1.3D planar guide plate combined with bundle diameter technology for extracorporeal pre-fenestration in the treatment of complex thoracoabdominal aortic diseases
Jinlong ZHANG ; Chengkai SU ; Haoyue HUANG ; Yihuan CHEN ; Haofan SHI ; Lei ZHENG ; Zhenya SHEN
Journal of Interventional Radiology 2025;34(12):1311-1315
Objective To summarize the clinical experience of using 3D planar guide plate combined with bundle diameter technology for extracorporeal pre-fenestration in treating complex thoracoabdominal aortic diseases.Methods The clinical data of 31 patients with complex thoracoabdominal aortic diseases,who were treated with 3D planar guide plate combined with bundle diameter technology of extracorporeal pre-fenestration at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University of China from January 2017 to February 2024,were retrospectively analyzed.The patients' preoperative thin-layer chest and abdominal vascular CTA data were imported into specialized software and to create a 3D planar guide plate.Under the guidance of 3D planar guide plate technology,precise extracorporeal pre-fenestration of aortic covered stent was performed,and combined with bundle diameter technology the endovascular repair of complex thoracoabdominal aortic disease was accomplished.Results Successful operation was accomplished in all patients,and two patients had failed visceral artery reconstruction surgery.The median follow-up time was 55 months,with a technical success rate of 97.6%.The postoperative follow-up blood flow patency rate was 100%,and the phase Ⅰ patency rate of branch arteries was 98%.Three patients experienced internal leakage after surgery,and none of them developed paraplegia or died during the perioperative period.Conclusion In treating complex thoracoabdominal aortic diseases,the use of 3D planar guide plate combined with bundle diameter technology of extracorporeal pre-fenestration is simple,safe and effective,with good short-term therapeutic effect,although its long-term efficacy need to be further investigated.
2.Safety analysis of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019
Jin'e PENG ; Hui LIU ; Xiao LI ; Lijun WANG ; Shuo WANG ; Haofan SU ; Hanqiu ZHAN ; Wei ZHANG
Adverse Drug Reactions Journal 2023;25(1):11-16
Objective:To explore the safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Methods:Medical records of adult patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalized and treated with Paxlovid in Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University between March 23 and May 31, 2022 were collected through the hospital electronic medical record system. The occurrence (time of occurrence, clinical manifestations, severity, etc.) and outcomes of adverse reactions were analyzed retrospectively and the clinical characteristics of patients with or without adverse reactions were compared. Paxlovid was administered orally with nirmatrelvir 300 mg and ritonavir 100 mg every 12 hours for 5 consecutive days.Results:Three hundred and sixty-four patients were entered in the analysis, including 200 males (54.9%) and 164 females (45.1%), with a median age of 60 (19, 92) years. The incidence of adverse reactions of Paxlovid was 13.2% (48/364), and the adverse reactions occurred 1 to 7 days after taking Paxlovid. Among the 48 patients, 37 patients had digestive system symptoms (mainly manifested as diarrhea in 17 patients, bitter mouth in 14 patients, etc.), 7 patients had nervous system symptoms (dizziness in 5 patients, headache in 2 patients), 4 patients had respiratory system symptoms (pharyngalgia in 3 patients, pharyngeal itching in 1 patient), 2 patients had kidney injury, 1 patient had elevated blood uric acid, 1 patient had myalgia, and 1 patient had rash. Of them, 2 patients had digestive and neurological symptoms at the same time, 1 patient had digestive and respiratory symptoms at the same time, and 1 patient had digestive, neurological, and respiratory symptoms at the same time. The severity of adverse reactions was grade 1 in 33 patients (68.8%) and grade 2 in 15 patients (31.2%), and no serious adverse reactions of grade 3 and above occurred. All patients completed 5 days of treatment except 1 patient who discontinued the drug because of intolerance to grade 2 digestive symptoms (nausea and bitter mouth). There were no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index, smoking status, underlying diseases, and COVID-19 clinical classification between the patients with and without adverse reactions (all P>0.05). Conclusions:Paxlovid has a good safety in the treatment of COVID-19. The main adverse reaction is digestive system symptoms, mainly diarrhea and bitter mouth. Most of the symptoms are mild and the patient′s tolerance is good.
3.Safety analysis of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019
Jin'e PENG ; Hui LIU ; Xiao LI ; Lijun WANG ; Shuo WANG ; Haofan SU ; Hanqiu ZHAN ; Wei ZHANG
Adverse Drug Reactions Journal 2023;25(1):11-16
Objective:To explore the safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Methods:Medical records of adult patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalized and treated with Paxlovid in Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University between March 23 and May 31, 2022 were collected through the hospital electronic medical record system. The occurrence (time of occurrence, clinical manifestations, severity, etc.) and outcomes of adverse reactions were analyzed retrospectively and the clinical characteristics of patients with or without adverse reactions were compared. Paxlovid was administered orally with nirmatrelvir 300 mg and ritonavir 100 mg every 12 hours for 5 consecutive days.Results:Three hundred and sixty-four patients were entered in the analysis, including 200 males (54.9%) and 164 females (45.1%), with a median age of 60 (19, 92) years. The incidence of adverse reactions of Paxlovid was 13.2% (48/364), and the adverse reactions occurred 1 to 7 days after taking Paxlovid. Among the 48 patients, 37 patients had digestive system symptoms (mainly manifested as diarrhea in 17 patients, bitter mouth in 14 patients, etc.), 7 patients had nervous system symptoms (dizziness in 5 patients, headache in 2 patients), 4 patients had respiratory system symptoms (pharyngalgia in 3 patients, pharyngeal itching in 1 patient), 2 patients had kidney injury, 1 patient had elevated blood uric acid, 1 patient had myalgia, and 1 patient had rash. Of them, 2 patients had digestive and neurological symptoms at the same time, 1 patient had digestive and respiratory symptoms at the same time, and 1 patient had digestive, neurological, and respiratory symptoms at the same time. The severity of adverse reactions was grade 1 in 33 patients (68.8%) and grade 2 in 15 patients (31.2%), and no serious adverse reactions of grade 3 and above occurred. All patients completed 5 days of treatment except 1 patient who discontinued the drug because of intolerance to grade 2 digestive symptoms (nausea and bitter mouth). There were no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index, smoking status, underlying diseases, and COVID-19 clinical classification between the patients with and without adverse reactions (all P>0.05). Conclusions:Paxlovid has a good safety in the treatment of COVID-19. The main adverse reaction is digestive system symptoms, mainly diarrhea and bitter mouth. Most of the symptoms are mild and the patient′s tolerance is good.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail