Background/Aims: Visualization of palisade vessels (PVs) in Barrett’s esophagus is crucial for proper assessment. This study aimed to determine whether red dichromatic imaging (RDI) improves PV visibility compared with white-light imaging (WLI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI). Methods: Five expert and trainee endoscopists evaluated the PV visibility in Barrett’s esophagus using WLI, NBI, and RDI on 66 images from 22 patients. Visibility was rated on a 4-point scale: 4, excellent; 3, good; 2, fair; and 1, poor. The color difference between the most recognizable PV spots and surrounding areas with undetectable blood vessels was also analyzed. Results: Mean visibility scores were 2.6±0.7, 2.3±0.6, and 3.4±0.4 for WLI, NBI, and RDI, respectively. The RDI scores were significantly higher than the WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p<0.001) scores. These differences were recognized by trainees and expert endoscopists. Color differences in PVs were 7.74±4.96 (WLI), 10.43±5.09 (NBI), and 15.1±6.54 (RDI). The difference in RDI was significantly higher than that in WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p=0.006). Conclusions RDI significantly improved PV visibility compared to WLI and NBI based on objective and subjective measures.

Background/Aims: Visualization of palisade vessels (PVs) in Barrett’s esophagus is crucial for proper assessment. This study aimed to determine whether red dichromatic imaging (RDI) improves PV visibility compared with white-light imaging (WLI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI). Methods: Five expert and trainee endoscopists evaluated the PV visibility in Barrett’s esophagus using WLI, NBI, and RDI on 66 images from 22 patients. Visibility was rated on a 4-point scale: 4, excellent; 3, good; 2, fair; and 1, poor. The color difference between the most recognizable PV spots and surrounding areas with undetectable blood vessels was also analyzed. Results: Mean visibility scores were 2.6±0.7, 2.3±0.6, and 3.4±0.4 for WLI, NBI, and RDI, respectively. The RDI scores were significantly higher than the WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p<0.001) scores. These differences were recognized by trainees and expert endoscopists. Color differences in PVs were 7.74±4.96 (WLI), 10.43±5.09 (NBI), and 15.1±6.54 (RDI). The difference in RDI was significantly higher than that in WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p=0.006). Conclusions RDI significantly improved PV visibility compared to WLI and NBI based on objective and subjective measures.

Background/Aims: Visualization of palisade vessels (PVs) in Barrett’s esophagus is crucial for proper assessment. This study aimed to determine whether red dichromatic imaging (RDI) improves PV visibility compared with white-light imaging (WLI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI). Methods: Five expert and trainee endoscopists evaluated the PV visibility in Barrett’s esophagus using WLI, NBI, and RDI on 66 images from 22 patients. Visibility was rated on a 4-point scale: 4, excellent; 3, good; 2, fair; and 1, poor. The color difference between the most recognizable PV spots and surrounding areas with undetectable blood vessels was also analyzed. Results: Mean visibility scores were 2.6±0.7, 2.3±0.6, and 3.4±0.4 for WLI, NBI, and RDI, respectively. The RDI scores were significantly higher than the WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p<0.001) scores. These differences were recognized by trainees and expert endoscopists. Color differences in PVs were 7.74±4.96 (WLI), 10.43±5.09 (NBI), and 15.1±6.54 (RDI). The difference in RDI was significantly higher than that in WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p=0.006). Conclusions RDI significantly improved PV visibility compared to WLI and NBI based on objective and subjective measures.

Mohs paste (MP) is a topical treatment that can help relieve the symptoms of self-destructive skin lesions caused by malignant tumors. Despite the potential benefits of MP in improving the quality of life of patients, its use in home-based care is limited due to various obstacles. In this study, we developed a 1-mm-thick MP gauze sheet, which allowed us to apply the MP treatment at home to a patient with breast cancer. After three weekly treatments, the patient’s main symptoms, including itchiness, odor caused by exudates, and mobility issues, showed improvement. By using MP as a sheet, we overcame the obstacles associated with its use, such as alterations in the physical properties and the risk of damage to healthy skin tissue. Additionally, we reduced the treatment duration and need for trained personnel. Our findings suggest that the MP treatment can effectively control the symptoms of patients in home-based care, consistent with prior research.

Objectives: To assess the perception of care and outcomes of end-of-life palliative care by bereaved family members to determine differences in care provided to patients with and without cancer. Methods: This cross-sectional, anonymous survey using a self-reporting questionnaire for bereaved family members was conducted online. Care was assessed using overall satisfaction score and the care evaluation scale (CES) and outcomes were assessed using good death inventory (GDI). Results: The present study included data from 118 patients with cancer and 299 patients without cancer (103, heart failure; 71, stroke; and 125, pneumonia). The overall satisfaction score was not significantly different between patients with and without cancer. Conversely, physical care score in the CES and autonomy score in the GDI were significantly lower in patients without cancer than in patients with cancer (p<0.05). Conclusion: The satisfaction with end-of-life care was comparable between the bereaved family members of patients without cancer and those of patients with cancer. However, results related to some items of CES and GDI suggest that some components of end-of-life care for patients without cancer might require attention. Not only treatment of the underlying disease but also relief of suffering is important to improve end-of-life care.

The aims of this study are 1. to evaluate the usability of workshop to introduce and manage distress screening effectively and efficiently and to use it for cancer patients and their family and 2. to consider the appropriate subject of workshop. All of the participants answered the questionnaire on the site (n=51). Their knowledge about screening practice, various screening tools and how to use screening tools and data from screening tool were significantly improved after the workshop. The workshop was highly regarded by participants. Thirty-eight of fifty-one patients responded to web questionnaire three months later (Response rate: 75%). More than thirty percent of participants put into practice what they learned in the workshop. The workshop decreased factors to interfere screening practice three months later. Knowledge about how to use screening tools was negatively correlated to number of cancer patients at hospital where participants worked and number of their hospital beds. And factor to interfere screening practice was negatively correlated to how long participants were involved in palliative care team. This study indicated the usability of workshop to spread screening triage program regarding cancer patients’ distress. The workshop may be appropriate for medical staffs who have relatively much experience of palliative care team and who have difficulty in screening practice at designated cancer hospitals where number of cancer patients is relatively large.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the consequences of caring for end-of-life elderly patients from the bereaved family’s perspective. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, anonymous, self-report questionnaire survey for bereaved family members by web survey. Outcomes were caregiving consequences (Caregiving Consequences Inventory). We compared the outcomes between with and without dementia. Results: 163 and 224 dying elderly patients with and without comorbid dementia were analyzed from bereaved family members’ responses. The outcomes were not significantly different (burden, 5.24±1.12, 5.32±1.24, p=0.487; fulfillment, 4.53±1.06, 4.59±1.29, p=0.627; growth, 4.94±0.93, 5.00±1.04, p=0.523). Fulfillment was significantly associated with spouse, family visitation, and mental health. Growth was significantly associated with age, spouse, end-of-life discussion, and family preference of treatments. Conclusion: The evaluation of the consequences of caring for end-of-life elderly patients from the bereaved family’s perspective were not significantly between the informal caregivers of those with and without comorbid dementia.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate good death (end-of-life quality of life) from the perspective of bereaved family members. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, anonymous, self-report questionnaire survey for bereaved family members by web survey. Outcomes were achievement of a good death (Good Death Inventory, GDI). We compared the outcomes between with and without dementia. Results: 163 and 224 dying elderly patients with and without comorbid dementia were analyzed from bereaved family members’ responses. The achievement of good death were significantly different (GDI scores, 4.2±1.0, 4.4±0.9, Adj P=0.053) as regards “maintaining hope and pleasure,” “good relationship with family,” and “independence.” Conclusion: The achievement of good death was not significantly different between the dying elderly patients with and without comorbid dementia. Psychosocial care for informal caregivers would be important for better quality of dying in the terminally ill elderly patients with dementia.

Objectives:To determine the factors that influence the decision maker regarding end-of-life (EOL) care and to disclose how aggressive care in the last week before death, place of death, and quality-of-life (QOL) affected the decisions made. Methods:The subjects were 409 bereaved family members (cause of death included cancer, stroke, heart disease, and pneumonia) that registered with an internet research agency. Decision-making was controlled either by the patient, family, or physician or shared by the patient, family, and physician. Results:The results of a multinomial logistic regression analysis demonstrated that when a family controlled decision-making, they were less likely to report patient-family EOL discussion [odds ratio (OR)=0.52], and that the patient had good communication with the physician (OR=0.77); they were also likely to report that the patient had dementia (OR=1.94). Families who reported physician-controlled decision-making (vs patient controlled) were less likely to report that the patient had good communication with the physician (OR=0.62). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the last week and place of death were not associated with the decision maker. EOL QOL was associated with EOL care of the decision maker. When a physician controlled decision-making, patient EOL QOL was at its lowest. Conclusion:To improve patient-controlled decision-making, it is critical that patients, families, and physicians have more communication regarding EOL care.

East Japan earthquake after cancer is not little survey about patients with palliative care and home health care. In this study, the cancer during an earthquake which aims to make recommendations for future large－scale disasters, and investigation of actual conditions of palliative care and home health care system or manual for basic data. Healthcare in the stricken coastal region 53 conducted semi－structured interviews. Results than cancer healthcare for patients with palliative care and home health care experience is 【cancer providing healthcare to patients with disabilities】【patient lost during the tsunami damage and evacuation oral medication continued failure】【failure of the medical provision of in－home patients by disruption of lifeline】【regional health providers and backward medical assistance and emergency medical group with disabilities】【mental care to medical staff】【disorder of the nuclear power plant accident community health providers】 of 6 organized by category. Be prepared for major disasters, disasters when cancer patients with palliative care and home care issues and how to respond it became evident.