Background: Despite widespread vaccination efforts against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, variants with increased transmissibility or immune evasion continue to emerge, posing a considerable challenge. Understanding the immunological factors associated with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) progression is essential for improving patient management and treatment strategies. We explored the dynamic changes in the peripheral white blood cell (WBC) profile, including T lymphocyte subsets, to assess their potential as predictors of disease severity and progression. Methods: Two hundred fifty-eight patients hospitalized for confirmed COVID-19 were classified into four sub-cohorts based on changes in disease severity over 7 days. WBC parameters, including absolute neutrophil, total lymphocyte, and T cell subset counts, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were assessed at admission and after 7 days. Results: Patients with persistent mild-to-moderate illness exhibited a marked increase in the lymphocyte count and a decrease in the NLR over time. In contrast, patients with sustained severe-to-critical illness showed an increasing WBC count without a corresponding increase in the lymphocyte count, in addition to a marked elevation in the NLR. Patients whose condition improved from severe-to-critical to mild-to-moderate illness showed increased cluster of differentiation (CD)3+ and CD4+ T cell counts and an elevated CD4/CD8 ratio, whereas the NLR did not significantly change. Conclusions The early-phase dynamics of T cell subsets may serve as a useful biomarker of disease severity and recovery in patients with COVID-19. Monitoring these immunological changes may help support clinical decision-making and inform the timing of therapeutic interventions.

Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) remains a cornerstone of curative treatment for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. However, dose escalation to improve tumor control is often constrained by the proximity of the rectum, which increases the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicities. Biodegradable rectal spacers inserted between the prostate and rectum have emerged as an effective approach to reduce rectal radiation exposure. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on indications, contraindications, procedural standards, and clinical management for biodegradable rectal spacer insertion during prostate cancer RT. Materials and Methods: This guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel through a systematic review of the literature, analysis of international guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, European Association of Urology, American Society for Radiation Oncology), and expert consensus among radiation oncologists, radiologists, and urologists with clinical experience in spacer insertion. The strength of each recommendation and the level of evidence were classified according to the modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. Results: Spacer insertion is conditionally recommended (Grade C, Level I) for patients receiving definitive external-beam RT without rectal invasion. It reduces the high-dose rectal irradiation volume (V70–75) by >50%, decreases acute GI toxicity, and helps maintain bowel-related quality of life. However, the benefit for late severe toxicity (grade 2 or higher) remains debated in recent meta-analyses. Contraindications include rectal invasion, anatomical inaccessibility, infection, and material hypersensitivity. Procedures should be performed under local anesthesia in a sterile environment by trained physicians. Short-course antibiotics and simulator-based training, including completion of multiple supervised cases, are advised. Conclusion Biodegradable rectal spacer insertion is clinically validated and effective in reducing acute rectal toxicity. Although pivotal trials demonstrated a favorable procedural safety profile, real-world postmarket data include reports of rare but severe procedural complications. This guideline provides standardized recommendations tailored to Korean clinical practice while remaining consistent with international standards, emphasizing the importance of operator training and careful patient selection.

Purpose: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) resulting from total hip arthroplasty (THA) pose significant challenges. Partial two-stage exchange arthroplasty (TSEA) retains either the femoral stem or acetabular cup by preserving bone stock and soft tissue and offers a potential alternative to total TSEA. Our meta-analysis evaluated the pooled success rate of partial TSEA in treating late chronic PJIs in THA. Our study also focused on the outcomes associated with retained prosthetic implant (stem or cup) and the type of prior surgery (primary vs. revision arthroplasty) performed. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from 355 hips of patients with PJI following THA across 11 studies using a random-effects model to estimate the success rate of partial TSEA and spacer dislocation that occurs during the interval between the first and second stages of partial TSEA. The heterogeneity between the subgroups was also calculated. Results: The overall pooled success rate of partial TSEA in the study cohort was 87% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83-91).Lacking statistical significance (P=0.904), the success rates were 88% for stem-retained and 90% for cup-retained implant cases. The partial TSEA success rates were 88% for primary arthroplasty and 80% for revision arthroplasty, although this was not statistically significant (P=0.193). Spacer dislocation occurred in only 5% of the cases (95% CI 1-9). Conclusion Partial TSEA achieves high success rates comparable to those of total TSEA. Although revision arthroplasty cases carry a high risk of recurrence, partial TSEA remains a viable, tailored treatment option with a low complication rate.

