in only 12 of the 18 patients. After dividing the patients according to this observation, we discovered significant differences in both change in DRF (dDRF) and change in RCT (dRCT) (difference between before and after initial pyeloplasty) between the two groups (p<0.001). Additionally, we noted a significant positive correlation between dRCT and dDRF. All patients showed improvements in hydronephrosis grade and relief of symptoms compared with before redo pyeloplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Redo pyeloplasty should be considered in cases of failed pyeloplasty to preserve renal function and obtain relief from symptoms. If patients show severe deterioration of DRF or a decrease in RCT after initial pyeloplasty, preservation of DRF in these patients after redo pyeloplasty could be difficult. Therefore, redo pyeloplasty should be performed before severe deterioration of DRF or decrease in RCT.
Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Disease Progression ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Hydronephrosis/etiology/ultrasonography ; Infant ; Kidney/*physiopathology/ultrasonography ; Kidney Cortex/pathology ; Kidney Function Tests/methods ; Kidney Pelvis/*surgery/ultrasonography ; Male ; Postoperative Period ; Prognosis ; Reoperation/adverse effects/methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Failure ; Treatment Outcome ; Ureteral Obstruction/complications/pathology/*surgery ; Ureteral Obstruction/*surgery

PURPOSE: Urinary calculi is a familiar disease. A well-known complication of endourological treatment for impacted ureteral stones is the formation of ureteral strictures, which has been reported to occur in 14.2% to 24% of cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study. Ureterotripsy treatment was used on patients with impacted ureteral stones. Then, after 3 months and 6 months, the condition of these patients was assessed by means of a kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) ultrasound. If the KUB ultrasound indicated moderate to serious hydronephrosis, the patient was further assessed by means of a computed tomography intravenous urogram or retrograde pyelogram to confirm the occurrence of ureteral strictures. RESULTS: Of the 77 patients who participated in the study, 5 developed ureteral strictures. Thus, the stricture rate was 7.8%. An analysis of the intraoperative risk factors including perforation of the ureter, damage to the mucous membrane, and residual stone impacted within the ureter mucosa revealed that none of these factors contributed significantly to the formation of the ureteric strictures. The stone-related risk factors that were taken into consideration were stone size, stone impaction site, and duration of impaction. These stone factors also did not contribute significantly to the formation of the ureteral strictures. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study failed to identify any predictable factors for ureteral stricture formation. It is proposed that all patients undergo a simple postoperative KUB ultrasound screening 3 months after undergoing endoscopic treatment for impacted ureteral stones.
Constriction, Pathologic/*diagnosis ; Humans ; Hydronephrosis/diagnosis ; Kidney/ultrasonography ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Ureter/*pathology/ultrasonography ; Ureteral Calculi/*therapy ; Ureterolithiasis/*surgery ; Ureteroscopy/*adverse effects ; Urinary Bladder/ultrasonography

PURPOSE: We undertook this study to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, management, and outcome of postoperative ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for VUR were retrospectively reviewed and classified into two groups according to ureteral obstruction: the nonobstruction group (83 cases, 122 ureters; mean age, 7.0+/-2.8 years) and the obstruction group (7 cases, 10 ureters; mean age, 6.2+/-8.1 years). We analyzed the following factors: age, sex, injection material, laterality, voiding dysfunction, constipation, renal scarring, preoperative and postoperative ultrasound findings, endoscopic findings, injection number, and injection volume. Additionally, we reviewed the clinical manifestations, natural course, management, and outcome of ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment. RESULTS: The incidence of ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment was 7.6% (10/132 ureters). The type of bulking agent used and injection volume tended to be associated with ureteral obstruction. However, no significant risk factors for obstruction were identified between the two groups. Three patients showed no symptoms or signs after the onset of ureteral obstruction. Most of the patients with ureteral obstruction experienced spontaneous resolution within 1 month with conservative therapy. Two patients required temporary ureteral stents to release the ureteral obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the incidence of ureteral obstruction was slightly higher than in previous reports. Our study identified no predictive risk factors for developing ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment. Although most of the ureteral obstructions resolved spontaneously within 1 month, some cases required drainage to relieve symptoms or to prevent renal function deterioration.
Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cystoscopy/*adverse effects ; Drainage ; Female ; Humans ; Hydronephrosis/etiology ; Male ; Postoperative Period ; Prognosis ; Remission, Spontaneous ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stents ; Ureteral Obstruction/*etiology/pathology/therapy ; Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/*surgery

OBJECTIVETo compare clinical outcomes of three dimensional (3D) and traditional two dimentional (2D) laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

METHODSClinical data on 31 patients who underwent retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJO in Peking Union Medical Hospital from January 2013 to March 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 16 male and 15 female patients, and the age ranged from 21 to 42 years, mean (30 ± 6) years. The lesions of 20 cases were located on the left side and 11 cases on the right side. All cases were diagnosed as UPJO by B ultrasound and computed tomography urography (CTU). According to 3D or 2D laparoscopy, these patients were divided into two groups. The 3D laparoscopy group included 16 cases, who received 3D retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty. The 2D laparoscopy group included 15 cases, who received traditional 2D retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty. Demographic data (gender, age, laterality, body mass index), perioperative indexes and clinical outcomes (operative time, estimated blood loss , postoperative hospital stay, total hospitalization charge) were collected and compared between two groups.Numerical demographic and perioperative data were analyzed by using Student's t-test. Categorical data were compared using Pearson's Chi-square test.

RESULTSAll operations were completed successfully without open convertion.In the 3D laparoscopy group operative time was significantly shorter than 2D laparoscopy group ((106 ± 16) minutes vs. (124 ± 24) minutes, t = 5.993, P = 0.021) . There were no significant difference between two groups on the estimated blood loss ((54 ± 14) ml vs. (57 ± 16) ml, t = 0.285, P = 0.598), postoperative hospital stay ((7.3 ± 0.7) days vs. (7.5 ± 0.6) days, t = 1.415, P = 0.244), incidence of postoperative complications (0/16 vs. 1/15, χ(2) = 1.102, P = 0.484) and total hospitalization charge ((25 687 ± 3 032) RMB vs. (25 426 ± 2 626) RMB, t = 0.065, P = 0.800) . All patients were followed up from 3 to 12 months (mean 6 months).Ureteropelvic junction stricture recurred in 2 cases respectively from 3D laparoscopic group and traditional laparoscopic group. Both were cured.

CONCLUSIONS3D laparoscopic pyeloplasty is safe and feasible. Compared with the traditional 2D laparoscopic technology, 3D laparoscopy technology reduces the operation difficulty and shortens the operative time.

Adult ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Female ; Humans ; Hydronephrosis ; congenital ; surgery ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Kidney Pelvis ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney ; surgery ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Ureteral Obstruction ; surgery ; Urologic Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo investigate the diagnosis, treatment and surgical outcomes of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) caused by renal crossing vessels.

METHODSThe case records of 24 patients discharged from Peking University Third Hospital between June 2001 and September 2011 with the diagnosis of UPJO caused by renal crossing vessels were reviewed .Of the 24 patients, 17 were male and 7 were female patients. The mean age was 28 years (range, 2-63 years). The mean disease duration was 22.3 months (range, 7 days to 180 months). Of which, 4 patients underwent open surgery, and the other 20 patients were treated with laparoscopic surgery. Surgical approach was decided by operative conditions: adhesion release technique, dismembered pyeloplasty or Y-V anastomosisor, with or without cut off the crossing vessels. The kind of crossing vessels was recorded, and the effect of surgery was evaluated by follow-up.

RESULTSFifteen cases were caused by oppressed renal crossing artery, 8 cases by renal crossing vein, and 1 case by 2 renal crossing arteries and 1 renal crossing vein. Among them, 11 cases were followed up successfully. Average follow-up time was 48.2 months (range, 13-120 months). Eight cases (8/11) were relieved, and 1 case (1/11) had no obvious improvement, another 2 cases (2/11) were aggravating. Among those 6 cases underwent adhesion release technique, 3 cases were relieved, 1 case had no obvious improvement, and 2 cases were aggravating. Five cases who underwent dismembered pyeloplasty was relieved significantly.

CONCLUSIONSRenal crossing artery is one of the main causes of UPJO, the crossing artery should be retained as far as possible. Crossing vessel oppression is not the only pathological cause of UPJO, so the treatment of UPJ constriction is also very important. Dismembered pyeloplasty seems to be the most efficacies treatment procedure for UPJO caused by repressed vessels, and the remission rate of adhesion release technique seems limited.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Arteries ; surgery ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Hydronephrosis ; congenital ; etiology ; surgery ; Kidney ; blood supply ; Kidney Pelvis ; blood supply ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney ; etiology ; surgery ; Renal Artery ; abnormalities ; Treatment Outcome ; Ureteral Obstruction ; etiology ; surgery ; Young Adult

No abstract available.
Child ; Humans ; Hydronephrosis/*congenital/diagnosis/etiology ; Male ; Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney/diagnosis/*etiology ; Polyps/*complications/diagnosis/surgery ; Ureteral Diseases/complications/diagnosis/surgery ; Ureteral Obstruction/diagnosis/*etiology