1.Poor accuracy of endometrial sampling in patients with uterine carcinosarcomas: a nationwide analysis
Eveline N.B. PHAM ; Caroline B. VAN DEN BERG ; Rachel VAN ES ; Helena C. VAN DOORN ; Floris H. GROENENDIJK ; Heleen J. VAN BEEKHUIZEN
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(4):e52-
Objective:
To determine the accuracy of aspiration biopsy (AB), hysteroscopic biopsy (HB), and dilatation & curettage (D&C) in detecting uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS).
Methods:
Pathology reports were retrieved from the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank PALGA for patients with a certain or suggested diagnosis of UCS in pre- and/or postoperative histology between 2001 and 2021. Patients without available pre- or postoperative pathology reports were excluded. The accuracy measures sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), accuracy, and concordance using Cohen’s kappa were calculated for AB, D&C, and HB, using postoperative histology as the reference. This was analyzed for 2 scenarios: Analysis A compared samples with a certain or suggested diagnosis of UCS vs. no mention of UCS.Analysis B compared samples with a certain diagnosis of UCS vs those without UCS.
Results:
The study included 1,481 patients, totaling 1,685 samples. Sensitivity was similar for AB and HB (52.4% and 50.5%, respectively, for analysis A; 45.1% and 42.2% for analysis B).D&C showed the highest sensitivity (70.8% and 64.9% for analysis A and B, respectively).AB had the highest PPV (85.3% and 90.9% for analysis A and B, respectively), HB had the lowest PPV (79.7% and 80.9%, respectively). Accuracy was highest for D&C (44.4%) compared to AB (32.8%) and HB (29.5%). All Cohen’s kappa values were below 0.20, indicating poor correlation between preoperative and postoperative diagnoses.
Conclusion
The study reveals low accuracy measures across all conventional endometrial sampling techniques, highlighting the need for research to identify markers or tools to diagnose UCS.
2.Factors predicting postoperative morbidity after cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Malika KENGSAKUL ; Gatske M. NIEUWENHUYZEN-DE BOER ; Suwasin UDOMKARNJANANUN ; Stephen J. KERR ; Christa D. NIEHOT ; Heleen J. van BEEKHUIZEN
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2022;33(4):e53-
Objective:
Advances in ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery have enabled more extensive procedures to achieve maximal cytoreduction but with a consequent increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors for postoperative morbidity after extensive cytoreductive surgery for primary epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), particularly those which may be modifiable.
Methods:
Electronic databases were searched. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models.
Results:
Fifteen relevant studies, involving 15,325 ovarian cancer patients, were included in this review. Severe 30-day postoperative complications occurred in 2,357 (15.4%) patients. The postoperative mortality rate was 1.92%. Meta-analysis demonstrated that patient with following risk factors; age (p<0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score >0 (p=0.001), albumin level <3.5 g/dL (p<0.001), presence of ascites on CT scan (p=0.013), stage IV disease (p<0.001) and extensive surgical procedure (p<0.001) has a significantly increase risk of developing postoperative complications. Surgical procedures including peritonectomy (p=0.012), splenectomy (p<0.001) and colon surgery (p<0.001) were significant predictors for postoperative complications. Moreover, we found that patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) had a lower risk of developing severe complications compared to those who underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS) (p<0.001).
Conclusion
Our study demonstrated that patient performance status and hypoalbuminemia were the only significant adjustable preoperative risk factors associated with postoperative complications. Patients who underwent NACT-IDS had a lower risk of developing severe complications compared to PDS.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail