Puji Xiaoduyin， a specialized formula for the swollen-head epidemic， was recorded in the Catalogue of Ancient Classical Formula （the Second Batch）-Han Medicine， published in September 2023. It had been inherited and developed by medical experts of successive generations and passed down to this day. This paper sorted out the historical evolution of this formula using bibliometric methods. It also comprehensively analyzed key information on the formula name， historical origin， drug dosage， herb origin， processing methods， decocting methods， function， and clinical applications. Additionally， this paper analyzed the application of this formula in both modern and ancient times. Results showed that the formula was first recorded as "Puji Xiaodu Yinzi" in LI Dongyuan's Proven Formulas written by LI Gao from the Jin dynasty. The medicinal composition and dosage were： Scutellariae Radix and Coptidis Rhizoma （20.65 g each）， Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma 12.39 g， Scrophulariae Radix， Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium， and Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma （8.26 g each）， Forsythiae Fructus， Arctii Fructus， Isatidis Radix， and Lasiosphaera Calvatia （4.13 g each）， Bombyx Batryticatus and Cimicifugae Rhizoma （2.891 g each）， Bupleuri Radix and Platycodonis Radix （8.26 g each）. These medicines were grounded to fine powder. One dose， including 20.65 g of the powder， was mixed with 600 mL of water and decocted to 300 mL. After abandoning slag， the medicine should be taken warm frequently. In the formula， Bombyx Batryticatus is stir-fired. With the effect of dispersing wind and clearing heat， removing stagnation and dissipating mass， the formula is specialized in swollen-head epidemic， pestilence， red and swelling head， face， and neck， dry mouth and tongue， as well as other diseases resulting from toxic heat stagnated in the upper jiao. The formula is widely used in treating diseases involving the respiratory， dermal， ophthalmologic， otolaryngologic， and nervous systems. The formula is most frequently used for respiratory diseases， with a wide range of symptoms including parotitis/mumps （66 times）， followed by tonsillitis （28 times）. In conclusion， the broadly applied formula has accurate efficacy and great development value.

Puji Xiaoduyin， a specialized formula for the swollen-head epidemic， was recorded in the Catalogue of Ancient Classical Formula （the Second Batch）-Han Medicine， published in September 2023. It had been inherited and developed by medical experts of successive generations and passed down to this day. This paper sorted out the historical evolution of this formula using bibliometric methods. It also comprehensively analyzed key information on the formula name， historical origin， drug dosage， herb origin， processing methods， decocting methods， function， and clinical applications. Additionally， this paper analyzed the application of this formula in both modern and ancient times. Results showed that the formula was first recorded as "Puji Xiaodu Yinzi" in LI Dongyuan's Proven Formulas written by LI Gao from the Jin dynasty. The medicinal composition and dosage were： Scutellariae Radix and Coptidis Rhizoma （20.65 g each）， Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma 12.39 g， Scrophulariae Radix， Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium， and Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma （8.26 g each）， Forsythiae Fructus， Arctii Fructus， Isatidis Radix， and Lasiosphaera Calvatia （4.13 g each）， Bombyx Batryticatus and Cimicifugae Rhizoma （2.891 g each）， Bupleuri Radix and Platycodonis Radix （8.26 g each）. These medicines were grounded to fine powder. One dose， including 20.65 g of the powder， was mixed with 600 mL of water and decocted to 300 mL. After abandoning slag， the medicine should be taken warm frequently. In the formula， Bombyx Batryticatus is stir-fired. With the effect of dispersing wind and clearing heat， removing stagnation and dissipating mass， the formula is specialized in swollen-head epidemic， pestilence， red and swelling head， face， and neck， dry mouth and tongue， as well as other diseases resulting from toxic heat stagnated in the upper jiao. The formula is widely used in treating diseases involving the respiratory， dermal， ophthalmologic， otolaryngologic， and nervous systems. The formula is most frequently used for respiratory diseases， with a wide range of symptoms including parotitis/mumps （66 times）， followed by tonsillitis （28 times）. In conclusion， the broadly applied formula has accurate efficacy and great development value.

Depression is a common mental dis-ease.At present,there are poor efficacy and drug-related safety problems in antidepressant treat-ment.Toludesvenlafaxine,as a new triple reuptake inhibitor(TRIs/SNDRIs),increases the inhibitory ef-fect of dopamine(DA)reuptake on the basis of se-rotonin(5-HT)and norepinephrine(NE),achieves multi-target synergistic therapy and reduces 5-HT/NE-related adverse drug reactions.This article re-views the basic introduction,preclinical research,clinical efficacy and safety of toludesvenlafaxine,in order to provide more ideas and options for the treatment of depression.

Depression is a common mental dis-ease.At present,there are poor efficacy and drug-related safety problems in antidepressant treat-ment.Toludesvenlafaxine,as a new triple reuptake inhibitor(TRIs/SNDRIs),increases the inhibitory ef-fect of dopamine(DA)reuptake on the basis of se-rotonin(5-HT)and norepinephrine(NE),achieves multi-target synergistic therapy and reduces 5-HT/NE-related adverse drug reactions.This article re-views the basic introduction,preclinical research,clinical efficacy and safety of toludesvenlafaxine,in order to provide more ideas and options for the treatment of depression.

Purpose To investigate the value of T2WI MR-based radiomics nomogram for predicting deep stromal invasion of cervical cancer preoperatively.Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of 164 consecutive patients with early-stage cervical cancer with postoperative pathological findings and preoperative MR images admitted to two medical centers in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University(first center)and the Huaihe Hospital of Henan University(second center)from May 2018 to August 2022.The data in the first center(n=1 14)and the second center(n=50)were divided into the training and validation cohorts,respectively.To segment T2WI images in the 3D Slicer software and to extract image features in the python software.The radiomic features were selected in the training cohort.Based on the selected features,support vector machine prediction model was constructed.Univariate Logistic regression was used to select clinicopathological risk factors,then,multi-variate Logistic regression combined with radiomics score was used to construct radiomics nomogram,diagnostic performance of the radiomics model,clinical prediction model and radiomics nomogram model were assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis.The predictive efficacy of the different models were compared.Results The 12 radiomics features were selected out.The FIGO staging and radiomics score were included in the multifactor Logistic regression to build the radiomics nomogram for predicting deep stromal invasion.The results showed that the predictive performance for the radiomics nomogram model was better than the clinical prediction model(in validation cohort:area under the curve was 0.845 vs.0.717;Z=2.728,P=0.006).Conclusion Radiomics nomogram based on T2WI is of high value for predicting deep stromal invasion of cervical cancer preoperatively.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anaprazole (40 mg and 60 mg) and compared with rabeprazole (20 mg) in the treatment of reflux esophagitis (RE).Methods:This multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, positive drug parallel controlled study was led by the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Shanghai Changhai Hospital) and a total of 24 clinical trial institutions nationwide including the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Yichun People′s Hospital, Meihekou Central Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, and Jinhua Central Hospital, participated in this research. A total of 156 patients with RE (Los Angeles grade A to D) were enrolled and randomly divided into 3 groups, anaprazole 40 mg group, anaprazole 60 mg group and rabeprazole 20 mg group, using a random number table in a ratio of 1∶1∶1. Patients in the above 3 groups were treated with the appropriate trial medication once per day for 4 or 8 weeks. The endoscopic healing rates were evaluated by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) and investigators. In addition, the improvement in the severity of individual symptoms (daytime reflux, daytime heartburn, nighttime reflux, nighttime heartburn) and medication safety were also evaluated. The endoscopic healing rates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) at week-8 and -4 were calculated by groups, as well as the difference in the healing rates and their 95% CI among groups. The chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. Results:A total of 153 subjects were included in the full analysis set (FAS), 144 in the per-protocol analysis set (PPS) and 151 in the safety set (SS). In the FAS, after 8 weeks of treatment, the endoscopic healing rates of anaprazole 40 mg group, anaprazde 60 mg group and raberazole 20 mg group blindly assessed by BICR were 86.0% (43/50), 86.5% (45/52) and 86.3% (44/51), respectively, and the 95% CI were 76.4% to 95.6%, 77.3% to 95.8% and 76.8% to 95.7%, respectively.The endoscopic healing rates of anaprazole 40 mg group, anaprazde 60 mg group and raberazole 20 mg group blindly evaluated by investigators were 88.0% (44/50), 90.4% (47/52) and 86.3% (44/51), respectively, and the 95% CI were 79.0% to 97.0%, 82.4% to 98.4% and 76.8% to 95.7%, respectively. The endoscopic healing rates were similar among groups. In the FAS, the differences in healing rates(95% CI) assessed by BICR and investigators between anaprazole 40 mg, anaprazole 60 mg and rabeprazole 20 mg group were -0.3%(-13.7% to 13.2%), 0.6%(-12.3% to 13.6%), respectively and 1.7%(-11.3% to 14.8%), 3.9%(-8.5% to 16.3%), respectively. The results of the PPS were consistent with those of the FAS. After 8 weeks of treatment, the severity scores of individual symptoms (daytime reflux, daytime heartburn, nighttime reflux, nighttime heartburn) decreased in all groups. The differences between post-treatment and baseline in anaprazole 40 mg group, anaprazole 60 mg group and rabeprazole 20 mg group were -1.54±1.00, -1.91±1.00, -1.51±0.76, -1.45±0.71; -1.30±0.94, -1.59±0.96, -1.33±0.65, -1.42±0.60; and -1.74±0.85, -1.76±0.93, -1.45±0.66, -1.66±0.79, respectively. The incidence of treatment emergent adverse event of anaprazole 40 mg group, anaprazole 60 mg group and rabeprazole 20 mg group were 57.1% (28/49), 48.1% (25/52) and 60.0% (30/50), respectively, and the incidence of treatment related adverse event were 18.4% (9/24), 25.0% (13/52) and 24.0% (12/50), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of treatment emergent adverse event and treatment related adverse event among 3 groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion:The efficacy and safety of anaprazole 40, 60 mg/d, and rabeprazole 20 mg/d in the treatment of RE are comparable.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose injectable dexlansoprazole in the treatment of acute upper gastrointestinal ulcer hemorrhage.Methods:This study was a randomized, double-blind, positive drug parallel controlled, multicenter clinical trial led by the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Shanghai Changhai Hospital), with participation from 43 hospitals such as Yichun People′s Hospital, Army Medical Center of PLA (Chongqing Daping Hospital), etc. From August 31, 2019 to May 25, 2020, 346 patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage caused by acute gastric and (or) duodenal ulcer were selected. The subjects were randomly divided into experimental group and control group according to a 2 to 1 stratification scheme using the SAS 9.4 software. The medication regimen for the experimental group was intravenous injection of dexlansoprazole 30 mg/times, once every 12 h, while the medication regimen for the control group was intravenous injection of lansoprazole and dexlansoprazole mimetics, 30 mg/times, once every 12 h; the treatment course was 5 days. The primary efficacy indicator (72 h effective hemostasis rate), the secondary efficacy indicator(clinical hemostasis rate at 24, 48, and 120 h, and the proportion of subjects who underwent endoscopic treatment or surgical procedures again due to hemorrhage within 5 days), and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the 2 groups. Binomial distribution normal approximation method was performed to calculate the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the difference in hemostasis rate between the experimental group and the control group. Fisher′s exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results:A total of 329 patients (219 cases in the experimental group and 110 cases in the control group) were enrolled. The 72 h effective hemostasis rate (95% CI) of the experimental and control group was 95.9%(210/219, 92.3% to 98.1%) and 93.6%(103/110, 87.3% to 97.4%), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The difference in the 72-hour effective hemostasis rate(95% CI) between the experimental and the control group was 2.3% (-3.0% to 7.5%). The clinical hemostasis rates at 24, 48, and 120 h of the treatment were 82.2% (176/214), 99.1%(210/212), and 100.0%(210/210) in the experimental group, and 85.2%(92/108), 98.1%(104/106), and 100.0%(105/105) in the control group, respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The proportion of subjects who underwent endoscopic treatment and surgical procedure again within 5 days (95% CI)of the experimental group and control group was 0 (0 to 1.7%) and 1.9% (0.2% to 6.5%), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The result of safety evaluation showed that the overall incidence of adverse reactions of the experimental group and the control group was 6.4% (14/219) and 11.8% (13/110), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). Conclusion:High dose injectable dexlansoloprazole is an effective and safe treatment for upper gastrointestinal ulcer hemorrhage, and suitable for clinical application.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anaprazole (40 mg and 60 mg) and compared with rabeprazole (20 mg) in the treatment of reflux esophagitis (RE).Methods:This multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, positive drug parallel controlled study was led by the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Shanghai Changhai Hospital) and a total of 24 clinical trial institutions nationwide including the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Yichun People′s Hospital, Meihekou Central Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, and Jinhua Central Hospital, participated in this research. A total of 156 patients with RE (Los Angeles grade A to D) were enrolled and randomly divided into 3 groups, anaprazole 40 mg group, anaprazole 60 mg group and rabeprazole 20 mg group, using a random number table in a ratio of 1∶1∶1. Patients in the above 3 groups were treated with the appropriate trial medication once per day for 4 or 8 weeks. The endoscopic healing rates were evaluated by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) and investigators. In addition, the improvement in the severity of individual symptoms (daytime reflux, daytime heartburn, nighttime reflux, nighttime heartburn) and medication safety were also evaluated. The endoscopic healing rates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) at week-8 and -4 were calculated by groups, as well as the difference in the healing rates and their 95% CI among groups. The chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. Results:A total of 153 subjects were included in the full analysis set (FAS), 144 in the per-protocol analysis set (PPS) and 151 in the safety set (SS). In the FAS, after 8 weeks of treatment, the endoscopic healing rates of anaprazole 40 mg group, anaprazde 60 mg group and raberazole 20 mg group blindly assessed by BICR were 86.0% (43/50), 86.5% (45/52) and 86.3% (44/51), respectively, and the 95% CI were 76.4% to 95.6%, 77.3% to 95.8% and 76.8% to 95.7%, respectively.The endoscopic healing rates of anaprazole 40 mg group, anaprazde 60 mg group and raberazole 20 mg group blindly evaluated by investigators were 88.0% (44/50), 90.4% (47/52) and 86.3% (44/51), respectively, and the 95% CI were 79.0% to 97.0%, 82.4% to 98.4% and 76.8% to 95.7%, respectively. The endoscopic healing rates were similar among groups. In the FAS, the differences in healing rates(95% CI) assessed by BICR and investigators between anaprazole 40 mg, anaprazole 60 mg and rabeprazole 20 mg group were -0.3%(-13.7% to 13.2%), 0.6%(-12.3% to 13.6%), respectively and 1.7%(-11.3% to 14.8%), 3.9%(-8.5% to 16.3%), respectively. The results of the PPS were consistent with those of the FAS. After 8 weeks of treatment, the severity scores of individual symptoms (daytime reflux, daytime heartburn, nighttime reflux, nighttime heartburn) decreased in all groups. The differences between post-treatment and baseline in anaprazole 40 mg group, anaprazole 60 mg group and rabeprazole 20 mg group were -1.54±1.00, -1.91±1.00, -1.51±0.76, -1.45±0.71; -1.30±0.94, -1.59±0.96, -1.33±0.65, -1.42±0.60; and -1.74±0.85, -1.76±0.93, -1.45±0.66, -1.66±0.79, respectively. The incidence of treatment emergent adverse event of anaprazole 40 mg group, anaprazole 60 mg group and rabeprazole 20 mg group were 57.1% (28/49), 48.1% (25/52) and 60.0% (30/50), respectively, and the incidence of treatment related adverse event were 18.4% (9/24), 25.0% (13/52) and 24.0% (12/50), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of treatment emergent adverse event and treatment related adverse event among 3 groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion:The efficacy and safety of anaprazole 40, 60 mg/d, and rabeprazole 20 mg/d in the treatment of RE are comparable.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose injectable dexlansoprazole in the treatment of acute upper gastrointestinal ulcer hemorrhage.Methods:This study was a randomized, double-blind, positive drug parallel controlled, multicenter clinical trial led by the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Shanghai Changhai Hospital), with participation from 43 hospitals such as Yichun People′s Hospital, Army Medical Center of PLA (Chongqing Daping Hospital), etc. From August 31, 2019 to May 25, 2020, 346 patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage caused by acute gastric and (or) duodenal ulcer were selected. The subjects were randomly divided into experimental group and control group according to a 2 to 1 stratification scheme using the SAS 9.4 software. The medication regimen for the experimental group was intravenous injection of dexlansoprazole 30 mg/times, once every 12 h, while the medication regimen for the control group was intravenous injection of lansoprazole and dexlansoprazole mimetics, 30 mg/times, once every 12 h; the treatment course was 5 days. The primary efficacy indicator (72 h effective hemostasis rate), the secondary efficacy indicator(clinical hemostasis rate at 24, 48, and 120 h, and the proportion of subjects who underwent endoscopic treatment or surgical procedures again due to hemorrhage within 5 days), and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the 2 groups. Binomial distribution normal approximation method was performed to calculate the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the difference in hemostasis rate between the experimental group and the control group. Fisher′s exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results:A total of 329 patients (219 cases in the experimental group and 110 cases in the control group) were enrolled. The 72 h effective hemostasis rate (95% CI) of the experimental and control group was 95.9%(210/219, 92.3% to 98.1%) and 93.6%(103/110, 87.3% to 97.4%), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The difference in the 72-hour effective hemostasis rate(95% CI) between the experimental and the control group was 2.3% (-3.0% to 7.5%). The clinical hemostasis rates at 24, 48, and 120 h of the treatment were 82.2% (176/214), 99.1%(210/212), and 100.0%(210/210) in the experimental group, and 85.2%(92/108), 98.1%(104/106), and 100.0%(105/105) in the control group, respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The proportion of subjects who underwent endoscopic treatment and surgical procedure again within 5 days (95% CI)of the experimental group and control group was 0 (0 to 1.7%) and 1.9% (0.2% to 6.5%), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The result of safety evaluation showed that the overall incidence of adverse reactions of the experimental group and the control group was 6.4% (14/219) and 11.8% (13/110), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). Conclusion:High dose injectable dexlansoloprazole is an effective and safe treatment for upper gastrointestinal ulcer hemorrhage, and suitable for clinical application.

This study aimed to explore key quality control factors that affected the prognosis of intensive care unit (ICU) patients in Chinese mainland over six years (2015-2020). The data for this study were from 31 provincial and municipal hospitals (3425 hospital ICUs) and included 2 110 685 ICU patients, for a total of 27 607 376 ICU hospitalization days. We found that 15 initially established quality control indicators were good predictors of patient prognosis, including percentage of ICU patients out of all inpatients (%), percentage of ICU bed occupancy of total inpatient bed occupancy (%), percentage of all ICU inpatients with an APACHE II score ⩾15 (%), three-hour (surviving sepsis campaign) SSC bundle compliance (%), six-hour SSC bundle compliance (%), rate of microbe detection before antibiotics (%), percentage of drug deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis (%), percentage of unplanned endotracheal extubations (%), percentage of patients reintubated within 48 hours (%), unplanned transfers to the ICU (%), 48-h ICU readmission rate (%), ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) (per 1000 ventilator days), catheter related blood stream infection (CRBSI) (per 1000 catheter days), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) (per 1000 catheter days), in-hospital mortality (%). When exploratory factor analysis was applied, the 15 indicators were divided into 6 core elements that varied in weight regarding quality evaluation: nosocomial infection management (21.35%), compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines (17.97%), ICU resources (17.46%), airway management (15.53%), prevention of deep-vein thrombosis (14.07%), and severity of patient condition (13.61%). Based on the different weights of the core elements associated with the 15 indicators, we developed an integrated quality scoring system defined as F score=21.35%xnosocomial infection management + 17.97%xcompliance with SSC guidelines + 17.46%×ICU resources + 15.53%×airway management + 14.07%×DVT prevention + 13.61%×severity of patient condition. This evidence-based quality scoring system will help in assessing the key elements of quality management and establish a foundation for further optimization of the quality control indicator system.
Humans ; China/epidemiology* ; Cross Infection/epidemiology* ; Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data* ; Quality Control ; Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data* ; Sepsis/therapy* ; East Asian People/statistics & numerical data*