Objective To evaluate the efficacy of shoulder arthroscopic double row suture bridge repair program in patients with rotator cuff tears.Methods 118 cases of rotator cuff tear patients admitted from September 2019 to July 2023 were selected,then they were divided in the control group and pilot group,each with 59 cases(the random number table method was used as the basis for dividing the groups),and each of two groups 1 case was lost,and finally 58 cases were included in each.Both underwent shoulder arthroscopic rotator cuff repair under general anesthesia,the control group was treated with single-row fixed suture,the pilot group was treated with double row suture bridge repair program,and were followed up for 6 months after surgery.Two groups were compared operative-related conditions,pain[visual analogue scale(VAS)score],shoulder function[the Constant-Murley scale,University of California at Los Angeles(UCLA)scale,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons(ASES)scale],shoulder mobility,inflammatory reaction[C reactive protein(CRP),transforming growth factor-β1(TGF-β1)and interleukin-6(IL-6)]and safety.Results Compared to control group,surgery time of the pilot group was shorter,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);Compared to before surgery,VAS score in two groups 6 months after surgery was lower,the pilot group was lower than that of control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);Constant-Murley scale,UCLA scale and ASES scale of pilot group 6 months after surgery were higher than those of control group,and the shoulder joint mobility 6 months after surgery was bigger than that of control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);CRP,TGF-β1,IL-6 3 days after surgery in two groups were higher than those before surgery,but the pilot group was lower than control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);Compared to control group(13.79%and 18.97%),the incidence of rotator cuff re-tear and joint stiffness were lower in the pilot group(3.45%and 3.45%),the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of double-row suture bridge repair technique in patients with rotator cuff tear could shorten the operation time,reduce the postoperative inflammatory stress and pain,improve the shoulder mobility,restore the shoulder function,and reduce the occurrence of rotator cuff re-tear and joint stiffness.

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under unilateral biportal endoscopy(UBE-TLIF)and traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF)in treating single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with lumbar spinal stenosis(DLS-LSS).Methods The clinical data of 85 patients diagnosed with DLS-LSS who underwent surgery between Jan.2020 and Jan.2022 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were assigned to UBE-TLIF group(46 cases)and PLIF group(39 cases)based on the surgical procedure.The general characteristics,perioperative data,radiological parameters,and clinical efficacy indicators were analyzed.Results There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics,preoperative radiological parameters,pain visual analogue scale(VAS)score,or Oswestry disability index(ODI)score between the 2 groups(all P＞0.05).Compared with the PLIF group,the UBE-TLIF group had significantly longer operation time([156.42+26.65]min vs[141.36+21.46]min,P=0.006),significantly less operation blood loss([170.15+10.87]mL vs[203.15+15.67]mL,P＜0.001),and significantly shorter hospital stay([6.73+2.42]d vs[9.61+2.56]d,P＜0.001).The UBE-TLIF group had significantly smaller lumbar lordosis and segmental angle 3 months postoperatively([42.52±8.57]° vs[46.61+7.31]°,[10.93+2.59]° vs[12.16+3.05]°)and at final follow-up([41.35+7.46]° vs[44.62+6.42]°,[10.65+2.43]° vs[11.87+2.53]°)compared with the PLIF group(all P＜0.05).The fusion rate was significantly lower in the UBE-TLIF group compared with the PLIF group 3 months after operation(34.78％[16/46]vs 58.97％[23/39],P＜0.05),with no significant difference at final follow-up(93.48％[43/46]vs 94.87％[37/39],P＞0.05).The VAS score and ODI score 3 months after operation were significantly lower in the UBE-TLIF group compared with the PLIF group(2.43+0.92 vs 3.12±1.03,26.81+9.14 vs 33.35+8.76,both P＜0.01),with no significant differences at final follow-up(both P＞0.05).Conclusion As a minimally invasive surgical technique,UBE-TLIF has the advantages of minimal trauma,fast recovery,mild postoperative pain,and a reliable fusion rate.It is an effective treatment for DLS-LSS and deserves to be promoted.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of shoulder arthroscopic double row suture bridge repair program in patients with rotator cuff tears.Methods 118 cases of rotator cuff tear patients admitted from September 2019 to July 2023 were selected,then they were divided in the control group and pilot group,each with 59 cases(the random number table method was used as the basis for dividing the groups),and each of two groups 1 case was lost,and finally 58 cases were included in each.Both underwent shoulder arthroscopic rotator cuff repair under general anesthesia,the control group was treated with single-row fixed suture,the pilot group was treated with double row suture bridge repair program,and were followed up for 6 months after surgery.Two groups were compared operative-related conditions,pain[visual analogue scale(VAS)score],shoulder function[the Constant-Murley scale,University of California at Los Angeles(UCLA)scale,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons(ASES)scale],shoulder mobility,inflammatory reaction[C reactive protein(CRP),transforming growth factor-β1(TGF-β1)and interleukin-6(IL-6)]and safety.Results Compared to control group,surgery time of the pilot group was shorter,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);Compared to before surgery,VAS score in two groups 6 months after surgery was lower,the pilot group was lower than that of control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);Constant-Murley scale,UCLA scale and ASES scale of pilot group 6 months after surgery were higher than those of control group,and the shoulder joint mobility 6 months after surgery was bigger than that of control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);CRP,TGF-β1,IL-6 3 days after surgery in two groups were higher than those before surgery,but the pilot group was lower than control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);Compared to control group(13.79%and 18.97%),the incidence of rotator cuff re-tear and joint stiffness were lower in the pilot group(3.45%and 3.45%),the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of double-row suture bridge repair technique in patients with rotator cuff tear could shorten the operation time,reduce the postoperative inflammatory stress and pain,improve the shoulder mobility,restore the shoulder function,and reduce the occurrence of rotator cuff re-tear and joint stiffness.

Objective To observe the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine and intertrochanteric combination thera-py fractures. Methods From January 2009 to January 2011 in our hospital,100 cases of intertrochanteric fracture pa-tients were randomly divided into observation group and control group,50 cases in each group,the two groups were performed within PFNA fixed,observation group were simultaneously combined traditional Chinese medicine treatment,after treatment,the fracture healing time,Harris hip score,incidence of complications of two groups were compared. Results After treatment,the excellent rate of observation group was 86%,was significantly higher than the control group of 72%,the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.127,P<0.05).The fracture healing time of observation group was significantly shorter than the control group,but Harris hip score of t observation group patients was significantly higher than the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The complication rate of observation group was 10%,was significantly lower than the control group of 26%,the difference was statistically significant (χ2=11.348,P<0.05). Conclusion Integrative treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with good effect,can promote healing,significantly improve hip function in patients,reduce the incidence of complications,should be promoted and applied.