Objectives:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of single-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion(LLIF)combined with unilateral pedicle screw(UPS)versus bilateral pedicle screw(BPS)fixation in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease(LDD).Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 65 patients with LDD who underwent single-level LLIF between January 2019 and December 2021.14 patients received UPS fixation(UPS group)and 51 received BPS fixation(BPS group).The operative time,hospitalization cost,and imaging parameters including disc height(DH),foraminal height(FH),lumbar lordosis(LL),segmental lordosis(SL),axial central canal cross-sectional area(CCA),midsagittal canal diameter(CD),ligamentum flavum area(LFA),and ligamentum flavum thickness(LFT),as well as fusion rate,complication rate,and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.Results:The UPS group was shorter in operative time(80.64±10.87min vs 131.57±11.37min)and lower in hospitalization cost(86463.14±1889.54 yuan vs 101213.06±4512.54 yuan)compared with the BPS group(P＜0.05).Both groups showed significant improvements in DH,FH,SL,CD,and CCA after operation,with no significant differences between groups(P＞0.05).The immediate postoperative thickness of the right ligamentum flavum was significantly lower in the UPS group(2.28±0.71mm vs 2.67±0.49mm,P=0.019).The fusion rates were 85.7％in the UPS group and 94.1％in the BPS group,with no statistically significant difference(P=0.292).There was no significant difference in complication rates between the two groups(28.6％vs 23.5％,P=0.733).Conclusions:Single-level LLIF combined with UPS fixation for treating LDD provides comparable imaging improvements,clinical outcomes,and complications control to BPS fixation,while offering the advantages of reduced operative time and lower hospitalization costs,supporting its clinical feasibility.

Objective:To analyze the efficacy of phantom-less quantitative computer tomography (PL-QCT) for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases.Methods:From October 2021 to October 2023, a total of 1 248 patients with lumbar degenerative disease who did not receive anti-osteoporosis treatment in the Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. There were 520 males and 728 females, aged 62.31±9.37 years (range, 40-87 years), height 1.66±0.08 m (range, 1.43-1.89 m), weight 69.04±8.27 kg (range, 49-93 kg). The mean body mass index was 26.11±3.67 kg/m 2 (range, 14.40-37.11 kg/m 2). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and PL-QCT were used to diagnose osteoporosis, and the detection rates of the two diagnostic methods were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of PL-QCT for the diagnosis of osteoporosis was drawn, the area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI), sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results:Among 1 248 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases, 626 (50.2%) were diagnosed as osteoporosis by PL-QCT, 423(33.9%) were diagnosed by spine DXA, 488(39.1%) were diagnosed by hip DXA and 539 patients(43.2%) were diagnosed by dual-site DXA. The detection rate of osteoporosis of PL-QCT was higher than that of spine DXA (χ 2=193.557, P<0.001), hip DXA (χ 2=322.201, P<0.001) and dual-site DXA (χ 2=94.683, P<0.001), and the difference was statistically significant. Taking the diagnostic results of spinal DXA for osteoporosis as a reference, the ROC curve of PL-QCT for the diagnosis of osteoporosis showed a sensitivity of 79%, a specificity of 81%, and an AUC and 95% CI of 0.82(0.79, 0.85). Taking the diagnostic results of hip DXA for osteoporosis as a reference, the ROC curve of PL-QCT for the diagnosis of osteoporosis showed a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 55%, and an AUC and 95% CI of 0.75(0.71, 0.78). Taking the diagnostic results of two-site DXA for osteoporosis as a reference, the ROC curve of PL-QCT for the diagnosis of osteoporosis showed a sensitivity of 72%, a specificity of 75%, and an AUC and 95% CI of 0.81(0.78, 0.83). Conclusion:Compared with DXA, PL-QCT has a higher detection rate of osteoporosis in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease and good diagnostic efficacy.

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods:The data of patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent LLIF or PLIF from February 2019 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 30 patients in the LLIF group, 10 males and 20 females, aged 62.7±5.6 years (range, 53-74 years), including 21 cases of single segment and 9 cases of double segment. There were 46 patients in the PLIF group, including 20 males and 26 females, aged 63.2±8.4 years (range, 43-75 years), 40 cases of single segment and 6 cases of double segment. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), intervertebral space height, intervertebral foramen height and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results:All patients were followed up for an average of 21.3±6.4 months (range, 12-32 months). The intraoperative blood loss in the LLIF group was 112.2±76.9 ml, which was significantly lower than 193.9±88.2 ml in the PLIF group ( P<0.05). The VAS scores of back pain and leg pain after operation were significantly lower than those before operation in the two groups ( P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in back pain VAS scores at preoperative, 6 months postoperative, and final follow-up ( P>0.05); the back pain VAS score at 1 month postoperatively in the LLIF group was 1.6±1.2, which was less than 2.8±0.7 in the PLIF group ( P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in leg pain VAS scores at preoperative, 1 month postoperative, and 6 months postoperative ( P>0.05); the leg pain VAS score at the final follow-up in the LLIF group was 1.2±1.5, which was smaller than 1.8±1.0 in the PLIF group ( P<0.05). The postoperative ODI was smaller than the preoperative one in both groups, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05); the preoperative, 1-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and final follow-up ODIs in the LLIF group were 45.7%±16.0%, 17.9%±12.0%, 16.2%±11.6%, and 15.7%±11.7%, and those in the PLIF group were 47.9%±15.4%, 20.1%±9.3%, 16.9%±10.6%, and 14.6%±11.0% in the PLIF group, and the difference between the groups was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The preoperative intervertebral space height in the LLIF group was 10.6±2.0 mm, which was smaller than that in the PLIF group 11.8±2.2 mm ( P<0.05). The intervertebral space heights in the immediate postoperative period and at the final follow-up were 13.3±2.3 mm and 12.3±2.2 mm in the LLIF group and 13.7±1.7 mm and 13.0±1.9 mm in the PLIF group ( P>0.05). The preoperative intervertebral foraminal height in the LLIF group was 18.0±3.2 mm, which was smaller than that of 19.7±2.4 mm in the PLIF group ( P<0.05); the intervertebral foraminal heights in the immediate postoperative period and at the final follow-up were 21.4±2.5 mm and 20.2±2.4 mm in the LLIF group, and in the PLIF group were 20.7±2.4 mm and 19.7±2.6 mm in the PLIF group ( P>0.05). In the LLIF group, 2 cases had femoral nerve injury and 2 cases had transient back pain after operation. There were 2 cases of cerebrospinal fluid leakage, 1 case of screw loosening, and 2 cases of deep vein thrombosis in the PLIF group. In the PLIF group, 2 patients underwent revision, including 1 case due to cage displacement and 1 case due to screw malposition. The fusion settling rate was 21% (8/39) in the LLIF group and 12% (6/52) in the PLIF group ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Both LLIF and PLIF can effectively restore the intervertebral height, improve the lumbar function and the symptoms of back and leg pain in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possible mechanism and fracture stability of subtypes of type B Hangman's fracture by using imaging observation. METHODS: Patients with type B Hangman's fractures admitted to multiple centers between January 2008 and October 2023 were selected as the research objects. The clinical data and imaging data of patients who met the selection criteria were extracted. The patients' age, gender, cause of fracture, disease duration, visual analogue scale (VAS) score of neck pain, neck disability index (NDI), and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification of spinal cord function were collected. Based on the imaging data, the anatomical structure of the contralateral superior articular process fracture, the relationship between the superior articular process fracture line and the position of the odontoid process, the associated posterior vertebral wall fracture and its classification, the incidence of vertebral arch floating and C _{2, 3} instability were observed. The superior articular fracture angle (SAFA), superior articular fracture displacement distance (SAFD), and C ₂ vertebral body rotation (VBRA) were measured. According to the anatomical structure of the contralateral superior articular process fracture, the patients were divided into a pedicle fracture group (POA group), a inferior articular process fracture group (IAP group), and a laminar fracture group (CSL group). The baseline data and imaging indexes were analyzed between groups, and the imaging anatomical characteristics of each subtype of fracture were observed to explore its possible mechanism and fracture stability. RESULTS: A total of 86 cases of type B Hangman's fractures were collected. There were 67 males and 19 females. The mean age was 51.0 years (range, 21-78 years). There were 48 cases of pedicle fracture (POA group), 25 cases of inferior articular process fracture (IAP group), and 13 cases of laminar fracture (CSL group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, cause of fracture, disease duration, VAS score of neck pain, and NDI between groups ( P>0.05). However, the incidence of spinal cord injury in POA group was the highest ( P<0.05). The incidences of superior articular process fracture line posterior to the odontoid process and posterior vertebral wall fracture in POA group were the highest ( P<0.05). The incidences of vertebral arch floating and C _{2, 3} instability in IAP group were the highest ( P<0.05). There were significant differences in SAFA and VBRA between groups ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in SAFD between groups ( P>0.05). The differences in the incidences of fracture displacement>3 mm and VBRA>5° between groups were significant ( P<0.05). There were 78 cases of unstable Hangman's fracture, including 2 cases of simple C _2、3 instability, 22 cases of simple axis rotation and displacement instability, 8 cases of simple vertebral arch floating instability, and the rest of the patients had two or more types of instability. CONCLUSION The mechanism of different subtypes of type B Hangman's fracture may be that the lateral mass of the rotation of the atlas applied the overextension compression force to the unilateral superior articular process of the axis vertebra, and the contralateral pedicle, inferior articular process and lamina fractures were caused by direct violence or/and rotational violence to different degrees. The decomposition of this type of fracture into C _{2, 3} intervertebral, axis vertebra body displacement and rotation and vertebral arch floating instability is beneficial to the treatment and surgical approach selection.
Humans ; Spinal Fractures/surgery* ; Male ; Female ; Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging* ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Aged ; Odontoid Process/injuries* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods* ; Young Adult

AIM:To investigate the clinical effects of tirofiban and butylphthalide combined with stent thrombectomy in the treatment of patients with acute cerebral infarction in the ultra-time win-dow.METHODS:A total of 100 patients with ACI beyond time window admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to January 2023 were randomly grouped into the control group(50 cases,treated with stent thrombectomy)and the study group(50 cases,treated with tirofiban and butylphthalide combined with stent thrombectomy),clinical data of patients were collected,and the clinical efficacy,blood lipid levels,coagulation function,neurologi-cal function,quality of life,and incidence of ad-verse reactions were compared between the two groups.RESULTS:Compared with the control group,the total effective rate of the study group obviously increased(P＜0.05).Before treatment,there was no obvious difference between the two groups in triacylglycerol(TG),total cholesterol(TC),low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C),high-density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C),prothrom-bin time(PT),activated partial thromboplastin time(APTT),D-dimer(D-D),fibrinogen(FIB),NIHSS score and Barthel index scale(BI)score of patients with ACI beyond time window(P＞0.05).After treat-ment,the TG,TC,LDL-C,FIB,D-D,and NIHSS score of ACI patients in both groups decreased(P＜0.05),while HDL-C,PT,APTT,and BI score increased(P＜0.05),and the above indicators improved more ob-viously in the study group(P＜0.05).There was no obvious difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P＞0.05).CON-CLUSION:The combination of tirofiban and bu-tylphthalide with stent thrombectomy in the treat-ing ACI beyond time window has a definite effect,which can improve the blood lipid level,coagula-tion function and neurological function of patients,and help to improve the quality of life of patients,with good safety.

AIM:To investigate the clinical effects of tirofiban and butylphthalide combined with stent thrombectomy in the treatment of patients with acute cerebral infarction in the ultra-time win-dow.METHODS:A total of 100 patients with ACI beyond time window admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to January 2023 were randomly grouped into the control group(50 cases,treated with stent thrombectomy)and the study group(50 cases,treated with tirofiban and butylphthalide combined with stent thrombectomy),clinical data of patients were collected,and the clinical efficacy,blood lipid levels,coagulation function,neurologi-cal function,quality of life,and incidence of ad-verse reactions were compared between the two groups.RESULTS:Compared with the control group,the total effective rate of the study group obviously increased(P＜0.05).Before treatment,there was no obvious difference between the two groups in triacylglycerol(TG),total cholesterol(TC),low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C),high-density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C),prothrom-bin time(PT),activated partial thromboplastin time(APTT),D-dimer(D-D),fibrinogen(FIB),NIHSS score and Barthel index scale(BI)score of patients with ACI beyond time window(P＞0.05).After treat-ment,the TG,TC,LDL-C,FIB,D-D,and NIHSS score of ACI patients in both groups decreased(P＜0.05),while HDL-C,PT,APTT,and BI score increased(P＜0.05),and the above indicators improved more ob-viously in the study group(P＜0.05).There was no obvious difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P＞0.05).CON-CLUSION:The combination of tirofiban and bu-tylphthalide with stent thrombectomy in the treat-ing ACI beyond time window has a definite effect,which can improve the blood lipid level,coagula-tion function and neurological function of patients,and help to improve the quality of life of patients,with good safety.

Objective:To analyze the efficacy of phantom-less quantitative computer tomography (PL-QCT) for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases.Methods:From October 2021 to October 2023, a total of 1 248 patients with lumbar degenerative disease who did not receive anti-osteoporosis treatment in the Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. There were 520 males and 728 females, aged 62.31±9.37 years (range, 40-87 years), height 1.66±0.08 m (range, 1.43-1.89 m), weight 69.04±8.27 kg (range, 49-93 kg). The mean body mass index was 26.11±3.67 kg/m 2 (range, 14.40-37.11 kg/m 2). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and PL-QCT were used to diagnose osteoporosis, and the detection rates of the two diagnostic methods were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of PL-QCT for the diagnosis of osteoporosis was drawn, the area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI), sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results:Among 1 248 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases, 626 (50.2%) were diagnosed as osteoporosis by PL-QCT, 423(33.9%) were diagnosed by spine DXA, 488(39.1%) were diagnosed by hip DXA and 539 patients(43.2%) were diagnosed by dual-site DXA. The detection rate of osteoporosis of PL-QCT was higher than that of spine DXA (χ 2=193.557, P<0.001), hip DXA (χ 2=322.201, P<0.001) and dual-site DXA (χ 2=94.683, P<0.001), and the difference was statistically significant. Taking the diagnostic results of spinal DXA for osteoporosis as a reference, the ROC curve of PL-QCT for the diagnosis of osteoporosis showed a sensitivity of 79%, a specificity of 81%, and an AUC and 95% CI of 0.82(0.79, 0.85). Taking the diagnostic results of hip DXA for osteoporosis as a reference, the ROC curve of PL-QCT for the diagnosis of osteoporosis showed a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 55%, and an AUC and 95% CI of 0.75(0.71, 0.78). Taking the diagnostic results of two-site DXA for osteoporosis as a reference, the ROC curve of PL-QCT for the diagnosis of osteoporosis showed a sensitivity of 72%, a specificity of 75%, and an AUC and 95% CI of 0.81(0.78, 0.83). Conclusion:Compared with DXA, PL-QCT has a higher detection rate of osteoporosis in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease and good diagnostic efficacy.

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods:The data of patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent LLIF or PLIF from February 2019 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 30 patients in the LLIF group, 10 males and 20 females, aged 62.7±5.6 years (range, 53-74 years), including 21 cases of single segment and 9 cases of double segment. There were 46 patients in the PLIF group, including 20 males and 26 females, aged 63.2±8.4 years (range, 43-75 years), 40 cases of single segment and 6 cases of double segment. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), intervertebral space height, intervertebral foramen height and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results:All patients were followed up for an average of 21.3±6.4 months (range, 12-32 months). The intraoperative blood loss in the LLIF group was 112.2±76.9 ml, which was significantly lower than 193.9±88.2 ml in the PLIF group ( P<0.05). The VAS scores of back pain and leg pain after operation were significantly lower than those before operation in the two groups ( P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in back pain VAS scores at preoperative, 6 months postoperative, and final follow-up ( P>0.05); the back pain VAS score at 1 month postoperatively in the LLIF group was 1.6±1.2, which was less than 2.8±0.7 in the PLIF group ( P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in leg pain VAS scores at preoperative, 1 month postoperative, and 6 months postoperative ( P>0.05); the leg pain VAS score at the final follow-up in the LLIF group was 1.2±1.5, which was smaller than 1.8±1.0 in the PLIF group ( P<0.05). The postoperative ODI was smaller than the preoperative one in both groups, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05); the preoperative, 1-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and final follow-up ODIs in the LLIF group were 45.7%±16.0%, 17.9%±12.0%, 16.2%±11.6%, and 15.7%±11.7%, and those in the PLIF group were 47.9%±15.4%, 20.1%±9.3%, 16.9%±10.6%, and 14.6%±11.0% in the PLIF group, and the difference between the groups was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The preoperative intervertebral space height in the LLIF group was 10.6±2.0 mm, which was smaller than that in the PLIF group 11.8±2.2 mm ( P<0.05). The intervertebral space heights in the immediate postoperative period and at the final follow-up were 13.3±2.3 mm and 12.3±2.2 mm in the LLIF group and 13.7±1.7 mm and 13.0±1.9 mm in the PLIF group ( P>0.05). The preoperative intervertebral foraminal height in the LLIF group was 18.0±3.2 mm, which was smaller than that of 19.7±2.4 mm in the PLIF group ( P<0.05); the intervertebral foraminal heights in the immediate postoperative period and at the final follow-up were 21.4±2.5 mm and 20.2±2.4 mm in the LLIF group, and in the PLIF group were 20.7±2.4 mm and 19.7±2.6 mm in the PLIF group ( P>0.05). In the LLIF group, 2 cases had femoral nerve injury and 2 cases had transient back pain after operation. There were 2 cases of cerebrospinal fluid leakage, 1 case of screw loosening, and 2 cases of deep vein thrombosis in the PLIF group. In the PLIF group, 2 patients underwent revision, including 1 case due to cage displacement and 1 case due to screw malposition. The fusion settling rate was 21% (8/39) in the LLIF group and 12% (6/52) in the PLIF group ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Both LLIF and PLIF can effectively restore the intervertebral height, improve the lumbar function and the symptoms of back and leg pain in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis.

Objectives:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of single-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion(LLIF)combined with unilateral pedicle screw(UPS)versus bilateral pedicle screw(BPS)fixation in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease(LDD).Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 65 patients with LDD who underwent single-level LLIF between January 2019 and December 2021.14 patients received UPS fixation(UPS group)and 51 received BPS fixation(BPS group).The operative time,hospitalization cost,and imaging parameters including disc height(DH),foraminal height(FH),lumbar lordosis(LL),segmental lordosis(SL),axial central canal cross-sectional area(CCA),midsagittal canal diameter(CD),ligamentum flavum area(LFA),and ligamentum flavum thickness(LFT),as well as fusion rate,complication rate,and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.Results:The UPS group was shorter in operative time(80.64±10.87min vs 131.57±11.37min)and lower in hospitalization cost(86463.14±1889.54 yuan vs 101213.06±4512.54 yuan)compared with the BPS group(P＜0.05).Both groups showed significant improvements in DH,FH,SL,CD,and CCA after operation,with no significant differences between groups(P＞0.05).The immediate postoperative thickness of the right ligamentum flavum was significantly lower in the UPS group(2.28±0.71mm vs 2.67±0.49mm,P=0.019).The fusion rates were 85.7％in the UPS group and 94.1％in the BPS group,with no statistically significant difference(P=0.292).There was no significant difference in complication rates between the two groups(28.6％vs 23.5％,P=0.733).Conclusions:Single-level LLIF combined with UPS fixation for treating LDD provides comparable imaging improvements,clinical outcomes,and complications control to BPS fixation,while offering the advantages of reduced operative time and lower hospitalization costs,supporting its clinical feasibility.

Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and practicality of the Jaundice color card (JCard) as a screening tool for neonatal jaundice.Methods:Following the standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) statement, a multicenter prospective study was conducted in 9 hospitals in China from October 2019 to September 2021. A total of 845 newborns who were admitted to the hospital or outpatient department for liver function testing due to their own diseases. The inclusion criteria were a gestational age of ≥35 weeks, a birth weight of ≥2 000 g, and an age of ≤28 days. The neonate′s parents used the JCard to measure jaundice at the neonate′s cheek. Within 2 hours of the JCard measurement, transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) was measured with a JH20-1B device and total serum bilirubin (TSB) was detected. The Pearson′s correlation analysis, Bland-Altman plots and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used for statistic analysis.Results:Out of the 854 newborns, 445 were male and 409 were female; 46 were born at 35-36 weeks of gestational age and 808 were born at ≥37 weeks of gestational age. Additionally, 432 cases were aged 0-3 days, 236 cases were aged 4-7 days, and 186 cases were aged 8-28 days. The TSB level was (227.4±89.6) μmol/L, with a range of 23.7-717.0 μmol/L. The JCard level was (221.4±77.0) μmol/L and the TcB level was (252.5±76.0) μmol/L. Both the JCard and TcB values showed good correlation ( r=0.77 and 0.80, respectively) and agreements (96.0% (820/854) and 95.2% (813/854) of samples fell within the 95% limits of agreement, respectively) with TSB. The JCard value of 12 had a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.75 for identifying a TSB ≥205.2?μmol/L, and a sensitivity of 1.00 and specificity of 0.35 for identifying a TSB ≥342.0?μmol/L. The TcB value of 205.2?μmol/L had a sensitivity of 0.97 and specificity of 0.60 for identifying TSB levels of 205.2 μmol/L, and a sensitivity of 1.00 and specificity of 0.26 for identifying TSB levels of 342.0 μmol/L. The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of JCard for identifying TSB levels of 153.9, 205.2, 256.5, and 342.0 μmol/L were 0.96, 0.92, 0.83, and 0.83, respectively. The AUC of TcB were 0.94, 0.91, 0.86, and 0.87, respectively. There were both no significant differences between the AUC of JCard and TcB in identifying TSB levels of 153.9 and 205.2 μmol/L (both P>0.05). However, the AUC of JCard were both lower than those of TcB in identifying TSB levels of 256.5 and 342.0 μmol/L (both P<0.05). Conclusions:JCard can be used to classify different levels of bilirubin, but its diagnostic efficacy decreases with increasing bilirubin levels. When TSB level are ≤205.2 μmol/L, its diagnostic efficacy is equivalent to that of the JH20-1B. To prevent the misdiagnosis of severe jaundice, it is recommended that parents use a low JCard score, such as 12, to identify severe hyperbilirubinemia (TSB ≥342.0 μmol/L).