OBJECTIVE: To investigate the analgesic effect of locally injecting a "cocktail" analgesia containing a high-dose compound betamethasone during revision hip arthroplasty, and also to study the usage of opioid drugs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 180 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening of the hip prosthesis between January 2015 and December 2021. Among them, 95 patients received intraoperative injection of "cocktail" analgesia containing high-dose compound betamethasone (group A), and 85 patients received intraoperative injection of traditional "cocktail" analgesia (group B). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, presence or absence of diabetes mellitus between the two groups ( P>0.05). The hospital stay, use of opioid drugs within 72 hours, and the incidence of adverse reactions within 72 hours after operation [including nausea and vomiting, insomnia, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), infection, etc.] were recorded and compared between the two groups. The pain relief of patients was evaluated using the static and dynamic visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after operation. The incidence of complications (including prosthesis re-loosening, hip joint dislocation, hip joint stiffness, limping, chronic pain, etc.) at 2 years after operation was recorded, and the Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used to evaluate the function at 2 years after operation. RESULTS: In group A, the utilization rate of opioid drugs within 72 hours after operation was significantly lower than that in group B ( P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, as well as the incidence of adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting, insomnia, DVT, and infection within 72 hours after operation ( P>0.05). The VAS scores of both groups decreased with time, and the differences between different time points were significant ( P<0.05). The static and dynamic VAS scores of group A were significantly lower than those of group B at 12, 24, and 48 hours after operation ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in static and dynamic VAS scores between the two groups at 72 hours after operation ( P>0.05). All patients in both groups were followed up 2-8 years, with an average of 5.73 years. At 2 years after operation, no significant difference was found between the two groups in the incidence of complications and HHS score ( P>0.05). CONCLUSION "Cocktail" analgesia containing a high-dose compound betamethasone for early analgesia after revision hip arthroplasty can effectively reduce postoperative pain and the use of opioid drugs, but will not increase the incidence of infection and DVT after operation.
Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects* ; Betamethasone/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Male ; Female ; Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage* ; Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control* ; Middle Aged ; Reoperation ; Aged ; Analgesia/methods* ; Adult ; Pain Measurement ; Pain Management/methods* ; Prosthesis Failure ; Hip Prosthesis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of ^99mTc-MDP three-phase bone scintigraphy (TPBS) combined with C-reactive protein (CRP) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). METHODS: The clinical data of 198 patients who underwent revision surgery of artificial joint between January 2017 and January 2024 and received TPBS examination before surgery were retrospectively analyzed. There were 77 males and 121 females with an average age of 63.74 years ranging from 24 to 92 years. There were 90 cases of hip arthroplasty and 108 cases of knee arthroplasty. PJI was diagnosed according to the 2013 American Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) standard diagnostic criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predict value (PPV) were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the diagnostic performance of the three methods, and the area under curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance. RESULTS: According to the 2013 MSIS criteria, 116 cases were diagnosed as PJI, and the remaining 82 cases were aseptic loosening. The cases of PJI diagnosed by TPBS, CRP, and TPBS-CRP were 125, 109, and 137 respectively, and the cases of aseptic loosening were 73, 89, and 61 respectively. The sensitivity, accuracy, NPV, and PPV of TPBS-CRP combination in the diagnosis of PJI were higher than those of TPBS and CRP, but the specificity was lower than that of TPBS and CRP. ROC curve analysis further showed that the AUC value of TPBS-CRP combination was better than that of TPBS and CRP. The severity of bone defect and the duration of symptoms in patients with false positive TPBS diagnosis were worse than those in patients with true negative TPBS diagnosis (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the survival time of prosthesis between the two groups (P>0.05). Among the patients diagnosed with PJI by TPBS, CRP, and TPBS-CRP, 49, 35, and 54 patients had received antibiotic treatment 2 weeks before diagnosis, respectively. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of TPBS and TPBS-CRP before diagnosis between patients treated with and without antibiotics and those not treated (P>0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of antibiotic therapy before CRP diagnosis was significantly lower than that of untreated patients (P<0.05). CONCLUSION TPBS and CRP have limited specificity in differentiating PJI from aseptic loosening. The TPBS-CRP combination diagnostic method can synergize the local bone metabolic characteristics and systemic inflammatory response to achieve higher diagnostic accuracy, but caution should be exercised in patients with severe bone defects and longer symptom duration.
Humans ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/blood* ; Middle Aged ; Male ; Female ; Aged ; C-Reactive Protein/metabolism* ; Retrospective Studies ; Adult ; Radionuclide Imaging/methods* ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects* ; Aged, 80 and over ; Technetium Tc 99m Medronate ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects* ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Knee Prosthesis/adverse effects* ; ROC Curve ; Reoperation ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical utility of novel of new hematological markers in the preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a total of 149 patients who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a single center between January 2016 and June 2022, including 63 males and 86 females, aged from 47 to 93 years old with an average of (69.5±11.8) years old. Of them, 46 were diagnosed as PJI(PJI group), including 22 males and 24 females. The mean age was (71.3±12.5) years old. The body mass index (BMI) was (26.4±3.1) kg·m^-2. And 103 patients were diagnosed as aseptic prosthesis loosening (aseptic group), including 41 males and 62 females. The mean age was (68.7±11.4) years old. The BMI was (25.8±3.5) kg·m^-2. Preoperatively analyzed clinical parameters included C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), albumin, globulin, albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), plasma D-dimer, and plasma fibrinogen. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), sensitivity, and specificity analysis were employed to compare the diagnostic value of each blood marker in preoperative PJI diagnosis. RESULTS: In the PJI group, the levels of CRP were 16.6 (7.6, 4.5) mg·L^-1, ESR was 17.0 (12.8, 35.5) mm·h^-1, plasma D-dimer was 1.0 (0.5, 3.1) μg·L^-1, and plasma fibrinogen was 4.2 (3.2, 3.1) mg·L^-1;all of which were higher compared to the aseptic group with CRP at 4.2 (2.6, 7.8) mg·L^-1, ESR at 12.0(8.0, 20.0 )mm·h^-l, D-dimer at 0.4(0.2, 0.7)μg·L^-1, and fibrinogen at 2.8(2.4, 3.3 ) g·L^-1(P<0.05). However, the albumin level of 35.3 (32.3, 37.5) g·L^-1 and the WBC ratio of 1.0(0.9, 1.1) in the PJI group were significantly lower compared to the aseptic group with levels of 39.8 (36.1, 41.8) g·L^-1 and 1.4 (1.3, 1.5), respectively (P<0.05). Only the area under the curve (AUC) of AGR and plasma fibrinogen were greater than 0.8. The optimal predictive cut-1off, AUC, sensitivity and specificity were 3.4 g·L-1, 0.820, 69.57% and 84.47% for plasma fibrinogen; 1.18, 0.813, 82.61% and 78.64% for AGR, respectively. CONCLUSION AGR and plasma fibrinogen are promising blood markers for improving the diagnosis of PJI.
Humans ; Female ; Fibrinogen/metabolism* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/blood* ; Retrospective Studies ; Biomarkers/blood* ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects* ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects* ; Leukocyte Count

OBJECTIVE: To construct and evaluate nomogram prediction model for periprosthetic fractures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A total of 538 patients who underwent THA from April 2013 to February 2019 were selected as the research subjects, including 318 males and 220 females, aged 40 to 60 years old with an average age of (50.79±6.37) years old. All patients with THA were divided into non-fracture group (506 patients) and fracture group (32 pathents) according to the 3-year follow-up results. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze the influencing factors of postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients with THA. A nomogram prediction model for periprosthetic fractures in patients undergoing THA was constructed, and the validity and discrimination of the prediction model were evaluated. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with osteoporosis, trauma history, and hip revision in the fracture group were higher than those in the non-fracture group(P<0.05), and the proportion of bone cement prosthesis was lower than that in the non-fracture group(P<0.05). The osteoporosis status[OR=4.177, 95%CI(1.815, 9.617), P<0.05], trauma history[OR=7.481, 95%CI(3.104, 18.031), P<0.05], and hip revision[OR=11.371, 95%CI(3.220, 40.153, P<0.05] were independent risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients undergoing THA, cemented prosthesis [OR=0.067, 95%CI(0.019, 0.236), P<0.05] was an independent protective factor for postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients undergoing THA(P<0.05). Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test showed that χ²=7.864, P=0.325;the area under the curve (AUC) for periprosthetic fractures in patients undergoing THA was 0.892 with a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 77.7% by receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve. CONCLUSION The nomogram prediction model for periprosthetic fractures after THA constructed in this study has good discrimination, which is beneficial to clinical prediction of periprosthetic fractures in patients undergoing THA, and facilitates individualized fracture prevention.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects* ; Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery* ; Nomograms ; Reoperation/adverse effects* ; Risk Factors ; Osteoporosis/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Hip Prosthesis

Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects* ; Surgical Wound Infection/etiology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects* ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology*

Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects* ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects* ; Reoperation ; Prosthesis-Related Infections ; Retrospective Studies

The choice of friction interface has always been a controversial topic in hip arthroplasty. Although the metal-on-metal (MoM) interface has gradually faded out of our vision, its revision is a clinical difficulty. Adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) is the most common indication for MoM hip arthroplasty revision, and the clinical results of hip arthroplasty due to ARMD are not satisfactory. At present, the indications and suggestions for revision of ARMD are not uniform. In this article, the clinical diagnosis, indications of revision, risk factors of prognosis, intraoperative suggestions and reasons for revision of ARMD were summarized. This article briefly introduces the diagnosis and treatment strategies and precautions of hip arthroplasty due to ARMD, in order to provide reference for such patients in clinical practice.
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects* ; Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects* ; Humans ; Metal-on-Metal Joint Prostheses/adverse effects* ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Reoperation

Prosthetic infection is one of the severe postoperative complications of arthroplasty. Mixed bacterial-fungal prosthetic infection is rare but can be disastrous. This case was a 76-year-old female suffered from prosthetic infection following total hip replacement due to femoral neck fracture and underwent multiple debridements. The culture of periprosthetic tissue was bacteriologically sterile following the first debridement, while the Staphylococcus hominis was identified in the second debridement in the previous hospitalization where fungal infection had not been considered. Thus the pathogen spectrum of anti-infection therapy failed to contain fungus. Ultimately, the culture result of our sampled periprosthetic tissue during the third debridement was Candida albicans without bacterium in our hospital. The fungal prosthetic infection was successfully treated by a two-stage revision with antifungal drugs. Accurate diagnosis and standardized treatment is the key to the therapy of infection after hip arthroplasty, especially for mixed bacterial-fungal prosthetic infection.
Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects* ; Debridement ; Female ; Fungi ; Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects* ; Humans ; Mycoses/drug therapy* ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy* ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare the clinical efficacy of different types of surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture(PFF) after hip arthroplasty (HA). METHODS: From September 2010 to September 2016, 47 patients (47 hips) with periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty were retrospectively analyzed, including 13 males and 34 females. According to Vancouver classification, there were 2 patients with type AG, 17 patients with type B1, 19 patients with type B2, 7 patients with type B3 and 2 patients with type C. The age of patients ranged from 56 to 94 (71.5±8.3) years. After admission, nutritional risk screening (NRS2002) was used to assess the nutritionalstatus of the patients. Eighteen patients (38%) had malnutrition risk (NRS>3 points). After admission, the patients were given corresponding surgical treatment according to different types. Intraoperative blood loss was recorded. Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function. VAS pain score was performed on admission and after operation. RESULTS: All the 47 patients were followed up for 19 to 62 (34±11) months. The Harris scores were (41.8±12.1) and (89.0±2.6) respectively before and 1 year after operation, and the difference was statistically significant ( CONCLUSION The treatment of hip periprosthetic fracture patients should be based on the general situation of patients, imaging data, intraoperative correction classification, etc. to develop individualized treatment plan in line with patients. For patients with preoperative malnutrition risk, preoperative nutritional intervention may reduce intraoperative bleeding.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects* ; Female ; Femoral Fractures/surgery* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery* ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

Periprosthetic infection after hip replacement is a clinical catastrophic disease, which often leads to the failure of the prosthesis. It needs the combination of systemic antibiotics to cure the infection, which brings huge burden to doctors and patients. There are strict indications for debridement and one-stage revision of the prosthesis, and few cases meet the requirements. The second revision is still the gold standard for the treatment of periprosthetic infection. It is suitable for all infection conditions and has a high success rate. On the second phase of renovation, the antibiotic sustained release system plays a key role, and the carrier of antibiotic sustained-release system is the focus of current research, including classic bone cement and absorbable biomaterials. Bone cement has strong mechanical strength, but the antibiotic release shows a sharp decline trend; the absorbable biomaterials can continuously release antibiotics with high concentration, but the mechanical strength is poor, so it could not use alone. The combination of bone cement and absorbable biomaterials will be an ideal antibiotic carrier. PMMA is the most commonly used antibiotic carrier, but the antibiotic release concentration is decreased sharply after 24 hours. It will be difficult to control the infection and increase the risk of bacterial resistance if it is lower than the minimum inhibitory concentration. The biodegradable materials can release antibiotics completely, with long release time and high concentration, but low mechanical strength. Antibiotic spacer plays an important role in the control of infection. In the future, how to further extend the antibiotic release time of antibiotic sustained-release system, increase the amount of antibiotic release and maintain the mechanical strength of the material will be studied.
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects* ; Bone Cements ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery* ; Reoperation