OBJECTIVE: To summarize the research progress of rodent models of secondary lymphedema (SL) and provide a reference for selecting appropriate animal models in SL research. METHODS: Recent literature on rodent SL models at home and abroad was comprehensively analyzed, summarizing model categories, development techniques, strengths, and weaknesses. RESULTS: Current research primarily utilizes rats and mice to establish SL models. The main model types include hind limb, forelimb, tail, and head/neck models. The hind limb model is the most frequently employed, typically requiring surgery combined with irradiation to induce stable chronic edema. Forelimb models primarily simulate upper limb lymphedema, but exhibit relatively rapid edema resolution. Tail models offer operational simplicity and are predominantly used for studying acute edema mechanisms and interventions; however, they demonstrate poor clinical relevance. Emerging head/neck models provide a valuable tool for investigating head and neck cancer-associated lymphedema. These models exhibit variations in lymphedema duration, degree of fibrosis, and edema incidences. CONCLUSION Existing models still fall short in faithfully replicating the chronicity, fibrosis, fat deposition, and complex microenvironment characteristic of human chronic lymphedema. Future research must integrate multidisciplinary approaches, optimize model construction strategies, and explore novel modeling approaches to more accurately mimic the human disease and advance SL prevention and treatment research.
Lymphedema/pathology* ; Animals ; Disease Models, Animal ; Rats ; Mice ; Humans ; Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications* ; Rodentia

High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers consist of cervical cancer, anal cancer, penile cancer, vulvar cancer, vaginal cancer, and head and neck cancer (HNC). Of these, the disease burden of HNC is second only to cervical cancer. HNC mostly originates from malignant lesions of squamous epithelial cells and mainly includes oral cavity cancer, pharyngeal cancer (including nasopharyngeal cancer, oropharyngeal cancer, and hypopharyngeal cancer), and laryngeal cancer. Tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and HPV infection are three primary risk factors. Recently, there is an upward trend of HNC incidence globally, especially in high-income countries. In China, the disease burden and trends of HPV-related HNC are still not clear. A few small sample size and single-center studies suggest a high HPV prevalence and increasing trend in HNC. Methodological differences in HPV testing and regional variabilities still exist among these studies. Among the anatomic sites, oropharyngeal cancer has been shown to be caused by HPV infection, but the association of HPV with other sites is still under debate. In addition, there is a paucity of relevant studies. Here, this review narrates the association between HPV infection and HNC, compares the differences between global and Chinese studies, and then explores the importance of HPV infection in various anatomical sites. The main objective is to highlight the research on HPV-related HNC and promote relevant prevention and treatment programs.
Female ; Humans ; Human Papillomavirus Viruses ; Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control* ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/complications* ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/complications* ; Head and Neck Neoplasms/epidemiology* ; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology* ; Papillomaviridae

OBJECTIVE: To discover the factors that may affect the use of selective tracheostomy among patients who have undergone head and neck surgeries with free flap reconstruction, so that the patients will not need tracheostomy nor receive the unnecessary treatment. METHODS: Five hundred and thirty-three patients who had undergone head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction operated by the same team of surgery at Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Peking University School of Stomatology from 2015 to 2016 were reviewed. Three hundred and twenty-one (60.2%) of these patients underwent selective tracheostomy. All the patients' demographic information, operation-related information, prior treatments, comorbidities and complications were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The patients with defects of the tongue, mouth floor, oropharynx and bilateral mandible, who underwent neck dissection and with previous radiotherapy and smoking habit were more likely to get selective tracheostomy. Usage of bulky soft tissue flap might also add to the risk of airway obstruction and the need of selective tracheostomy, while other factors were not significantly related to the risk of postoperative airway obstruction and the patients could be kept safe without selective tracheostomy. Most cases without tracheostomy were kept safe except one case, while 8.39% of the patients with tracheostomy suffered from tracheostomy related complications, mainly pneumonia and hemorrhage of the tracheostomy wound, yet none led to serious consequences or even death. CONCLUSION Selective tracheostomy is not necessary for patients who have undergone head and neck surgeries with free flap reconstruction except that there are defects at the tongue, oropharynx and mandible. Neck dissection, bulky soft tissue flap reconstruction, previous radiotherapy and smoking habit may also add to the risk of postoperative airway obstruction, while a favorable decision would involve a combination of all the above factors to assure the safety of the postoperative airway for the patients undergone head and neck surgeries with free flap reconstruction.
Airway Obstruction/surgery* ; Free Tissue Flaps ; Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery* ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications/surgery* ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects* ; Retrospective Studies ; Tracheostomy

Objective: To evaluate the indications, safety, feasibility, and surgical technique for patients with head and neck cancers undergoing transoral robotic retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLN) dissection. Methods: The current study enrolled 12 consecutive head and neck cancer patients (seven males and four females) who underwent transoral robotic RPLN dissection with the da Vinci surgical robotic system at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from May 2019 to July 2020. Seven patients were diagnosed as nasopharyngeal carcinoma with RPLN metastasis after initial treatments, 4 patients were diagnosed as thyroid carcinoma with RPLN metastasis after initial treatments, and one patient was diagnosed as oropharyngeal carcinoma with RPLN metastasis before initial treatments. The operation procedure and duration time, intraoperative blood loss volume and complications, nasogastric feeding tube dependence, tracheostomy dependence, postoperative complications, and hospitalization time were recorded and analyzed. Results: All patients were successfully treated by transoral robotic dissection of the metastatic RPLNs, none of which was converted to open surgery. RPLNs were completely resected in 10 patients, and partly resected in 2 patients (both were nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients). The mean number of RPLN dissected was 1.7. The operation duration time and intraoperative blood loss volume were (191.3±101.1) min and (150.0±86.6) ml, respectively. There was no severe intraoperative complication such as massive haemorrhage or adjacent organ injury during surgery. Nasogastric tube use was required in all patients with (17.1±10.6) days of dependence, while tracheotomy was performed in 8 patients with (11.6±10.7) days of dependence. The postoperative hospitalization stay was (8.5±5.7) days. Postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients, including 2 of retropharyngeal incision and 2 of dysphagia. During a follow-up of (6.5±5.1) months, disease-free progression was observed in all patients, 10 patients were disease-free survival and other 2 patients were survival with tumor burden. Conclusions: The transoral robotic RPLN dissection is safety and feasible. Compared with the traditional open surgical approach, it is less traumatic and safer, has fewer complications and good clinical application potentiality. The indications for transoral robotic RPLN dissection include thyroid carcinoma, oropharyngeal carcinoma, and some selected nasopharyngeal carcinoma and other head and neck cancers. Metastatic RPLNs from some nasopharyngeal carcinoma with incomplete capsule, unclear border and adhesion to the surrounding vessels are not suitable for transoral robotic RPLN dissection.
Blood Loss, Surgical ; Female ; Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology* ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision/methods* ; Lymph Nodes/pathology* ; Male ; Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/pathology* ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Neck Dissection/methods* ; Postoperative Complications/surgery* ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology*

Objective: To explore the therapeutic effects of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and traditional surgical modes in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Methods: The clinicopathological data of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2010 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. 135 cases were treated with traditional surgery (non-TORS group), while 52 cases were treated with TORS (TORS group). The prognosis of the two groups of patients were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and Log rank test, the influencing factors were analyzed by Cox regression model. Results: The 2-year overall survival (OS, 94.2%) and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS, 93.8%) of patients in the TORS group were better than those in the non-TORS group (71.4% and 71.4%, respectively, P<0.05). The 2-year OS (93.3%) and 2-year PFS (92.8%) of TORS group patients in T1-2 stage were better than those of non-TORS group (73.1% and 72.8%, respectively, P<0.05). The 2-year OS (95.8%) and 2-year PFS (95.2%) of patients with stage Ⅰ to Ⅱ in the TORS group were not significantly different from those in the non-TORS group (84.1% and 83.9%, respectively, P>0.05). The 2-year OS (92.9%) and 2-year PFS rate (92.7%) of patients with stage Ⅲ to Ⅳ in the TORS group were better than those in the non-TORS group (64.7% and 63.9%, respectively, P<0.05). The 2-year OS (94.4%) of HPV-positive patients in the TORS group was not significantly different from that in the non-TORS group (83.3%, P=0.222). The 2-year OS of HPV-negative patients in the TORS group (94.1%) was significantly different from that in the non-TORS group (43.7%, P<0.001). HPV status was an independent prognostic factor (P=0.008). Conclusions: TORS has a better prognosis in the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma compared with the traditional treatment methods. The patients with T1-T2 can achieve better survival benefits after TORS treatment. The HPV-positive OPSCC patients has a better prognosis than that of HPV-negative OPSCC patients, and regardless of HPV status, OPSCC patients in the TORS group could obtain a better survival prognosis.
Head and Neck Neoplasms ; Humans ; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Papillomavirus Infections/complications* ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/surgery*

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the clinical management of hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HSCC). Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 168 patients with pyriform sinus carcinoma in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2015 to January 2019 were divided into two groups, based on the different perioperative interventions that patients received, i.e. the ERAS group (n=64) and the conventional group (n=104), including 164 males and 4 females, whose ages ranged from 42 to 84 years old. The difference between two groups in the operative time, postoperative nutritional status, incidences of postoperative complications and postoperative hospitalization time were compared using the student's t test, Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Results: Compared with the conventional group, patients in the ERAS group had significantly shorter operative time [(166.8±58.2) min vs. (183.3±39.9) min,t=-2.72, P=0.031], higher levels of postoperative serum albumin [(38.3±4.2) μmol/L vs. (36.6±3.3) μmol/L, t=2.73, P=0.007] and more body weight [(65.4±9.4) kg vs. (62.1±9.4) kg, t=2.22, P=0.028], lower incidences of postoperative subcutaneous infection [7.8% (5/64) vs. 20.2% (21/104), χ²=4.64, P=0.03] and severe pneumonia [4.7% (3/64) vs. 15.4% (16/104), χ²=4.52, P=0.03], and shorter postoperative hospitalization time [(16.5±3.9) d vs. (18.2±4.3) d, t=-2.65, P<0.05]. Conclusion: ERAS is effective and safe in the surgical management of HSCC, with benefits in reducing the operative stress via saving operation time, shortening the hospitalization time, ameliorating nutritional status and decreasing the incidences of complications.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ; Female ; Head and Neck Neoplasms ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol incorporates up-to-date perioperative care principles; the primary aim in using an ERAS protocol is to reduce issues that delay the recovery and cause the complications. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes associated with head and neck cancer surgery with free-flap reconstruction before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol. METHODS: Outcomes were analyzed by dividing patients into 2 groups: 29 patients in the non-ERAS group and 60 patients in the ERAS group. The ERAS group performed a prospective observational cohort study of patients who underwent a head and neck cancer surgery with free-flap reconstruction in Ajou University Hospital from August 2015 to December 2017. The non-ERAS group retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had undergone the same surgery from August 2012 to July 2015. RESULTS: Demographics, comorbidities, hospital length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, starting time of rehabilitation, and postoperative periods before radiotherapy for the non-ERAS and ERAS groups were compared. Hospital LOS was significantly lower for patients whose care followed the ERAS protocol than for patients in the non-ERAS group (30.87 ± 20.72 days vs. 59.66 ± 40.43 days, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In this study, hospital LOS was reduced through fast recovery after the implementation of the ERAS protocol. Therefore, the ERAS protocol appeared feasible and safe in head and neck cancer surgery with free-flap reconstruction.
Cohort Studies ; Comorbidity ; Demography ; Free Tissue Flaps ; Head and Neck Neoplasms ; Head ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Medical Records ; Perioperative Care ; Postoperative Care ; Postoperative Complications ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Rehabilitation ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVES: Length of in-hospital stay (LOS) is often regarded as a surrogate marker of efficiency in medical care. A shorter stay can redistribute medical resources to more patients if patient outcomes would not be worsened. However, the adequate LOS remains largely understudied for a complex head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery and free flap reconstruction. METHODS: Active management of LOS (14-day LOS program) included detailed preoperative surgical planning, intensive wound care, postoperative early ambulation and positive psychological encouragement. It was applied to 43 patients undergoing HNC surgery and free flap reconstruction. Outcomes such as noninferior oncological results, rates of timely adjuvant treatments and complications were compared with those of 125 patients without active management of LOS. In addition, the medical costs of shortened LOS were compared with those of the control group. Cases undergoing HNC surgery as a salvage treatment were excluded from both groups for analyses. RESULTS: Active management of LOS resulted in less in-hospital period compared to the control group (15.0 vs. 21.0 days, P=0.001), and reduced medical costs significantly. Incidence of postoperative complications was comparable between the two groups. Oncological outcomes did not differ significantly according to LOS. In all patients in both groups, initial high T status (T3–4) and occurrence of postoperative complications were independent risk factors for long LOS (>30 days). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing HNC surgery with free flap reconstruction as an initial treatment, a 14-day LOS could be safe in terms of comparable oncological outcomes and postoperative complications. To achieve this goal safely, careful management for T3–4 tumors and prevention of postoperative complications seem to be necessary.
Biomarkers ; Early Ambulation ; Free Tissue Flaps ; Head and Neck Neoplasms ; Head ; Humans ; Incidence ; Length of Stay ; National Health Programs ; Postoperative Care ; Postoperative Complications ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Risk Factors ; Salvage Therapy ; Wounds and Injuries

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a major complication after radical neck dissection (RND) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). We investigated the incidence, risk factors, and etiology of SSI among patients who underwent RND. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on HNC patients, excluding those with thyroid cancer, who underwent first RND at a teaching hospital between January 2006 and June 2010. Medical records were collected and analyzed to evaluate the risk factors and microbiological etiologies. RESULTS: A total of 370 patients underwent first RND. The overall incidence of SSI was 19.7% (73/370). Multivariate analysis showed that male sex (odds ratio [OR], 4.281; p = 0.004), cardiovascular diseases (OR, 1.941; p = 0.020), large amount of blood loss during surgery (OR, 4.213; p = 0.001), and surgery lasting longer than 6 hours (OR, 4.213; p = 0.002) were significantly associated with SSI. The most common causative pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (32.6%), and 93.2% of S. aureus isolates were methicillin-resistant. Klebsiella pneumoniae (13/92, 14.1%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11/92, 12.0%), and Enterococcus species (11/92, 12.0%) were also frequently detected. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, we predict that certain groups of patients are at high risk for SSIs after major HNC surgery. Preventive measures or close monitoring in these patients may be required to reduce the likelihood of postoperative SSIs. Furthermore, even though additional research is required, we would consider changing the prophylactic antibiotic regimens according to the causative organisms.
Aged ; Bacteriological Techniques ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Cardiovascular Diseases/complications ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Female ; Head and Neck Neoplasms/*surgery ; Humans ; Incidence ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medical Records ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neck Dissection/*adverse effects ; Odds Ratio ; Operative Time ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sex Factors ; Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis/epidemiology/*microbiology ; Treatment Outcome

Primary cutaneous mucinous carcinoma (PCMC) is a rare low-grade malignant neoplasm derived from the eccrine glands. PCMC most commonly arises in the head and neck, with the eyelid being the most common site of origin. This case report describes a 51-year-old male with a painless, pigmented superficial nodular lesion over his right lower eyelid. The lesion was considered to be benign, and the initial treatment was simple excision with a 3-mm margin. However, histologic examination revealed the diagnosis of PCMC, and the patient underwent re-excision of the tumor site with an additional 3-mm margin from the initial scar. Histologic study of this second margin was free of any malignant cells. The patient experienced no postoperative complication or recurrence after 2 years. In our case, the skin lesion had benign morphologic findings and was strongly suspected to be a benign mass. Physicians should be aware of this tumor and be able to differentiate it from benign cystic or solid eyelid lesions.
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous* ; Cicatrix ; Diagnosis ; Eccrine Glands ; Eyelids* ; Head ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mucins* ; Neck ; Postoperative Complications ; Recurrence ; Skin ; Skin Neoplasms