1.Expert consensus on the clinical application of oral antihistamines in the treatment of upper airway allergic diseases in children.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(8):691-698
Upper airway allergic disease in children refers to chronic non-infectious inflammatory diseases of the upper airway caused by allergic inflammation. These diseases have high prevalences and great harm. Attentions should be paid to the treatment of these diseases. Oral antihistamines play an important role in the treatment of allergic diseases. However, there are many types of antihistamines. How to select appropriate antihistamines according to the age and characteristics of children to treat upper airway allergic diseases is a concern of pediatricians. Therefore, the Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Committee of the Chinese Association for the Promotion of Human Health Science and Technology organized relevant experts to form this consensus, in order to guide the use of oral antihistamines in children with upper airway allergic diseases.
Humans
;
Child
;
Histamine Antagonists/administration & dosage*
;
Administration, Oral
;
Consensus
;
Hypersensitivity/drug therapy*
2.Clinical study of the combination therapy with intranasal antihistamine and nasal corticosteroids in the treatment of nasal obstruction of persistent non-allergic rhinitis.
Limin GUO ; Xicai SUN ; Juanmei YANG ; Juan LIU ; Dehui WANG
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2015;29(3):243-251
OBJECTIVE:
To determine if greater efficacy could be achieved with the intranasal antihistamine azelastine and the intranasal corticosteroid fluticasone propionate used concurrently in the treatment of nasal obstruction of persistent non-allergic rhinitis.
METHOD:
A total of 162 persistent non-allergic rhinitis cases with moderate to severe nasal obstruction were randomized to treatment with the following: the combination therapy or nasal corticosteroids monotherapy. Efficacy was assessed by change from baseline in nasal obstruction score at week 2 and week 6 visits. The perceptions of global treatment satisfaction(convenience, side effects, cost and effectiveness) in both groups were analyzed.
RESULT:
In both groups, the nasal obstruction score assessment descended significantly at week 2 and week 6 visits versus at baseline (all P < 0.01). At week 2 and week 6 visits, the nasal obstruction score in the combination therapy groups were significantly improved than that in nasal corticosteroids monotherapy groups (all P < 0.01). The perceptions of global treatment satisfaction in the combination therapy groups were significantly better (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Azelastine nasal spray and intranasal corticosteroid in combination may provide a substantial therapeutic benefit for patients with persistent non-allergic rhinitis, especially nasal obstruction. The combination therapy was well tolerated and safety.
Administration, Intranasal
;
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
;
therapeutic use
;
Drug Therapy, Combination
;
Histamine H1 Antagonists
;
therapeutic use
;
Humans
;
Nasal Obstruction
;
Phthalazines
;
therapeutic use
;
Rhinitis
;
drug therapy
4.Contact dermatitis caused by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Byoung Won PARK ; Jin Wook CHUNG ; Min Su HYON ; Dong Cheol HAN
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2013;28(1):120-120
No abstract available.
Administration, Cutaneous
;
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/*adverse effects/instrumentation
;
Dermatitis, Contact/diagnosis/drug therapy/*etiology
;
Female
;
Histamine Antagonists/administration & dosage
;
Humans
;
Hypertension/*diagnosis/physiopathology
;
Middle Aged
;
Steroids/administration & dosage
;
Treatment Outcome
5.Optimal Duration of Medical Treatment in Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome in Children.
Myung Seok SHIN ; Jae Young KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(8):1220-1225
The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome, and optimal duration of medical treatment in children with superior mesenteric artery syndrome (SMAS). Eighteen children with SMAS were retrospectively studied. The data reviewed included demographics, presenting symptoms, co-morbid conditions, clinical courses, nutritional status, treatments, and outcomes. The three most common symptoms were postprandial discomfort (67.7%), abdominal pain (61.1%), and early satiety (50%). The median duration of symptoms before diagnosis was 68 days. The most common co-morbid condition was weight loss (50%), followed by growth spurt (22.2%) and bile reflux gastropathy (16.7%). Body mass index (BMI) was normal in 72.2% of the patients. Medical management was successful in 13 patients (72.2%). The median duration of treatment was 45 days. Nine patients (50%) had good outcomes without recurrence, 5 patients (27.8%) had moderate outcomes, and 4 patients (22.2%) had poor outcomes. A time limit of >6 weeks for the duration of medical management tended to be associated with worse outcomes (P=0.018). SMAS often developed in patients with normal BMI or no weight loss. Medical treatment has a high success rate, and children with SMAS should be treated medically for at least 6 weeks before surgical treatment is considered.
