Peyronie’s disease is an acquired condition characterized by penile deformities caused by fibrosis of the penile tunica albuginea, leading to symptoms such as penile pain, erectile dysfunction, and other associated issues. Despite extensive research, the pathophysiology of this condition remains poorly understood, and standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols are lacking. While clinical guidelines from several professional societies exist, they do not consistently account for factors such as patient ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status. Thus, the Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology (KSSMA) aimed to develop recommendations tailored to clinical practice in Korea. These recommendations summarize the latest evidence, including clinical practice guidelines from various international professional societies, and represent the consensus opinion of an expert group within the KSSMA. They encompass all aspects of Peyronie’s disease, including the definition, diagnosis, non-surgical interventions, and surgical treatment options.

Peyronie’s disease is an acquired condition characterized by penile deformities caused by fibrosis of the penile tunica albuginea, leading to symptoms such as penile pain, erectile dysfunction, and other associated issues. Despite extensive research, the pathophysiology of this condition remains poorly understood, and standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols are lacking. While clinical guidelines from several professional societies exist, they do not consistently account for factors such as patient ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status. Thus, the Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology (KSSMA) aimed to develop recommendations tailored to clinical practice in Korea. These recommendations summarize the latest evidence, including clinical practice guidelines from various international professional societies, and represent the consensus opinion of an expert group within the KSSMA. They encompass all aspects of Peyronie’s disease, including the definition, diagnosis, non-surgical interventions, and surgical treatment options.

Background: This study aimed to assess the severity of postoperative delirium (PD) in elderly patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs) under general anesthesia (GA) compared to those under interscalene block (IB). Methods: Forty elderly patients aged 65 years or older diagnosed with an irreparable mRCT who underwent rTSA were included in the prospective case-controlled study. Of these, 20 patients were operated under GA and the other 20 under IB. The average age was 77.1 years (range, 65–95 years). The severity of delirious symptoms was evaluated by the Delirium Rating Scale–revised–98 (DRS) score from the patients or guardians before the surgery and at 0, 3, and 7 days and 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery and compared between the 2 groups. Results: Immediately after surgery, the visual analog scale score difference between the groups was statistically significant, with the GA group at 6.25 (standard deviation, ± 0.85) and the IB group at 3.80 (± 0.62) (p < 0.001). On the day of operation, the mean DRS score in the GA and IB groups were 9.10 (± 5.63) and 6.60 (± 5.33), respectively (p = 0.157). On day 3 of surgery, the mean DRS score in the GA group peaked to 9.95 (± 8.73), while in the IB group, it declined to 6.40 (±5.81) (p = 0.138). After 3 days, DRS scores showed a decreasing trend in both groups. When comparing the mean change (∆) from the preoperative baseline scores to the postoperative values, the ∆DRS score was significantly higher with 4.15 (± 4.53) points in the GA group as compared to 1.30 (± 1.92) in the IB group (p = 0.014). Conclusions IB can be an attractive and efficient anesthetic choice in preventing PD for elderly patients undergoing rTSA for irreparable mRCTs. The IB group showed lower DRS scores and a peak on day 0 compared to the higher DRS scores and peak on day 3 in the GA group. Additionally, IB showed less pain than GA.

