Background::An evidence gap still exists regarding the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) in China. This study aimed to verify the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan vs. esomeprazole in patients with EE in China. Methods::This study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, non-inferiority phase III trial of patients with EE randomized 1:1 to tegoprazan 50 mg/day vs. esomeprazole 40 mg/day. This study was conducted in 32 sites between October 24, 2018 and October 18, 2019. The primary endpoint was the cumulative endoscopic healing rate at week 8. The secondary endpoint included endoscopic healing rate at week 4, changes in the reflux disease questionnaire (RDQ) and gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) scores, and symptom improvement. Results::A total of 261 patients were randomized: 132 to the tegoprazan group and 129 to the esomeprazole group. The cumulative endoscopic healing rate at 8 weeks in the tegoprazan group was non-inferior to that of the esomeprazole group (91.1% vs. 92.8%, difference: -1.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.5%, 5.0%, P = 0.008). There were no statistically significant differences in the changes in RDQ (total, severity, and frequency) and GERD-HRQL scores between the two groups (all P >0.05). The percentages of days without symptoms, including daytime and nighttime symptoms based on patients' diaries, were similar between the two groups (all P >0.05). In the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups, 71.5% (93/130) and 61.7% (79/128) of the participants reported adverse events (AEs), 2.3% and 0 experienced serious AEs, while 70.0% and 60.2% had treatment-emergent AEs, respectively. Conclusion::Tegoprazan 50 mg/day demonstrated non-inferior efficacy in healing EE, symptom improvement, and quality of life, and it has similar tolerability compared with esomeprazole 40 mg/day.

Objective To investigate the effect of subanesthetic dose of esketamine on emergence agitation(EA)in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair.Methods Seventy-two male patients who treated with lapa-roscopic hernia repair under general anesthesia were randomly divided into AS group(subanesthetic esketamine)and control group.In the AS group,0.2 mg/kg of esketamine was administered intravenously 30 minutes before the surgery ended,while the control group was given an equal volume of normal saline.Upon surgery completion,patients were transferred to PACU with endotracheal tube retained,and the time to extubation was recorded.Hemo-dynamic parameters were measured immediately after extubation and at 10 min,30 min,1 h,and 4 h thereafter.Patients' pain and sedation levels were assessed at the above time points using RASS and VAS,respectively.The incidence of EA was evaluated using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit(CAM-ICU).Observation duration in the PACU and recovery outcomes within 24 hours postoperatively were assessed via the QoR-40 and adverse events were recorded.Results Compared to those in the control group,patients in the AS group had higher HR and MAP at 10 min post-extubation,and the changes in HR and MAP over time were more stable(P<0.05).The RASS and VAS scores in the AS group were significantly lower than those in the control group at the time of extubation and all subsequent time points(P<0.05),both groups showed temporal changes in RASS and VAS scores(P<0.05),but the change process in the AS group was more stable(P<0.05).Postoperative extubation time,PACU observation duration,and adverse event rates(delirium,respiratory depression,nausea and vomiting)did not differ significantly between the two groups(P>0.05),while recovery quality was markedly better in the AS group(P<0.05).Conclusion Subanesthetic esketamine effectively alleviates pain and the incidence of EA,supports hemodynamic stability during PACU stay,and enhances recovery quality in patients undergoing laparo-scopic hernia repair,demonstrating clinical value.

Objective To investigate the effect of subanesthetic dose of esketamine on emergence agitation(EA)in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair.Methods Seventy-two male patients who treated with lapa-roscopic hernia repair under general anesthesia were randomly divided into AS group(subanesthetic esketamine)and control group.In the AS group,0.2 mg/kg of esketamine was administered intravenously 30 minutes before the surgery ended,while the control group was given an equal volume of normal saline.Upon surgery completion,patients were transferred to PACU with endotracheal tube retained,and the time to extubation was recorded.Hemo-dynamic parameters were measured immediately after extubation and at 10 min,30 min,1 h,and 4 h thereafter.Patients' pain and sedation levels were assessed at the above time points using RASS and VAS,respectively.The incidence of EA was evaluated using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit(CAM-ICU).Observation duration in the PACU and recovery outcomes within 24 hours postoperatively were assessed via the QoR-40 and adverse events were recorded.Results Compared to those in the control group,patients in the AS group had higher HR and MAP at 10 min post-extubation,and the changes in HR and MAP over time were more stable(P<0.05).The RASS and VAS scores in the AS group were significantly lower than those in the control group at the time of extubation and all subsequent time points(P<0.05),both groups showed temporal changes in RASS and VAS scores(P<0.05),but the change process in the AS group was more stable(P<0.05).Postoperative extubation time,PACU observation duration,and adverse event rates(delirium,respiratory depression,nausea and vomiting)did not differ significantly between the two groups(P>0.05),while recovery quality was markedly better in the AS group(P<0.05).Conclusion Subanesthetic esketamine effectively alleviates pain and the incidence of EA,supports hemodynamic stability during PACU stay,and enhances recovery quality in patients undergoing laparo-scopic hernia repair,demonstrating clinical value.

Background::An evidence gap still exists regarding the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) in China. This study aimed to verify the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan vs. esomeprazole in patients with EE in China. Methods::This study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, non-inferiority phase III trial of patients with EE randomized 1:1 to tegoprazan 50 mg/day vs. esomeprazole 40 mg/day. This study was conducted in 32 sites between October 24, 2018 and October 18, 2019. The primary endpoint was the cumulative endoscopic healing rate at week 8. The secondary endpoint included endoscopic healing rate at week 4, changes in the reflux disease questionnaire (RDQ) and gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) scores, and symptom improvement. Results::A total of 261 patients were randomized: 132 to the tegoprazan group and 129 to the esomeprazole group. The cumulative endoscopic healing rate at 8 weeks in the tegoprazan group was non-inferior to that of the esomeprazole group (91.1% vs. 92.8%, difference: -1.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.5%, 5.0%, P = 0.008). There were no statistically significant differences in the changes in RDQ (total, severity, and frequency) and GERD-HRQL scores between the two groups (all P >0.05). The percentages of days without symptoms, including daytime and nighttime symptoms based on patients' diaries, were similar between the two groups (all P >0.05). In the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups, 71.5% (93/130) and 61.7% (79/128) of the participants reported adverse events (AEs), 2.3% and 0 experienced serious AEs, while 70.0% and 60.2% had treatment-emergent AEs, respectively. Conclusion::Tegoprazan 50 mg/day demonstrated non-inferior efficacy in healing EE, symptom improvement, and quality of life, and it has similar tolerability compared with esomeprazole 40 mg/day.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose injectable dexlansoprazole in the treatment of acute upper gastrointestinal ulcer hemorrhage.Methods:This study was a randomized, double-blind, positive drug parallel controlled, multicenter clinical trial led by the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Shanghai Changhai Hospital), with participation from 43 hospitals such as Yichun People′s Hospital, Army Medical Center of PLA (Chongqing Daping Hospital), etc. From August 31, 2019 to May 25, 2020, 346 patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage caused by acute gastric and (or) duodenal ulcer were selected. The subjects were randomly divided into experimental group and control group according to a 2 to 1 stratification scheme using the SAS 9.4 software. The medication regimen for the experimental group was intravenous injection of dexlansoprazole 30 mg/times, once every 12 h, while the medication regimen for the control group was intravenous injection of lansoprazole and dexlansoprazole mimetics, 30 mg/times, once every 12 h; the treatment course was 5 days. The primary efficacy indicator (72 h effective hemostasis rate), the secondary efficacy indicator(clinical hemostasis rate at 24, 48, and 120 h, and the proportion of subjects who underwent endoscopic treatment or surgical procedures again due to hemorrhage within 5 days), and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the 2 groups. Binomial distribution normal approximation method was performed to calculate the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the difference in hemostasis rate between the experimental group and the control group. Fisher′s exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results:A total of 329 patients (219 cases in the experimental group and 110 cases in the control group) were enrolled. The 72 h effective hemostasis rate (95% CI) of the experimental and control group was 95.9%(210/219, 92.3% to 98.1%) and 93.6%(103/110, 87.3% to 97.4%), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The difference in the 72-hour effective hemostasis rate(95% CI) between the experimental and the control group was 2.3% (-3.0% to 7.5%). The clinical hemostasis rates at 24, 48, and 120 h of the treatment were 82.2% (176/214), 99.1%(210/212), and 100.0%(210/210) in the experimental group, and 85.2%(92/108), 98.1%(104/106), and 100.0%(105/105) in the control group, respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The proportion of subjects who underwent endoscopic treatment and surgical procedure again within 5 days (95% CI)of the experimental group and control group was 0 (0 to 1.7%) and 1.9% (0.2% to 6.5%), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The result of safety evaluation showed that the overall incidence of adverse reactions of the experimental group and the control group was 6.4% (14/219) and 11.8% (13/110), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). Conclusion:High dose injectable dexlansoloprazole is an effective and safe treatment for upper gastrointestinal ulcer hemorrhage, and suitable for clinical application.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose injectable dexlansoprazole in the treatment of acute upper gastrointestinal ulcer hemorrhage.Methods:This study was a randomized, double-blind, positive drug parallel controlled, multicenter clinical trial led by the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Shanghai Changhai Hospital), with participation from 43 hospitals such as Yichun People′s Hospital, Army Medical Center of PLA (Chongqing Daping Hospital), etc. From August 31, 2019 to May 25, 2020, 346 patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage caused by acute gastric and (or) duodenal ulcer were selected. The subjects were randomly divided into experimental group and control group according to a 2 to 1 stratification scheme using the SAS 9.4 software. The medication regimen for the experimental group was intravenous injection of dexlansoprazole 30 mg/times, once every 12 h, while the medication regimen for the control group was intravenous injection of lansoprazole and dexlansoprazole mimetics, 30 mg/times, once every 12 h; the treatment course was 5 days. The primary efficacy indicator (72 h effective hemostasis rate), the secondary efficacy indicator(clinical hemostasis rate at 24, 48, and 120 h, and the proportion of subjects who underwent endoscopic treatment or surgical procedures again due to hemorrhage within 5 days), and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the 2 groups. Binomial distribution normal approximation method was performed to calculate the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the difference in hemostasis rate between the experimental group and the control group. Fisher′s exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results:A total of 329 patients (219 cases in the experimental group and 110 cases in the control group) were enrolled. The 72 h effective hemostasis rate (95% CI) of the experimental and control group was 95.9%(210/219, 92.3% to 98.1%) and 93.6%(103/110, 87.3% to 97.4%), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The difference in the 72-hour effective hemostasis rate(95% CI) between the experimental and the control group was 2.3% (-3.0% to 7.5%). The clinical hemostasis rates at 24, 48, and 120 h of the treatment were 82.2% (176/214), 99.1%(210/212), and 100.0%(210/210) in the experimental group, and 85.2%(92/108), 98.1%(104/106), and 100.0%(105/105) in the control group, respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The proportion of subjects who underwent endoscopic treatment and surgical procedure again within 5 days (95% CI)of the experimental group and control group was 0 (0 to 1.7%) and 1.9% (0.2% to 6.5%), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The result of safety evaluation showed that the overall incidence of adverse reactions of the experimental group and the control group was 6.4% (14/219) and 11.8% (13/110), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). Conclusion:High dose injectable dexlansoloprazole is an effective and safe treatment for upper gastrointestinal ulcer hemorrhage, and suitable for clinical application.

Objective:To evaluate the value of autologous platelet-rich plasma (aPRP) separation-retransfusion for blood conservation in the patients undergoing thoracolumbar laminectomy.Methods:Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients, aged 18-60 yr, with body mass index of 19-30 kg/m 2, scheduled for elective thoracolumbar laminectomy, were divided into 2 groups ( n=30 each) using a random number table method: conventional blood conservation group (group C) and aPRP blood conservation group (group aPRP). Group C received tranexamic acid and autologous blood salvage-retransfusion. Group aPRP received aPRP separation-retransfusion, tranexamic acid and autologous blood salvage-retransfusion. The volume of allogeneic blood transfused, percentage of patients who did not need the allogeneic blood transfusion and adverse reactions were recorded. Venous blood samples were collected for blood routine examination and for determination of the plasma concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-10 at 1 day before operation (T 0), when the volume of blood loss reached 500 ml (T 1), immediately after surgery (T 2), and at 24 and 48 h after surgery (T 3, 4). The incidence of hypoxemia and amount of 24-h wound drainage were recorded. Results:Compared with group C, the amount of allogeneic red blood cells, plasma transfused and 24-h wound drainage were significantly decreased ( P<0.05), the percentage of patients who did not need the allogeneic red blood cell and plasma transfusion was increased (30% vs 47%, 10% vs 60%, P<0.05), the plasma concentrations of IL-6 and IL-10 at T 2-4 were significantly decreased ( P<0.05), and the incidence of hypoxemia in PACU was decreased in group aPRP (27% vs 10%, P<0.05). Conclusions:aPRP separation-retransfusion can provide marked improvement in conventional blood conservation in the patients undergoing thoracolumbar laminectomy.

Objective:To explore the real-world effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir-based regimen for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 6 infection in Hainan Island.Methods:Fifty-three cases with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 6 infection who were initially treated with a sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimen [sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) for 12 weeks or sofosbuvir combined with ribavirin (SOF+RBV) for 24 weeks], followed by 24 weeks of follow-up after discontinuation of the drug from January 2018 to March 2020 were selected. The primary outcome measures were incidence of sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR12) after the drug withdrawal. The secondary outcome measures were adverse drug events with sustained virological response at the end of treatment and 24 weeks after the end of treatment. The occurrence of adverse events was observed during the treatment. An intragroup comparison was performed by t-test. Intention-to-treat and modified intention-to-treat analysis was used for sustained virological respons.Results:The subtype distribution of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 6 in 53 cases of chronic hepatitis C infection were as follows: 22 cases of type 6a, 5 cases of type 6w, 5 cases of type 6xa, 3 cases of type 6v, 2 cases of type 6e, 2 cases of type 6r, 1 case of type 6xh, and 13 cases of special virus strains with undetermined genotype. The overall sustained virological response rate at 12 weeks after the drug withdrawal was 100%. Furthermore, HCV RNA was undetectable during the treatment period (4 weeks), at the end of treatment and after the treatment (24 weeks). There were seven cases of adverse events, mainly including fatigue, anorexia, and mild anemia; however, no serious adverse events were reported.Conclusion:Sofosbuvir-based regimen combined with ribavirin or velpatasvir cannot only achieve high response rate to HCV subtype 6a, but also obtain a good sustained virological response to the rare prevalent sub-genotypes and special virus strains of HCV genotype 6, with mild adverse reactions and acceptable safety profile.

Objective To investigate the current distribution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype in Southern China and to understand the HCV transmission and to infer its transmitting trend.Methods The HCV gene subtypes of 3 524 specimens from Southern China were detected and analyzed by polyonerase chain reaction (PCR)-fluorescence probe method or sequencing.The regular nested PCR and sequencing were used for the phylogenetic tree analysis when the fluorescence PCR inefficiently identifying virus isolates.Results Among 3 524 specimens,there were 2 922 cases from Guangdong,78 cases from Fujian,152 cases from Hainan and 372 cases from Guangxi.Genotype 1b comprised the majority (1 808/ 3 524,51.3％),followed by genotype 6a (925/3 524,26.2％),2a (298/3 524,8.46％),3a (246/ 3 524,6.98％),3b (200/3 524,5.68％) and 1a (27/3 524,0.77％).In addition,1 case wasgenotype 6e,1 case was genotype 6q,1 case was genotype 6r,3 case were genotype 6w,2 case were genotype 6xa,2 case were genotype 6n,and 1 case was genotype 6 with unclassified subtype.The genotype 1b accounted for the majority in most areas of 21 cities and counties in Guangdong Province,followed by genotype 6a.But in some areas,the major genotype was genotype 6a,followed by 1b.Genotype 4,genotype 5 and genotype 7 were not found in this study.Conclusions In the past two years,genotype 1b and 6a are still the epidemic genotypes in Guangdong,Guangxi and Hainan provinces.However,genotype 6a has replaced 1b as the dominant one in some areas in Guangdong Province.The distributions of HCV genotypes do not change significantly in Guangxi and Fujian provinces.