Adolescent
;
Bile Reflux/diagnosis
;
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
Demography
;
Domperidone/therapeutic use
;
Dopamine Antagonists/therapeutic use
;
Drug Administration Schedule
;
Female
;
Histamine H2 Antagonists/therapeutic use
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Male
;
Parenteral Nutrition
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome/*diagnosis/drug therapy
;
Time Factors
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Weight Loss
6.Updated Guidelines 2012 for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Hye Kyung JUNG ; Su Jin HONG ; Yunju JO ; Seong Woo JEON ; Yu Kyung CHO ; Kwang Jae LEE ; Joon Seong LEE ; Hyo Jin PARK ; Ein Soon SHIN ; Sun Hee LEE ; Sang Uk HAN
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2012;60(4):195-218
In 2010, a Korean guideline for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was made by the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, in which the definition and diagnosis of GERD were not included. The aim of this guideline was to update the clinical approach to the diagnosis and management of GERD in adult patients. This guideline was developed by the adaptation process of the ADAPTE framework. Twelve guidelines were retrieved from initial queries through the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II process. Twenty-seven statements were made as a draft and revised by modified Delphi method. Finally, 24 consensus statements for the definition (n=4), diagnosis (n=7) and management (n=13) of GERD were developed. Multidisciplinary experts participated in the development of the guideline, and the external review of the guideline was conducted at the finalization phase.
Antacids/therapeutic use
;
Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use
;
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use
;
Barrett Esophagus/complications/diagnosis
;
Databases, Factual
;
Diet
;
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
;
Drug Administration Schedule
;
Drug Therapy, Combination
;
Endoscopy, Digestive System
;
Esophageal pH Monitoring
;
Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications/*diagnosis/drug therapy
;
Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use
;
Humans
;
Peptic Ulcer/complications/diagnosis
;
Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use
;
Stomach Neoplasms/complications/diagnosis
7.Behavior research of allergic rhinitis with adenoid hypertrophy in children.
Yunlong JING ; Binya HU ; Jing HUANG ; Sijun ZHAO ; Lihua TAO ; Xiangyue PENG
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2012;26(12):547-549
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the behavior difference of allergic rhinitis with adenoid hypertrophy between study group and control group.
METHOD:
One hundred and seventeen children diagnosed as allergic rhinitis with adenoid hypertrophy were enrolled in our study were divided into study group and control group. Forty-two children treated with local steroid nasal spray for two to three months and antihistamine were control group. Seventy-five children treated with endoscopic adenoidectomy and drug treatment were study group; All children' parents were inquired for their clinical presentation.
RESULT:
No distinctive differences were found between the two groups (P > 0.05) in adenoid hypertrophy, accompanying nasal problems and clinical questionnaire scoring. Significant statistical distinction were found (P < 0.05) in snoring, sleep disturbance and frequent arousal, nasal obstructive moth-breathing, and recurrent respiratory tract infection between the two groups after three-month follow up.
CONCLUSION
Endoscopic adenoidectomy should be taken into account for allergic rhinitis with adenoid hypertrophy in children. Adenoidectomy would be useful for the improvement of behavior symptoms.
Adenoidectomy
;
methods
;
Adenoids
;
pathology
;
Anti-Allergic Agents
;
administration & dosage
;
Case-Control Studies
;
Child
;
Combined Modality Therapy
;
Endoscopy
;
Female
;
Histamine H1 Antagonists
;
administration & dosage
;
Humans
;
Hypertrophy
;
complications
;
therapy
;
Male
;
Rhinitis, Allergic
;
complications
;
therapy
;
Steroids
;
administration & dosage
8.Hypersensitive Reaction to Praziquantel in a Clonorchiasis Patient.
Jung Min LEE ; Hyun Sul LIM ; Sung Tae HONG
The Korean Journal of Parasitology 2011;49(3):273-275
Praziquantel is the drug of choice for clonorchiasis. Since clonorchiasis is endemic in most river basins, praziquantel has been widely used for 30 years in Korea. A 54-year-old Korean woman suffered from hypersensitive reactions, such as nausea, dyspnea, rash, and urticaria after taking the first dose of praziquantel to treat clonorchiasis. She ingested one dose again and the same symptoms appeared, and she was treated at a clinic with anti-histamines. She tried one more dose with anti-histamines but found the same symptoms. Later, she was found to pass eggs of Clonorchis sinensis and medicated with flubendazole. The hypersensitive reaction to praziquantel is rare but occurs. This is the 5th case report in the world.
Animals
;
Anthelmintics/*administration & dosage/*adverse effects
;
Clonorchiasis/*complications/*drug therapy
;
Clonorchis sinensis/isolation & purification
;
Drug Hypersensitivity/*diagnosis/drug therapy/pathology
;
Feces/parasitology
;
Female
;
Histamine Antagonists/administration & dosage
;
Humans
;
Mebendazole/administration & dosage/analogs & derivatives
;
Middle Aged
;
Praziquantel/*administration & dosage/*adverse effects
;
Republic of Korea
9.Anaphylactic Reaction Associated with Ranitidine Administration: 2 Case Reports.
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2010;21(1):144-146
Ranitidine is a widely used histamine-2-receptor antagonist and it is usually well tolerated by patients with an excellent safety record. Anaphylactic reaction to ranitidine is rare event. We report here on 2 cases with anaphylactic reaction after the intravenous administration of ranitidine in an emergency medical center. Awareness of this rare, but life threatening adverse reaction to a commonly used ranitidine can help physicians avoid being caught unaware when they experience this medical situation. Although the incidences of anaphylactic reactions induced by these drugs are low, clinicians should be aware of this possibility of life threatening risk of anaphylactic reaction when administering ranitidine. Furthermore, the possibility of cross reactivity between drugs in the same antihistamine group should be considered. (ED note: please check the part in the yellow.)
Administration, Intravenous
;
Anaphylaxis
;
Emergencies
;
Histamine H2 Antagonists
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Ranitidine
10.Antihistamine Pretreatment to Reduce Incidence of Withdrawal Movement After Rocuronium Injection.
Ho Jun LEE ; Sung Jin HAN ; Heezoo KIM ; Il Ok LEE ; Myoung Hoon KONG ; Nan Suk KIM ; Sang Ho LIM ; Mi Kyoung LEE
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2009;24(5):879-882
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of antihistamine therapy for withdrawal movements caused by rocuronium injection. One hundred seventy one ASA I-II adults undergoing elective surgery were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Patients in the control group (Group C) were premedicated with 2 mL normal saline, and those in the antihistamine group (Group A) were pre-medicated with 2 mL (45.5 mg) pheniramine maleate. After the administration of thiopental sodium 5 mg/kg, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was injected. Withdrawal movements were assessed using a four-grade scale. The administration of antihistamine reveals lower grade of withdrawal movement after rocuronium injection.
Adult
;
Androstanols/*administration & dosage/adverse effects
;
Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage
;
Double-Blind Method
;
Female
;
Histamine H1 Antagonists/*pharmacology
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Injections, Intravenous
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Movement/drug effects/physiology
;
Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents/*administration & dosage/adverse effects
;
Pain/chemically induced
;
Pain Measurement
;
Pheniramine/*pharmacology
;
Thiopental/administration & dosage

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail