Appendectomy as the standard treatment for acute appendicitis has been challenged by accumulating evidence supporting nonoperative management with antibiotics as a potential primary treatment. This review aimed to summarize the clinical outcomes and the optimal indications for nonoperative management of acute appendicitis in adults. Current evidence suggests that uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis have different pathophysiologies and should be treated differently. Nonoperative management for uncomplicated appendicitis was not inferior to appendectomy in terms of complications and length of stay, with less than a 30% failure rate at 1 year. The risk of perforation and postoperative complications did not increase even if nonoperative management failed. Complicated appendicitis with localized abscess or phlegmon could also be treated conservatively, with a success rate of more than 80%. An interval appendectomy following successful nonoperative management is recommended only for patients over the age of 40 years to exclude appendiceal malignancy. The presence of appendicoliths increased the risk of treatment failure and complications; thus, it may be an indication for appendectomy. Nonoperative management is a safe and feasible option for both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Patients should be informed that nonoperative management may be a safe alternative to surgery, with the possibility of treatment failure.

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the treatment approaches and locoregional patterns for adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) in the breast, which is an uncommon malignant tumor with limited clinical data. Materials and Methods: A total of 93 patients diagnosed with primary ACC in the breast between 1992 and 2022 were collected from multi-institutions. All patients underwent surgical resection, including breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or total mastectomy (TM). Recurrence patterns and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were assessed. Results: Seventy-five patients (80.7%) underwent BCS, and 71 of them (94.7%) received post-operative radiation therapy (PORT). Eighteen patients (19.3%) underwent TM, with five of them (27.8%) also receiving PORT. With a median follow-up of 50 months, the LRFS rate was 84.2% at 5 years. Local recurrence (LR) was observed in five patients (5.4%) and four cases (80%) of the LR occurred in the tumor bed. Three of LR (3/75, 4.0%) had a history of BCS and PORT, meanwhile, two of LR (2/18, 11.1%) had a history of mastectomy. Regional recurrence occurred in two patients (2.2%), and both cases had a history of PORT with (n=1) and without (n=1) irradiation of the regional lymph nodes. Partial breast irradiation (p=0.35), BCS (p=0.96) and PORT in BCS group (p=0.33) had no significant association with LRFS. Conclusion BCS followed by PORT was the predominant treatment approach for ACC of the breast and LR mostly occurred in the tumor bed. The findings of this study suggest that partial breast irradiation might be considered for PORT in primary breast ACC.

Purpose: Mitochondria-accumulating amphiphilic peptide (Mito-FF) was designed to selectively target mitochondria in cancer cells and enhance anticancer effects through its unique structure. Mito-FF consists of (1) diphenylalanine, a β-sheet-forming building block critical for self-assembly; (2) triphenylphosphonium, a mitochondrial targeting moiety guiding the peptide to mitochondria; and (3) pyrene, a fluorescent probe enabling visualization of its accumulation and selfassembly. This study evaluates the anticancer efficacy of Mito-FF in breast cancer cells and explores its combination with paclitaxel, a standard therapy for breast cancer, focusing on its modulation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway. Methods: In vitro and in vivo experiments were performed using MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines and their respective xenograft models. Cell viability, migration, EMT marker expression, and apoptosis-related proteins were analyzed. Results: Mito-FF demonstrated superior inhibition of cell viability and migration compared to paclitaxel alone in both cell lines. Combination therapy with Mito-FF and paclitaxel resulted in enhanced reduction of cell viability and migration. EMT markers were significantly modulated, with decreased mesenchymal markers (Snail and vimentin) and increased epithelial marker (E-cadherin) following combination treatment. Furthermore, the combination therapy synergistically elevated proapoptotic markers such as poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase and reduced anti-apoptotic markers such as myeloid cell leukemia 1. In vivo experiments revealed a marked reduction in tumor volume with combination therapy, accompanied by the highest expression levels of E-cadherin and pro-apoptotic marker Bim. Conclusion Mito-FF, designed for mitochondrial targeting and visualization, exhibited potent anticancer effects when combined with paclitaxel, in the breast cancer cells.

