BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes is the most common type of diabetes in the Philippines. Diabetic foot complications represent a prevalent and significant chronic concern for individuals with type 2 diabetes. This poses an immediate community health concern, as diabetic complications may threaten an individual's well-being.

This study intends to cross-culturally adapt the Diabetic Foot Knowledge Subscale (DFKS) and Foot Self-Care Behavior Scale (FSCBS) questionnaires into the Filipino language as an assessment tool among Filipinos with diabetes.

The study employed a psychometric research design, where it entailed Phase A and Phase B. Phase A involved the forward translation of the DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires, followed by the synthesis of the translations and backward translation. Subsequently, an expert committee reviewed the translations and concluded the final version. The final translated versions of the questionnaires ensured that it can be understood by an individual who has a Grade 6 level of reading proficiency. Phase B entailed the validity testing with the evaluation of the expert committee, and reliability testing of the said questionnaires with a sample size of 30 participants. A wash-out period of 24 hours was given for the test-retest reliability, followed by data analysis. The validity and reliability of the questionnaires were measured using the item and scale content validity indices and the internal consistency and test-retest reliability, respectively, to ensure their accuracy and appropriateness. The content validity of the questionnaires was evaluated individually by the experts using a Likert scale from 1-4, with 4 being the highest meaning the item was very relevant and succinct. Scores per item were between 3 and 4, which indicate that the translated version of the items were relevant and succinct or were relevant but needed minor revisions.

The validity scores for the translated DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires were obtained using the Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI) with a score of 0.96 and 0.92, respectively. Moreover, all items in the questionnaires obtained an Item Content Validity Index (I-CVI) of 0.88-1.00. The DFKS also has an acceptable internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.72, while the FSCBS has a good internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85. The test-retest reliability shows an acceptable Spearman’s correlation at 0.76 for the DFKS and a strong positive Pearson correlation coefficient at 0.73 for the FSCBS.

The validity of the two questionnaires was acceptable and the test-retest reliability showed a strong positive correlation among the items thereby making the cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaires successful. The Filipino versions of the DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires accurately measure the knowledge and behavior of individuals with type 2 diabetes, respectively.

BACKGROUND

Scabies is a highly contagious neglected tropical disease and a persistent challenge globally, particularly in regions like the Philippines, where it remains endemic. With conventional treatments facing limitations such as resistance and adverse effects, exploring the potential of traditional medicinal plants offers a promising avenue for novel therapeutics. However, evidence of their comparative efficacy and safety is still lacking.

To determine the efficacy and safety of Gliricidia sepium (kakawati), Senna alata (akapulko), and Tinospora rumphii (makabuhay) compared to topical scabicides or placebo in the treatment of Filipino patients with scabies using a systematic review. 

We searched the following databases from inception to March 2024: MEDLINE via PubMed, CENTRAL, EMBASE, EBSCO, HERDIN, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO-ICRTP, and PHRR. We included all randomized controlled trials involving Filipino patients diagnosed with scabies where preparations containing one of three plants (G. sepium, S. alata, or T. rumphii) were compared with a topical scabicide or placebo for treatment. Two review authors independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed risk of bias (using Risk of Bias 2.0), and extracted data from the included studies. Primary outcomes were complete clearance of skin lesions, reduction of pruritus, and the presence of serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were recurrence, any adverse events, adverse events requiring withdrawal, and patientreported outcomes. We used RevMan 5.4 to pool dichotomous outcomes using risk ratios and continuous outcomes using mean difference and applied random-effects meta-analysis. We tested for statistical heterogeneity using both the Chi2 test and the I2 statistic. We presented the results using forest plots with 95% confidence intervals. We intended to conduct a funnel plot analysis to check for reporting bias but were unable to because of the limited number of studies. Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach, and a Summary of Findings table was created using GRADEpro GDT for the primary outcomes.

We included nine RCTs (N=607 participants) that compared various dosage forms (ointments, lotions, poultice, soap, aqueous extract) containing one of the three plants (G. sepium, three studies; S. alata, two studies; T. rumphii, four studies) versus placebo or existing topical scabicides (permethrin, sulfur, crotamiton). Pooled analyses showed that there is probably no difference in complete clearance of lesions between G. sepium and 5% sulfur (RR 0.92 [0.79, 1.07], 2 RCTs, N=85, moderate certainty of evidence). We are uncertain about the difference in complete clearance of lesions between S. alata lotion and placebo (RR 4.94 [1.67, 14.62], 2 RCTs, N=157, very low certainty of evidence), T. rumphii and crotamiton (RR 1.02 [0.76, 1.37], 2 RCTs, N=131, very low certainty of evidence), and T. rumphii lotion and placebo (RR 5.28 [0.76, 36.43], 2 RCTs, N=71, very low certainty of evidence). Data could not be pooled for reduction in pruritus scores due to limited studies for each intervention. No serious adverse events were reported across all studies.

Gliricidia sepium (kakawati) is probably as effective and safe as 5% sulfur in the management of patients with scabies and may be a promising alternative herbal treatment. Future RCTs should compare it with scabicides recommended by the Philippine Department of Health and World Health Organization, such as permethrin, benzyl benzoate or oral ivermectin. T. rumphii and S. alata may also be investigated using RCTs that should be adequately powered and with good methodologic quality.

Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are acknowledged as key drivers in realizing health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The University of the Philippines Manila, College of Public Health (UP CPH) together with the Asia-Pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health (APACPH), hosted the 53rd APACPH International Conference last 21-23 September 2022. The conference discussed current issues relating to the attainment of SDGs and promoted collaboration of leading academic institutions and other stakeholders in addressing various public health challenges. The conference revolved around the challenges and opportunities in attaining health-related SDGs, and the good practices and roles of HEIs in addressing health disparities. The lack of certificati on framework of public health tertiary programs, pedagogy and infrastructure, and ambiguous roles and network of public health professionals were discussed. The conference served as a platform for discussing potential resolutions and ways forward in addressing these challenges. Opportunities for improvement such as updating of policies and curricula, strengthening of internship and community engagement programs, establishment of capacity-building partnerships and programs, and developing multidisciplinary-competent faculty and students were identified. This paper providesthe highlights of the conference focusing on the good practices and roles of HEIs in addressing health disparities, the impact of COVID-19 pandemic, and other issues and challenges in attaining SDGs.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The Philippine Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases implemented health protocol guidelines to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission. Individuals with comorbidities were advised to take precautionary measures due to their increased vulnerability. This study aimed to assess the relationship between knowledge, acceptance, and adherence to health protocols among fully vaccinated individuals with comorbidities in the National Capital Region, Philippines.

The study employed an explanatory-sequential mixed-method design. The quantitative phase involved an online survey with 384 respondents. The survey included questions on socio-demographic profile, COVID-19 knowledge, acceptability of health protocols, and adherence to preventive practices. Chi-square Test of Independence and Pearson’s Correlation Test were used to analyze the data. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 participants, providing rich insights into their personal experiences. The interview transcripts were analyzed using Colaizzi’s descriptive method with the aid of qualitative analysis software (MAXQDA), ensuring a rigorous approach to thematic analysis. The integration of the two phases was achieved by connecting quantitative results with qualitative insights, creating a comprehensive understanding of the phenomena under study.

Findings showed that the relationship of sociodemographic characteristics and level of knowledge (Gender pCONCLUSION

The study suggests that multiple factors contribute to non-adherence to health protocols. Recognizing these holes and weaknesses in the COVID-19 pandemic response stresses the need for national leaders to place urgency on properly implementing preventive measures and providing health education to the masses during public health situations. Collaboration from all sectors is crucial in addressing public health crises. This study can be a valuable resource for future researchers, local government units, and policymakers in prioritizing public health care and pandemic preparedness.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Medication errors pose substantial risks in hospitals, particularly concerning patient safety. These errors, occurring throughout the medication use process, are one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in clinical practice. In the Philippines, there is a lack of evidence on the prevalence and effects of medication errors, emphasizing the need for further investigation. This study evaluated the prescribing, transcribing, and monitoring errors among inpatients under the Pulmonary Medicine Service of the Department of Medicine in the Philippine General Hospital.

This cross-sectional retrospective records review used the total population purposive sampling technique to examine eligible charts of inpatients with asthma and/or COPD from August 1 to December 31, 2022. The frequency, type, and severity of medication errors were determined. Linear regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationship between patient-related factors and medication errors, and length of hospital stay and mortality.

Fifty (50) out of 226 medical records were processed and analyzed. Included patients were predominantly older male adults. More than two-thirds of the patients were diagnosed with COPD while approximately one-fourth suffered from asthma. All patients were practicing polypharmacy and the vast majority presented with comorbidities. A total of 6,517 medication errors, predominantly prescribing errors (99.1%), were identified. Despite the high prevalence of medication errors, the majority were classified as “error, no harm” (98.8%), while only 1.17% were deemed as “error, harm.” As the frequency of prescribing errors increases in the power of three (rough approximation of e), from 1 to 3 to 9 to 27, etc., the expected hospital stay increases by 2.078 days (pCONCLUSION

All eligible patient charts had at least one medication error, with the majority being prescribing errors. Among the variables, prescribing errors significantly affected the length of stay, while severity of transcribing errors had a marginally significant effect. It is essential to develop comprehensive education and training initiatives and adopt a systematic approach to mitigate medication errors and promote patient safety.

Pathology ; Pathologists ; Public Health

BACKGROUND

Ahigh-quality measurement tool is essential to accurately assess the innovative teaching strategies in health professions education. The Blended Teaching Assessment Tool (BTAT) aims to evaluate quality blended teaching or instructional delivery in Philippine health science programs. However, there is a lack of studies examining students' cognitive processes to support the validity of questionnaires.

Cognitive interviewing (CI) was employed to determine whether students interpreted and responded to the items correctly. Content analysis was done using Tourangeau's Cognitive framework. Four CIs were conducted by an expert moderator and note-taker with a total of 8 health science students (2 groups with 3 members, and 2 one-on-one interview) for around 1 to 2 hours via Zoom following a retroactive approach with verbal and spontaneous probing, guided by a semi-structured interview questionnaire.

Various issues related to comprehension, retrieval, judgment, and response were identified, leading to significant revisions of the tool from 82 items across 8 dimensions to 53 items across 5 dimensions. The challenges included unfamiliar terminology, ambiguous phrasing, complex statements, inconsistencies and irrelevance to students' real-life experiences. These findings emphasize the importance of students' feedback in enhancing the validity and reliability of assessment tools.

The Cognitive Interview identified crucial issues in comprehension, retrieval, judgment, and response, making it essential for developing the Blended Teaching Assessment Tool and ensuring valid responses on the quality of blended teaching and learning delivery.

OBJECTIVES

Workers are continuously exposed to occupational hazards and risks. By analyzing recent data on the status of occupational safety and health (OSH) in the Philippines, this study aimed to determine the common occupational injuries and diseases among Filipino workers, and preventive and control measures/activities and occupational safety and health policies and programs implemented across the country.

A review of data on Philippine OSH from the Integrated Survey of Labor and Employment (ISLE) by the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) covering data from 2015/2016, 2017/2018, and 2019/2020 was done. The number of occupational injury cases, types of injuries, and types of diseases were assessed as well as the implementation of OSH policies and programs. Descriptive statistics, simple T-test, and Pareto analysis were used to analyze the collated data sets.

The number of occupational injury and diseases in the Philippines across industries are decreasing. Superficial injuries and open wounds (56.47%), and Work-related Musculoskeletal Diseases (WMSDs) (61.82%) top the list as the most common injury and disease across industries, respectively. In 2018, OSH programs and preventive and control measures underwent reforms due to the implementation of the Republic Act (RA) 11058. For OSH programs, there is an increase in implementation between 2015 and 2019.

Occupational injury and occupational diseases in the Philippines across industries are declining. In terms of OSH measures and programs, there has been a significant change over the years, especially after the introduction of RA 11058 in 2018. A rise in the implementation of measures and policies was noted. However, there are still gaps that need to be addressed.

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted global health, especially among older adults at higher risk for severe illness. Despite the benefits of vaccination, booster vaccine hesitancy posed a barrier to optimal protection in the elderly population.

This study aimed to identify factors associated with COVID-19 booster vaccine hesitancy among geriatric patients at the Family Medicine Outpatient Clinic of Region 1 Medical Center.

An analytic, cross-sectional study was conducted with 183 geriatric patients aged 60 and above who had received the primary COVID-19 vaccine series. Data were collected using a 25-item questionnaire addressing sociodemographic information, medical history, COVID-19 knowledge, and vaccine attitudes. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests and logistic regression, identified factors influencing booster vaccine hesitancy.

The majority of participants were between the ages of 60-69 (66.7%, n=122) and predominantly female (69.4%, n=127). High hesitancy rates were notably observed among elderly females (75.6%), individuals with lower educational attainment (79.7%), and single individuals (93.3%). Other significant factors included hypertension (76.5%) and the absence of prior influenza (81.5%) or pneumococcal (75.9%) vaccinations.

These findings highlight the critical need for targeted educational efforts to mitigate COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy within specific subgroups, particularly elderly females, those with lower education levels, and individuals with certain health conditions. By implementing personalized outreach and emphasizing the advantages of vaccination, stakeholders can enhance vaccine uptake and improve health outcomes for this vulnerable segment of the population.

Human ; Health Occupations ; Education ; Philippines