Traditional medicine, deeply rooted in cultural practices and historical wisdom, has faced surging challenges due to the escalating demand for plant-based remedies. This comprehensive review critically emphasizes the urgent need for sustainable practices within traditional medicine, with a special focus on the potential of plant part substitution. Case studies that illuminate successful instances of substituting plant parts and providing a deep insight into viable alternatives to conventional practices are presented. Opportunities and challenges inherent in plant part substitution are discussed by addressing key considerations such as phytochemical and pharmacological aspects, safety and toxicity profiles, cultural insights, standardization, clinical validation, and regulatory compliance. This review serves as a guide for navigating the delicate balance between tradition and conservation within indigenous medicine practices. It underscores the importance of embracing sustainable approaches through plant part substitution, ensuring the preservation of cultural heritage while meeting the evolving healthcare needs of society. Please cite this article as: Srivastava B, Sharma H, Meena AK, Bharthi V. Balancing tradition and conservation: exploring plant part substitution in traditional medicine. J Integr Med. 2025; 23(3): 209-217.
Medicine, Traditional/methods* ; Humans ; Plants, Medicinal/chemistry* ; Phytotherapy/methods* ; Conservation of Natural Resources

BACKGROUND: To explore the relationship between persistent post-radiotherapy pain and locoregional recurrence in head and neck cancer patients. METHODS: Five year retrospective data was reviewed of 86 patients of head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy who continued to have pain at 6 weeks after completion of treatment. At follow-up after 3 months, these patients were stratified into: Group A (n = 39) constituted of patients whose pain subsided and Group B (n = 47) were patients who continued to have persistent pain. RESULTS: At median follow-up time of 25 months (range: 8-47), one patient (2.6%) and 18 (38.3%) patients in group A and group B had locoregional recurrence respectively (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, group B patients had higher mean pain score levels as compared to group A (P = 0.03). Patients in whom pain subsided within 3 months had statistically much greater disease-free survival in comparison to those with persistent pain (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Pain in head and neck cancer is an important symptom and should be considered a poor prognostic factor. In the current study, the majority of the patients with persistent pain had recurrent disease as compared to those in whom pain subsided within 3 months of post-treatment. It is suggested that patients with persistent pain need more intense follow-up and should be investigated thoroughly to detect recurrence at an early stage to provide a better quality of life.
Disease-Free Survival ; Follow-Up Studies ; Head and Neck Neoplasms ; Head* ; Humans ; Neck* ; Quality of Life ; Radiotherapy ; Recurrence* ; Retrospective Studies