Liver fibrosis arises from chronic hepatic injury and remains a major clinical challenge due to the lack of effective therapies.Although G-protein-coupled receptor 119 (GPR119) has been explored as a metabolic target in type 2 diabetes, its role in liver fibrogenesis is not well understood. In this study, the protein and mRNA expression of GPR119 were detected in mouse primary hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) using immunostaining and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. The anti-fibrotic activities of GPR119 agonists were assessed in primary HSCs, LX-2 cells, and a carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄)–induced mouse model of liver fibrosis. Treatment with the GPR119 agonists MBX-2982 and GSK1292263 inhibited HSC activation, suppressed transforming growth factor-β1 (TGFβ1)–induced Smad2/3 phosphorylation, and reduced the expression of fibrogenic genes. In vivo, oral administration of MBX-2982 attenuated collagen accumulation and decreased hepatic α-smooth muscle actin and TGFβ expression in CCl₄-treated mice. Mechanistically, MBX-2982 activated AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and pharmacological inhibition of AMPK reversed its anti-fibrogenic effects. MBX-2982 further reduced Smad3 acetylation by disrupting the interaction between Smad3 and p300 and promoting AMPK-dependent proteasomal degradation of p300. These results identify GPR119 as a regulator of HSC activation and highlight GPR119 agonists as promising therapeutic candidates for liver fibrosis.

Purpose: Dorsal comminution is widely accepted as a prognostic factor for reduction loss in the nonoperative treatment of distal radius fractures. However, the reliability of measuring dorsal comminution in simple radiographs has not been adequately studied. This study investigated the reliability of dorsal comminution measurements from simple radiographs, based on inter- and intra-rater reliability indices. Methods: We included 40 patients with distal radius fractures who underwent operative treatment from March 2016 to March 2017. We established three definitions for dorsal comminution: first, the rater’s subjective judgment; second, the presence of a free-floating piece of dorsal cortex; and third, the presence of a dorsal cortical defect of 5 mm or greater. Reliability was measured using Fleiss’ or Cohen’s kappa. Results: Based on Cohen’s kappa values, the intra-rater reliability of dorsal comminution assessment demonstrated fair to good agreement. In contrast, inter-rater reliability was generally poor to fair, and subgroup analysis by rater experience revealed poor agreement among less experienced surgeons. Conclusion The radiological predictors of dorsal comminution exhibited overall low reliability, limiting their usefulness in predicting reduction loss in distal radius fractures. A more precise definition of dorsal comminution is necessary, and additional methods, such as computed tomography and artificial intelligence, should be considered to increase reliability.

Purpose: Dorsal comminution is widely accepted as a prognostic factor for reduction loss in the nonoperative treatment of distal radius fractures. However, the reliability of measuring dorsal comminution in simple radiographs has not been adequately studied. This study investigated the reliability of dorsal comminution measurements from simple radiographs, based on inter- and intra-rater reliability indices. Methods: We included 40 patients with distal radius fractures who underwent operative treatment from March 2016 to March 2017. We established three definitions for dorsal comminution: first, the rater’s subjective judgment; second, the presence of a free-floating piece of dorsal cortex; and third, the presence of a dorsal cortical defect of 5 mm or greater. Reliability was measured using Fleiss’ or Cohen’s kappa. Results: Based on Cohen’s kappa values, the intra-rater reliability of dorsal comminution assessment demonstrated fair to good agreement. In contrast, inter-rater reliability was generally poor to fair, and subgroup analysis by rater experience revealed poor agreement among less experienced surgeons. Conclusion The radiological predictors of dorsal comminution exhibited overall low reliability, limiting their usefulness in predicting reduction loss in distal radius fractures. A more precise definition of dorsal comminution is necessary, and additional methods, such as computed tomography and artificial intelligence, should be considered to increase reliability.

Purpose: Dorsal comminution is widely accepted as a prognostic factor for reduction loss in the nonoperative treatment of distal radius fractures. However, the reliability of measuring dorsal comminution in simple radiographs has not been adequately studied. This study investigated the reliability of dorsal comminution measurements from simple radiographs, based on inter- and intra-rater reliability indices. Methods: We included 40 patients with distal radius fractures who underwent operative treatment from March 2016 to March 2017. We established three definitions for dorsal comminution: first, the rater’s subjective judgment; second, the presence of a free-floating piece of dorsal cortex; and third, the presence of a dorsal cortical defect of 5 mm or greater. Reliability was measured using Fleiss’ or Cohen’s kappa. Results: Based on Cohen’s kappa values, the intra-rater reliability of dorsal comminution assessment demonstrated fair to good agreement. In contrast, inter-rater reliability was generally poor to fair, and subgroup analysis by rater experience revealed poor agreement among less experienced surgeons. Conclusion The radiological predictors of dorsal comminution exhibited overall low reliability, limiting their usefulness in predicting reduction loss in distal radius fractures. A more precise definition of dorsal comminution is necessary, and additional methods, such as computed tomography and artificial intelligence, should be considered to increase reliability.

Objective: We aimed to identify the expectations and preferences for medication and medical decision-making in patients with major psychiatric disorders. Methods: A survey was conducted among patients with major psychiatric disorders who visited psychiatric outpatient clinics at 15 hospitals between 2016 and 2018 in Korea. The survey consisted of 12 questions about demographic variables and opinions on their expectations for medication, important medical decision-makers, and preferred drug type. The most preferred value in each category in the total population was identified, and differences in the preference ratio of each item among the disease groups were compared. Results: A total of 707 participants were surveyed. In the total population, patients reported high efficacy (44.01%±21.44%) as the main wish for medication, themselves (37.39%±22.57%) and a doctor (35.27%±22.88%) as the main decision makers, and tablet/capsule (36.16%±30.69%) as the preferred type of drug. In the depressive disorders group, the preference ratio of high efficacy was significantly lower, and the preference ratio of a small amount was significantly higher than that of the psychotic disorder and bipolar disorder groups. The preference ratio of a doctor as an important decision maker in the bipolar disorder group was higher compared to the other groups. Conclusion This study revealed the preference for medications and showed differences among patients with psychiatric disorders. Providing personalized medicine that considers a patient’s preference for the drug may contribute to the improvement of drug compliance and outcomes.

Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone (160 mg/day) compared to quetiapine XR (QXR; 600 mg/day) in the treatment of acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with lurasidone 160 mg/day (n=105) or QXR 600 mg/day (n=105). Primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI-S) score. Adverse events, body measurements, and laboratory parameters were assessed. Results: Lurasidone demonstrated non-inferiority to QXR on the PANSS total score. Adjusted mean±standard error change at week 6 on the PANSS total score was -26.42±2.02 and -27.33±2.01 in the lurasidone and QXR group, respectively. The mean difference score was -0.91 (95% confidence interval -6.35–4.53). The lurasidone group showed a greater reduction in PANSS total and negative subscale on week 1 and a greater reduction in end-point CGI-S score compared to the QXR group. Body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference in the lurasidone group were reduced, with significantly lower mean change compared to QXR. Endpoint changes in glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein levels were also significantly lower. The most common adverse drug reactions with lurasidone were akathisia and nausea. Conclusion Lurasidone 160 mg/day was found to be non-inferior to QXR 600 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia with comparable efficacy and tolerability. Adverse effects of lurasidone were generally tolerable, and beneficial effects on metabolic parameters can be expected.