Purpose: Based on the KEYNOTE-522 study, neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy has become the standard treatment for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).This study evaluated the real-world efficacy, safety, and predictors of pathologic complete response (pCR) in Korean patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 174 patients with early-stage TNBC who received the KEYNOTE-522 regimen (neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin, followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) at a tertiary cancer center between August 2022 and July 2024. We assessed the primary endpoints, including pCR rate and event-free survival (EFS). We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify independent predictors of pCR. Results: The median patient age was 50 years (range, 24–74 years). The clinical stages were II and III in 79.3% and 20.1% of patients, respectively, and 10.9% had clinical N3 disease. The overall pCR rate was 62.1%, and the N3 subgroup had a pCR rate of 47.4%. On multivariable analysis, high baseline Ki-67 expression (≥ median, 75%) was significantly associated with pCR (odds ratio, 2.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.45 to 5.66; p = 0.002). At a median followup of 18.4 months, the 12-month EFS rate was 97.4%, with significantly superior outcomes observed in patients who achieved pCR compared with those who did not achieve pCR (100% vs. 93.1%, p = 0.007). The treatment completion rate was 92.0%, and immune-related adverse events occurred in 13.8% of patients. Conclusion In this real-world analysis of one of the largest Asian cohorts of patients with earlystage TNBC treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, the KEYNOTE-522 regimen demonstrated substantial efficacy and manageable toxicity, consistent with the original trial findings.

Background: Posterior spinal fusion is performed for severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), with bone graft playing a critical role in achieving solid fusion. Iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) is the gold standard but has donor site morbidity, leading to increased use of non-ICBG. This study compared the effectiveness and safety of ICBG and non-ICBG bone grafts in AIS. Methods: This meta-analysis included 23 studies with 3,350 patients, categorized into ICBG and non-ICBG groups. The primary outcome was fusion rate; secondary outcomes were implant-related complication rate, infection rate, donor site pain, blood loss, and operation time. A proportion meta-analysis was conducted to estimate binary outcomes, and a weighted mean model was used to estimate continuous variables. Results: The fusion rate was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93-99) in ICBG group and 97% (95% CI, 95-98) in non-ICBG group. Implant-related complications occurred in 5% (95% CI, 3-7) and 4% (95% CI, 2-6) of each group, while surgical site infections occurred in 3% (95% CI, 2-7) and 2% (95% CI, 1-3). Donor site pain was observed exclusively in ICBG group, with a prevalence of 49% (95% CI, 3–97). Estimated pooled blood loss was 1,461.10 mL (95% CI, 545.30-2,376.90) in ICBG group and 1,047.45 mL (95% CI, 666.92-1,427.99) in non-ICBG group. The estimated pooled operation time was 246.77 (95% CI, 221.74-271.80) and 232.37 (95% CI, 194.88-269.86) for each group. Conclusions Considering both ICBG and non-ICBG demonstrated high fusion rates and low complication rates, non-ICBG grafts may serve as an effective and safe alternative to ICBG, minimizing morbidity, donor site pain, and blood loss.

Purpose: In men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), new bone lesions are sometimes not properly categorized through a confirmatory bone scan, and clinical significance of the test itself remains unclear. This study aimed to demonstrate the performance rate of confirmatory bone scans in a real-world setting and their prognostic impact in enzalutamide-treated mCRPC. Materials and Methods: Patients who received oral enzalutamide for mCRPC during 2014-2017 at 14 tertiary centers in Korea were included. Patients lacking imaging assessment data or insufficient drug exposure were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included performance rate of confirmatory bone scans in a real-world setting. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed. Results: Overall, 520 patients with mCRPC were enrolled (240 [26.2%] chemotherapy-naïve and 280 [53.2%] after chemotherapy). Among 352 responders, 92 patients (26.1%) showed new bone lesions in their early bone scan. Confirmatory bone scan was performed in 41 patients (44.6%), and it was associated with prolonged OS in the entire population (median, 30.9 vs. 19.7 months; p < 0.001), as well as in the chemotherapy-naïve (median, 47.2 vs. 20.5 months; p=0.011) and post-chemotherapy sub-groups (median, 25.5 vs. 18.0 months; p=0.006). Multivariate Cox regression showed that confirmatory bone scan performance was an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.69; p=0.002). Conclusion Confirmatory bone scan performance was associated with prolonged OS. Thus, the premature discontinuation of enzalutamide without confirmatory bone scans should be discouraged.