Background: Anterior dislocation in epilepsy patients is relatively severe, difficult to treat, and prone to recurrence. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy patients who had anterior shoulder instability and to compare the results of the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy and non-epileptic groups. Methods: A total of 57 shoulders (34 dominant) in 55 patients (18–50 years, 45 men and 10 women) with anterior glenohumeral instability were included in the study and the average follow-up was 24 months. Out of 21 epilepsy patients (23 shoulders), 11 were treated with the open Latarjet procedure and 12 with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Additionally, comparisons were made between the 34 non-epileptic patients who underwent the open Latarjet procedure and the epilepsy patients who underwent the same procedure. Results: In the epilepsy group, all 12 patients who underwent Bankart repair had on-track lesions, and all 11 patients who underwent the Latarjet procedure had off-track lesions. In the non-epilepsy group, all cases were off-track lesions. In the epilepsy group, there was no significant difference in the postoperative clinical outcome and recurrence rate between the Bankart repair and Latarjet procedure groups. In the Latarjet group, postoperative re-dislocation rate in the non-epilepsy patients was 14% (5/34 cases), compared to 45% (5/11 cases) in the epilepsy patients, 4 of which 4 occurred during seizures. It was 41% in the Bankart repair group for on-track lesions, which was similar to the recurrence rate after the Latarjet for off-track lesions in the epilepsy group. Conclusions After the Latarjet procedure, the functional outcomes in the epilepsy group were similar to those in the non-epilepsy group, except for the higher re-dislocation rate. With either of the surgical procedures, the re-dislocation rate secondary to seizures was very high. Despite the presence of on-track lesions, the Latarjet procedure would be more preferrable for anterior stabilization in epilepsy patients, in view of the high recurrence rate with arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Background: This study aimed to report the short- and midterm outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in weight-bearing shoulders. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 19 cases of ARCR and 10 cases of RSA performed in weight-bearing shoulders from 2009 to 2021. In the ARCR group, postoperative 6-month magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the tendon integrity. In the RSA group, scapular notching, acromial fracture, and implant failure were assessed using plain radiographs, and complications were recorded. In both groups, preoperative and postoperative range of motion and functional scores were documented, along with subjective satisfaction and arm use for weight-bearing on the shoulders. For patients followed up for > 5 years, a midterm analysis was performed. Results: The ARCR group included 8 men and 11 women (average age, 58.8 ± 8.0 years). Initially, Patte types 1, 2, and 3 were noted in 9, 8, and 2 patients, respectively, and 4 patients exhibited full-thickness subscapularis tears. Four patients showed supraspinatus retear, and 2 patients showed subscapularis retear. Retear of any rotator cuff was observed in 5 patients (26.3%). Twelve patients were followed up for > 5 years; 11 (91.7%) used their operated arm for weight-bearing and 9 (75.0%) were satisfied. The RSA group included 5 men and 5 women (average age, 74.3 ± 7.9 years). Procedures included RSAs for cuff tear arthropathy (n = 6), osteoarthritis (n = 3), and fracture nonunion (n = 1). No cases of dislocation, prosthesis loosening, or disassociation were observed throughout the follow-up. However, 1 patient required implant removal due to infection, and 4 patients showed stage 1 scapular notching. Five patients were followed up for > 5 years, all of whom expressed satisfaction and used their operated arms for weight-bearing, despite mean forward flexion (107.5° ± 12.6°) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (61.5 ± 5.3) being less than reported patient acceptable symptomatic state (110° and 76, respectively). Conclusions Both ARCR and RSA showed promising outcomes in terms of weight-bearing on the operated arm and subjective satisfaction at short- and midterm follow-up. Therefore, neither of these surgeries should be considered contraindicated for patients with weight-bearing shoulder conditions.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: This study aimed to assess the severity of postoperative delirium (PD) in elderly patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs) under general anesthesia (GA) compared to those under interscalene block (IB). Methods: Forty elderly patients aged 65 years or older diagnosed with an irreparable mRCT who underwent rTSA were included in the prospective case-controlled study. Of these, 20 patients were operated under GA and the other 20 under IB. The average age was 77.1 years (range, 65–95 years). The severity of delirious symptoms was evaluated by the Delirium Rating Scale–revised–98 (DRS) score from the patients or guardians before the surgery and at 0, 3, and 7 days and 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery and compared between the 2 groups. Results: Immediately after surgery, the visual analog scale score difference between the groups was statistically significant, with the GA group at 6.25 (standard deviation, ± 0.85) and the IB group at 3.80 (± 0.62) (p < 0.001). On the day of operation, the mean DRS score in the GA and IB groups were 9.10 (± 5.63) and 6.60 (± 5.33), respectively (p = 0.157). On day 3 of surgery, the mean DRS score in the GA group peaked to 9.95 (± 8.73), while in the IB group, it declined to 6.40 (±5.81) (p = 0.138). After 3 days, DRS scores showed a decreasing trend in both groups. When comparing the mean change (∆) from the preoperative baseline scores to the postoperative values, the ∆DRS score was significantly higher with 4.15 (± 4.53) points in the GA group as compared to 1.30 (± 1.92) in the IB group (p = 0.014). Conclusions IB can be an attractive and efficient anesthetic choice in preventing PD for elderly patients undergoing rTSA for irreparable mRCTs. The IB group showed lower DRS scores and a peak on day 0 compared to the higher DRS scores and peak on day 3 in the GA group. Additionally, IB showed less pain than GA.

Background: This study aimed to assess the severity of postoperative delirium (PD) in elderly patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs) under general anesthesia (GA) compared to those under interscalene block (IB). Methods: Forty elderly patients aged 65 years or older diagnosed with an irreparable mRCT who underwent rTSA were included in the prospective case-controlled study. Of these, 20 patients were operated under GA and the other 20 under IB. The average age was 77.1 years (range, 65–95 years). The severity of delirious symptoms was evaluated by the Delirium Rating Scale–revised–98 (DRS) score from the patients or guardians before the surgery and at 0, 3, and 7 days and 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery and compared between the 2 groups. Results: Immediately after surgery, the visual analog scale score difference between the groups was statistically significant, with the GA group at 6.25 (standard deviation, ± 0.85) and the IB group at 3.80 (± 0.62) (p < 0.001). On the day of operation, the mean DRS score in the GA and IB groups were 9.10 (± 5.63) and 6.60 (± 5.33), respectively (p = 0.157). On day 3 of surgery, the mean DRS score in the GA group peaked to 9.95 (± 8.73), while in the IB group, it declined to 6.40 (±5.81) (p = 0.138). After 3 days, DRS scores showed a decreasing trend in both groups. When comparing the mean change (∆) from the preoperative baseline scores to the postoperative values, the ∆DRS score was significantly higher with 4.15 (± 4.53) points in the GA group as compared to 1.30 (± 1.92) in the IB group (p = 0.014). Conclusions IB can be an attractive and efficient anesthetic choice in preventing PD for elderly patients undergoing rTSA for irreparable mRCTs. The IB group showed lower DRS scores and a peak on day 0 compared to the higher DRS scores and peak on day 3 in the GA group. Additionally, IB showed less pain than GA.

Background: Anterior dislocation in epilepsy patients is relatively severe, difficult to treat, and prone to recurrence. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy patients who had anterior shoulder instability and to compare the results of the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy and non-epileptic groups. Methods: A total of 57 shoulders (34 dominant) in 55 patients (18–50 years, 45 men and 10 women) with anterior glenohumeral instability were included in the study and the average follow-up was 24 months. Out of 21 epilepsy patients (23 shoulders), 11 were treated with the open Latarjet procedure and 12 with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Additionally, comparisons were made between the 34 non-epileptic patients who underwent the open Latarjet procedure and the epilepsy patients who underwent the same procedure. Results: In the epilepsy group, all 12 patients who underwent Bankart repair had on-track lesions, and all 11 patients who underwent the Latarjet procedure had off-track lesions. In the non-epilepsy group, all cases were off-track lesions. In the epilepsy group, there was no significant difference in the postoperative clinical outcome and recurrence rate between the Bankart repair and Latarjet procedure groups. In the Latarjet group, postoperative re-dislocation rate in the non-epilepsy patients was 14% (5/34 cases), compared to 45% (5/11 cases) in the epilepsy patients, 4 of which 4 occurred during seizures. It was 41% in the Bankart repair group for on-track lesions, which was similar to the recurrence rate after the Latarjet for off-track lesions in the epilepsy group. Conclusions After the Latarjet procedure, the functional outcomes in the epilepsy group were similar to those in the non-epilepsy group, except for the higher re-dislocation rate. With either of the surgical procedures, the re-dislocation rate secondary to seizures was very high. Despite the presence of on-track lesions, the Latarjet procedure would be more preferrable for anterior stabilization in epilepsy patients, in view of the high recurrence rate with arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Background: This study aimed to report the short- and midterm outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in weight-bearing shoulders. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 19 cases of ARCR and 10 cases of RSA performed in weight-bearing shoulders from 2009 to 2021. In the ARCR group, postoperative 6-month magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the tendon integrity. In the RSA group, scapular notching, acromial fracture, and implant failure were assessed using plain radiographs, and complications were recorded. In both groups, preoperative and postoperative range of motion and functional scores were documented, along with subjective satisfaction and arm use for weight-bearing on the shoulders. For patients followed up for > 5 years, a midterm analysis was performed. Results: The ARCR group included 8 men and 11 women (average age, 58.8 ± 8.0 years). Initially, Patte types 1, 2, and 3 were noted in 9, 8, and 2 patients, respectively, and 4 patients exhibited full-thickness subscapularis tears. Four patients showed supraspinatus retear, and 2 patients showed subscapularis retear. Retear of any rotator cuff was observed in 5 patients (26.3%). Twelve patients were followed up for > 5 years; 11 (91.7%) used their operated arm for weight-bearing and 9 (75.0%) were satisfied. The RSA group included 5 men and 5 women (average age, 74.3 ± 7.9 years). Procedures included RSAs for cuff tear arthropathy (n = 6), osteoarthritis (n = 3), and fracture nonunion (n = 1). No cases of dislocation, prosthesis loosening, or disassociation were observed throughout the follow-up. However, 1 patient required implant removal due to infection, and 4 patients showed stage 1 scapular notching. Five patients were followed up for > 5 years, all of whom expressed satisfaction and used their operated arms for weight-bearing, despite mean forward flexion (107.5° ± 12.6°) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (61.5 ± 5.3) being less than reported patient acceptable symptomatic state (110° and 76, respectively). Conclusions Both ARCR and RSA showed promising outcomes in terms of weight-bearing on the operated arm and subjective satisfaction at short- and midterm follow-up. Therefore, neither of these surgeries should be considered contraindicated for patients with weight-bearing shoulder conditions.