OBJECTIVE: To validate the effectiveness of a novel comprehensive classification for intertrochanteric fracture (ITF). METHODS: The study included 616 patients with ITF, including 279 males (45.29%) and 337 females (54.71%); the age ranged from 23 to 100 years, with an average of 72.5 years. Two orthopaedic residents (observers Ⅰ and Ⅱ) and two senior orthopaedic surgeons (observers Ⅲ and Ⅳ) were selected to classify the CT imaging data of 616 patients in a random order by using the AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification of 1996/2007 edition, the AO/OTA classification of 2018 edition, and the novel comprehensive classification method at an interval of 1 month. Kappa consistency test was used to evaluate the intra-observer and inter-observer consistency of the three ITF classification systems. RESULTS: The inter-observer consistency of the three classification systems evaluated by 4 observers twice showed that the 3 classification systems had strong inter-observer consistency. Among them, the κ value of the novel comprehensive classification was higher than that of the AO/OTA classification of 1996/2007 edition and 2018 edition, and the experience of observers had a certain impact on the classification results, and the inter-observer consistency of orthopaedic residents was slightly better than that of senior orthopaedic surgeons. The intra-observer consistency of two evaluations of three classification systems by 4 observers showed that the consistency of the novel comprehensive classification was better for the other 3 observers, except that the consistency of observer Ⅳ in the AO/OTA classification of 2018 version was slightly higher than that of the novel comprehensive classification. The results showed that the novel comprehensive classification has higher repeatability, and the intra-observer consistency of senior orthopaedic surgeons was better than that of orthopaedic residents. CONCLUSION The novel comprehensive classification system has good intra- and inter-observer consistency, and has high validity in the classification of CT images of ITF patients; the experience of observers has a certain impact on the results of the three classification systems, and those with more experiences have higher intra-observer consistency.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Young Adult ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Observer Variation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Hip Fractures/surgery* ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods* ; Radiography

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effect of bridge combined internal fixation system in the treatment of periprosthesis fracture of femur after hip replacement. METHODS: From October 2016 to June 2018, 5 patients of periprosthesis fractures of femur classified type B1 and type C in Vancouver were treated by open reduction and bridging combined with internal fixation, including 2 males and 3 females, with ages of 68, 70, 74, 75, 79 years;type B1 fractures in 4 and type C fractures in 1. Causes of injury:1 case of traffic injury, 4 cases of fall. After the operation, the patients were followed up for complications and fracture healing time by clinical and imaging examination, and Parker activity score was performed. RESULTS: The wounds of 5 patients healed without infection. One case of DVT was confirmed by venography. Five patients were followed up, and the durations were 2, 8, 9, 10, 15 months. One patient died of myocardial infarction 2 months after operation. The average healing time was 12.5 weeks. No loss of reduction or failure of internal fixation was found. Two patients could walk without protection and 1 patient needed to rely on single crutch. One case of periprosthetic fracture had to walk with a single crutch before operation and move indoors with two crutches after operation. The average Parker activity score was 51.8% before operation. CONCLUSION The bridge combined internal fixation system can be used to fix the fracture after hip replacement with stable femoral prosthesis.
Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Bone Plates ; Female ; Femoral Fractures ; surgery ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Fracture Healing ; Humans ; Male ; Periprosthetic Fractures ; surgery ; Radiography ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND: Painful hip following hip dislocation or acetabular fracture can be an important signal for early degeneration and progression to osteoarthritis due to intraarticular pathology. However, there is limited literature discussing the use of arthroscopy for the treatment of painful hip. The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze the effectiveness and benefit of arthroscopic treatment for patients with a painful hip after major trauma. METHODS: From July 2003 to February 2013, we reviewed 13 patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment after acetabular fracture or hip dislocation and were followed up for a minimum of 2 postoperative years. The degree of osteoarthritis based on the Tonnis classification pre- and postoperatively at final follow-up was determined. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analogue scale for pain (VAS) and modified Harris hip score (MHHS), and range of motion (ROM) of the hip pre- and postoperatively at final follow-up. RESULTS: There were nine male and four female patients with a mean age at surgery of 28 years (range, 20 to 50 years). The mean follow-up period of the patients was 59.8 months (range, 24 to 115 months), and the mean interval between initial trauma and arthroscopic treatment was 40.8 months (range, 1 to 144 months). At the final follow-up, VAS and MHHS improved significantly from 6.3 and 53.4 to 3.0 and 88.3, respectively (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in hip flexion, abduction, adduction, external rotation, and internal rotation as minor improvements from 113.1°, 38.5°, 28.5°, 36.5°, and 22.7° to 118.5°, 39.0°, 29.2°, 38.9°, and 26.5° were observed, respectively (p = 0.070, p = 0.414, p = 0.317, p = 0.084, and p = 0.136, respectively). None of the patients exhibited progression of osteoarthritis of the hip at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic treatment after acetabular fracture or hip dislocation is effective and delays the progression of traumatic osteoarthritis.
Adult ; Arthroscopy/*methods ; Female ; Hip/*physiopathology/radiography/*surgery ; Hip Dislocation/*surgery ; Hip Fractures/*surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarthritis ; Pain/physiopathology/*surgery ; Pain Measurement ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult

BACKGROUND: The treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to present treatment strategies for unstable intertrochanteric fractures with hemiarthroplasty using standard uncemented collared femoral stems and at the same time preserving the fractured calcar fragment. METHODS: Fifty-four patients aged 75 years or older with unstable intertrochanteric fractures were included in this prospective cohort study. All patients were treated with calcar preserving hemiarthroplasty using cementless collored femoral stems. Fractured calcar fragment was stabilized either by compaction between the implant and femur or fixed with cable grip system. Follow-up evaluations were performed at least 24 months and later. Palmer and Parker mobility score and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score were assessed. We also analyzed radiographs of the operated hip at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: The patients were 15 males and 39 females with a mean age of 81.3 years (range, 75 to 93 years). The average operative time was 86.6 minutes. The mean transfused blood units were 1.2 units. The average duration of hospital stay was 5.3 days. The preoperative mean mobility score was 6.20. This score was found to be 4.96 on postoperative third day and 5.90 at 24 months postoperatively. The results of the statistical analysis revealed significant increase in the mobility scores at each follow-up after three days. Radiological interpretation revealed no loosening in the cable-grip systems, and no significant subsidence (> 5 mm) of prosthesis was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Calcar preservation arthroplasty is a good option for elderly patients with severe osteoporosis, frail constitution and the patients who are at higher risk for second operation due to unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects/*methods ; Female ; Femur/pathology/radiography/surgery ; Hemiarthroplasty/adverse effects/*methods ; Hip/pathology/radiography/surgery ; Hip Fractures/physiopathology/radiography/*surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Pain Measurement ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies

PURPOSE: Presence of a cephalomedullary nail (CMN) in the medullary canal has been thought as advantageous in the control of femoral neck shortening (FNS) and lag screw sliding in trochanteric fracture compared to extramedullary fixation system. However, researches on the factors that influence the degree of FNS after cephalomedullary nailing are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We observed 95 patients (mean age, 75+/-2.8 years) with trochanteric fractures who were treated with a CMN, and evaluated the relationship between FNS and patient factors including age, gender, fracture type (AO/OTA), bone mineral density, medullary canal diameter, canal occupancy ratio (COR=nail size/canal diameter), and tip-apex distance using initial, immediate postoperative, and follow-up radiography. RESULTS: Univariate regression analyses revealed that the degree of FNS was significantly correlated with fracture type (A1 versus A3, p<0.001), medullary canal diameter (p<0.001), and COR (p<0.001). Multiple regression analyses revealed that FNS was strongly correlated with fracture type (p<0.001) and COR (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Presence of a CMN in the medullary canal could not effectively prevent FNS in patients with low COR and in A3 type fracture.
Aged ; *Bone Nails ; Female ; Femur Neck/*radiography ; Hip Fractures/radiography/*surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Orthopedic Procedures/*methods ; Regression Analysis

BACKGROUND: Currently, an algorithmic approach for deciding treatment options according to the Vancouver classification is widely used for treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty. However, this treatment algorithm based on the Vancouver classification lacks consideration of patient physiology and surgeon's experience (judgment), which are also important for deciding treatment options. The purpose of this study was to assess the treatment results and discuss the treatment options using a case series. METHODS: Eighteen consecutive cases with periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty were retrospectively reviewed. A locking compression plate system was used for osteosynthesis during the study period. The fracture type was determined by the Vancouver classification. The treatment algorithm based on the Vancouver classification was generally applied, but was modified in some cases according to the surgeon's judgment. The reasons for modification of the treatment algorithm were investigated. Mobility status, ambulatory status, and social status were assessed before the fracture and at the latest follow-up. Radiological results including bony union and stem stability were also evaluated. RESULTS: Thirteen cases were treated by osteosynthesis, two by revision arthroplasty and three by conservative treatment. Four cases of type B2 fractures with a loose stem, in which revision arthroplasty is recommended according to the Vancouver classification, were treated by other options. Of these, three were treated by osteosynthesis and one was treated conservatively. The reasons why the three cases were treated by osteosynthesis were technical difficulty associated with performance of revision arthroplasty owing to severe central migration of an Austin-Moore implant in one case and subsequent severe hip contracture and low activity in two cases. The reasons for the conservative treatment in the remaining case were low activity, low-grade pain, previous wiring around the fracture and light weight. All patients obtained primary bony union and almost fully regained their prior activities. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest reaching a decision regarding treatment methods of periprosthetic femoral fractures by following the algorithmic approach of the Vancouver classification in addition to the assessment of each patient's hip joint pathology, physical status and activity, especially for type B2 fractures. The customized treatments demonstrated favorable overall results.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/*adverse effects ; Female ; Femoral Fractures/classification/etiology/radiography/*surgery ; Hemiarthroplasty/adverse effects ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Periprosthetic Fractures/classification/etiology/radiography/*surgery ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVETo analyze the gender, age, fracture classification and variation trend of adult intertrochanteric fractures treated in a single-center hospital in ten years.

METHODSThe data of adult (age ≥ 16 years) intertrochanteric fractures admitted to the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2003 to December 2012 were collected retrospectively. All the fractures were acute and the pathological or periprosthetic fractures were excluded. The radiography of fracture were classified by same experienced orthopedic resident and verified by two orthopedic deans and one radiologist. The gender, age and fracture classification were analyzed and compared between January 2003 to December 2007 and January 2008 to December 2012.

RESULTSA total of 3 201 cases were collected. The adult intertrochanteric fractures accounted for 2.97% of all adult fractures and 43.76% of adult proximal femoral fractures. Of all fractures 64.98% were elderly ( ≥ 60 years) and 35.02% were middle-aged (16-59 years). In elderly, female were common (57.78%) while in middle-aged were male commonly (79.13%). According to Evans classification, instable fractures were more common (68.92%). According to AO classification, the most common type was A2 (49.67%) and the least was A3 (15.93%). Comparing between January 2003 to December 2012 and January 2008 to December 2012, the proportion of intertrochanteric fracture of adult fracture was decreased by 0.31% (χ² = 9.29, P = 0.002)and the proportion of intertrochanteric fracture of adult proximal femoral fractures was decreased by 3.15% (χ² = 7.35, P = 0.007). The proportion of elderly patients, female and stable fractures was increased by 14.35% (χ² = 71.98, P < 0.01), 4.04% (χ² = 8.16, P = 0.004) and 5.62% (χ² = 11.7, P = 0.001), respectively. The proportion of AO classification was not significantly verified (χ² = 3.24, P = 0.198).

CONCLUSIONSThe intertrochanteric fractures are most common in elderly patients, A2-type of AO Classification and stable (Evans III, IV, V) in Evans classification. Compared with the previous five years, the proportions of female, elderly and stable (Evans I, II) fracture increase in last 5 years.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; China ; epidemiology ; Female ; Femoral Fractures ; diagnostic imaging ; epidemiology ; surgery ; Hip Fractures ; diagnostic imaging ; epidemiology ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Periprosthetic Fractures ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult

Adult ; Fractures, Bone ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Hip Dislocation ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Hip Fractures ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Humans ; Knee Dislocation ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiography

We report on three cases of subtrochanteric femoral fractures during trochanteric intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. Trochanteric intramedullary nails, which have a proximal lateral bend, are specifically designed for trochanteric insertion. When combined with the modified insertion technique, trochanteric intramedullary nails reduce iatrogenic fracture comminution and varus malalignment. We herein describe technical aspects of trochanteric intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures to improve its application and prevent implant-derived complications.
Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Femoral Fractures/radiography/*surgery ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/*adverse effects/methods ; Hip Fractures/*etiology/radiography ; Humans ; Iatrogenic Disease ; Male ; Middle Aged

OBJECTIVETo investigate the operative reduction techniques and clinical results of surgical treatment of type C1 (AO/ASIF) acetabular fracture by posteroproximal-posteroanterior sequential reduction and internal fixation.

METHODSFrom August 2004 to January 2012, 13 patients with type C1 (AO/ASIF) acetabular fracture were treated by posteroproximal-posteroanterior sequential reduction and internal fixation. Of them, 8 cases were male and 5 cases were female with an average age of 42 years years old (ranged, 18 to 64). Pelvis 3-dimentional CT reconstruction were used to confirmed the classification of fracture, and the operation were performed during from 5 to 20 days with an average of 9.5 days. Operation time, blood loss, complications and reduction were recorded and evaluated. The function of hip joint were accessed at the final follow-up.

RESULTSThe operation time ranged from 190 to 290 min with an average of 240 min. The mean blood loss was 1 800 ml (ranged, 1 300 to 3 000 ml). One case had superficial infection and healed after 3 weeks. According to Matta reduction criteria, 8 cases obtained anatomical reduction, 4 cases got satisfied results and 1 cases got unsatisfied results. Eleven cases were followed up with an average of (24.0 +/- 8.0) months, and 2 cases were lost to follow-up. According to revised Mede d'Aubingne and Postel evaluation system, 7 cases got excellent results, 2 good, 1 moderate and 1 poor.

CONCLUSIONPosteroproximal-posteroanterior sequential reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of type C1 (AO/ASIF) acetabular fracture can achieve satisfied surgical proces and operation quality.

Acetabulum ; diagnostic imaging ; injuries ; surgery ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Hip Fractures ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Hip Joint ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiography ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult