Objective: To analyze the short-term clinical effects of robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of the hiatal hernia. Methods: The clinical data of 56 patients underwent minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair from January 2021 to January 2022 in the Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region were retrospectively analyzed. There were 32 males and 24 females, aging (59.7±10.7) years (range: 28 to 75 years). All patients were divided into laparoscopy group (n=27) and robot group (n=29) according to surgical procedures. Perioperative conditions, hospital stay, and improvement in symptoms before and after surgery were compared between the two groups by the t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and χ² test. Results: All surgical procedures were successfully completed, without conversion to laparotomy or change in operation mode. There were no serious complications related to the operation. The intraoperative blood loss of the robot group was less than that of the laparoscopic group (M (IQR)): (20 (110) ml vs. 40 (80) ml, Z=-4.098, P<0.01). The operation time ((111.7±33.6) minutes vs. (120.4±35.0) minutes, t=-0.943, P=0.350) and hospitalization time ((3.9±1.4) days vs. (4.7±1.9) days, t=-1.980, P=0.053) of the robot group and the laparoscopic group were similar. Follow-up for 12 months after the operation showed no postoperative complications and recurrence. The score of the health-related quality of life questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the robot group decreased from 10.8±2.8 before the operation to 6.5±0.6 after the operation, and that in the laparoscopic group decreased from 10.6±2.1 before the operation to 6.3±0.6 after the operation. There was no difference in the influence of different surgical methods on the change in score (t=0.030,P=0.976). Conclusion: Compared with laparoscopic repair of the hiatal hernia, robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair has the advantages of less bleeding, rapid postoperative recovery and good short-term effect.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Hernia, Hiatal/complications* ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotics ; Herniorrhaphy/methods* ; Quality of Life ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Recurrence ; Fundoplication/methods*

Complex ventral hernia refers to a large hernia that is complicated by a series of concurrent conditions. Change in intra-abdominal pressure is one of the main pathways through which various factors exert an impact on perioperative risk and postoperative recurrence. Taking abdominal pressure reconstruction as the core, the treatment strategy for complex abdominal hernia can be formulated from three aspects: improving patients' tolerance, expanding abdominal cavity volume, and reducing the volume of abdominal contents. Improving patients' tolerance includes abdominal wall compliance training and progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum. To expand the volume of the abdominal cavity, implanting hernia repair materials, component separation technique, autologous tissue transplantation, component expend technique, and chemical component separation can be used. Initiative content reduction surgery and temporary abdominal closure may be performed to reduce the volume of abdominal contents. For different cases of complex ventral hernia, personalized treatment measures can be safely and feasibly adopted depending on the condition of the patients and the intra-abdominal pressure situation.
Humans ; Hernia, Ventral/surgery* ; Abdominal Wall/surgery* ; Plastic Surgery Procedures ; Herniorrhaphy/methods* ; Surgical Mesh ; Recurrence

With the development of modern surgery, the field of hernia and abdominal wall surgery is undergoing a transformative change, and new techniques, new concepts, and recent progress are being updated, which have motivated the high-quality development of the discipline. In the past two decades, the development of hernia and abdominal wall surgery in China has been recognized by international peers. Many young surgeons have gradually become the main force in the treatment of hernia and leaders in surgical technique. The innovation and development of discipline will never terminate; young surgeons as the main force should seriously think about how to improve their professional qualities. Young surgeons are interested in the innovation of surgical techniques and need to push for a traditional operation on the one hand and an innovative operation on the other. Updates to concepts and acquisition of new materials are more important, which can provide a solid foundation for technological innovation. Young surgeons should start with the basics and classics. Understanding the history and development of new techniques, new concepts and recent progress, and grasping indications of clinical application, is the important part of growing up for young surgeons, which can make surgical treatment more standardized, benefit patients, and promote the progress of Chinese specialized medical education.
Humans ; Abdominal Wall/surgery* ; Hernia ; Surgeons ; Herniorrhaphy/methods* ; China ; Surgical Mesh

Objective: To examine the patterning cropped and shaped mesh repair for perineal hernia after abdominoperineal excision (APE) in rectal cancer. Methods: The clinical data of 8 patients with perineal hernia after APE who accepted surgical treatment in the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Hernia Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from March 2017 to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 3 males and 5 females, aged (67.6±7.2) years (range: 56 to 76 years). Eight patients developed a perineal mass at (11.3±2.9) months (range: 5 to 13 months) after APE. After surgical separation of adhesion and exposing the pelvic floor defect, a 15 cm×20 cm anti-adhesion mesh was fashioned as a three-dimensional pocket shape to fit the pelvic defect, then fixed to the promontory or sacrum and sutured to the pelvic sidewalls and the anterior peritoneum, while two side slender slings were tailored in front of the mesh and fixed on the pectineal ligament. Results: The repair of their perineal hernias went well, with an operating time of (240.6±48.8) minutes (range: 155 to 300 minutes). Five patients underwent laparotomy, 3 patients tried laparoscopic surgery first and then transferred to laparotomy combined with the perineal approach. Intraoperative bowel injury was observed in 3 patients. All patients did not have an intestinal fistula, bleeding occurred. No reoperation was performed and their preoperative symptoms improved significantly. The postoperative hospital stay was (13.5±2.9) days (range: 7 to 17 days) and two patients had postoperative ileus, which improved after conservative treatment. Two patients had a postoperative perineal hernia sac effusion, one of them underwent placement of a tube to puncture the hernia sac effusion due to infection, and continued irrigation and drainage. The postoperative follow-up was (34.8±14.0) months (range: 13 to 48 months), and 1 patient developed recurrence in the seventh postoperative month, no further surgery was performed. Conclusions: Surgical repair of the perineal hernia after APE can be preferred transabdominal approach, routine application of laparoscopy is not recommended, combined abdominoperineal approach can be considered if necessary. The perineal hernia after APE can be repaired safely and effectively using the described technique of patterning cropped and shaped mesh repair.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Animals ; Herniorrhaphy/methods* ; Surgical Mesh ; Retrospective Studies ; Hernia, Abdominal/surgery* ; Hernia ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Proctectomy ; Laparoscopy ; Perineum/surgery* ; Postoperative Complications ; Incisional Hernia/surgery* ; Hominidae

Objective: To compare laparoscopic Keyhole repair with Sugarbaker repair in consecutive patients with parastomal hernia. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2021, 117 patients with parastomal hernia were treated with Keyhole or Sugarbaker laparoscopy repairs in the Department of Hernia and Bariatrci Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 45 males and 72 females, aged (68.6±8.6) years (range: 44 to 84 years). Laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair was performed in 89 cases, and Keyhole repair was performed in 28 cases. The t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, χ² test and Fisher exact test were used to compare the observation indicators between the two groups, such as operation time, incidence of operation-related complications, and postoperative recurrence rate. Results: The follow-up period was (M(IQR)) 33 (36) months (range: 12 to 84 months). Compared to the Sugarbaker group, the hernia ring area of the Keyhole group was bigger (35 (26) cm² vs. 25 (16) cm², Z=1.974, P=0.048), length of stay was longer ((22.0±8.0) d vs. (14.1±6.2) d, t=5.485, P<0.01), and the postoperative rate of recurrence was higher (28.6% (8/28) vs. 6.7% (6/89), χ²=7.675, P=0.006). There was no difference in operation time and postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusions: Laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair is superior to Keyhole repair in the recurrence rate of parastomal hernia treated with compsite mesh (not funnel-shaped mesh). There are no differences in operation time and postoperative complications between the two groups.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Mesh/adverse effects* ; Incisional Hernia/etiology* ; Hernia/complications* ; Postoperative Complications/etiology* ; Herniorrhaphy/methods* ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Hernia, Ventral/surgery* ; Recurrence ; Treatment Outcome

Objective: To analyze the recurrence factors and reoperation effect of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Methods: A total of 41 patients with recurrence after laparoscopic repair of the inguinal hernia admitted to the Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from January 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were males, aging (62±7) years (range: 51 to 75 years). The recurrence intervals were 3 days to 7 years postoperatively. The surgical methods, causes of recurrence, and treatment outcomes of the patients were analyzed. Fisher exact probability method is used to compare the rates. Results: Among all cases, the primary surgical procedures included transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy (TAPP) in 31 cases and total extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy in 10 cases. The reoperative procedures included the TAPP of 11 cases and the Lichtenstein procedure of 30 cases. The factors of recurrent cases in all patients could be divided into 4 categories, including insufficient mesh coverage in 23 cases, mesh curling in 9 cases, mesh contractuture in 7 cases, and improper mesh fixation in 2 cases. Recurrence, infection, chronic pain, foreign body sensation didn't occur in the followed period of(M(IQR)) 18(24) months(range: 12 to 50 months). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative seroma between the TAPP and Lichtenstein procedure (3/11 vs. 20.0% (6/30), P=0.68). Conclusions: Postoperative recurrence of laparoscopic inguinal hernia is mostly caused by the lack of mesh coverage. Due to the emphasis on standardized surgical operation, a good outcome could be achieved through reoperation by the TAPP or Lichtenstein procedure.
Male ; Humans ; Female ; Hernia, Inguinal/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Treatment Outcome ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology* ; Herniorrhaphy/methods* ; Surgical Mesh ; Recurrence

Vasectomy damage is a common complication of open nonmesh hernia repair. This study was a retrospective analysis of the characteristics and possible causes of vas deferens injuries in patients exhibiting unilateral or bilateral vasal obstruction caused by open nonmesh inguinal herniorrhaphy. The site of the obstructed vas deferens was intraoperatively confirmed. Data, surgical methods, and patient outcomes were examined. The Anderson-Darling test was applied to test for Gaussian distribution of data. Fisher's exact test or Mann-Whitney U test and unpaired t-test were used for statistical analyses. The mean age at operation was 7.23 (standard deviation [s.d.]: 2.09) years and the mean obstructive interval was 17.72 (s.d.: 2.73) years. Crossed (n = 1) and inguinal ( n = 42) vasovasostomies were performed. The overall patency rate was 85.3% (29/34). Among the 43 enrolled patients (mean age: 24.95 [s.d.: 2.20] years), 73 sides of their inguinal regions were explored. The disconnected end of the vas deferens was found in the internal ring on 54 sides (74.0%), was found in the inguinal canal on 16 sides (21.9%), and was found in the pelvic cavity on 3 sides (4.1%). Location of the vas deferens injury did not significantly differ according to age at the time of hernia surgery ( ≥ 12 years or <12 years) or obstructive interval (≥15 years or <15 years). These results underscore that high ligation of the hernial sac warrants extra caution by surgeons during open nonmesh inguinal herniorrhaphy.
Male ; Humans ; Young Adult ; Adult ; Child ; Vas Deferens/surgery* ; Herniorrhaphy/methods* ; Retrospective Studies ; Hernia, Inguinal/surgery* ; Iatrogenic Disease ; Laparoscopy

Parastomal hernia is a common complication after abdominal ostomy. Although the European Hernia Society guidelines recommend surgical treatment for parastomal hernia, there is still no "gold standard" procedure. The exploration and practice of parastomal hernia repair surgery has been carried out for many years, from the earlier hernia ring suture and stoma relocation repair, to the reinforcement of meshes (such as the Keyhole repair technique and the Sugarbaker repair technique) and the application of laparoscopic technique, and then to the combination of various methods. The intervention of single-port laparoscopic technique and robot-assisted surgery, the prevention of parastomal hernia, the specialization of treatment, multidisciplinary cooperation, and the improvement of diagnostic methods will all provide more optimal solutions for stoma patients. This article will review and summarize the development process and evaluation of parastomal hernia surgical techniques.
Humans ; Herniorrhaphy/methods* ; Surgical Mesh ; Incisional Hernia/surgery* ; Surgical Stomas/adverse effects* ; Laparoscopy/methods*

OBJECTIVETo investigate the efficacy of single-hand four-needle suture with sled-shaped needle three-tail fixed stitch in closure of pesudohernia sac of direct hernia under transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.

METHODSA randomized controlled trail was conducted on adult patients with unilateral direct inguinal hernia undergoing laparoscopic TAPP repair from January 2014 to January 2018 at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. A total of 156 patients were enrolled prospectively in the study and were randomly divided into single-hand four-needle suture group (trial group, 76 cases) and traditional tacking group (control group, 80 cases). In trial group, sled-shaped needle three-tail knot-free stitch was applied to the continuous four-needle suture. The sled-shaped needle three-tail fixed stitch was made as follows: straighten the tail of a 3-0, 1/2-circle looper VICRYL Rapide into a sled shape; use suture overlap method to make and tighten a single knot; thread the end of the needle into the single knot loop;knot two ends of the thread next to the first knot; tighten the second knot, leaving about 12 cm to the end of the needle;cut the end of the loop (leaving about 0.6 cm) and the other end of the thread(leaving about 1.5 cm). In the control group, a hernia repair tack was used to fix the pseudohernia sac on pectineal ligament. This study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee(approval number: L2014ZSLYEC-016). Operation time, pseudoherina sac closure time, hospitalization cost, morbidity of postoperative complication, VAS score and postoperative recurrence were compared between two groups.

RESULTSAll the patients completed operations successfully. There were no significant differences between trial group and control group in age [(60.2±0.4) years vs. (61.1±0.7) years)], gender (male ratio 93.4% vs. 92.5%), BMI [(25.1±0.2) kg/m vs. (24.9±0.2) kg/m ], defection area [(16.1±0.4) cm vs. (15.7±0.7) cm ] (all P > 0.05). As compared to control group, trial group had longer operative time[(34.2±1.9) minutes vs. (30.3±1.1) minutes, t=5.484, P=0.045], longer closure time of psudohernia sac [(4.2±0.5) minutes vs. (1.8±0.7) minutes, t=7.423, P=0.031], but lower VAS score (3.2±0.1 vs. 5.3±0.6, t=-3.186, P=0.015) and lower total cost [(9 897.3±104.4) yuan vs. (12 325.6±169.7) yuan, t=-3.972, P=0.023]. No severe complication and death were found in either groups intra-operatively and postoperatively. No mesh infection and relapse occurred during postoperative follow-up of 1-24 (12.0±1.2) months. During follow-up, seroma occurred in 2 cases (2.6%) of trial group and 3 cases (3.8%) of control group without significant difference (χ =1.284, P=0.799), and all were absorbed and disappeared within 30 days after local application of mirabilite.

CONCLUSIONCompared to tack fix method, single-hand four-needle suture with sled-shaped needle three-tail fixed stitch can effectively close pseudohernia sac, reduce hospitalization cost and ameliorate postoperative pain in TAPP repair, which is worth promotion.

Hernia, Inguinal ; surgery ; Herniorrhaphy ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Surgical Mesh ; Suture Techniques ; Sutures ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: The transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) method has been as popular as the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The preferred approach to TAPP has been inserting two operative trocars in the contralateral midclavicular line, respectively. This can be uncomfortable for surgeons with a shorter reach. For this reason, we developed an only left side TAPP approach(L-TAPP) through an ipsilateral trocar position on the patient's left side regardless location of inguinal hernia. METHODS: We included patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair by a single surgeon between April 2016 and August 2017. The patients were divided into TEP and L-TAPP groups and compared regarding the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: There were no differences in clinicopathologic characteristics between the 33 patients in L-TAPP group and 11 patients in TEP group. The mean operative time for the L-TAPP group was 71.4±20.5 min, and 75.8±17.4 min for the TEP group (p=0.522). The mean length of hospital stay for the L-TAPP group was 2.5±0.7 days, and 2.5±0.5 days (p=0.797) for the TEP group. There was one postoperative scrotal hematoma and cord edema in the TEP group and no complications in the L-TAPP group (p=0.219). There were no early recurrences in both groups. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, L-TAPP is a feasible and safe procedure compared with TEP. In addition, this procedure might be adopted with more comfort for surgeons who have short reaches.
Abdominal Wall ; Edema ; Hematoma ; Hernia, Inguinal* ; Herniorrhaphy* ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Methods ; Operative Time ; Recurrence ; Surgeons ; Surgical Instruments