1.Analysis on trend of hearing changes in infants with p.V37I mutation in GJB2 gene at different months of age.
Shan GAO ; Cheng WEN ; Yiding YU ; Yue LI ; Lin DENG ; Yu RUAN ; Jinge XIE ; Lihui HUANG
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(1):10-18
Objective:To explore the trend of hearing changes in infants with GJB2 gene p.V37I mutation at different months. Methods:The subjects were 54 children(108 ears) with p.V37I homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in GJB2 gene. All the subjects underwent auditory brainstem response, auditory steady-state response, acoustic immittance and other audiological tests. Children were divided into three groups according to their age, 26 cases in group A were ≤3 months old, 17 cases in group B were>3~≤6 months old, and 11 cases in group C were>6 months old. Statistical analysis was performed on the three groups of ABR response threshold, hearing degree, the ASSR average response threshold of four frequencies and the ASSR response thresholds for each frequency of 500, 1 000, 2 000 and 4 000 Hz. Results:Among the 54 cases, 35 were male and 19 were female, with an age rang of 2-27 months and a median age of 4 months. The ABR response threshold of the three groups were ranked from low to high as group A, group B and group C, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The ABR response thresholds of the three groups were ranked from low to high as group A, group B, and group C. The comparison between groups showed that the ABR response thresholds of group C was higher than that of group A(P=0.006). The proportion of confirmed hearing loss in the three groups was 34.61%, 50.00% and 63.64%, respectively, and the difference of hearing level among the three groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). The comparison between groups showed that the difference between group A and group C was statistically significant(P=0.012), normal hearing accounted for the highest proportion in group A(65.39%), while mild hearing loss accounted for the highest proportion in group C(45.46%). The ASSR average response thresholds of the four frequencies in the three groups were ranked from low to high as group A, group B and group C, and the difference is statistically significant(P<0.05). The comparison between groups showed that response ASSR thresholds of group C was higher than that of group A(P=0.002). Response thresholds of ASSR in each frequency in the three groups were all ranked from low to high as in group A, group B and group C, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Compared with each other between groups, response ASSR thresholds of group C was higher than those of group A(P=0.003) and group B(P=0.015) at 500 Hz, while response ASSR thresholds of group C was higher than group A at 1 000 Hz(P=0.010) and 2 000 Hz(P<0.001), and there was no statistical difference at 4 000 Hz. Conclusion:The incidence of hearing loss in GJB2 gene p.V37I mutation increased with age, and the degree of hearing loss increased, the hearing progression was mainly 500, 1 000 and 2 000 Hz suggesting regular follow-up and alert to hearing changes.
Humans
;
Connexin 26
;
Male
;
Female
;
Infant
;
Child, Preschool
;
Mutation
;
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
;
Connexins/genetics*
;
Auditory Threshold
;
Hearing/genetics*
;
Hearing Loss/genetics*
2.The study of detection and etiology of delayed sensorineural hearing loss in children.