Appendectomy as the standard treatment for acute appendicitis has been challenged by accumulating evidence supporting nonoperative management with antibiotics as a potential primary treatment. This review aimed to summarize the clinical outcomes and the optimal indications for nonoperative management of acute appendicitis in adults. Current evidence suggests that uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis have different pathophysiologies and should be treated differently. Nonoperative management for uncomplicated appendicitis was not inferior to appendectomy in terms of complications and length of stay, with less than a 30% failure rate at 1 year. The risk of perforation and postoperative complications did not increase even if nonoperative management failed. Complicated appendicitis with localized abscess or phlegmon could also be treated conservatively, with a success rate of more than 80%. An interval appendectomy following successful nonoperative management is recommended only for patients over the age of 40 years to exclude appendiceal malignancy. The presence of appendicoliths increased the risk of treatment failure and complications; thus, it may be an indication for appendectomy. Nonoperative management is a safe and feasible option for both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Patients should be informed that nonoperative management may be a safe alternative to surgery, with the possibility of treatment failure.

Appendectomy as the standard treatment for acute appendicitis has been challenged by accumulating evidence supporting nonoperative management with antibiotics as a potential primary treatment. This review aimed to summarize the clinical outcomes and the optimal indications for nonoperative management of acute appendicitis in adults. Current evidence suggests that uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis have different pathophysiologies and should be treated differently. Nonoperative management for uncomplicated appendicitis was not inferior to appendectomy in terms of complications and length of stay, with less than a 30% failure rate at 1 year. The risk of perforation and postoperative complications did not increase even if nonoperative management failed. Complicated appendicitis with localized abscess or phlegmon could also be treated conservatively, with a success rate of more than 80%. An interval appendectomy following successful nonoperative management is recommended only for patients over the age of 40 years to exclude appendiceal malignancy. The presence of appendicoliths increased the risk of treatment failure and complications; thus, it may be an indication for appendectomy. Nonoperative management is a safe and feasible option for both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Patients should be informed that nonoperative management may be a safe alternative to surgery, with the possibility of treatment failure.

Purpose: Mitochondria-accumulating amphiphilic peptide (Mito-FF) was designed to selectively target mitochondria in cancer cells and enhance anticancer effects through its unique structure. Mito-FF consists of (1) diphenylalanine, a β-sheet-forming building block critical for self-assembly; (2) triphenylphosphonium, a mitochondrial targeting moiety guiding the peptide to mitochondria; and (3) pyrene, a fluorescent probe enabling visualization of its accumulation and selfassembly. This study evaluates the anticancer efficacy of Mito-FF in breast cancer cells and explores its combination with paclitaxel, a standard therapy for breast cancer, focusing on its modulation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway. Methods: In vitro and in vivo experiments were performed using MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines and their respective xenograft models. Cell viability, migration, EMT marker expression, and apoptosis-related proteins were analyzed. Results: Mito-FF demonstrated superior inhibition of cell viability and migration compared to paclitaxel alone in both cell lines. Combination therapy with Mito-FF and paclitaxel resulted in enhanced reduction of cell viability and migration. EMT markers were significantly modulated, with decreased mesenchymal markers (Snail and vimentin) and increased epithelial marker (E-cadherin) following combination treatment. Furthermore, the combination therapy synergistically elevated proapoptotic markers such as poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase and reduced anti-apoptotic markers such as myeloid cell leukemia 1. In vivo experiments revealed a marked reduction in tumor volume with combination therapy, accompanied by the highest expression levels of E-cadherin and pro-apoptotic marker Bim. Conclusion Mito-FF, designed for mitochondrial targeting and visualization, exhibited potent anticancer effects when combined with paclitaxel, in the breast cancer cells.

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the treatment approaches and locoregional patterns for adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) in the breast, which is an uncommon malignant tumor with limited clinical data. Materials and Methods: A total of 93 patients diagnosed with primary ACC in the breast between 1992 and 2022 were collected from multi-institutions. All patients underwent surgical resection, including breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or total mastectomy (TM). Recurrence patterns and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were assessed. Results: Seventy-five patients (80.7%) underwent BCS, and 71 of them (94.7%) received post-operative radiation therapy (PORT). Eighteen patients (19.3%) underwent TM, with five of them (27.8%) also receiving PORT. With a median follow-up of 50 months, the LRFS rate was 84.2% at 5 years. Local recurrence (LR) was observed in five patients (5.4%) and four cases (80%) of the LR occurred in the tumor bed. Three of LR (3/75, 4.0%) had a history of BCS and PORT, meanwhile, two of LR (2/18, 11.1%) had a history of mastectomy. Regional recurrence occurred in two patients (2.2%), and both cases had a history of PORT with (n=1) and without (n=1) irradiation of the regional lymph nodes. Partial breast irradiation (p=0.35), BCS (p=0.96) and PORT in BCS group (p=0.33) had no significant association with LRFS. Conclusion BCS followed by PORT was the predominant treatment approach for ACC of the breast and LR mostly occurred in the tumor bed. The findings of this study suggest that partial breast irradiation might be considered for PORT in primary breast ACC.

Appendectomy as the standard treatment for acute appendicitis has been challenged by accumulating evidence supporting nonoperative management with antibiotics as a potential primary treatment. This review aimed to summarize the clinical outcomes and the optimal indications for nonoperative management of acute appendicitis in adults. Current evidence suggests that uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis have different pathophysiologies and should be treated differently. Nonoperative management for uncomplicated appendicitis was not inferior to appendectomy in terms of complications and length of stay, with less than a 30% failure rate at 1 year. The risk of perforation and postoperative complications did not increase even if nonoperative management failed. Complicated appendicitis with localized abscess or phlegmon could also be treated conservatively, with a success rate of more than 80%. An interval appendectomy following successful nonoperative management is recommended only for patients over the age of 40 years to exclude appendiceal malignancy. The presence of appendicoliths increased the risk of treatment failure and complications; thus, it may be an indication for appendectomy. Nonoperative management is a safe and feasible option for both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Patients should be informed that nonoperative management may be a safe alternative to surgery, with the possibility of treatment failure.

Appendectomy as the standard treatment for acute appendicitis has been challenged by accumulating evidence supporting nonoperative management with antibiotics as a potential primary treatment. This review aimed to summarize the clinical outcomes and the optimal indications for nonoperative management of acute appendicitis in adults. Current evidence suggests that uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis have different pathophysiologies and should be treated differently. Nonoperative management for uncomplicated appendicitis was not inferior to appendectomy in terms of complications and length of stay, with less than a 30% failure rate at 1 year. The risk of perforation and postoperative complications did not increase even if nonoperative management failed. Complicated appendicitis with localized abscess or phlegmon could also be treated conservatively, with a success rate of more than 80%. An interval appendectomy following successful nonoperative management is recommended only for patients over the age of 40 years to exclude appendiceal malignancy. The presence of appendicoliths increased the risk of treatment failure and complications; thus, it may be an indication for appendectomy. Nonoperative management is a safe and feasible option for both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Patients should be informed that nonoperative management may be a safe alternative to surgery, with the possibility of treatment failure.

Purpose: Mitochondria-accumulating amphiphilic peptide (Mito-FF) was designed to selectively target mitochondria in cancer cells and enhance anticancer effects through its unique structure. Mito-FF consists of (1) diphenylalanine, a β-sheet-forming building block critical for self-assembly; (2) triphenylphosphonium, a mitochondrial targeting moiety guiding the peptide to mitochondria; and (3) pyrene, a fluorescent probe enabling visualization of its accumulation and selfassembly. This study evaluates the anticancer efficacy of Mito-FF in breast cancer cells and explores its combination with paclitaxel, a standard therapy for breast cancer, focusing on its modulation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway. Methods: In vitro and in vivo experiments were performed using MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines and their respective xenograft models. Cell viability, migration, EMT marker expression, and apoptosis-related proteins were analyzed. Results: Mito-FF demonstrated superior inhibition of cell viability and migration compared to paclitaxel alone in both cell lines. Combination therapy with Mito-FF and paclitaxel resulted in enhanced reduction of cell viability and migration. EMT markers were significantly modulated, with decreased mesenchymal markers (Snail and vimentin) and increased epithelial marker (E-cadherin) following combination treatment. Furthermore, the combination therapy synergistically elevated proapoptotic markers such as poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase and reduced anti-apoptotic markers such as myeloid cell leukemia 1. In vivo experiments revealed a marked reduction in tumor volume with combination therapy, accompanied by the highest expression levels of E-cadherin and pro-apoptotic marker Bim. Conclusion Mito-FF, designed for mitochondrial targeting and visualization, exhibited potent anticancer effects when combined with paclitaxel, in the breast cancer cells.