Objective:To investigate the attention level of oral medicine residents in standardized training (referred to as residency training) to oral aesthetic information and its influencing factors.Methods:This study was a cross-sectional study, which included 262 residents undergoing standardized training at Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University in January 2020. Among them, there were 73 males and 189 females, with an age range of 23-33 (26±2) years. A questionnaire survey method was used, and the questionnaire included the basic characteristics of the subjects (gender, grade, major, identity, and having training experience in prosthodontic base or not) as well as their attention to oral aesthetic information (facial proportions, facial midline, smile line, facial contour, E-line, nasolabial angle, tooth shape and contour, and tooth proportions). Differences in the attention to oral aesthetic information among residents with different basic characteristics were compared, and a multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the influencing factors.Results:Among the 262 oral medicine residents, 256 (97.7%) believed that it was necessary to pay attention to oral aesthetic information. The differences in attention to facial proportions between residents of different genders and between those with and without training experience in the prosthodontic base were statistically significant (both P<0.05). The results of the multivariate logistic regression showed that male residents were less likely to pay attention to facial proportions compared with female residents ( OR=0.45, 95% CI: 0.23-0.88). Compared with residents specializing in orthodontics, non-orthodontic residents were less likely to pay attention to the E-line ( OR=0.14-0.27, 95% CI: 0.04-0.68) and nasolabial angle ( OR=0.14-0.31, 95% CI: 0.04-0.81). Residents who were graduate students with integrated four certificates were more likely to pay attention to the E-line compared with industry-based personnel ( OR=1.88, 95% CI: 1.01-3.49). Residents without training experience in the prosthodontic base were less likely to pay attention to the facial proportion ( OR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.20-0.97) and tooth shape and contour ( OR=0.33, 95% CI: 0.11-0.98) compared with those with such training experience in prosthodontic base. Conclusions:Oral medicine residents have a high level of attention to oral aesthetic information. Gender, major, identity, and having training experience in the prosthodontic base or not are factors that influence their attention to oral aesthetic information.

Objective:To investigate the attention level of oral medicine residents in standardized training (referred to as residency training) to oral aesthetic information and its influencing factors.Methods:This study was a cross-sectional study, which included 262 residents undergoing standardized training at Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University in January 2020. Among them, there were 73 males and 189 females, with an age range of 23-33 (26±2) years. A questionnaire survey method was used, and the questionnaire included the basic characteristics of the subjects (gender, grade, major, identity, and having training experience in prosthodontic base or not) as well as their attention to oral aesthetic information (facial proportions, facial midline, smile line, facial contour, E-line, nasolabial angle, tooth shape and contour, and tooth proportions). Differences in the attention to oral aesthetic information among residents with different basic characteristics were compared, and a multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the influencing factors.Results:Among the 262 oral medicine residents, 256 (97.7%) believed that it was necessary to pay attention to oral aesthetic information. The differences in attention to facial proportions between residents of different genders and between those with and without training experience in the prosthodontic base were statistically significant (both P<0.05). The results of the multivariate logistic regression showed that male residents were less likely to pay attention to facial proportions compared with female residents ( OR=0.45, 95% CI: 0.23-0.88). Compared with residents specializing in orthodontics, non-orthodontic residents were less likely to pay attention to the E-line ( OR=0.14-0.27, 95% CI: 0.04-0.68) and nasolabial angle ( OR=0.14-0.31, 95% CI: 0.04-0.81). Residents who were graduate students with integrated four certificates were more likely to pay attention to the E-line compared with industry-based personnel ( OR=1.88, 95% CI: 1.01-3.49). Residents without training experience in the prosthodontic base were less likely to pay attention to the facial proportion ( OR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.20-0.97) and tooth shape and contour ( OR=0.33, 95% CI: 0.11-0.98) compared with those with such training experience in prosthodontic base. Conclusions:Oral medicine residents have a high level of attention to oral aesthetic information. Gender, major, identity, and having training experience in the prosthodontic base or not are factors that influence their attention to oral aesthetic information.

Objective The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and mortality of prostate cancer in cancer registra-tion areas of Yunnan province in 2020,as well as its changing trends from 2012 to 2020,and provide suggestions for the prevention and treatment of prostate cancer in Yunnan province.Methods The data of prostate cancer incidence and mortality in cancer regis-tration areas of Yunnan province from 2012 to 2020 were collected and organized.Excel 2016 and SPSS 18.0 software were used to calculate the crude incidence,crude mortality,age-standardized incidence rate by World standard population(ASIRW),age-stand-ardized mortality rate by Chinese standard population(ASMRC),truncated rate,cumulative rate and other indicators.ASIRW and ASMRC were calculated by using Segi's World population composition.Joinpoint 4.8.0.1 software was used to calculate the annual percentage change(APC)and 95%CI of ASIRW and ASMRC of prostate cancer from 2012 to 2020,and analyze their annual change trends.Results In 2020,the crude incidence and ASIRW of male prostate cancer in cancer registration areas of Yunnan province were 9.71/100,000 and 6.21/100,000,respectively.ASIRW in urban areas(7.94/100,000)was higher than that in rural areas(5.48/100,000).In 2020,the crude mortality and ASMRC of male prostate cancer in cancer registration areas of Yunnan province were 4.68/100,000 and 2.87/100,000,respectively.ASMRC in urban areas(3.68/100,000)was higher than that in rural areas(2.53/100,000).In 2020,the incidence and mortality of male prostate cancer in Yunnan province increased with age,were at a low level before the age of 45,and began to rise rapidly after the age of 55.From 2012 to 2020,there was no statistically significant change trend in ASIRW and ASMRC of male prostate cancer in Yunnan province(APC were 1.79%and 3.61%,P>0.05).However,ASIRW and ASMRC of rural males were on the rise(APC were 4.45%and 3.85%,respectively,P<0.05).Conclusion ASIRW and ASMRC of male prostate cancer in cancer registration areas of Yunnan province in 2020 are higher in urban men than those in rural areas.The change trend of ASIRW and ASMRC from 2012 to 2020 is flat,and rural elderly men should be paid more attention.

Objective The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and mortality of prostate cancer in cancer registra-tion areas of Yunnan province in 2020,as well as its changing trends from 2012 to 2020,and provide suggestions for the prevention and treatment of prostate cancer in Yunnan province.Methods The data of prostate cancer incidence and mortality in cancer regis-tration areas of Yunnan province from 2012 to 2020 were collected and organized.Excel 2016 and SPSS 18.0 software were used to calculate the crude incidence,crude mortality,age-standardized incidence rate by World standard population(ASIRW),age-stand-ardized mortality rate by Chinese standard population(ASMRC),truncated rate,cumulative rate and other indicators.ASIRW and ASMRC were calculated by using Segi's World population composition.Joinpoint 4.8.0.1 software was used to calculate the annual percentage change(APC)and 95%CI of ASIRW and ASMRC of prostate cancer from 2012 to 2020,and analyze their annual change trends.Results In 2020,the crude incidence and ASIRW of male prostate cancer in cancer registration areas of Yunnan province were 9.71/100,000 and 6.21/100,000,respectively.ASIRW in urban areas(7.94/100,000)was higher than that in rural areas(5.48/100,000).In 2020,the crude mortality and ASMRC of male prostate cancer in cancer registration areas of Yunnan province were 4.68/100,000 and 2.87/100,000,respectively.ASMRC in urban areas(3.68/100,000)was higher than that in rural areas(2.53/100,000).In 2020,the incidence and mortality of male prostate cancer in Yunnan province increased with age,were at a low level before the age of 45,and began to rise rapidly after the age of 55.From 2012 to 2020,there was no statistically significant change trend in ASIRW and ASMRC of male prostate cancer in Yunnan province(APC were 1.79%and 3.61%,P>0.05).However,ASIRW and ASMRC of rural males were on the rise(APC were 4.45%and 3.85%,respectively,P<0.05).Conclusion ASIRW and ASMRC of male prostate cancer in cancer registration areas of Yunnan province in 2020 are higher in urban men than those in rural areas.The change trend of ASIRW and ASMRC from 2012 to 2020 is flat,and rural elderly men should be paid more attention.

BACKGROUND: LY01005 (Goserelin acetate sustained-release microsphere injection) is a modified gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist injected monthly. This phase III trial study aimed to evaluated the efficacy and safety of LY01005 in Chinese patients with prostate cancer. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial across 49 sites in China. This study included 290 patients with prostate cancer who received either LY01005 or goserelin implants every 28 days for three injections. The primary efficacy endpoints were the percentage of patients with testosterone suppression ≤50 ng/dL at day 29 and the cumulative probability of testosterone ≤50 ng/dL from day 29 to 85. Non-inferiority was prespecified at a margin of -10%. Secondary endpoints included significant castration (≤20 ng/dL), testosterone surge within 72 h following repeated dosing, and changes in luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and prostate specific antigen levels. RESULTS: On day 29, in the LY01005 and goserelin implant groups, testosterone concentrations fell below medical-castration levels in 99.3% (142/143) and 100% (140/140) of patients, respectively, with a difference of -0.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.9% to 2.0%) between the two groups. The cumulative probabilities of maintaining castration from days 29 to 85 were 99.3% and 97.8%, respectively, with a between-group difference of 1.5% (95% CI, -1.3% to 4.4%). Both results met the criterion for non-inferiority. Secondary endpoints were similar between groups. Both treatments were well-tolerated. LY01005 was associated with fewer injection-site reactions than the goserelin implant (0% vs . 1.4% [2/145]). CONCLUSION: LY01005 is as effective as goserelin implants in reducing testosterone to castration levels, with a similar safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04563936.
Humans ; Male ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use* ; East Asian People ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists* ; Goserelin/therapeutic use* ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Testosterone

Objective To assess the value of free-hand transperineal multiparametric nagnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound (mpMRI/TRUS) fusion-guided targeted biopsy (TB) for the diagnosis of prostate cancer(PCa).Methods Patients with elevated PSA level and/or an abnormal DRE finding were recruited prospectively between January 2015 and September 2016.Patients were classified to various scores from 2 to 5 according to prebiopsy mpMRI PI-RADS.Based on free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guiding,a 2-cores TB for each cancer-suspicious lesion were carried out and followed 12-cores systematic biopsy (SB) protocol.Pathological findings of biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens were analyzed.Results A total of 397 patients were enrolled in this study.The median age of the patients was (68.2 ± 7.4) years old,ranging 42-78 years.The median PSA level was (15.0 ±12.4)ng/ml,ranging 3.0-88.3 ng/ml.DRE showed abnormality in 28 patients(7.1％).The median prostate volume was (41.6 ± 16.4)cm3,ranging 24.6-89.8 cm3.The PCa detection rate of TB was significantly increased compared with SB (44.8 ％ vs.34.8％) (P =0.003),especially in clinically significant PCa (P ＜ 0.001) and intermediate/high-risk PCa (P =0.003),respectively.Of the all 588 mpMRI targeted lesions,277 lesions were positive.A total of 105 index tumors were identified in RP specimens,the locations of TB-proven cancer showed 96.6％ (85/88) in correspondence with the location of the index lesion in RP specimens.Conclusions Free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided TB providing greater detection of intermediate-high risk PCa while limits over detection of low risk PCa.Moreover,TB can reliably predict the location of an index tumor.

Objective To analyze the features of diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of primary renal neuroendocrine tumors, and to improve the understanding of primary renal neuroendocrine tumors. Methods From January 2008 to June 2015, 5 cases of primary renal neuroendocrine tumors were hospitalized and their data was analyzed retrospectively, with 1 male 4 females, aged 40-73 years with the middle age of 48 years.Tumors were all located in the left kidney, whose diameters arranged from 4 to 9 cm, with an average of 6.5cm.One case presented with hematuria, one case was identified because of abdominal pain, and the other three cases were identified via physical examination.Four cases underwent a renal contrast-enhanced ultrasound, which indicated a medium-hypoechoic mass in three cases and a hyperechoic mass in one case.All five cases underwent CT scan, presenting irregularly shape and density. Calcification was found in three cases on plain scanning.Significantly heterogeneous enhancement was found in three cases and moderate heterogeneous enhancement was found in one case on enhanced scanning. Results All five cases underwent operations, with two cases undergoing radical nephrectomy and three cases undergoing partial nephrectomy.Pathological examination showed three cases of tumor cells arranged in a nest slug or ribbon-like infiltrative growth, with no or rare mitosis and no necrosis, which is consistent with renal carcinoids.Three out of 4 renal hilar lymph nodes containing tumor cells were identified in one case. The tumor cells in another case exhibited a ribbon-like arrangement, with some round nuclei, no significant atypia, and rare mitosis, which is consistent with renal atypical carcinoid.Two out of two renal hilar lymph nodes containing tumor cells were identified in this case. The tumor tissue of one case showed morphologically uniform, medium-sized cells arranged in nest slug form with necrosis, a high nuclear cytoplasm ratio, an obvious allotype and frequent mitosis, which is consistent with renal small cell carcinoma.The immunohistochemistry of the five cases indicated synaptophysin( Syn) and chromogranin A ( CgA) positive in varying degree.One case of renal carcinoid relapsed approximately 78 months after partial nephrectomy, following with radical surgery.The other two cases were followed up for 8 or 27 months and no recurrence or metastasis was detected.One case of renal atypical carcinoid was followed up for 4 months after radical nephrectomy and no recurrence or metastasis was detected.One case of renal small cell carcinoma died of multiple organ failure 11 months after radical nephrectomy plus hepatic metastatic carcinoma radio-frequency ablation approximately.Conclusions Primary renal neuroendocrine tumors are rare clinically. Renal neuroendocrine tumors may be expressed as carcinoid, atypical carcinoid or small cell carcinoma, and the clinical manifestations, pathological characteristics and prognosis varied.Primary renal carcinoids may be treated by surgery with a nice prognosis.Patients with primary renal small cell carcinoma require comprehensive treatment, and their prognosis is poor.

Objective Castleman′s disease ( CD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder, which has a very high misdiagnosis rate according to its lack of clinical and imaging specificity.The study was to improve the recognition, diagnosis and management of this disease by analyzing the clinicopathological characteristics and concluding diagnosis and treatment as well as literature review. Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 31 CD patients (13 males and 18 females) who were hospitalized in the Affiliated Drum Tower Hosipital to Medical college of Nanjing University from January 2006 to Feburary 2014.Their mean age was (47.4 ±13.3) years.There were 24 cases with unicentric Castleman′s disease (UCD) and 7 cases with multicentric Castleman′s disease ( MCD) .UCD tended to be present in the form of an enlarged and painless mass which generally remained asymptomatic by accidental touch or regular physical examination.MCD was usually associated with constitutional symptoms.All the 24 patients with UCD underwent complete surgical resection.7 patients with MCD received different treatment methods, such as surgical resection, ste-riod and rituximab in combination with chemotherapy ( CHOP) . Results Postoperative pathology confirmed 23 cases were hyaline vascular type while 8 were plasma cell type.25 cases had been followed up (46.3 ±32.3) months after operation, among which 1 UCD case died of pancreatic head carcinoma 13 months after operation, 1 case with MCD plus pemphigus died 2 months after surgical resection of retroperitoneal lymphadenectasis, another MCD case died in 1 month without any treatment.The remaining 22 cases were alive. Conclusion CD is lack of clinical specificity and its diagnosis should be made by pathology.Each subtype differ greatly in prognosis, therefore different treatments should be taken after definitive subtype diagnosis.

Objective To evallhte factors affecting blood loss during mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy using ureteroscope and pneumatic intracorporeal lithotripsy(MPCNL). Methods 1156MPCNL procedures in 885 patients from July 2002 to October 2006 were reviewed. Various patientrelated and intraoperative factors were assessed for association with total blood loss using multivariate regression analysis. ResuIts The average hemoglobin drop was(14.2+8.3)g/L.The overall blood transfusion rate was 1.5%. Approximately 0.6%of patients required angiography embolization to control intractable bleeding. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the occurrence ot operative complications(6=0.496,P＜0.001),size of the tract(b=0.405,P＜0.001),mature nephrostomy tract(6=0.377,P＜0.001),multiple tracts(6=0.326,P=0.005),size of stone(b=0.210,P=0.015),operative time(6=0.139,P=0.027),renal parenehymal thickness(b=0.128,P=0.035),prior stone intervention(b=-0.121,P=0.038),diabetes(b=0.110,P=0.051),and bacteriuria(b=-0.095,P=0.058)were significant predictors of blood loss.Factors such as age,sex,side,obesity,hypertension,renal function,operating surgeon,anaesthesia,calix of puncture,number of attempts to successful puncture,urine from puncture needle may not affect the blood loss. Concluslons Maneuvers that may reduce blood loss include reducing the operative time,decreasing the occurrence of intraoperative complications, reducing the tract size and tract number, and staging the procedure.Staging the procedure of MPCNL is a judicious decision in case of a large stone burden,intraoperative complications,multiple-tract,lager tract or diabetes.