1.Japanese nationwide survey to track the impact of long COVID over 3 years.
Takuya OZAWA ; Hideki TERAI ; Hiromu TANAKA ; Arisa IBA ; Mariko HOSOZAWA ; Miyuki HORI ; Yoko MUTO ; Eiko YOSHIDA-KOHNO ; Ho NAMKOONG ; Shotaro CHUBACHI ; Ryo TAKEMURA ; Kengo NAGASHIMA ; Yasunori SATO ; Makoto ISHII ; Hiroyasu ISO ; Koichi FUKUNAGA
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 2025;30():84-84
BACKGROUND:
The long-term impact of symptom classification on quality of life (QOL) and economic outcomes among individuals with long coronavirus disease (COVID) remains poorly understood. This study aimed to clarify the situation of long COVID in Japan by analyzing patients using cluster classification.
METHODS:
This multicenter, retrospective cohort study enrolled 515 patients with COVID-19 and followed up for 36 months via standardized questionnaires. Patients were classified based on: 1) symptom trajectory over time and 2) symptom cluster profiles at 3 months.
RESULTS:
While the number of symptoms decreased, fatigue and dyspnea frequently persisted, whereas anosmia and dysgeusia declined. Cough and sputum decreased gradually. The proportion of patients with 5-9 symptoms increased. The mean (interquartile range) presenteeism scores were lower in the continuous (60 [50-80]) and relapse groups (65 [48-80]) than in the recovered group (70 [50-80]). The multiple symptoms cluster had the worst SF-36, presenteeism, and absenteeism scores (47.2 [44.7-49.8], 48.8 [27.5-72.5], and 10.9 [0.0-11.0], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with continuous and multiple symptoms experienced persistently lower QOL and greater economic burden up to 36 months after COVID-19 diagnosis. The long-term effects of long COVID are not only physical but also mental and economical. Thus, further research is needed to clarify the economical and physiological impact of long COVID.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
COVID-19/complications*
;
Japan/epidemiology*
;
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome/psychology*
;
Quality of Life
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Surveys and Questionnaires
;
East Asian People
2.Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2023 guidelines for treatment of uterine body neoplasm
Tohru MORISADA ; Yoichi KOBAYASHI ; Satoru NAGASE ; Tsukasa BABA ; Hideki TOKUNAGA ; Hidemichi WATARI ; Munetaka TAKEKUMA ; Yasuhisa TERAO ; Yoshito TERAI ; Hiroaki KAJIYAMA ; Mikiko ASAI-SATO ; Kazuhiro TAKEHARA ; Tsutomu TABATA ; Kenichi HARANO ; Yasuyuki HIRASHIMA ; Mayu YUNOKAWA ; Aikou OKAMOTO ; Mikio MIKAMI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(3):e119-
The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) guideline for the treatment of uterine body neoplasm are revised from the 2018 guideline. This guideline aimed to provide standardized care for uterine body neoplasm, indicate appropriate current treatment methods for uterine body neoplasm, minimize variances in treatment methods among institutions, improve disease prognosis and treatment safety, reduce the economic and psychosomatic burden on patients by promoting the performance of appropriate treatment, and enhance mutual understanding between patients and healthcare professionals. The guidelines were prepared through the consensus of the JSGO guideline committee, based on a careful review of evidence from the literature searches and the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice situations in Japan. The main features of the 2023 revision are as follows: 1) The Guidelines Formulation Committee members were asked to understand Minds' medical guideline development method in advance. 2) The clinical question (CQ) was changed to Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome format as much as possible. 3) Introduced the "body of evidence," which summarizes the results of research reports collected for the CQs by outcome and study design, and the strength of evidence for each body of evidence was rated from levels A to D. 4) Introduction of systematic reviews in some CQs. 5) The strength of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, value and hope for patients, and clinical applicability were considered while drafting recommendations. Herein, we present the English version of the JSGO guidelines 2023 for the treatment of uterine body neoplasm.
3.Quality indicators for endometrial cancer care in Japan
Tamaki KAKUWA ; Yuichi ICHINOSE ; Ryoko RIKITAKE ; Taisuke ISHII ; Satoru NAGASE ; Yoichi KOBAYASHI ; Masanori KANEUCHI ; Hideki TOKUNAGA ; Manabu SEINO ; Hiroaki KAJIYAMA ; Munetaka TAKEKUMA ; Tsutomu TABATA ; Yoshito TERAI ; Yasuhisa TERAO ; Tohru MORISADA ; Hidemichi WATARI ; Yoko YAMAMOTO ; Akira KAWATA ; Takahiro HIGASHI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(5):e77-
Objective:
The incidence and mortality rates of endometrial cancer are increasing globally, including in Japan. Quality of cancer care is promoted through guideline adherence. This study aimed to establish quality indicators (QIs) for endometrial cancer and explore the factors contributing to treatment nonadherence.
Methods:
QIs and pattern-of-care indicators (PCIs) were developed using the Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles modified Delphi method. QIs reflect desirable healthcare patterns, whereas PCIs address treatment areas with lacking evidence.Data from the Hospital-Based Cancer Registry and Diagnosis Procedure Combination Survey were used. Patients diagnosed or treated between January 1 and December 31, 2020 were included. The reasons for nonadherence were collected. Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors influencing adherence, including age, body mass index, comorbidities, facilities, and recurrence risk.
Results:
Of the 35 proposed QI candidates, 8 QIs and 9 PCIs were selected, predominantly focusing on surgical aspects. Adherence rates varied, with peritoneal lavage cytology being the highest (93.1%), and postoperative hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for patients aged <45 years being the lowest (30.9%), when focusing on process indicators. Reasons for nonadherence included patient preference and medical comorbidities as significant factors. Multivariate analysis highlighted age, clinical stage, and Barthel index as significant contributors to nonadherence.
Conclusion
We developed QIs to comprehensively assess endometrial cancer treatment.Adherence rates are favorable; however, HRT has a low adherence rate. Factors leading to nonadherence include advanced age and incomplete activities of daily living, particularly in advanced stages.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail