Objective:To compare the anticoagulant efficacy and safety between argatroban and heparin in patients with liver failure complicated with hepatic encephalopathy undergoing artificial liver treatment.Methods:A total of 207 patients with liver failure complicated with hepatic encephalopathy who received artificial liver treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Wuxi No.5 People′s Hospital from January 2021 to October 2024 were enrolled, including 105 cases in the argatroban group and 102 cases in the heparin group. Changes in coagulation function, hemoglobin (Hb), platelet (PLT) count, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score before and after artificial liver treatment were compared between the two groups. The formation of deep vein thrombosis in the lower extremities, coagulation in the extracorporeal circulation circuit and plasma separator, bleeding at the deep venous catheter site were compared between the two groups. The 28-day survival outcome of the patient were recorded. Two independent sample t-test, rank sum test, and chi-square test were used for statistical comparisons, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to analyze the survival rate of patients. Results:There were no statistically significant differences in activated partial thromboplastin (APTT), international normalized ratio (INR), Hb and PLT count before and after artificial liver treatment in the argatroban group ( Z=-1.74, -1.80, -1.26 and -0.52, respectively, all P>0.05), while the MELD score after treatment was lower than that before treatment and the difference was statistically significant ( t=6.49, P<0.001). After artificial liver treatment, the APTT in the argatroban group was 47.10(42.65, 51.90) s, which was shorter than that in the heparin group (56.05(50.02, 63.00) s). The INR, Hb, and PLT count in the argatroban group were 2.00(1.65, 2.54), 98.00(88.00, 112.00) g/L, and 92.00(75.50, 106.00)×10 9/L, respectively, which were all higher than those in the heparin group, which were 1.56(1.22, 1.93) g/L, 90.50(80.00, 104.75) g/L, and 74.00(64.75, 99.50)×10 9/L, respectively. The differences were all statistically significant ( Z=-7.16, -5.28, -3.05 and -3.32, respectively, all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in MELD scores between the two groups ( P=0.250). The incidence of coagulation in the extracorporeal circulation circuit and plasma separator and bleeding at the deep venous catheter site in the argatroban group was 5.71%(6/105) and 1.90%(2/105), respectively, which were both lower than those in the heparin group (14.71%(15/102) and 9.80%(10/102), respectively). The differences were both statistically significant ( χ2=4.59 and 5.91, respectively, both P<0.05). At the end of the 28-day follow-up, the mortality rates in the argatroban group and the heparin group were 22.9%(24/105) and 34.3%(35/102), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( χ2=3.33, P=0.068). There was no statistically significant difference in the 28-day survival rate between the argatroban group and the heparin group ( χ2=2.09, P>0.05). Conclusions:Argatroban has a relatively minor impact on PLT count and Hb when it is used in artificial liver treatment for patients with liver failure complicated with hepatic encephalopathy. The incidence of coagulation in extracorporeal circulation circuits and plasma separators is low, and the risk of bleeding at the deep venous catheters is low. Argatroban is highly safe, which provides a new anticoagulation option for patients with a high risk of bleeding.

Objective:To explore the correlation and predictive value of the blood urea nitrogen to serum albumin ratio (BAR) in the development of sepsis among patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).Methods:A total of 410 patients diagnosed with ACLF who were admitted to Wuxi Fifth People′s Hospital between January 1st, 2020 and December 31st, 2024 were enrolled in this study. Demographic information, laboratory test indicators, and other clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Participants were stratified into two groups using a 6∶4 allocation ratio, comprising a training set of 246 patients and a validation set of 164 patients, the clinical data of two groups were compared. Logistic regression was employed to evalute the influencing factors of sepsis during hospitalization in ACLF patients. Additionally, the predictive value of different factors for sepsis occurrence was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. DeLong test was used to compare the area under the curve.Results:The comparison of baseline data between the training set and the validation set revealed no statistically significant differences (all P>0.05). A total of 197 sepsis cases were observed during the study period. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that both BAR and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score were independent influencing factors for sepsis development in ACLF patients (odds ratio ( OR)=1.274, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.075 to 1.510, P=0.005; OR=1.142, 95% CI 1.038 to 1.256, P=0.006). In the training set, the area under the curve (AUC) of BAR for predicting sepsis in ACLF patients was 0.802, which was superior to that of the SOFA score (AUC=0.706) ( Z=2.16, P=0.031). The validation set showed the predictive ability of BAR with an AUC of 0.726, which was superior to the SOFA score′s performance (AUC=0.606) ( Z=2.28, P=0.023). Conclusions:BAR could independently predict sepsis development in ACLF patients with significant prognostic value. BAR could be used as a clinically useful biomarker for sepsis risk stratification.

Objective:To explore the correlation and predictive value of the blood urea nitrogen to serum albumin ratio (BAR) in the development of sepsis among patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).Methods:A total of 410 patients diagnosed with ACLF who were admitted to Wuxi Fifth People′s Hospital between January 1st, 2020 and December 31st, 2024 were enrolled in this study. Demographic information, laboratory test indicators, and other clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Participants were stratified into two groups using a 6∶4 allocation ratio, comprising a training set of 246 patients and a validation set of 164 patients, the clinical data of two groups were compared. Logistic regression was employed to evalute the influencing factors of sepsis during hospitalization in ACLF patients. Additionally, the predictive value of different factors for sepsis occurrence was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. DeLong test was used to compare the area under the curve.Results:The comparison of baseline data between the training set and the validation set revealed no statistically significant differences (all P>0.05). A total of 197 sepsis cases were observed during the study period. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that both BAR and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score were independent influencing factors for sepsis development in ACLF patients (odds ratio ( OR)=1.274, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.075 to 1.510, P=0.005; OR=1.142, 95% CI 1.038 to 1.256, P=0.006). In the training set, the area under the curve (AUC) of BAR for predicting sepsis in ACLF patients was 0.802, which was superior to that of the SOFA score (AUC=0.706) ( Z=2.16, P=0.031). The validation set showed the predictive ability of BAR with an AUC of 0.726, which was superior to the SOFA score′s performance (AUC=0.606) ( Z=2.28, P=0.023). Conclusions:BAR could independently predict sepsis development in ACLF patients with significant prognostic value. BAR could be used as a clinically useful biomarker for sepsis risk stratification.

Objective:To compare the anticoagulant efficacy and safety between argatroban and heparin in patients with liver failure complicated with hepatic encephalopathy undergoing artificial liver treatment.Methods:A total of 207 patients with liver failure complicated with hepatic encephalopathy who received artificial liver treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Wuxi No.5 People′s Hospital from January 2021 to October 2024 were enrolled, including 105 cases in the argatroban group and 102 cases in the heparin group. Changes in coagulation function, hemoglobin (Hb), platelet (PLT) count, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score before and after artificial liver treatment were compared between the two groups. The formation of deep vein thrombosis in the lower extremities, coagulation in the extracorporeal circulation circuit and plasma separator, bleeding at the deep venous catheter site were compared between the two groups. The 28-day survival outcome of the patient were recorded. Two independent sample t-test, rank sum test, and chi-square test were used for statistical comparisons, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to analyze the survival rate of patients. Results:There were no statistically significant differences in activated partial thromboplastin (APTT), international normalized ratio (INR), Hb and PLT count before and after artificial liver treatment in the argatroban group ( Z=-1.74, -1.80, -1.26 and -0.52, respectively, all P>0.05), while the MELD score after treatment was lower than that before treatment and the difference was statistically significant ( t=6.49, P<0.001). After artificial liver treatment, the APTT in the argatroban group was 47.10(42.65, 51.90) s, which was shorter than that in the heparin group (56.05(50.02, 63.00) s). The INR, Hb, and PLT count in the argatroban group were 2.00(1.65, 2.54), 98.00(88.00, 112.00) g/L, and 92.00(75.50, 106.00)×10 9/L, respectively, which were all higher than those in the heparin group, which were 1.56(1.22, 1.93) g/L, 90.50(80.00, 104.75) g/L, and 74.00(64.75, 99.50)×10 9/L, respectively. The differences were all statistically significant ( Z=-7.16, -5.28, -3.05 and -3.32, respectively, all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in MELD scores between the two groups ( P=0.250). The incidence of coagulation in the extracorporeal circulation circuit and plasma separator and bleeding at the deep venous catheter site in the argatroban group was 5.71%(6/105) and 1.90%(2/105), respectively, which were both lower than those in the heparin group (14.71%(15/102) and 9.80%(10/102), respectively). The differences were both statistically significant ( χ2=4.59 and 5.91, respectively, both P<0.05). At the end of the 28-day follow-up, the mortality rates in the argatroban group and the heparin group were 22.9%(24/105) and 34.3%(35/102), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( χ2=3.33, P=0.068). There was no statistically significant difference in the 28-day survival rate between the argatroban group and the heparin group ( χ2=2.09, P>0.05). Conclusions:Argatroban has a relatively minor impact on PLT count and Hb when it is used in artificial liver treatment for patients with liver failure complicated with hepatic encephalopathy. The incidence of coagulation in extracorporeal circulation circuits and plasma separators is low, and the risk of bleeding at the deep venous catheters is low. Argatroban is highly safe, which provides a new anticoagulation option for patients with a high risk of bleeding.

Objective:To analyze the impact of baseline quantification of hepatitis B core antibody (qHBcAb) on prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF).Methods:A total of 91 HBV-ACLF patients (HBV-ACLF group), who admitted to Wuxi No.5 People′s Hospital from July 1, 2019 to December 30, 2021, were included in this study. Fifty chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients (CHB group) and 50 chronic HBV carriers (HBV carrier group) were enrolled as controls. Baseline clinical data such as qHBcAb, blood routine examination biochemical, and coagulation indices, HBsAg, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), HBV DNA levels were recorded and analyzed retrospectively. The HBV-ACLF, HBsAg and HBV-DNA data were converted logarithmically. Patients were followed-up for 90 days. Cox regression was used to analyze the correlation between HBV-ACLF and survival outcome; survival rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of baseline qHBcAb for the prognosis in patients with HBV-ACLF.Results:The baseline qHBcAb level in HBV-ACLF patients was (4.83±0.42) IU/ml, which was significantly higher than that in the CHB group [(4.59±0.54) IU/ml] and chronic HBV carrier group [(3.86±0.74) IU/ml] (all P<0.05). At the end of 90 days follow-up, 46 patients (50.55%) survived, and 45 patients (49.45%) died in the HBV-ACLF group. The baseline qHBcAb level was significantly higher in the survival group [(4.93±0.22) IU/ml] than in the death group [(4.70±0.52) IU/ml, P<0.01]. Significant differences were also found in the alpha fetoprotein, international normalized ratio, prothrombin activity, antithrombin Ⅲ activity, platelet, end-stage liver disease model score and hepatic encephalopathy complication between the two groups ( P<0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that the baseline qHBcAb was an independent risk factor affecting the 90-day survival of HBV-ACLF patients [hazard ratio=0.027,95% confidence interval ( CI) 0.001-0.696, P<0.05]. The area under the ROC curve of baseline qHBcAb level for predicting the 90-day survival outcome of HBV-ACLF patients was 0.639 (95% CI 0.525-0.752, P<0.05), with a cut-off value of 4.89 IU/ml. The cumulative survival rate of patients with baseline qHBcAb≥4.89 IU/ml was higher than that of patients with baseline qHBcAb<4.89 IU/ml ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Higher baseline qHBcAb level is associated with favorable outcome of HBV-ACLF patients and baseline qHBcAb may be used as a new biomarker to predict the clinical outcome of HBV-ACLF patients. HBV-ACLF patients with serum qHBcAb lower than 4.89 IU/ml face increased risk of short-term death.

Objective:To explore the therapeutic effect of multi-mode sequential combination of artificial liver in the treatment of hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF).Methods:The clinical data of HBV-ACLF patients treated with artificial liver in Wuxi Fifth People′s Hospital from January 2018 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Eighty-six patients were divided into artificial liver multi-mode sequential combination therapy group (sequential combination group) and conventional treatment group. The cytokine level changes and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score were analyzed at 14 days of disease duration. The survival outcome and complications of artificial liver were analyzed after 30 days of follow-up. Two independent samples t test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of death, and Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the survival rate of patients. Results:A total of 86 patients were enrolled, including 48 patients in sequential combination group with the average number of artificial liver of 4.68 times/person, and 38 patients in conventional treatment group with the average number of artificial liver of 3.17 times/person. At 14 days of disease duration, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, interferon γ-inducible protein (IP)-10 level and MELD score in sequential combination group decreased significantly than those in the conventional treatment group ( t=3.80, 3.62, 4.95 and 1.11, respectively, all P<0.050). After 30 days of follow-up, 63 patients survived and 23 patients died. Cox regression analysis showed that baseline international normalized ratio (hazard ratio ( HR)=0.558, 95% confidence interval ( CI) 0.193 to 0.856, P=0.027), baseline antithrombin Ⅲ activity ( HR=0.876, 95% CI 0.824 to 0.932, P<0.001), artificial liver mode ( HR=0.819, 95% CI 0.236 to 0.992, P=0.005), spontaneous peritonitis ( HR=0.170, 95% CI 0.045 to 0.647, P=0.009) and hepatic encephalopathy ( HR=0.004, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.030, P<0.001) were independent influencing factors for 30-day survival outcome. The cumulative survival rate of sequential combination group was higher than that of conventional treatment group, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=5.45, P=0.020). There were no significant differences in the proportions of bleeding, deep vein thrombosis, heart rate and blood pressure instability between the two groups ( χ2=0.63, 1.20 and 0.54, respectively, all P>0.050). The platelet decline of patients in sequential combination group was slighter than that in conventional treatment group, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=-4.17, P=0.002). Conclusions:Multi-mode sequential combination therapy of artificial liver could eliminate cytokines and reduce MELD score more effectively in patients with HBV-ACLF, and prolong the survival time of patients and have little effect on platelet count.

Objective:To analyze the relationship between antithrombin Ⅲ(AT-Ⅲ) activity and survival, bleeding and thrombosis complications in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), and to explore the prediction value of AT-Ⅲ activity in the prognosis of ACLF patients.Methods:The clinical data of 130 hospitalized patients with ACLF were retrospectively collected in Wuxi No.5 People′s Hospital from January 1, 2013 to April 1, 2019. The liver function, international normalized ratio (INR), and 90-day survival rate were detected. The AT-Ⅲ activity values at admission, week two, week four, and week eight of hospitalization were recorded, and the occurrences of fecal occult blood and femoral vein thrombosis were also recorded. The measurement data were compared by t test, analysis of variance, or rank sum test, and the categorical data were compared by chi-square test. The risk factors affecting the survival of ACLF patients were analyzed by Cox regression. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results:At the end of 90-day follow-up of 130 patients, 56 patients died, 20 patients (15.38%) were fecal occult blood positive and 15 (11.54%) had femoral vein thrombosis. The baseline AT-Ⅲ activity in the death group was lower than that in the survival group ((17.89±13.68)% vs (36.03±11.96)%), and the difference was statistically significant ( t=-8.045, P<0.01). The baseline AT-Ⅲ activities in fecal occult blood positive and negative patients were (18.26±11.52)% and (25.06±10.97)%, respectively, and in femoral vein thrombosis and non-thrombotic patients were (17.55±10.33)% and (32.48±11.88)%, respectively. The differences were both statistically significant ( t=8.746 and 8.090, respectively, both P<0.01). Through dynamic monitoring of AT-Ⅲ, the AT-Ⅲ activity showed a downward trend in the death group, while that showed an upward trend in the survival group, but the differences were not statistically significant ( F=0.282 and 0.401, respectively, both P>0.05). The Cox regression analysis suggested INR (odds ratio ( OR)=1.364, 95% confidence interval ( CI) 1.078-1.726, P=0.010) and AT-Ⅲ activity ( OR=0.930, 95% CI 0.906-0.954, P<0.01) were the independent factors affecting the survival of patients with ACLF. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of the AT-Ⅲ activity for predicting 90-day survival outcome of the patient was 0.706 (95% CI 0.773-0.952, P<0.01), and the cut-off value was 25%. Patients with AT-Ⅲ activity ≥ 25% had a higher survival rate than those with AT-Ⅲ activity <25% ( χ2=58.20, P<0.01). Conclusions:AT-Ⅲ activity is associated with fecal occult blood positive and femoral vein thrombosis in ACLF patients. The AT-Ⅲ activity is an independent influencing factor for predicting the prognosis of ACLF patients. Patients with AT-Ⅲ activity less than 25% have the higher mortality rate.

Hepatitis B ; Humans ; Th17 Cells