Stroke remains a major cause of death and disability, highlighting the intimate relationship between cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Despite substantial advances in diagnosis and treatment, marked disparities in access to care and clinical outcomes continue to exist. As such, stroke remains a shared challenge for primary care physicians, cardiologists, and neurologists, emphasizing the need for effective prevention, timely intervention, structured rehabilitation, and optimal secondary prevention. In this issue, we feature the Executive Summary of the 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke and Intracerebral Hemorrhage in the Philippines, an important resource for promoting evidence-based, patient-centered care and improving stroke outcomes.

INTRODUCTION

Stroke is the leading cause of disability worldwide and remains a major cause of death among Filipinos. Despite being the most common neurological disease, wide variations in management persist among clinicians. This CPG aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of acute stroke.

A systematic synthesis of evidence was conducted to address the diagnosis and management of both acute hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was followed. The process included: (1) generation of critical questions and outcomes (2) retrieval of current and relevant evidence, (3) synthesis and appraisal of the evidence base, (4) formulation of draft recommendations, (5) deliberation by a multi-sectoral stakeholder panel on feasibility, values and preferences to assess the strength of recommendations and (6) planning for dissemination, implementation, impact evaluation and updating.

Sixteen clinical questions were addressed leading to 21 recommendations. Most were strong recommendations supported by moderate to high certainty of evidence. The recommendations span the spectrum of acute stroke care, including early diagnosis with imaging, admission to stroke units, reperfusion therapies, surgical options, prevention of complications and the role of adjunctive treatments.

The recommendations in this CPG are intended to guide clinicians and other stakeholders in the diagnosis and management of acute stroke. They are meant to supplement, not replace, the sound clinical judgment of healthcare providers.

INTRODUCTION

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus P2Y12 receptor inhibitor has become a cornerstone in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the prevention of stent thrombosis. However, aspirin intolerance poses a problem in the lack of guideline-based alternatives with proven benefit. In this study, we aim to determine the efficacy and safety of cilostazol-based DAPT as an alternative treatment for aspirin among patients undergoing PCI.

A comprehensive literature search was performed. All studies that investigated cilostazol as an alternative to aspirin on top of P2Y12 inhibitors for patients undergoing PCI were included. Outcomes of interest in this meta-analysis were reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding.

Three cohort studies including 1,227 patients on cilostazol and 1,480 on aspirin, both with a P2Y12 inhibitor were analyzed. Pooled estimates showed no significant difference in MACE (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.79–2.23; p = 0.29) or acute myocardial infarction (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.46–1.89; p = 0.85) between groups. However, cilostazol-based DAPT was associated with significantly less bleeding (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27–0.99; p = 0.05). All outcomes were statistically homogeneous (p>0.1, I²CONCLUSION

Cilostazol compared to aspirin, both on top of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is as efficient in the reduction of MACE and acute myocardial infarction; and even safer in terms of bleeding. Cilostazol-based DAPT may serve as an alternative to standard DAPT among aspirin-intolerant patients undergoing PCI.

Stroke remains a major cause of death and disability, highlighting the intimate relationship between cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Despite substantial advances in diagnosis and treatment, marked disparities in access to care and clinical outcomes continue to exist. As such, stroke remains a shared challenge for primary care physicians, cardiologists, and neurologists, emphasizing the need for effective prevention, timely intervention, structured rehabilitation, and optimal secondary prevention. In this issue, we feature the Executive Summary of the 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke and Intracerebral Hemorrhage in the Philippines, an important resource for promoting evidence-based, patient-centered care and improving stroke outcomes.

INTRODUCTION

Stroke is the leading cause of disability worldwide and remains a major cause of death among Filipinos. Despite being the most common neurological disease, wide variations in management persist among clinicians. This CPG aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of acute stroke.

A systematic synthesis of evidence was conducted to address the diagnosis and management of both acute hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was followed. The process included: (1) generation of critical questions and outcomes (2) retrieval of current and relevant evidence, (3) synthesis and appraisal of the evidence base, (4) formulation of draft recommendations, (5) deliberation by a multi-sectoral stakeholder panel on feasibility, values and preferences to assess the strength of recommendations and (6) planning for dissemination, implementation, impact evaluation and updating.

Sixteen clinical questions were addressed leading to 21 recommendations. Most were strong recommendations supported by moderate to high certainty of evidence. The recommendations span the spectrum of acute stroke care, including early diagnosis with imaging, admission to stroke units, reperfusion therapies, surgical options, prevention of complications and the role of adjunctive treatments.

The recommendations in this CPG are intended to guide clinicians and other stakeholders in the diagnosis and management of acute stroke. They are meant to supplement, not replace, the sound clinical judgment of healthcare providers.

INTRODUCTION

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus P2Y12 receptor inhibitor has become a cornerstone in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the prevention of stent thrombosis. However, aspirin intolerance poses a problem in the lack of guideline-based alternatives with proven benefit. In this study, we aim to determine the efficacy and safety of cilostazol-based DAPT as an alternative treatment for aspirin among patients undergoing PCI.

A comprehensive literature search was performed. All studies that investigated cilostazol as an alternative to aspirin on top of P2Y12 inhibitors for patients undergoing PCI were included. Outcomes of interest in this meta-analysis were reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding.

Three cohort studies including 1,227 patients on cilostazol and 1,480 on aspirin, both with a P2Y12 inhibitor were analyzed. Pooled estimates showed no significant difference in MACE (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.79–2.23; p = 0.29) or acute myocardial infarction (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.46–1.89; p = 0.85) between groups. However, cilostazol-based DAPT was associated with significantly less bleeding (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27–0.99; p = 0.05). All outcomes were statistically homogeneous (p>0.1, I²CONCLUSION

Cilostazol compared to aspirin, both on top of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is as efficient in the reduction of MACE and acute myocardial infarction; and even safer in terms of bleeding. Cilostazol-based DAPT may serve as an alternative to standard DAPT among aspirin-intolerant patients undergoing PCI.

Introduction: While uterine leiomyosarcoma, an aggressive smooth muscle malignancy, has a strong propensity for hematogenous spread—most commonly to the lungs and liver—gastric metastasis remains exceedingly rare. When it occurs, it presents as a masquerading lesion that mimics primary gastric tumors, creating a significant diagnostic pitfall for both clinicians and pathologists. Case Description: A 75-year-old female presented with recurrent melena. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a friable, bell-shaped mass measuring 7 × 6 cm in the gastric fundus, suspicious for GIST. Histopathology showed spindle to epithelioid tumor cells arranged in intersecting fascicles and solid sheets with vesicular nuclei, conspicuous nucleoli, numerous mitosis, and tumor necrosis. IHCs demonstrated strong SMA positivity but negative CD117, raising consideration of undifferentiated GIST. However, subsequent DOG1 staining was negative, arguing strongly against GIST. Additional markers including S100, PanCK, CD3, CD20, CD15, and CD30 were negative. Further IHCs revealed diffuse, desmin and H-caldesmon positivity, supporting smooth muscle differentiation. Review of prior records revealed TAHBSO in 2023 for uterine leiomyosarcoma. Discussion: Metastatic involvement of the stomach is rare and most commonly arises from breast or lung primaries. Gastric metastases are rare and most commonly originate from breast or lung primaries. Metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma presenting as a solitary gastric mass is exceedingly uncommon and may closely mimic primary gastric tumors such as GIST both endoscopically and histologically, representing an important diagnostic pitfall. Conclusion This case highlights a rare metastatic pattern of uterine leiomyosarcoma presenting as an overt gastric mass with GI bleeding. Awareness of this deceptive presentation and careful clinicopathologic correlation are essential for accurate diagnosis. To our knowledge, this represents one of the few reported cases worldwide and possibly the first documented in the Philippines.
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ; Immunohistochemistry ; Leiomyosarcoma ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

Against the backdrop of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict in 2022, this article reviews the characteristics of traumatic hemorrhage in modern warfare spanning the past century. It investigates several types of tourniquets used by the Russian and Ukrainian armed forces, including limb tourniquets and junctional tourniquets recommended by the Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care, tourniquets employed by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, and those used by the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict. The analysis is conducted from perspectives, including the structure, usage methods, and limitations of different tourniquets. Additionally, the article synthesizes the research progress on tourniquets from 3 angles: battlefield adaptability, the impact of tourniquet application methods on patient outcomes, and training in tourniquet usage, offering insights from our team's perspective.
Tourniquets ; Humans ; Russia ; Hemorrhage/therapy* ; Ukraine ; Military Medicine/methods* ; Warfare ; Armed Conflicts

PURPOSE: Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a life-threatening complication after pancreatoduodenectomy. Stent-graft implantation is an emerging treatment option for PPH. This study reports the outcome of PPH treated with stent-graft implantation. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study. Between April 2020 and December 2023, 1723 pancreatectomy cases were collected while we screened 12 cases of PPH after pancreatoduodenectomy treated with stent-graft implantation. Patients' medical and radiologic images were retrospectively reviewed. Technical and clinical success, complications, and stent-graft patency were evaluated. Continuous data are reported as means ± standard deviation when normally distributed or as median (Q₁, Q₃) when the data is non-normal distributed. Categorical data are reported as n (%). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for stent patency and patients' survival. RESULTS: Pancreatic fistula was identified in 6 cases (50.0%), and pseudoaneurysm was identified in 3 cases (25.0%), including pancreatic fistula together with pseudoaneurysm in 1 case (8.3%). All pseudoaneurysm or contrast extravasation sites were successfully excluded with patent distal perfusion, thus technical success was achieved in all cases. The overall survival rate at 6 months and 1 year was 91.7% and 78.6%, respectively. One patient had herniation of the small intestine into the thoracic cavity, which caused a broad thoracic and abdominal infection and died during hospitalization. Rebleeding occurred at the gastroduodenal artery stump in 1 case after stent-graft implantation for the splenic artery and was successfully treated with another stent-graft implantation. Two cases of asymptomatic stent-graft occlusion were observed at 24.6 and 26.3 after the operation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS With suitable anatomy, covered stent-graft implantation is an effective and safe treatment option for PPH with various bleeding sites and causes.
Humans ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects* ; Stents ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Hemorrhage/surgery* ; Aged ; Adult

To guide clinical blood transfusion practices for pediatric patients, the National Health Commission has issued the health standard "Guideline for pediatric transfusion" (WS/T 795-2022). Critically ill children often present with anemia and have a higher demand for transfusions compared to other pediatric patients. This guideline provides guidance and recommendations for blood transfusions in cases of general critical illness, septic shock, acute brain injury, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, non-life-threatening bleeding, and hemorrhagic shock. This article interprets the background and evidence of the blood transfusion provisions for critically ill and severely bleeding children in the "Guideline for pediatric transfusion", aiming to enhance understanding and implementation of this aspect of the guidelines. Citation:Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 2025, 27(4): 395-403.
Humans ; Critical Illness ; Blood Transfusion/standards* ; Child ; Hemorrhage/therapy* ; Practice Guidelines as Topic