Purpose: The impact of altering a patient’s hip offset during total hip arthroplasty (THA) on periprosthetic fracture risk is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare periprosthetic fracture risk in patients where THA offset was “matched” to their contralateral native hip versus those where offset was mismatched. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 50 patients with Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures at a single academic institution between 2012 and 2019 and compared them with a matched cohort. By utilizing a validated technique, two reviewers calculated combined hip offset from anteroposterior pelvis radiographs. Offsets of the operative side and the native hip were measured and denoted as either as a “match” if values were within 5 mm of the contralateral, native hip, or a “mismatch” if the prosthetic horizontal hip offset differed more than 5 mm from the native side. Independent sample t-tests and chi square analyses were used for data comparison. Relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was then calculated. Results: Unmatched offset was associated with increased risk of periprosthetic fracture (P<0.001). This finding was true for cases where offset was increased relative to the native hip (P<0.001) and where implant offset was decreased relative to the native hip (RR=3.0, 95% CI 1.3-7.6, P=0.015). Conclusion Failure to restore a patient’s offset during THA is associated with increased rates of periprosthetic fracture. Although restoration of native hip anatomy is an important technical consideration of this procedure, alterations in the hip lever arm may predispose patients to periprosthetic fracture.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine complication-free survival rates by assessing Barthel Index (BI) grades at discharge and to identify prognostic factors following hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 404 patients. We collected data on BI scores following surgery and at discharge, BI improvement rate (BI speed), postoperative complications (dislocations, thrombosis, death, infection, and nerve disorder), and peri-hip fractures (contralateral and periprosthetic fractures). Results: Cluster analysis categorized patients into low (<35, n=92), moderate (40-80, n=199), and high (>85, n=113) BI groups. The moderate BI group showed an intermediate BI speed (1.97±1.31/day, P<0.001) and a peri-hip fracture incidence of 11.1% (P=0.015). Four-year complication-free survival rates were 47.5% in the low, 45.9% in the moderate, and 74.7% in the high BI groups (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified BI speed as a significant prognostic factor for complications (hazard ratio 0.746, 95% confidence interval 0.560-0.994, P<0.05). Conclusion BI speed is a significant prognostic indicator for complications following hip hemiarthroplasty. Although it does not predict peri-hip fractures, the high fracture incidence in the moderate BI group suggests the need for targeted preventive interventions in this population.

Purpose: The frequency of total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased significantly. The morbidity and economic burden of periprosthetic hip fractures (PPHFx) following THA is high. The objective of this study is to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and hospital costs associated with PPHFx. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for all patients diagnosed with periprosthetic fracture around the internal prosthetic hip joint (International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-10-CM], M97.01XA, and M97.02XA) between 2016 and 2019 was conducted. Predictors of outcomes following PPHFx were assessed using univariable analyses; those with a P-value below 0.2 were included in the final multivariable models. Logistic regression was used to determine predictors of in-hospital mortality and linear regression for assessment of hospital cost and LOS predictors. Results: The study included 77,565 patient encounters. Significant predictors of in-hospital mortality included age, female sex, and comorbidities, such as metastatic cancer and liver disease. Predictors of increased LOS included black race, comorbidities, such as paralysis and fluid and electrolyte disorders, primary payment source, household income, hospital size, and type. Hospital costs showed an association with race, comorbidities, hospital type, and procedure. Conclusion In the setting of PPHFx, higher comorbidity, particularly fluid and electrolyte, paralysis, and metastatic cancer, showed an association with all three outcome variables. In addition to comorbidity, advanced age, particularly nonagenarians, showed an association with in-hospital mortality, while cost was primarily driven by the procedure performed.

Cemented and uncemented fixation are the two categories of fixation in hip arthroplasty (HA). While uncemented stems rely on biologic fixation, cemented HA uses PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate) to lend stability through an interlocking fit between the stem and the cancellous bone. The optimal choice of fixation in elderly patients is debatable. Although patients with poor bone quality have demonstrated good results with uncemented stems, recent improvements in cementing techniques have led to superior outcomes compared to those of older versions. We prefer fully cemented HA in elderly patients to achieve immediate stability that leads to early mobilization and minimal complications, such as intraoperative or postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures. This technical note describes cement fixation in HA.

Purpose: When managing femoral neck fractures, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines (2023) recommend total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients who are expected to independently perform activities of daily living (ADLs) beyond two years. These attempt to clarify the indication for THA versus hemiarthroplasty (HA). Frailty assessment tools, such as the Rockwood Frailty Scale (RFS), may provide surgeons a more objective means to assess patient function. The aim of this study is to ascertain whether frailty assessments are predictive of mortality associated with THA thus helping determine arthroplasty suitability. Materials and Methods: Single-center data was collected retrospectively between 2014 and 2020. Three hundred thirty-three cases were eligible for review. For the RFS, Johns Hopkins Frailty Assessment (JHFA) and Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS), frailty scores were generated and 2-year mortality was calculated for ‘frail’ and ‘non-frail’ patient cohorts. Results: Overall 2-year mortality was 8.4%. Mortality within two postoperative years was 0.8% for RFS <4 compared to 12.7% for scores ≥4. This highlights an approximate 17-times greater mortality risk between these groups (odds ratio [OR] 17.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.32-128.82, P=0.005). For the JHFA, the 2-year mortality rate for ‘frail’ patients was over 6-times greater than those ‘not frail’ (OR 6.91, 95% CI 3.04-15.72, P<0.0001). Positive findings were noted by the NHFS (P=0.054). Conclusion This study demonstrates that following THA for femoral neck fractures, preoperative frailty scores are predictive of 2-year postoperative mortality. Frailty assessments could objectively guide surgical decision making with respect to offering THA versus HA.

Purpose: Due to recent shifts in healthcare reimbursement models, more primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) are now being performed in the outpatient setting. However, there is a lack of knowledge around the comparative outcomes of revision outpatient THA. Materials and Methods: Adults undergoing revision THA between 2010 and 2020 with 2-year follow-up data were identified on a large insurance claims database. Following stratification by inpatient versus outpatient revision THA, patients from both groups were matched 1:1 by demographics and revision characteristics. Ninety-day postoperative medical and 1- and 2-year postoperative surgical complications after matching were compared. Results: Among 67,570 patients, mean age was 65.3 years, 57.0% were female, and mean Charlson comorbidity index score was 1.72. Subsequent to 1:1 matching, 1,555 inpatient and outpatient revision THA patients were identified. Outpatient THA patients had significantly lower rates of blood transfusions (3.6% vs 5.1%, P=0.049), broken prosthesis (1 year: 0.1% vs.0.6%, P=0.027; 2 years: 0.2% vs. 0.9%, P=0.015), and other postoperative mechanical complications (1 year: 4.9% vs. 7.1%, P=0.010; 2 years: 6.2% vs. 8.4%, P=0.023). Otherwise, the data for outpatient THA patients was not statistically different from inpatient THA patients across all studied complications. Conclusion Outpatient revision THA may be a safe alternative to inpatient revision THA for carefully selected patients. Establishing patient- and case-specific parameters to optimize outcomes, satisfaction, safety, and value is critical.

Purpose: In the existing literature, isolated femoral head and polyethylene liner exchange is commonly performed in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for a variety of indications with mixed outcomes. The purpose of this study is to investigate patient outcomes following head-liner exchange and risk factors associated with failure in THA. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review from May 2016 to November 2023 was conducted on patients who underwent isolated head-liner exchange at two institutions. Patients had minimum 1-year follow-up periods. For each patient, data such as indication for revision, surgical approach, revision head size, immediate and short-term complications, postoperative disposition, 90-day readmissions, and re-operations were recorded. Results: Out of 175 patients, there were 24 readmissions/emergency department visits within 90 postoperative days (13.7%), 21 subsequent revision surgeries (12.0%), 21 postoperative dislocations (12.0%), and 20 immediate postoperative complications (11.4%). A statistically significant association was demonstrated between indication for revision and postoperative instability (P=0.04). Patients operated upon for instability had higher rates of postoperative instability. Furthermore, patients with reported preoperative dislocation events had higher incidences of postoperative dislocations. Patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) were associated with an increased number of hospital readmissions within 90 days of surgery, reoperation, and postoperative dislocation (P<0.05). No statistically significant associations were found between surgical approach and complications. Conclusion This study suggests that, in the context of isolated head-liner exchanges, factors such as preoperative dislocation history, indication for revision, and discharge to SNF are associated with poorer outcomes and complications.

Purpose: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) resulting from total hip arthroplasty (THA) pose significant challenges. Partial two-stage exchange arthroplasty (TSEA) retains either the femoral stem or acetabular cup by preserving bone stock and soft tissue and offers a potential alternative to total TSEA. Our meta-analysis evaluated the pooled success rate of partial TSEA in treating late chronic PJIs in THA. Our study also focused on the outcomes associated with retained prosthetic implant (stem or cup) and the type of prior surgery (primary vs. revision arthroplasty) performed. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from 355 hips of patients with PJI following THA across 11 studies using a random-effects model to estimate the success rate of partial TSEA and spacer dislocation that occurs during the interval between the first and second stages of partial TSEA. The heterogeneity between the subgroups was also calculated. Results: The overall pooled success rate of partial TSEA in the study cohort was 87% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83-91).Lacking statistical significance (P=0.904), the success rates were 88% for stem-retained and 90% for cup-retained implant cases. The partial TSEA success rates were 88% for primary arthroplasty and 80% for revision arthroplasty, although this was not statistically significant (P=0.193). Spacer dislocation occurred in only 5% of the cases (95% CI 1-9). Conclusion Partial TSEA achieves high success rates comparable to those of total TSEA. Although revision arthroplasty cases carry a high risk of recurrence, partial TSEA remains a viable, tailored treatment option with a low complication rate.

Purpose: Reports remain sparse on the outcomes of quadratus femoris muscle pedicle bone grafting (QF-MPBG) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in the existing literature. This study reports on the clinico-radiological outcomes of this procedure in early-stage non-traumatic ONFH using a quadriceps-coxae sparing (QCS) modified posterior approach. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 22 symptomatic patients suffering from early-stage, non-traumatic ONFH. These patients underwent QF-MPBG surgery using a QCS modified posterior approach and were followed up for a minimum duration of 24 months. Results: The mean age of patients was 29 years (range, 20-47 years). As per the modified Kerboul’s combined necrotic angle, the distribution of patients was as follows: grade 1 (n=5); grade 2 (n=9); grade 3 (n=4); and grade 4 (n=4). All four patients belonging to grade 4 and two belonging to grade 3 required total hip arthroplasty (THA) within 24 months. As per the modified Ficat’s classification, 18 cases were in stage II and four in stage I. Six cases (out of the preoperative 18 cases classified as stage II) deteriorated to stage IV, and two deteriorated to stage III. The mean Harris hip score improved from 63 (range, 57-67) to 75 (range, 50-93) after surgery (P<0.05). Four out of six patients necessitating THA had steroid-induced ONFH. Conclusion The QCS modified posterior approach provides sufficient exposure required for QF-MPBG. Steroid-induced ONFH and a modified Kerboul’s combined necrotic angle of >250° may be considered as potential risk factors for progression of this disease.

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a risk factor for future hip osteoarthritis and is prevalent in both athletic and non-athletic populations. This bibliometric review aimed to understand the history of FAIS and provide detailed information for future FAIS research. The Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection was used to search and obtain all studies between 2020 and 2025 using bibliometrix (ver. 3.0.4) and R package software. Between 2020 and 2025, 1,486 articles were published on FAIS. There was an overall 41.3% downward trend in published research during this period. Furthermore, recent key terms include “physical impairments” and “muscle strength”. Institutions and surgical authors across North America, Europe, and Australia published the highest volume of research papers. Across keywords, femoroacetabular impingement and osteoarthritis had the strongest relationship. FAIS research continues to be led by surgical authors within surgical journals. While surgical key terms have been historically prevalent within the existing literature, research aligning with more conservative management has started to emerge. Despite an increase in physiotherapy researchers, inter-disciplinary collaboration remains limited and concentrated in western countries.