Purpose: This study investigated the results of antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing in Korean patients with uveitis, examining its relationship with the clinical course of uveitis and systemic diseases. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the medical records of 64 patients with noninfectious uveitis who underwent ANA testing and were followed for at least 6 months at the Department of Ophthalmology at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital from January 2006 to December 2021. Patients were divided into ANA-positive and ANA-negative groups and correlations between uveitis-related factors and ANA status were assessed. Results: Among the 516 patients tested for ANA, 6.58% (34/516) were positive. The initial visual acuity (logMAR) before treatment was significantly better in the ANA-positive group (0.21 ± 0.20) than in the ANA-negative group (0.59 ± 0.68) (p = 0.002). However, the final visual acuity after treatment showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Additionally, no statistically significant differences were observed in terms of immune deficiency status, types of associated rheumatic disease, rheumatoid factor positivity, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (define) levels, or treatment modalities. No significant correlation was found between ANA titers and the severity of uveitis. Conclusions Relationships between ANA positivity and the etiology, treatment outcomes, and systemic diseases associated with uveitis are unclear. Routine ANA testing is not recommended for the diagnosis of uveitis.

Purpose: To report the clinical utility of the Barrett True-K formula in predicting multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) power in a patient with corneal deformation caused by radial keratotomy (RK), where postoperative refractive power prediction is challenging.Case summary: A 61-year-old male who underwent RK 30 years ago presented for cataract surgery. Slit-lamp examination showed eight RK incisions in each eye. Refractive error was +3.25 D sph; -1.75 D cyl, axis 70 in the right eye and +2.75 D sph; -1.00 D cyl, axis 110 in the left. Uncorrected visual acuity was 0.32 in the right eye and 0.63 in the left. IOL power was calculated using the Barrett True-K formula on the IOLMaster 700, with a target refraction of -0.25 D, and a multifocal IOL was implanted. Six months after cataract surgery, both eyes achieved a fraction close to emmetropia, with best corrected visual acuity of 0.63 in the right eye and 1.0 in the left. No significant refractive shifts or other complications were observed during surgery or 6-month follow-up. Conclusions The Barrett True-K formula, which measures the actual corneal refractive power to compensate for corneal deformation, is expected to be clinically useful for multifocal IOL implantation during cataract surgery in eyes after RK.

Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of early pars plana vitrectomy versus intravitreal antibiotic injection in patients who developed infectious endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. Methods: The medical records of patients diagnosed with infectious endophthalmitis following cataract surgery between 2006 and 2023, whose initial best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) values were 0.48 to 2.3 in LogMAR units, were retrospectively reviewed. Final BCVA and the degree of visual improvement were compared between early vitrectomy and intravitreal antibiotic injection-only groups. Additionally, patients who underwent delayed vitrectomy within 3 days after the initial intravitreal antibiotic injection (delayed vitrectomy group) were separately analyzed and compared. Results: At 6 months post-treatment, the mean BCVA values were significantly better in the early vitrectomy group (0.37 ± 0.27) than in the injection group (1.02 ± 0.81) (p = 0.004); the early vitrectomy group also had greater visual improvement at both 1 week and 6 months after treatment (p = 0.004, p < 0.001). Compared to the delayed vitrectomy group, the early group demonstrated significantly greater visual improvement at both time points (p = 0.010, p = 0.001). The retreatment rate was higher in the injection group than in the early vitrectomy group. Conclusions In patients who developed infectious endophthalmitis after cataract surgery and had an initial visual acuity between light perception or better and 20/60, early vitrectomy resulted in better visual outcomes compared to intravitreal antibiotic injection alone or delayed vitrectomy.

Background/Aims: The optimal vascular access strategy for very elderly patients initiating hemodialysis (HD) remains unclear. Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) offer long-term benefits but may be limited due to vascular aging. This study evaluated vascular access outcomes in patients aged ≥ 80 years. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service between 2008 and 2019. Patients aged ≥ 80 years who initiated HD with a newly created AVF or arteriovenous graft (AVG) were included. Primary outcomes were primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. Outcomes were compared using Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression. Results: Among 8,487 patients, 5,124 (60.4%) received AVFs (AVF group) and 3,363 (39.6%) received AVGs (AVG group). AVFs were associated with significantly lower rates of patency loss across all definitions. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for AVG vs. AVF were 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.67–1.86) for primary patency loss, 1.90 (95% CI, 1.77–2.03) for assisted primary, and 3.18 (95% CI, 2.81–3.61) for secondary patency loss. All-cause mortality was also higher in the AVG group (adjusted HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.17–1.30). Conclusions In this large-scale study, AVF use was associated with superior patency and lower mortality compared with AVG in patients aged ≥ 80 years. These findings suggest that AVF remains a beneficial option for appropriately selected elderly patients and that age alone should not be a primary barrier to its creation.

Background/Aims: Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is a rare but important cause of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The clinical course of GAVE is not well-known, and recurrent bleeding from GAVE is a therapeutic challenge. Therefore, we investigated the clinical course of GAVE and identified the risk factors for bleeding from it. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients diagnosed with GAVE using upper GI endoscopy at Asan Medical Center between January 2004 and December 2019 and evaluated the clinical course and risk factors for bleeding from GAVE. Results: Of the 348 patients (mean age, 62.3 ± 10.7 years; male, 62%), bleeding from GAVE occurred in 123 (35%) patients during follow-up (median, 17.3 months; interquartile range [IQR], 4.2–46.6). GI bleeding from GAVE was significantly associated with Child–Pugh class B or C liver cirrhosis (odds ratio [OR], 2.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57–4.16), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.52–5.07), use of antithrombotic agents (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.13–4.82), and involvement of the duodenal bulb (OR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.76–5.86). Rebleeding occurred in 39 of 123 patients (32%), in whom CKD (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.12–5.81) was significantly associated with rebleeding. Endoscopic hemostasis was most commonly performed using argon plasma coagulation, and the median number of endoscopic hemostasis performed was 2 (IQR, 1–3). Conclusions A careful follow-up for bleeding is needed in GAVE patients with liver cirrhosis, CKD, use of antithrombotic agents, and duodenal bulb involvement.

Purpose: The chromodomain helicase DNA-binding (CHD) protein family comprises adenosine triphosphate-dependent chromatin remodelers that regulate chromatin structure and gene expression. Pathogenic CHD2 variants are associated with neurodevelopmental phenotypes, but these genotype–phenotype correlations remain unclear. This study aimed to delineate the clinical and genetic features of patients with CHD2-related disorders and to explore the associated genotype–phenotype relationships. Methods: Among 22 patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic CHD2 variants identified using a customized 172-gene neurodevelopmental and epilepsy panel, 19 with sufficient clinical data were included. Demographic, clinical, neuroimaging, electroencephalographic, and genetic data were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Eighteen pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified, including eight novel variants: nine nonsense (50.0%), five splice-site (27.8%), two missense (11.1%), and two exon deletions (11.1%). All patients had epilepsy, with a median age of seizure onset of 2.33 years. Comorbidities included global developmental delay (89.5%), intellectual disability (82.0%), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (47.4%). Seizure types were heterogeneous, with a predominance of generalized-onset seizures, and 13 patients (68.4%) achieved seizure freedom. Marked phenotypic variability was observed: two unrelated patients with the same truncating variant had different developmental and seizure-related profiles, a symptomatic child with an inherited exon 5 deletion contrasted with her asymptomatic father, and a patient with an exon 17–29 deletion exhibited relatively mild features. Conclusion Epilepsy was a consistent manifestation in this study and was accompanied by diverse developmental and neurobehavioral features, with substantial genotype–phenotype discordance. Further research on genotype–phenotype correlation is warranted.

Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

Background: Laser procedures are integral to dermatologic practice, yet safety measures- particularly regarding ocular protection and plume control- are poorly studied in real-world settings. Objective: To evaluate current practices in eye protection, infection control, and occupational risk awareness among Korean dermatologists performing laser treatments. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among board-certified dermatologists at the 2024 Korean Society for Dermatologic Laser Surgery meeting. The questionnaire covered demographics, laser frequency, use of goggles and masks, infection control strategies, ophthalmologic monitoring, and history of warts or cancer. Results: Seventy-nine respondents completed the survey. All reported using protective goggles, but only 26.6% and 22.8% did so for CO 2 and erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet lasers, respectively. Only 24.1% underwent regular eye exams, and 13.9% reported eye conditions after starting laser practice. While 89.9% used masks, 40.8% used dental masks, which are inadequate for plume protection. Suction devices were used by 94.9%, though performance specifications were unclear. Warts were reported by 46.8% of respondents; two reported cancer diagnoses after initiating laser work. Conclusion Despite high overall adherence to basic safety practices, critical gaps remain. Our findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and long-term occupational health monitoring to ensure safe laser practice.