Objective: To compare the effects of eccentric cycling (ECC), concentric cycling (CON), and standard care (CTL) on cardiopulmonary capacity, respiratory health, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: Thirty-one CKD patients were divided into the CTL, CON, and ECC groups. The CON and ECC groups participated in 8-week, 24-session cycling programs. Outcomes were assessed through cardiopulmonary exercise tests, respiratory function tests, and the 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument questionnaire. Results: The ECC group achieved significant improvements in maximal oxygen uptake, while the CTL group showed a decline. For oxygen uptake efficiency slope, significant changes were observed only in the ECC group, with a group-by-time interaction effect compared to CTL. Furthermore, the ECC group demonstrated the most significant increase in diaphragm movement and a significant increase in diaphragm thickness, with comparisons indicating that ECC outperformed both CTL and CON. Regarding QoL, the ECC group exhibited significantly greater improvements in Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary, with statistically significant differences compared with the CTL and CON groups. Conclusion ECC is a low-effort, high-benefit exercise modality that significantly enhances cardiopulmonary fitness, respiratory function, and QoL in patients with CKD.

Objectives: Concerns about erythropoietin (EPO) therapy for anemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) contributing to potential bone loss and increased fracture risks are growing. This study investigated the impact of EPO administration on the risk of common osteoporotic fractures in ESRD patients. Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study compared EPO users and non-EPO users among ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis, diagnosed with ESRD between 2000 and 2014 identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The cohorts were matched at a propensity score ratio of 1:1, resulting in equal sample sizes of 2839. Variables related to comorbidities were considered. Results: EPO users exhibited higher cumulative incidences of major osteoporotic fractures, hip fractures, spine fractures, and wrist fractures compared with the non-EPO user (all P < 0.001). In adjusted Cox regression models, higher adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios (aSHRs) were observed for major osteoporotic fractures (2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.01–2.89), osteoporotic hip fractures (2.19, 95% CI = 1.69–2.85), spine fractures (2.50, 95% CI = 1.87–3.34), and wrist fractures (2.34, 95% CI = 1.44–3.78) in EPO users than in nonEPO users. The risk of major osteoporotic fractures significantly increased with increasing EPO doses (P for trend < 0.0001), and a similar trend was observed for the risks of osteoporotic spine and wrist fractures. Conclusions Our findings suggest that EPO treatment in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis is associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures.

Background/Aims: Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients who failed antiviral therapy are at increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study assessed the potential role of metformin and statins, medications for diabetes mellitus (DM) and hyperlipidemia (HLP), in reducing HCC risk among these patients. Methods: We included CHC patients from the T-COACH study who failed antiviral therapy. We tracked the onset of HCC 1.5 years post-therapy by linking to Taiwan’s cancer registry data from 2003 to 2019. We accounted for death and liver transplantation as competing risks and employed Gray’s cumulative incidence and Cox subdistribution hazards models to analyze HCC development. Results: Out of 2,779 patients, 480 (17.3%) developed HCC post-therapy. DM patients not using metformin had a 51% increased risk of HCC compared to non-DM patients, while HLP patients on statins had a 50% reduced risk compared to those without HLP. The 5-year HCC incidence was significantly higher for metformin non-users (16.5%) versus non-DM patients (11.3%; adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio [aSHR]=1.51; P=0.007) and metformin users (3.1%; aSHR=1.59; P=0.022). Statin use in HLP patients correlated with a lower HCC risk (3.8%) compared to non-HLP patients (12.5%; aSHR=0.50; P<0.001). Notably, the increased HCC risk associated with non-use of metformin was primarily seen in non-cirrhotic patients, whereas statins decreased HCC risk in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients. Conclusions Metformin and statins may have a chemopreventive effect against HCC in CHC patients who failed antiviral therapy. These results support the need for personalized preventive strategies in managing HCC risk.

Objectives: Concerns about erythropoietin (EPO) therapy for anemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) contributing to potential bone loss and increased fracture risks are growing. This study investigated the impact of EPO administration on the risk of common osteoporotic fractures in ESRD patients. Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study compared EPO users and non-EPO users among ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis, diagnosed with ESRD between 2000 and 2014 identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The cohorts were matched at a propensity score ratio of 1:1, resulting in equal sample sizes of 2839. Variables related to comorbidities were considered. Results: EPO users exhibited higher cumulative incidences of major osteoporotic fractures, hip fractures, spine fractures, and wrist fractures compared with the non-EPO user (all P < 0.001). In adjusted Cox regression models, higher adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios (aSHRs) were observed for major osteoporotic fractures (2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.01–2.89), osteoporotic hip fractures (2.19, 95% CI = 1.69–2.85), spine fractures (2.50, 95% CI = 1.87–3.34), and wrist fractures (2.34, 95% CI = 1.44–3.78) in EPO users than in nonEPO users. The risk of major osteoporotic fractures significantly increased with increasing EPO doses (P for trend < 0.0001), and a similar trend was observed for the risks of osteoporotic spine and wrist fractures. Conclusions Our findings suggest that EPO treatment in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis is associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures.

Objectives: Concerns about erythropoietin (EPO) therapy for anemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) contributing to potential bone loss and increased fracture risks are growing. This study investigated the impact of EPO administration on the risk of common osteoporotic fractures in ESRD patients. Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study compared EPO users and non-EPO users among ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis, diagnosed with ESRD between 2000 and 2014 identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The cohorts were matched at a propensity score ratio of 1:1, resulting in equal sample sizes of 2839. Variables related to comorbidities were considered. Results: EPO users exhibited higher cumulative incidences of major osteoporotic fractures, hip fractures, spine fractures, and wrist fractures compared with the non-EPO user (all P < 0.001). In adjusted Cox regression models, higher adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios (aSHRs) were observed for major osteoporotic fractures (2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.01–2.89), osteoporotic hip fractures (2.19, 95% CI = 1.69–2.85), spine fractures (2.50, 95% CI = 1.87–3.34), and wrist fractures (2.34, 95% CI = 1.44–3.78) in EPO users than in nonEPO users. The risk of major osteoporotic fractures significantly increased with increasing EPO doses (P for trend < 0.0001), and a similar trend was observed for the risks of osteoporotic spine and wrist fractures. Conclusions Our findings suggest that EPO treatment in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis is associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures.

Objectives: Concerns about erythropoietin (EPO) therapy for anemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) contributing to potential bone loss and increased fracture risks are growing. This study investigated the impact of EPO administration on the risk of common osteoporotic fractures in ESRD patients. Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study compared EPO users and non-EPO users among ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis, diagnosed with ESRD between 2000 and 2014 identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The cohorts were matched at a propensity score ratio of 1:1, resulting in equal sample sizes of 2839. Variables related to comorbidities were considered. Results: EPO users exhibited higher cumulative incidences of major osteoporotic fractures, hip fractures, spine fractures, and wrist fractures compared with the non-EPO user (all P < 0.001). In adjusted Cox regression models, higher adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios (aSHRs) were observed for major osteoporotic fractures (2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.01–2.89), osteoporotic hip fractures (2.19, 95% CI = 1.69–2.85), spine fractures (2.50, 95% CI = 1.87–3.34), and wrist fractures (2.34, 95% CI = 1.44–3.78) in EPO users than in nonEPO users. The risk of major osteoporotic fractures significantly increased with increasing EPO doses (P for trend < 0.0001), and a similar trend was observed for the risks of osteoporotic spine and wrist fractures. Conclusions Our findings suggest that EPO treatment in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis is associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures.

Objectives: Concerns about erythropoietin (EPO) therapy for anemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) contributing to potential bone loss and increased fracture risks are growing. This study investigated the impact of EPO administration on the risk of common osteoporotic fractures in ESRD patients. Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study compared EPO users and non-EPO users among ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis, diagnosed with ESRD between 2000 and 2014 identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The cohorts were matched at a propensity score ratio of 1:1, resulting in equal sample sizes of 2839. Variables related to comorbidities were considered. Results: EPO users exhibited higher cumulative incidences of major osteoporotic fractures, hip fractures, spine fractures, and wrist fractures compared with the non-EPO user (all P < 0.001). In adjusted Cox regression models, higher adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios (aSHRs) were observed for major osteoporotic fractures (2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.01–2.89), osteoporotic hip fractures (2.19, 95% CI = 1.69–2.85), spine fractures (2.50, 95% CI = 1.87–3.34), and wrist fractures (2.34, 95% CI = 1.44–3.78) in EPO users than in nonEPO users. The risk of major osteoporotic fractures significantly increased with increasing EPO doses (P for trend < 0.0001), and a similar trend was observed for the risks of osteoporotic spine and wrist fractures. Conclusions Our findings suggest that EPO treatment in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis is associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures.