Purpose: Dorsal comminution is widely accepted as a prognostic factor for reduction loss in the nonoperative treatment of distal radius fractures. However, the reliability of measuring dorsal comminution in simple radiographs has not been adequately studied. This study investigated the reliability of dorsal comminution measurements from simple radiographs, based on inter- and intra-rater reliability indices. Methods: We included 40 patients with distal radius fractures who underwent operative treatment from March 2016 to March 2017. We established three definitions for dorsal comminution: first, the rater’s subjective judgment; second, the presence of a free-floating piece of dorsal cortex; and third, the presence of a dorsal cortical defect of 5 mm or greater. Reliability was measured using Fleiss’ or Cohen’s kappa. Results: Based on Cohen’s kappa values, the intra-rater reliability of dorsal comminution assessment demonstrated fair to good agreement. In contrast, inter-rater reliability was generally poor to fair, and subgroup analysis by rater experience revealed poor agreement among less experienced surgeons. Conclusion The radiological predictors of dorsal comminution exhibited overall low reliability, limiting their usefulness in predicting reduction loss in distal radius fractures. A more precise definition of dorsal comminution is necessary, and additional methods, such as computed tomography and artificial intelligence, should be considered to increase reliability.

Purpose: Dorsal comminution is widely accepted as a prognostic factor for reduction loss in the nonoperative treatment of distal radius fractures. However, the reliability of measuring dorsal comminution in simple radiographs has not been adequately studied. This study investigated the reliability of dorsal comminution measurements from simple radiographs, based on inter- and intra-rater reliability indices. Methods: We included 40 patients with distal radius fractures who underwent operative treatment from March 2016 to March 2017. We established three definitions for dorsal comminution: first, the rater’s subjective judgment; second, the presence of a free-floating piece of dorsal cortex; and third, the presence of a dorsal cortical defect of 5 mm or greater. Reliability was measured using Fleiss’ or Cohen’s kappa. Results: Based on Cohen’s kappa values, the intra-rater reliability of dorsal comminution assessment demonstrated fair to good agreement. In contrast, inter-rater reliability was generally poor to fair, and subgroup analysis by rater experience revealed poor agreement among less experienced surgeons. Conclusion The radiological predictors of dorsal comminution exhibited overall low reliability, limiting their usefulness in predicting reduction loss in distal radius fractures. A more precise definition of dorsal comminution is necessary, and additional methods, such as computed tomography and artificial intelligence, should be considered to increase reliability.

Purpose: Dorsal comminution is widely accepted as a prognostic factor for reduction loss in the nonoperative treatment of distal radius fractures. However, the reliability of measuring dorsal comminution in simple radiographs has not been adequately studied. This study investigated the reliability of dorsal comminution measurements from simple radiographs, based on inter- and intra-rater reliability indices. Methods: We included 40 patients with distal radius fractures who underwent operative treatment from March 2016 to March 2017. We established three definitions for dorsal comminution: first, the rater’s subjective judgment; second, the presence of a free-floating piece of dorsal cortex; and third, the presence of a dorsal cortical defect of 5 mm or greater. Reliability was measured using Fleiss’ or Cohen’s kappa. Results: Based on Cohen’s kappa values, the intra-rater reliability of dorsal comminution assessment demonstrated fair to good agreement. In contrast, inter-rater reliability was generally poor to fair, and subgroup analysis by rater experience revealed poor agreement among less experienced surgeons. Conclusion The radiological predictors of dorsal comminution exhibited overall low reliability, limiting their usefulness in predicting reduction loss in distal radius fractures. A more precise definition of dorsal comminution is necessary, and additional methods, such as computed tomography and artificial intelligence, should be considered to increase reliability.

Objective: We aimed to identify the expectations and preferences for medication and medical decision-making in patients with major psychiatric disorders. Methods: A survey was conducted among patients with major psychiatric disorders who visited psychiatric outpatient clinics at 15 hospitals between 2016 and 2018 in Korea. The survey consisted of 12 questions about demographic variables and opinions on their expectations for medication, important medical decision-makers, and preferred drug type. The most preferred value in each category in the total population was identified, and differences in the preference ratio of each item among the disease groups were compared. Results: A total of 707 participants were surveyed. In the total population, patients reported high efficacy (44.01%±21.44%) as the main wish for medication, themselves (37.39%±22.57%) and a doctor (35.27%±22.88%) as the main decision makers, and tablet/capsule (36.16%±30.69%) as the preferred type of drug. In the depressive disorders group, the preference ratio of high efficacy was significantly lower, and the preference ratio of a small amount was significantly higher than that of the psychotic disorder and bipolar disorder groups. The preference ratio of a doctor as an important decision maker in the bipolar disorder group was higher compared to the other groups. Conclusion This study revealed the preference for medications and showed differences among patients with psychiatric disorders. Providing personalized medicine that considers a patient’s preference for the drug may contribute to the improvement of drug compliance and outcomes.

Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone (160 mg/day) compared to quetiapine XR (QXR; 600 mg/day) in the treatment of acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with lurasidone 160 mg/day (n=105) or QXR 600 mg/day (n=105). Primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI-S) score. Adverse events, body measurements, and laboratory parameters were assessed. Results: Lurasidone demonstrated non-inferiority to QXR on the PANSS total score. Adjusted mean±standard error change at week 6 on the PANSS total score was -26.42±2.02 and -27.33±2.01 in the lurasidone and QXR group, respectively. The mean difference score was -0.91 (95% confidence interval -6.35–4.53). The lurasidone group showed a greater reduction in PANSS total and negative subscale on week 1 and a greater reduction in end-point CGI-S score compared to the QXR group. Body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference in the lurasidone group were reduced, with significantly lower mean change compared to QXR. Endpoint changes in glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein levels were also significantly lower. The most common adverse drug reactions with lurasidone were akathisia and nausea. Conclusion Lurasidone 160 mg/day was found to be non-inferior to QXR 600 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia with comparable efficacy and tolerability. Adverse effects of lurasidone were generally tolerable, and beneficial effects on metabolic parameters can be expected.

Background: Sutureless valves are widely used in aortic valve replacement surgery, with Perceval valves and Intuity valves being particularly prominent. However, concerns have been raised about postoperative thrombocytopenia with Perceval valves (Corcym, UK). We conducted a comparative analysis with the Intuity valve (Edwards Lifesciences, USA), and assessed how thrombocytopenia affected patient and transfusion outcomes. Methods: Among 595 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement from June 2016 to March 2023, sutureless valves were used in 53 (Perceval: n=23; Intuity: n=30). Platelet counts were monitored during hospitalization and outpatient visits. Daily platelet count changes were compared between groups, and the results from patients who underwent procedures using Carpentier Edwards Perimount Magna valves were used as a reference group. Results: Compared to the Intuity group, the Perceval group showed a significantly higher amount of platelet transfusion (5.48±1.64 packs vs. 0.60±0.44 packs, p=0.008). During the postoperative period, severe thrombocytopenia (<50,000/μL) was significantly more prevalent in the Perceval group (56.5%, n=13) than in the Intuity group (6.7%, n=2). After initial postoperative depletion, daily platelet counts increased, with significant differences observed in the extent of improvement between the Perceval and Intuity groups (p<0.001).However, there was no significant difference in early mortality or the incidence of neurological complications between the 2 groups. Conclusion The severity of postoperative thrombocytopenia differed significantly between the Perceval and Intuity valves. The Perceval group showed a significantly higher prevalence of severe thrombocytopenia and higher platelet transfusion volumes. However, thrombocytopenia gradually recovered during the postoperative period in both groups, and the early outcomes were similar in both groups.