Purpose: Adjuvant pembrolizumab improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) versus placebo in participants with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at increased risk of recurrence after nephrectomy in the global phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 study. This post hoc subgroup analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant pembrolizumab in East Asian (Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan) participants enrolled in KEYNOTE-564. Materials and Methods: Eligible participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive adjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤ 17 cycles. The primary endpoint was DFS by investigator assessment. OS was a key secondary endpoint. Safety was a secondary endpoint. Results: The East Asian subgroup included 126 participants (pembrolizumab, n=58; placebo, n=68). Median follow-up was 62.1 months (range, 49.6 to 73.0 months). Hazard ratio for DFS with pembrolizumab versus placebo was 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.41 to 1.20). Median DFS was not reached with pembrolizumab versus 58.8 months with placebo; estimated 48-month rate was 61.3% versus 51.2%. Hazard ratio for OS was 0.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 1.49). Median OS was not reached with pembrolizumab and placebo; estimated 48-month rate was 94.8% versus 91.2%. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 70.7% of participants (29.3% grade 3 or 4) receiving pembrolizumab and 36.8% of participants (0.0% grade 3 or 4) receiving placebo. No pembrolizumab-related deaths occurred. Conclusion In the KEYNOTE-564 East Asian subgroup, adjuvant pembrolizumab provided DFS and OS benefits versus placebo and had a safety profile consistent with the global results. These results further support pembrolizumab as adjuvant treatment for East Asian patients with RCC at increased risk of recurrence after nephrectomy.

Sarcopenia, characterized by progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength, is a prevalent but often overlooked condition in patients with cancer who are terminally ill. It contributes to functional decline, increased symptom burden, and reduced quality of life, yet remains underrecognized in palliative care. Diagnosing sarcopenia in this population is challenging because conventional imaging techniques are often impractical. Instead, alternative assessments, such as the Strength, Assistance with walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs, and Falls questionnaire (SARC-F), anthropometric measurements, and bioelectrical impedance analysis offer feasible options. Management should focus on symptom relief, functional preservation, and patient comfort, rather than on muscle mass restoration.Nutritional support must be tailored to prognosis, with aggressive interventions generally avoided during end-of-life care. Although exercise may help to maintain mobility and alleviate symptoms, its feasibility is often limited. Pharmacological interventions, including appetite stimulants and anti-cachexia agents, remain largely investigational, with insufficient evidence for routine use in palliative care. Future research should refine sarcopenia assessment methods and develop patient-centered interventions that align with palliative care principles, emphasizing quality of life and individualized needs.

Background: We aimed to analyze the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of malaria caused by Plasmodium vivax among military members of the Republic of Korea (ROK). Methods: We reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with P. vivax malaria in 16 military hospitals in the ROK between 2012–2021, excluding other types of malaria, as well as imported cases and those treated in civilian hospitals. Results: In total, 653 patients were treated for P. vivax malaria. Their mean age was 22.0 ± 3.8 years, and their mean body weight was 73.4 ± 10.8 kg. Hospitalization occurred in 92.0% (n = 601) of the cases, with 4.4% (n = 29) recurring. The mean administered dose was 20.7 ± 3.4 mg/kg for the chloroquine (CQ) base and 3.5 ± 1.2 mg/kg for the primaquine (PQ) base.Between 2012–2016 and 2017–2021, the mean patient body weight increased (72.9 ± 11.1 vs.74.3 ± 10.3 kg, P = 0.044). Correspondingly, the total administered doses of CQ (1,476.0 ± 144.0 vs. 1,515.1 ± 155.1 mg, P = 0.010) and PQ (242.6 ± 79.7 vs. 265.7 ± 92.3 mg, P < 0.001) were increased. However, there was no difference in the weight-based dosage of CQ (20.7 ± 3.6 vs. 20.7 ± 3.2 mg/kg, P = 0.580) or PQ (3.33 ± 1.1 vs. 3.64 ± 1.3 mg/kg, P = 0.256), nor in the percentage of patients who received sub-recommended doses. Among the 27 patients who experienced recurrence and had available initial treatment data, the proportion of those prescribed PQ (24 [88.9%] vs. 623 [99.5%], P = 0.001) and the mean PQ dose (2.75 ± 0.7 vs.3.50 ± 1.2 mg/kg, P = 0.003) were significantly lower in the recurrence group. Conclusion Over time, as the body weight of patients with P. vivax malaria in the ROK military has increased, the administered dosages of CQ and PQ have correspondingly risen.However, these dosages often remain suboptimal when compared to the body weightbased recommendations by the World Health Organization. Of particular concern is the continued administration of antimalarial drugs at suboptimal doses, which may contribute to an elevated risk of recurrence. Further education may therefore be beneficial to ensuring appropriate dosing for more effective malaria treatment.

Background: We aimed to analyze the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of malaria caused by Plasmodium vivax among military members of the Republic of Korea (ROK). Methods: We reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with P. vivax malaria in 16 military hospitals in the ROK between 2012–2021, excluding other types of malaria, as well as imported cases and those treated in civilian hospitals. Results: In total, 653 patients were treated for P. vivax malaria. Their mean age was 22.0 ± 3.8 years, and their mean body weight was 73.4 ± 10.8 kg. Hospitalization occurred in 92.0% (n = 601) of the cases, with 4.4% (n = 29) recurring. The mean administered dose was 20.7 ± 3.4 mg/kg for the chloroquine (CQ) base and 3.5 ± 1.2 mg/kg for the primaquine (PQ) base.Between 2012–2016 and 2017–2021, the mean patient body weight increased (72.9 ± 11.1 vs.74.3 ± 10.3 kg, P = 0.044). Correspondingly, the total administered doses of CQ (1,476.0 ± 144.0 vs. 1,515.1 ± 155.1 mg, P = 0.010) and PQ (242.6 ± 79.7 vs. 265.7 ± 92.3 mg, P < 0.001) were increased. However, there was no difference in the weight-based dosage of CQ (20.7 ± 3.6 vs. 20.7 ± 3.2 mg/kg, P = 0.580) or PQ (3.33 ± 1.1 vs. 3.64 ± 1.3 mg/kg, P = 0.256), nor in the percentage of patients who received sub-recommended doses. Among the 27 patients who experienced recurrence and had available initial treatment data, the proportion of those prescribed PQ (24 [88.9%] vs. 623 [99.5%], P = 0.001) and the mean PQ dose (2.75 ± 0.7 vs.3.50 ± 1.2 mg/kg, P = 0.003) were significantly lower in the recurrence group. Conclusion Over time, as the body weight of patients with P. vivax malaria in the ROK military has increased, the administered dosages of CQ and PQ have correspondingly risen.However, these dosages often remain suboptimal when compared to the body weightbased recommendations by the World Health Organization. Of particular concern is the continued administration of antimalarial drugs at suboptimal doses, which may contribute to an elevated risk of recurrence. Further education may therefore be beneficial to ensuring appropriate dosing for more effective malaria treatment.

Background: We aimed to analyze the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of malaria caused by Plasmodium vivax among military members of the Republic of Korea (ROK). Methods: We reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with P. vivax malaria in 16 military hospitals in the ROK between 2012–2021, excluding other types of malaria, as well as imported cases and those treated in civilian hospitals. Results: In total, 653 patients were treated for P. vivax malaria. Their mean age was 22.0 ± 3.8 years, and their mean body weight was 73.4 ± 10.8 kg. Hospitalization occurred in 92.0% (n = 601) of the cases, with 4.4% (n = 29) recurring. The mean administered dose was 20.7 ± 3.4 mg/kg for the chloroquine (CQ) base and 3.5 ± 1.2 mg/kg for the primaquine (PQ) base.Between 2012–2016 and 2017–2021, the mean patient body weight increased (72.9 ± 11.1 vs.74.3 ± 10.3 kg, P = 0.044). Correspondingly, the total administered doses of CQ (1,476.0 ± 144.0 vs. 1,515.1 ± 155.1 mg, P = 0.010) and PQ (242.6 ± 79.7 vs. 265.7 ± 92.3 mg, P < 0.001) were increased. However, there was no difference in the weight-based dosage of CQ (20.7 ± 3.6 vs. 20.7 ± 3.2 mg/kg, P = 0.580) or PQ (3.33 ± 1.1 vs. 3.64 ± 1.3 mg/kg, P = 0.256), nor in the percentage of patients who received sub-recommended doses. Among the 27 patients who experienced recurrence and had available initial treatment data, the proportion of those prescribed PQ (24 [88.9%] vs. 623 [99.5%], P = 0.001) and the mean PQ dose (2.75 ± 0.7 vs.3.50 ± 1.2 mg/kg, P = 0.003) were significantly lower in the recurrence group. Conclusion Over time, as the body weight of patients with P. vivax malaria in the ROK military has increased, the administered dosages of CQ and PQ have correspondingly risen.However, these dosages often remain suboptimal when compared to the body weightbased recommendations by the World Health Organization. Of particular concern is the continued administration of antimalarial drugs at suboptimal doses, which may contribute to an elevated risk of recurrence. Further education may therefore be beneficial to ensuring appropriate dosing for more effective malaria treatment.

Background: We aimed to analyze the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of malaria caused by Plasmodium vivax among military members of the Republic of Korea (ROK). Methods: We reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with P. vivax malaria in 16 military hospitals in the ROK between 2012–2021, excluding other types of malaria, as well as imported cases and those treated in civilian hospitals. Results: In total, 653 patients were treated for P. vivax malaria. Their mean age was 22.0 ± 3.8 years, and their mean body weight was 73.4 ± 10.8 kg. Hospitalization occurred in 92.0% (n = 601) of the cases, with 4.4% (n = 29) recurring. The mean administered dose was 20.7 ± 3.4 mg/kg for the chloroquine (CQ) base and 3.5 ± 1.2 mg/kg for the primaquine (PQ) base.Between 2012–2016 and 2017–2021, the mean patient body weight increased (72.9 ± 11.1 vs.74.3 ± 10.3 kg, P = 0.044). Correspondingly, the total administered doses of CQ (1,476.0 ± 144.0 vs. 1,515.1 ± 155.1 mg, P = 0.010) and PQ (242.6 ± 79.7 vs. 265.7 ± 92.3 mg, P < 0.001) were increased. However, there was no difference in the weight-based dosage of CQ (20.7 ± 3.6 vs. 20.7 ± 3.2 mg/kg, P = 0.580) or PQ (3.33 ± 1.1 vs. 3.64 ± 1.3 mg/kg, P = 0.256), nor in the percentage of patients who received sub-recommended doses. Among the 27 patients who experienced recurrence and had available initial treatment data, the proportion of those prescribed PQ (24 [88.9%] vs. 623 [99.5%], P = 0.001) and the mean PQ dose (2.75 ± 0.7 vs.3.50 ± 1.2 mg/kg, P = 0.003) were significantly lower in the recurrence group. Conclusion Over time, as the body weight of patients with P. vivax malaria in the ROK military has increased, the administered dosages of CQ and PQ have correspondingly risen.However, these dosages often remain suboptimal when compared to the body weightbased recommendations by the World Health Organization. Of particular concern is the continued administration of antimalarial drugs at suboptimal doses, which may contribute to an elevated risk of recurrence. Further education may therefore be beneficial to ensuring appropriate dosing for more effective malaria treatment.

The combination of oxycodone and naloxone is useful for cancer pain management. Naloxone, as a pure opioid antagonist, cannot be used simultaneously with opioids. However, owing to its low bioavailability, it can be used in an oral composite formulation. We present the case of a 55-year-old man with gastric cancer who experienced severe opioid withdrawal syndrome (OWS) triggered by oxycodonealoxone that was successfully managed with dexmedetomidine. He had been in a stable condition on intravenous morphine to alleviate cancer pain. Intravenous morphine was switched to oral oxycodonealoxone for discharge from the hospital. The patient suddenly developed restlessness, heartburn, and violent behavior 30 minutes after taking oxycodonealoxone. We attempted sedation with midazolam and propofol, but paradoxical agitation and desaturation occurred. Next, we tried dexmedetomidine and the patient showed a decreased heart rate and reduced agitation. The patient was eventually stabilized by increasing the dose of dexmedetomidine. This report informs clinicians of the possibility of OWS when switching from opioids to oxycodonealoxone, which can be overcome with the appropriate use of sedatives and dexmedetomidine depending on the patient’s condition.

Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there was a shortage of medical resources and the need for proper treatment guidelines for brain tumor patients became more pressing. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, has undertaken efforts to develop a guideline that is tailored to the domestic situation and that can be used in similar crisis situations in the future. As part II of the guideline, this consensus survey is to suggest management options in specific clinical scenarios during the crisis period. Methods: The KSNO Guideline Working Group consisted of 22 multidisciplinary experts on neuro-oncology in Korea. In order to confirm a consensus reached by the experts, opinions on 5 specific clinical scenarios about the management of brain tumor patients during the crisis period were devised and asked. To build-up the consensus process, Delphi method was employed. Results: The summary of the final consensus from each scenario are as follows. For patients with newly diagnosed astrocytoma with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant and oligodendroglioma with IDH-mutant/1p19q codeleted, observation was preferred for patients with low-risk, World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2, and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) ≥60, while adjuvant radiotherapy alone was preferred for patients with high-risk, WHO grade 2, and KPS ≥60. For newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma, the most preferred adjuvant treatment strategy after surgery was radiotherapy plus temozolomide except for patients aged ≥70 years with KPS of 60 and unmethylated MGMT promoters. In patients with symptomatic brain metastasis, the preferred treatment differed according to the number of brain metastasis and performance status. For patients with newly diagnosed atypical meningioma, adjuvant radiation was deferred in patients with older age, poor performance status, complete resection, or low mitotic count. Conclusion It is imperative that proper medical care for brain tumor patients be sustained and provided, even during the crisis period. The findings of this consensus survey will be a useful reference in determining appropriate treatment options for brain tumor patients in the specific clinical scenarios covered by the survey during the future crisis.

Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the need for appropriate treatment guidelines for patients with brain tumors was indispensable due to the lack and limitations of medical resources. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, has undertaken efforts to develop a guideline that is tailored to the domestic situation and that can be used in similar crisis situations in the future. Methods: The KSNO Guideline Working Group was composed of 22 multidisciplinary experts on neuro-oncology in Korea. In order to reach consensus among the experts, the Delphi method was used to build up the final recommendations. Results: All participating experts completed the series of surveys, and the results of final survey were used to draft the current consensus recommendations. Priority levels of surgery and radiotherapy during crises were proposed using appropriate time window-based criteria for management outcome. The highest priority for surgery is assigned to patients who are life-threatening or have a risk of significant impact on a patient’s prognosis unless immediate intervention is given within 24–48 hours. As for the radiotherapy, patients who are at risk of compromising their overall survival or neurological status within 4–6 weeks are assigned to the highest priority. Curative-intent chemotherapy has the highest priority, followed by neoadjuvant/adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy during a crisis period. Telemedicine should be actively considered as a management tool for brain tumor patients during the mass infection crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion It is crucial that adequate medical care for patients with brain tumors is maintained and provided, even during times of crisis. This guideline will serve as a valuable resource, assisting in the delivery of treatment to brain tumor patients in the event of any future crisis.