Background: Atherogenic dyslipidemia, which is frequently associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and insulin resistance, contributes to the development of vascular complications. Statin therapy is the primary approach to dyslipidemia management in T2D, however, the role of non-statin therapy remains unclear. Ezetimibe reduces cholesterol burden by inhibiting intestinal cholesterol absorption. Fibrates lower triglyceride levels and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels via peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor alpha agonism. Therefore, when combined, these drugs effectively lower non-HDL-C levels. Despite this, few clinical trials have specifically targeted non-HDL-C, and the efficacy of triple combination therapies, including statins, ezetimibe, and fibrates, has yet to be determined. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, active-comparator controlled trial involving 3,958 eligible participants with T2D, cardiovascular risk factors, and elevated non-HDL-C (≥100 mg/dL). Participants, already on moderate-intensity statins, will be randomly assigned to either Ezefeno (ezetimibe/fenofibrate) addition or statin dose-escalation. The primary end point is the development of a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and diabetic microvascular events over 48 months. Conclusion This trial aims to assess whether combining statins, ezetimibe, and fenofibrate is as effective as, or possibly superior to, statin monotherapy intensification in lowering cardiovascular and microvascular disease risk for patients with T2D. This could propose a novel therapeutic approach for managing dyslipidemia in T2D.

Selective cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography can be particularly challenging when the papilla is invisible, either due to an intradiverticular papilla (IDP) or because it is covered by a mucosal fold. Endoclipassisted cannulation is an effective and safe technique for everting and fixing the papilla and it can be used alone or in combination with other devices. In this report, we achieved successful papillary cannulation in two cases of IDP and one case where the papilla was covered by a mucosal fold. In two cases, cannulation was accomplished by repositioning the invisible papilla using an endoclip alone, while in one case, we used an endoclip-assisted technique to push a redundant fold with a catheter. Endoclipassisted papillary cannulation can be applied in different situations, either alone or in combination with other devices.

Background: Before the omicron era, health care workers were usually vaccinated with either the primary 2-dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) series plus a booster dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) (CCB group) or the primary 2-dose BNT162b2 series plus a booster dose of BNT162b2 (BBB group) in Korea. Methods: The two groups were compared using quantification of the surrogate virus neutralization test for wild type severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SVNT-WT), the omicron variant (SVNT-O), spike-specific IgG, and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), as well as the omicron breakthrough infection cases. Results: There were 113 participants enrolled in the CCB group and 51 enrolled in the BBB group. Before and after booster vaccination, the median SVNT-WT and SVNT-O values were lower in the CCB (SVNT-WT [before-after]: 72.02–97.61%, SVNT-O: 15.18–42.29%) group than in the BBB group (SVNT-WT: 89.19–98.11%, SVNT-O: 23.58–68.56%; all P < 0.001). Although the median IgG concentrations were different between the CCB and BBB groups after the primary series (2.677 vs. 4.700 AU/mL, respectively, P < 0.001), they were not different between the two groups after the booster vaccination (7.246 vs. 7.979 AU/mL, respectively, P = 0.108). In addition, the median IFN-γ concentration was higher in the BBB group than in the CCB group (550.5 and 387.5 mIU/mL, respectively, P = 0.014). There was also a difference in the cumulative incidence curves over time (CCB group 50.0% vs. BBB group 41.8%; P = 0.045), indicating that breakthrough infection occurred faster in the CCB group. Conclusion The cellular and humoral immune responses were low in the CCB group so that the breakthrough infection occurred faster in the CCB group than in the BBB group.

Background: Korea recently established 70 emergency medical service areas. However, there are many concerns that medical resources for stroke could not be evenly distributed through the country. We aimed to compare the treatment quality and outcomes of acute stroke among the emergency medical service areas. Methods: This study analyzed the data of 28,800 patients admitted in 248 hospitals which participated in the 8th acute stroke quality assessment by Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Individual hospitals were regrouped into emergency service areas according to the address of the location. Assessment indicators and fatality were compared by the service areas. We defined the appropriate hospital by the performance of intravenous thrombolysis. Results: In seven service areas, there were no hospitals which received more than 10 stroke patients for 6 months. In nine service areas, there were no patients who underwent intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Among 167 designated emergency medical centers, 50 hospitals (29.9%) responded that IVT was impossible 24 hours a day. There are 97 (39.1%) hospitals that meet the definitions of appropriate hospital. In 23 service areas (32.9%) had no appropriate or feasible hospitals. The fatality of service areas with stroke centers were 6.9% within 30 days and 15.6% within 1 year from stroke onset than those without stroke centers (7.7%, 16.9%, respectively). Conclusions There was a wide regional gap in the medical resource and the quality of treatments for acute stroke among emergency medical service areas in Korea. The poststroke fatality rate of the service areas which have stroke centers or appropriate hospitals were significantly low.