Donepezil, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, is widely used for managing the symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), yet its clinical response varies widely among individuals. This study aims to investigate the influence of CYP2D6 genetic variants on donepezil concentration, treatment response, and adverse effects in Korean patients with AD dementia. We conducted a longitudinal study involving 76 patients receiving either 5 mg or 10 mg of donepezil. Genetic testing identified 9 CYP2D6 alleles, categorizing patients by metabolizing abilities. Blood sampling for plasma concentrations of donepezil were performed at steady-state. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were conducted at 12, 24 and 36 months after the initiation of treatment. Adverse events were collected throughout the study period.Donepezil plasma concentrations differed significantly among metabolizer statuses (mean 56.8 ± 27.1 ng/ml in normal metabolizers vs. 69.6 ± 30.1 ng/ml in intermediate metabolizers, p = 0.042), but these differences did not affect cognitive function over three years as assessed by MMSE. Additionally, there was no significant correlation between donepezil plasma concentration and adverse events. Our study is the first to elucidate the associations between CYP2D6 genotype and the concentration, clinical response or adverse events of donepezil in Korean patients with AD dementia. Larger studies are necessary to fully understand the impact of CYP2D6 genetic variants on therapeutic outcomes with donepezil.

Donepezil, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, is widely used for managing the symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), yet its clinical response varies widely among individuals. This study aims to investigate the influence of CYP2D6 genetic variants on donepezil concentration, treatment response, and adverse effects in Korean patients with AD dementia. We conducted a longitudinal study involving 76 patients receiving either 5 mg or 10 mg of donepezil. Genetic testing identified 9 CYP2D6 alleles, categorizing patients by metabolizing abilities. Blood sampling for plasma concentrations of donepezil were performed at steady-state. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were conducted at 12, 24 and 36 months after the initiation of treatment. Adverse events were collected throughout the study period.Donepezil plasma concentrations differed significantly among metabolizer statuses (mean 56.8 ± 27.1 ng/ml in normal metabolizers vs. 69.6 ± 30.1 ng/ml in intermediate metabolizers, p = 0.042), but these differences did not affect cognitive function over three years as assessed by MMSE. Additionally, there was no significant correlation between donepezil plasma concentration and adverse events. Our study is the first to elucidate the associations between CYP2D6 genotype and the concentration, clinical response or adverse events of donepezil in Korean patients with AD dementia. Larger studies are necessary to fully understand the impact of CYP2D6 genetic variants on therapeutic outcomes with donepezil.

Background/Aims: We investigated the clinical practice patterns of Korean endoscopists for the endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps. Methods: From September to November 2021, an online survey was conducted regarding the preferred resection methods for colorectal polyps, and responses were compared with the international guidelines. Results: Among 246 respondents, those with <4 years, 4–9 years, and ≥10 years of experiencein colonoscopy practices accounted for 25.6%, 34.1%, and 40.2% of endoscopists, respectively. The most preferred resection methods for non-pedunculated lesions were cold forceps polypectomy for ≤3 mm lesions (81.7%), cold snare polypectomy for 4–5 mm (61.0%) and 6–9 mm (43.5%) lesions, hot endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for 10–19 mm lesions (72.0%), precut EMR for 20–25 mm lesions (22.0%), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for ≥26 mm lesions (29.3%). Hot EMR was favored for pedunculated lesions with a head size <20 mm and stalk size <10 mm (75.6%) and for those with a head size ≥20 mm or stalk size ≥10 mm (58.5%). For suspected superficial and deep submucosal lesions measuring 10–19 mm and ≥20 mm, ESD (26.0% and 38.6%) and surgery (36.6% and 46.3%) were preferred, respectively. The adherence rate to the guidelines ranged from 11.2% to 96.9%, depending on the size, shape, and histology of the lesions. Conclusions Adherence to the guidelines for endoscopic resection techniques varied depend-ing on the characteristics of colorectal polyps. Thus, an individualized approach is required to increase adherence to the guidelines.

Background/Aims: We investigated the clinical practice patterns of Korean endoscopists for the endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps. Methods: From September to November 2021, an online survey was conducted regarding the preferred resection methods for colorectal polyps, and responses were compared with the international guidelines. Results: Among 246 respondents, those with <4 years, 4–9 years, and ≥10 years of experiencein colonoscopy practices accounted for 25.6%, 34.1%, and 40.2% of endoscopists, respectively. The most preferred resection methods for non-pedunculated lesions were cold forceps polypectomy for ≤3 mm lesions (81.7%), cold snare polypectomy for 4–5 mm (61.0%) and 6–9 mm (43.5%) lesions, hot endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for 10–19 mm lesions (72.0%), precut EMR for 20–25 mm lesions (22.0%), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for ≥26 mm lesions (29.3%). Hot EMR was favored for pedunculated lesions with a head size <20 mm and stalk size <10 mm (75.6%) and for those with a head size ≥20 mm or stalk size ≥10 mm (58.5%). For suspected superficial and deep submucosal lesions measuring 10–19 mm and ≥20 mm, ESD (26.0% and 38.6%) and surgery (36.6% and 46.3%) were preferred, respectively. The adherence rate to the guidelines ranged from 11.2% to 96.9%, depending on the size, shape, and histology of the lesions. Conclusions Adherence to the guidelines for endoscopic resection techniques varied depend-ing on the characteristics of colorectal polyps. Thus, an individualized approach is required to increase adherence to the guidelines.

Donepezil, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, is widely used for managing the symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), yet its clinical response varies widely among individuals. This study aims to investigate the influence of CYP2D6 genetic variants on donepezil concentration, treatment response, and adverse effects in Korean patients with AD dementia. We conducted a longitudinal study involving 76 patients receiving either 5 mg or 10 mg of donepezil. Genetic testing identified 9 CYP2D6 alleles, categorizing patients by metabolizing abilities. Blood sampling for plasma concentrations of donepezil were performed at steady-state. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were conducted at 12, 24 and 36 months after the initiation of treatment. Adverse events were collected throughout the study period.Donepezil plasma concentrations differed significantly among metabolizer statuses (mean 56.8 ± 27.1 ng/ml in normal metabolizers vs. 69.6 ± 30.1 ng/ml in intermediate metabolizers, p = 0.042), but these differences did not affect cognitive function over three years as assessed by MMSE. Additionally, there was no significant correlation between donepezil plasma concentration and adverse events. Our study is the first to elucidate the associations between CYP2D6 genotype and the concentration, clinical response or adverse events of donepezil in Korean patients with AD dementia. Larger studies are necessary to fully understand the impact of CYP2D6 genetic variants on therapeutic outcomes with donepezil.

Objective: It has been 1 year since the start of the worldwide coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study analyzed the indirect effects of COVID-19 on treating patients with non-infectious diseases by comparing the incidence of complicated appendicitis before and after the pandemic. Methods: The target group included patients aged at least 16 years diagnosed with acute appendicitis between February 23 and July 31, 2020. Patients diagnosed during the same period in 2019 were selected as the control group. The differences in the incidence of complicated appendicitis before and after COVID-19 were investigated, and the association with various variables was analyzed using the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The study included 120 subjects in 2019 (pre-COVID group) and 119 cases in 2020 (post-COVID group). The pre-COVID group included 25 cases (20.8%) of complicated appendicitis, while the post-COVID group included 48 cases (40.3%). The median time from symptom onset to visit (pre-hospital time) increased from 15 to 22 hours, and the median time from the visit to surgery (in-hospital time) increased from 7 to 11 hours. Multivariate regression analysis of the three variables revealed odds ratios (95% CIs) of pre-hospital time, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and inclusion in the post-COVID group of 1.02 (1.01-1.02), 2.07 (1.11-3.86), and 2.15 (1.12-4.11), respectively. Conclusion The incidence of complicated appendicitis increased after the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, a healthcare system that can minimize the delay in treating non-infectious emergency patients is needed.

Objective: : In degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, interbody fusion surgery (IFS) has long been recommended as the gold standard of surgical management. However, IFS is less recommended for high-risk patients such as the elderly because it involves extensive surgery, with a long operation time and high volumes of blood loss, which lead to marked perioperative morbidity. We report an alternative primary and salvage treatment technique for high-risk lumbar spondylolisthesis through posterior lumbar element reinforcement using interspinous fixation and decompression alone without interbody fusion. Methods: : Plain radiographs, computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging, taken at different intervals, were used to measure local disc height (DH), vertebral body slippage (BS), and segmental motion angle (SMA). A Visual analogue scale and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) were applied pre-operation and at the last follow-up. Results: : The local SMA decreased significantly by 3.46°±3.07°, from 10.61°±3.42° preoperatively to 7.15±3.70 at the last follow-up (p<0.001). The DH decreased from 8.61±2.88 mm preoperatively to 8.41±2.48 mm at the last follow-up (p=0.074). The BS decreased from 3.49±4.29 mm preoperatively to 3.41±4.91 mm at the last follow-up (p=0.092). None of the patients reported worsening pain or an increased ODI after surgery, and there were no surgery-related complications. Conclusion : Posterior lumbar element reinforcement by decompression alone with SPIRE™ fixation is an alternative primary and salvage treatment option for select patients with spondylolisthesis.

Objective: : In degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, interbody fusion surgery (IFS) has long been recommended as the gold standard of surgical management. However, IFS is less recommended for high-risk patients such as the elderly because it involves extensive surgery, with a long operation time and high volumes of blood loss, which lead to marked perioperative morbidity. We report an alternative primary and salvage treatment technique for high-risk lumbar spondylolisthesis through posterior lumbar element reinforcement using interspinous fixation and decompression alone without interbody fusion. Methods: : Plain radiographs, computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging, taken at different intervals, were used to measure local disc height (DH), vertebral body slippage (BS), and segmental motion angle (SMA). A Visual analogue scale and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) were applied pre-operation and at the last follow-up. Results: : The local SMA decreased significantly by 3.46°±3.07°, from 10.61°±3.42° preoperatively to 7.15±3.70 at the last follow-up (p<0.001). The DH decreased from 8.61±2.88 mm preoperatively to 8.41±2.48 mm at the last follow-up (p=0.074). The BS decreased from 3.49±4.29 mm preoperatively to 3.41±4.91 mm at the last follow-up (p=0.092). None of the patients reported worsening pain or an increased ODI after surgery, and there were no surgery-related complications. Conclusion : Posterior lumbar element reinforcement by decompression alone with SPIRE™ fixation is an alternative primary and salvage treatment option for select patients with spondylolisthesis.

Donepezil, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, is widely used for managing the symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), yet its clinical response varies widely among individuals. This study aims to investigate the influence of CYP2D6 genetic variants on donepezil concentration, treatment response, and adverse effects in Korean patients with AD dementia. We conducted a longitudinal study involving 76 patients receiving either 5 mg or 10 mg of donepezil. Genetic testing identified 9 CYP2D6 alleles, categorizing patients by metabolizing abilities. Blood sampling for plasma concentrations of donepezil were performed at steady-state. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were conducted at 12, 24 and 36 months after the initiation of treatment. Adverse events were collected throughout the study period.Donepezil plasma concentrations differed significantly among metabolizer statuses (mean 56.8 ± 27.1 ng/ml in normal metabolizers vs. 69.6 ± 30.1 ng/ml in intermediate metabolizers, p = 0.042), but these differences did not affect cognitive function over three years as assessed by MMSE. Additionally, there was no significant correlation between donepezil plasma concentration and adverse events. Our study is the first to elucidate the associations between CYP2D6 genotype and the concentration, clinical response or adverse events of donepezil in Korean patients with AD dementia. Larger studies are necessary to fully understand the impact of CYP2D6 genetic variants on therapeutic outcomes with donepezil.