Yanling HU ; Zhongfang XIA ; Cong YAO
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(3):260-264
Objective:To investigate the detection of the age and pathway and the etiology of sensorineural hearing loss in children, and to guide the early diagnosis. Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the children who passed neonatal hearing screening but were diagnosed with sensorineural hearing loss in our department from January 2019 to September 2022. The clinical characteristics of 66 children with complete medical history, audiology examination, imaging examination and genetic detection of hearing loss were studied. The age group, detection route and degree of hearing loss were analyzed statistically. Results:①The children were aged from 7 months to 12 years old, and most of them were over 3 years old. ②The ways of detection were as follows: 23 cases(34.85%) due to abnormal hearing, 21 cases(31.82%) due to poor language, 15 cases(22.73%) found during physical examination, and 7 cases(10.61%) found with otitis media. Physical examination findings were concentrated in children aged ≤1 year old or 3-6 years old. ③Among the 56 cases, the degree of binaural hearing loss ranged from mild to severe, and most of those within 3 years of age had severe or above hearing loss. There were statistically significant differences in the degree of hearing loss distribution among different detection approaches(P<0.001). Most children with hearing or language problems had moderate to severe or above hearing loss, and the proportion was significantly higher than that of children detected during physical examination or otitis media. ④There were 21 cases(31.82%) with a pathogenic mutation of GJB2 gene and 9 cases(13.64%) of large vestibular aqueduct syndrome, 7 of which were related to SLC26A4 gene mutation. There were 8 cases(12.12%) with high risk factors of hearing loss. There was 1 case(1.52%) with progressive speech loss after severe infection and high fever and 1 case(1.52%) with unilateral cochlear nerve dysplasia. Conclusion:Delayed hearing loss can occur at all ages and was not easy to be detected in time. The etiology was related to the mutation of deafness-related genes and the high risk factors of hearing loss. Combining hearing and gene screening in childhood, guiding parents to observe children's hearing response and language development, especially strengthening the follow-up of children with high risk factors for hearing loss, is conducive to the early diagnosis of delayed hearing loss.
Humans
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
Infant
;
Connexin 26
;
Male
;
Female
;
Connexins/genetics*
;
Mutation
;
Sulfate Transporters
;
Hearing Tests
3.The natural history of the relationship between OTOF mutation-related genotypes and audiological phenotypes.
Lei HAN ; Liheng CHEN ; Sha YU ; Yuxin CHEN ; Luoying JIANG ; Shuang HAN ; Jiake ZHONG ; Luo GUO ; Huawei LI ; Yilai SHU
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(4):379-385
Sensorineural hearing loss is one of the most common sensory disorders. In recent years, auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders caused by mutations in the OTOF gene have garnered significant attention worldwide, marking it as the first deafness gene with breakthroughs in gene therapy. Most patients with OTOF gene mutations present with stable, congenital, or prelingual onset of hearing loss, which can range from severe to profound and even complete hearing loss. However, a minority of patients may exhibit mild to moderate progressive hearing loss or temperature-sensitive hearing loss. This review further explores the genotype-phenotype relationship of the OTOF gene based on reported cases in China and abroad. Additionally, we analyze the characteristics of the natural history of OTOF gene mutations within the Chinese population. This study aims to provide a reference for the clinical diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hearing loss associated with OTOF gene mutations.
Humans
;
Mutation
;
Phenotype
;
Genotype
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics*
;
Membrane Proteins/genetics*
4.Phenotypic and pathogenic variant analysis of an X-linked dominant inherited non-syndromic hearing loss pedigree.
Ziyu ZHAI ; Hongen XU ; Le WANG ; Xiaodan ZHU ; Yuan ZHANG ; Ling LI ; Xiaosai ZHANG ; Tingxian LI ; Kaixi WANG ; Fanglei YE
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(6):570-577
Objective:X-linked non-syndromic hearing loss is an extremely rare type of hearing impairment. This study conducted a phenotypic and genetic analysis of a family with X-linked dominant inheritance to explore the causes of hearing loss. Methods:Clinical data were collected from a patient with non-syndromic hearing loss who visited the Otorhinolaryngology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University in June 2023. Phenotypic and genetic analyses were performed on family members, including audiometric tests, whole-exome sequencing, and PCR-Sanger sequencing verification. Audiological assessments comprised pure-tone audiometry, impedance audiometry, auditory brainstem response, and otoacoustic emission tests. Results:The affected individuals in this pedigree have X-linked dominant non-syndromic deafness caused by mutations in the SMPX gene. The proband, along with their mother and maternal grandmother, exhibit varying degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. Whole-exome sequencing revealed a novel pathogenic variant, NM_014332.3: c. 133-2A>C, in the SMPX gene in the proband. Sanger sequencing confirmed that the proband, proband's mother, and grandmother all carried this pathogenic variant. Conclusion:This study reports a novel pathogenic variant in the SMPX gene, providing additional medical evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of X-linked dominant inherited non-syndromic hearing loss. It enriches the mutation spectrum of the SMPX gene.
Humans
;
Pedigree
;
Mutation
;
Phenotype
;
Male
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics*
;
Exome Sequencing
;
Female
;
Adult
;
Hearing Loss/genetics*
;
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
;
Muscle Proteins
5.Analysis and clinical characteristics of SLC26A4 gene mutations in 72 cases of large vestibular aqueduct syndrome.
Yuqing LIU ; Wenyu XIONG ; Yu LU ; Lisong LIANG ; Kejie YANG ; Li LAN ; Wei HAN ; Qing YE ; Min WANG ; Yuan ZHANG ; Fangying TAO ; Zuwei CAO ; Wei HUANG ; Xue YANG
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(7):603-609
Objective:To explore the genetic and clinical characteristics of Guizhou patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct(EVA) syndrome through combined SLC26A4 variant analysis and clinical phenotype analysis. Methods:Seventy-two EVA patients underwent comprehensive genetic testing using a multiplex PCR-based deafness gene panel and next-generation sequencing(NGS). The audiological and temporal bone imaging characteristics were compared across mutation subtypes. Results:A total of 27 pathogenic loci of SLC26A4 were detected in 72 patients, including c.919-2A>G in 79.2%(57/72). A novel deletion(c.1703_1707+6del) was discovered. Among 65 cases, truncated mutations were 89.2%(58/65), 52.3%(34/65), 28(43.1%) and 7(10.8%). No significant differences were observed in the midpoint diameter of the vestibular aqueduct and the incidence of incomplete partitioning typeⅡ(IP-Ⅱ) of the cochlea among the three groups of patients. Moreover, there was no difference in the midpoint diameter of different vestibular pipes or the combination with IP-Ⅱ. Conclusion:The most common mutation site of SLC26A4 in EVA patients in Guizhou is c.919-2A>G, though genotype-phenotype correlations remain elusive. The detection of 27 mutation sites and the discovery of new mutation sites suggested the precise diagnostic significance of NGS technology in EVA patients in Guizhou.
Humans
;
Sulfate Transporters
;
Vestibular Aqueduct/abnormalities*
;
Mutation
;
Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics*
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics*
;
Male
;
Female
;
Child
;
Adolescent
;
Child, Preschool
;
Adult
;
Young Adult
;
Phenotype
;
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
6.Mechanisms of enhanced noise susceptibility in waardenburg syndrome Sox10 p.S100Rfs*9 mutant mice.
Yang XIAO ; Li LI ; Ken LIN ; Dong SU ; Yingqin GAO ; Jing MA ; Tiesong ZHANG
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(7):632-639
Objective:To investigate the impact of Waardenburg syndrome(WS) -associated Sox10 p.S100Rfs*9 mutation on inner ear function and its mechanism in noise-induced hearing impairment. Methods:A mice model carrying the Sox10 p.S100Rfs*9 mutation was established using CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology. Auditory phenotypes were assessed under baseline conditions and after noise exposure(96 dB SPL, 2 hours). Auditory brainstem response(ABR) tests were performed to evaluate hearing function, combined with immunofluorescence staining of cochlear basilar membrane whole-mounts to observe hair cells and ribbon synapses. Transcriptome sequencing was conducted to analyze molecular mechanisms. Results:Sox10 p.S100Rfs*9 heterozygous mice exhibited normal hearing thresholds with characteristic ventral pigmentation abnormalities under baseline conditions. Following noise exposure, mutant mice showed significantly higher ABR thresholds at 24 000 Hz compared to wild-type controls([60.00±6.12]vs[48.13±4.28]dB SPL, P<0.000 1), and a significant reduction in ribbon synapses(CtBP2-positive puncta) in the basal turn([55.0±2.3]vs[64.8±3.3]per inner hair cell, P=0.006 6), while hair cell morphology and number remained intact. Transcriptome analysis revealed altered expression of genes involved in immune regulation, membrane structures, ion channels, and neuroactive ligand-receptor interactions. Conclusion:The Sox10 p.S100Rfs*9 mutation does not alter baseline hearing function but significantly increases inner ear susceptibility to noise damage, primarily manifested as enhanced ribbon synapse vulnerability, especially in high-frequency regions. This gene-environment interaction reveals that Sox10 haploinsufficiency may compromise noise tolerance by affecting synaptic stability and inner ear protective mechanisms. These findings provide new perspectives on the phenotypic heterogeneity in WS patients and theoretical basis for individualized noise protection strategies for patients carrying SOX10 mutations.
Animals
;
SOXE Transcription Factors/genetics*
;
Waardenburg Syndrome/physiopathology*
;
Mice
;
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/genetics*
;
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
;
Mutation
;
Noise
;
Disease Models, Animal
;
Ear, Inner/physiopathology*
7.Prediction of hearing change in children with enlarged vestibular aqueduct with different genotypes by linear mixed-effects model.
Lin DENG ; Lihui HUANG ; Xiaohua CHENG ; Yiding YU ; Yue LI ; Shan GAO ; Yu RUAN ; Jinge XIE
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(8):717-723
Objective:To explore the hearing changes of children with different genotypes of SLC26A4 with enlarged vestibular aqueduct(EVA) using the linear mixed effect model(LMM), providing evidence for the risk prediction of progressive hearing loss. Methods:A total of 48 children with EVA diagnosed in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2024. All subjects underwent two or more auditory tests. According to the results of deafness gene screening and sequencing, the genotypes are divided into: type A: homozygous mutation of c. 919-2A>G, type B: compound heterozygous or heterozygous mutation containing c. 919-2A>G, and type C: no mutation site of c. 919-2A>G of SLC26A4 gene. LMM was used to analyze the hearing thresholds change of 500 Hz, 1 000 Hz, 2 000 Hz, 4 000 Hz and the average in children with different genotypes with age. Results:A total of 92 ears, 314 audiograms of 48 children were included, the median number of audiograms was 3, the median age of initial diagnosis was 4 months, and the median follow-up time was 13 months. According to LMM, the standard deviation of random effects between patients and ears was large. There was no significant difference in hearing thresholds of different frequencies and the average in genotype A, genotype B, and genotype C, indicating that genotype had no effect on hearing threshold. There is an interaction between age and genotype. Taking genotype C as the reference, children with genotype B had the lowest increase in 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, and the average hearing threshold, followed by type A. Conclusion:EVA children exhibit substantial inter-individual/ear hearing threshold variability. Low-frequency thresholds progress slower than high frequencies. Genotype modulates progression rates, with wild-type(Type C) demonstrating fastest deterioration, supporting personalized auditory monitoring strategies.
Humans
;
Vestibular Aqueduct/abnormalities*
;
Genotype
;
Sulfate Transporters
;
Mutation
;
Auditory Threshold
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics*
;
Male
;
Female
;
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
Hearing Loss/genetics*
;
Hearing Tests
;
Linear Models
;
Infant
8.The cochlear extracellular matrix gene mutations and hearing loss.
Qin WANG ; Yongyi YUAN ; Weiju HAN
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(8):781-788
The extracellular matrix(ECM)is a complex network structure composed of collagen,glycoproteins,and proteoglycans.It not only provides structural support and viscoelasticity to tissues but also participates in cell signaling,responding to environmental forces and signals to mediate tissue remodeling in response to environmental cues. Due to the intricate and precise functions of the inner ear,the perception and transmission of sound rely on the complex interactions between cochlear cell structures and the ECM. In the inner ear,the ECM not only constitutes key structures such as the basilar membranes(BM)and tectorial membranes(TM),which are essential for sound perception,but also regulates cell shape,adhesion,and migration.Certain ECM components interact with cell surface receptors to activate signaling pathways that regulate gene expression.Additionally,the ECM modulates the storage and diffusion of ions and secreted factors, creating concentration gradients.These functions are critical for inner ear development,repair,and function.Thus,the ECM plays a vital role in auditory processes,and abnormalities in ECM are a cause of certain hereditary hearing loss.This review primarily summarizes the ECM genes that lead to hearing loss.
Humans
;
Extracellular Matrix/genetics*
;
Hearing Loss/genetics*
;
Mutation
;
Cochlea
;
Extracellular Matrix Proteins/genetics*
9.Expert consensus on prognostic evaluation of cochlear implantation in hereditary hearing loss.
Xinyu SHI ; Xianbao CAO ; Renjie CHAI ; Suijun CHEN ; Juan FENG ; Ningyu FENG ; Xia GAO ; Lulu GUO ; Yuhe LIU ; Ling LU ; Lingyun MEI ; Xiaoyun QIAN ; Dongdong REN ; Haibo SHI ; Duoduo TAO ; Qin WANG ; Zhaoyan WANG ; Shuo WANG ; Wei WANG ; Ming XIA ; Hao XIONG ; Baicheng XU ; Kai XU ; Lei XU ; Hua YANG ; Jun YANG ; Pingli YANG ; Wei YUAN ; Dingjun ZHA ; Chunming ZHANG ; Hongzheng ZHANG ; Juan ZHANG ; Tianhong ZHANG ; Wenqi ZUO ; Wenyan LI ; Yongyi YUAN ; Jie ZHANG ; Yu ZHAO ; Fang ZHENG ; Yu SUN
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(9):798-808
Hearing loss is the most prevalent disabling disease. Cochlear implantation(CI) serves as the primary intervention for severe to profound hearing loss. This consensus systematically explores the value of genetic diagnosis in the pre-operative assessment and efficacy prognosis for CI. Drawing upon domestic and international research and clinical experience, it proposes an evidence-based medicine three-tiered prognostic classification system(Favorable, Marginal, Poor). The consensus focuses on common hereditary non-syndromic hearing loss(such as that caused by mutations in genes like GJB2, SLC26A4, OTOF, LOXHD1) and syndromic hereditary hearing loss(such as Jervell & Lange-Nielsen syndrome and Waardenburg syndrome), which are closely associated with congenital hearing loss, analyzing the impact of their pathological mechanisms on CI outcomes. The consensus provides recommendations based on multiple round of expert discussion and voting. It emphasizes that genetic diagnosis can optimize patient selection, predict prognosis, guide post-operative rehabilitation, offer stratified management strategies for patients with different genotypes, and advance the application of precision medicine in the field of CI.
Humans
;
Cochlear Implantation
;
Prognosis
;
Hearing Loss/surgery*
;
Consensus
;
Connexin 26
;
Mutation
;
Sulfate Transporters
;
Connexins/genetics*
10.Genetic counseling for hearing loss today.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2024;38(1):1-7
Genetic counseling for hearing loss today originated from decoding the genetic code of hereditary hearing loss, which serves as an effective strategy for preventing hearing loss and constitutes a crucial component of the diagnostic and therapeutic framework. This paper described the main principles and contents of genetic counseling for hearing loss, the key points of counseling across various genetic models and its application in tertiary prevention strategies targeting hearing impairment. The prospects of an AI-assisted genetic counseling decision system and the envisions of genetic counseling in preventing hereditary hearing loss were introduced. Genetic counseling for hearing loss today embodies the hallmark of a new era, which is inseparable from the advancements in science and technology, and will undoubtedly contribute to precise gene intervention!
Humans
;
Genetic Counseling
;
Deafness/genetics*
;
Hearing Loss/diagnosis*
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics*

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail